|
On August 04 2013 20:13 MasterOfPuppets wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2013 20:08 Assirra wrote:On August 04 2013 19:07 Naphal wrote:On August 04 2013 18:49 Lonyo wrote:On August 04 2013 18:39 Naphal wrote: well i hope blizzard changes the policy regarding visa, at the very least for people who already had to forfeit once.
and i know it might not be fair to take it out on the players, but honestly, this is a tournament for the entertainment of the viewers, and not for the players, the players only get money because viewers are watching, and you cannot really watch walkovers, i dont know what they will do, but especially for chinese players it seems rather difficult, so they would need to do something for their sc2 scene.
on the other hand, violet already had a visa and only has problems now because he violated (<,<) the terms that came with it, so i dont really feel sorry for him. Blizzard doesn't have a policy regarding visas. You need a visa to get into the US if you are from certain countries. That's a US government requirement. The only way Blizzard can "change the policy" is by not holding WCS AM in the USA, thereby changing the visa policy to the policy of the Canadian/Mexican etc government, rather than the US government. maybe i phrased that wrong, blizzards policy (or better stance if i used that word wrong) regarding visas should be: any player must be able to participate in the offlinematches, if a player already failed to do so once and/or his situation makes participation unlikely, he should be prevented from playing in that wcsregion. of course i know that visas are government related and have nothing to do with a gaming company. So you say you understand and yet still say Blizzard need to change their policy when its completely out of their hands? He's saying Blizzard shouldn't have let viOLet compete to begin with...
well i am not a native speaker but "blizzards policy/stance REGARDING visa" as a formulation does not say they are involved with visas (not at all), but rather how they think or act based on it? or do i write fundamentally wrong english here?
|
On August 04 2013 18:57 Noocta wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2013 18:48 pretender58 wrote: Really sad to see visa issues again (and it´s always the US -.-) But it´s good to see that Blizzard has recognised this problem and pledged to deal with it.
Tbh, it's more Violet fault than anything this time. How you can say that this is rather Violet's fault?
"Hi guys viOLet's manager here, long story short when you spend too much time in the U.S. in the prior year, getting a VISA can be difficult." In other words: Violet lived more in America than in South Korea at year 2012 (<- this is the prior year). Blizzard announce their WCS stuff (later) at 3rd April 2013.
|
East Gorteau22261 Posts
On August 04 2013 19:25 Ronski wrote: They might aswell region lock WCS America, would decrease the amount of nasty surprises by 90%
Also the level of play
|
On August 04 2013 20:14 m0ck wrote: These constant abandonment from players outside the US is the best argument for a region lock. There should be consequences for not showing up for the matches you signed up for..
No, it is not. It is a good argument for - doing it not in the US (not likely for commercial reasons) - players/teams doing better preparation for these matters - extra penalisation of players who fail to obtain visas - Blizzard lobbying for SC2 recognition as a sport.
But you want the region lock, so youtry to use it as an argument for it, even though it isn't. These are very isolated cases, there are 11 koreans in the Ro16 and 10 of them seem to make it.
|
On August 04 2013 20:26 Dingodile wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2013 18:57 Noocta wrote:On August 04 2013 18:48 pretender58 wrote: Really sad to see visa issues again (and it´s always the US -.-) But it´s good to see that Blizzard has recognised this problem and pledged to deal with it.
Tbh, it's more Violet fault than anything this time. How you can say that this is rather Violet's fault? "Hi guys viOLet's manager here, long story short when you spend too much time in the U.S. in the prior year, getting a VISA can be difficult." In other words: Violet lived more in America than in South Korea at year 2012 (<- this is the prior year). Blizzard announce their WCS stuff (later) at 3rd April 2013.
On August 04 2013 18:12 Dodgin wrote: He stayed in the US illegally for a long time in 2012 and now they're not letting him back in, his manager lied and said it would all be fixed far before ro16 season 2 but well here we are.
it's not Violet's fault but WHO ?
|
still don't know how is Jim's visa going. he failed last time and he is trying again
|
So it's possible that we might have 3 walkovers on the ro16 for WCS AM? Violet cannot be there and Jim and Macsed may also not be able to make it... that's pretty bad :/
|
are you fucking kidding me?
poor guy really can't catch a break.
and can blizzard just call up riot already to figure out how they worked their way around this problem?
|
East Gorteau22261 Posts
On August 04 2013 20:40 DinosaurJones wrote: So it's possible that we might have 3 walkovers on the ro16 for WCS AM? Violet cannot be there and Jim and Macsed may also not be able to make it... that's pretty bad :/
Macsed got a visa though, didn't he?
|
On August 04 2013 20:23 Naphal wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2013 20:13 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On August 04 2013 20:08 Assirra wrote:On August 04 2013 19:07 Naphal wrote:On August 04 2013 18:49 Lonyo wrote:On August 04 2013 18:39 Naphal wrote: well i hope blizzard changes the policy regarding visa, at the very least for people who already had to forfeit once.
and i know it might not be fair to take it out on the players, but honestly, this is a tournament for the entertainment of the viewers, and not for the players, the players only get money because viewers are watching, and you cannot really watch walkovers, i dont know what they will do, but especially for chinese players it seems rather difficult, so they would need to do something for their sc2 scene.
on the other hand, violet already had a visa and only has problems now because he violated (<,<) the terms that came with it, so i dont really feel sorry for him. Blizzard doesn't have a policy regarding visas. You need a visa to get into the US if you are from certain countries. That's a US government requirement. The only way Blizzard can "change the policy" is by not holding WCS AM in the USA, thereby changing the visa policy to the policy of the Canadian/Mexican etc government, rather than the US government. maybe i phrased that wrong, blizzards policy (or better stance if i used that word wrong) regarding visas should be: any player must be able to participate in the offlinematches, if a player already failed to do so once and/or his situation makes participation unlikely, he should be prevented from playing in that wcsregion. of course i know that visas are government related and have nothing to do with a gaming company. So you say you understand and yet still say Blizzard need to change their policy when its completely out of their hands? He's saying Blizzard shouldn't have let viOLet compete to begin with... well i am not a native speaker but "blizzards policy/stance REGARDING visa" as a formulation does not say they are involved with visas (not at all), but rather how they think or act based on it? or do i write fundamentally wrong english here? Nope, everything you wrote was pretty clear. The guys responding to you didn't read it thoroughly.
|
Thats why its a terrible idea to do SC2 Events in america! All WCS NA Events should be held in Germany or Korea.
|
On August 04 2013 20:26 Zealously wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2013 19:25 Ronski wrote: They might aswell region lock WCS America, would decrease the amount of nasty surprises by 90%
Also the level of play This. No one would watch that.
|
On August 04 2013 20:26 Dingodile wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2013 18:57 Noocta wrote:On August 04 2013 18:48 pretender58 wrote: Really sad to see visa issues again (and it´s always the US -.-) But it´s good to see that Blizzard has recognised this problem and pledged to deal with it.
Tbh, it's more Violet fault than anything this time. How you can say that this is rather Violet's fault? "Hi guys viOLet's manager here, long story short when you spend too much time in the U.S. in the prior year, getting a VISA can be difficult." In other words: Violet lived more in America than in South Korea at year 2012 (<- this is the prior year). Blizzard announce their WCS stuff (later) at 3rd April 2013.
How isn't that Violet's fault? He chose to compete in WCS America twice, the first time knowing he'd been in the US illegally which would mean that it's unlikely he's going to get a Visa, and the second time after already being declined a Visa a few months prior.
Assuming he did stay in the US illegally (I've read that he did a few times, but cba checking since I don't really care about Violet) this is hardly surprising or undeserved.
|
On August 04 2013 20:47 Amaril wrote: Thats why its a terrible idea to do SC2 Events in america! All WCS NA Events should be held in Germany or Korea.
Isn't there a minimum age requirement for competing in Germany? That's hardly ideal...
|
They should have mandated some sort of "be sure you dont have VISA problems before choosing WCS region" policy to begin with - but since they dont provide a region for SEA and rushed the thing so fast, the fault is on blizzard with this one.
Wonder how EG-TL and Axiom has managed to avoid all these issues.
|
On August 04 2013 19:06 LittleRedBoy wrote: Welcome to America, the most free country in the world! You think other countries don't have visas? America just happens to be the most popular country to go to for tournaments, many European countries have issues with Russian players, for instance.
|
Let him play the games online. The lag is punishment enough.
|
On August 04 2013 20:43 Zealously wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2013 20:40 DinosaurJones wrote: So it's possible that we might have 3 walkovers on the ro16 for WCS AM? Violet cannot be there and Jim and Macsed may also not be able to make it... that's pretty bad :/ Macsed got a visa though, didn't he?
Last I heard both of them were still in question. I'd be happy to be wrong though!
|
On August 04 2013 19:10 Gamegene wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2013 19:05 petrox wrote:On August 04 2013 19:02 Fionn wrote: Riot also pays their players salaries. They're basically all "employees" of Riot while they play in the LCS, getting a set amount of salary for every season they play in. Wouldn't paying every Premier / Challenger league player a nominal sum (i.e. 1 dollar, or a peppercorn) circumvent the whole problem then? you really think our government is that incompetent when it comes to these kinds of issues?
Well... 
Joking aside, this is a pretty sad situation, and I think holding the finals next year in Canada might be an option. Alternatively, Blizz should indeed put the RO16 players on the payroll for the duration of the tournament (and not for 1$, but somewhat reasonable salary - maybe employ them in their home country so this can count as a 'work visit', which is probably easier to get. IMHO after a dropout, #17 should get a spot, so no-one gets the advantage of a walkover, and we get to see more matches
|
On August 04 2013 20:55 arie3000 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2013 19:10 Gamegene wrote:On August 04 2013 19:05 petrox wrote:On August 04 2013 19:02 Fionn wrote: Riot also pays their players salaries. They're basically all "employees" of Riot while they play in the LCS, getting a set amount of salary for every season they play in. Wouldn't paying every Premier / Challenger league player a nominal sum (i.e. 1 dollar, or a peppercorn) circumvent the whole problem then? you really think our government is that incompetent when it comes to these kinds of issues? Well...  Joking aside, this is a pretty sad situation, and I think holding the finals next year in Canada might be an option. Alternatively, Blizz should indeed put the RO16 players on the payroll for the duration of the tournament (and not for 1$, but somewhat reasonable salary - maybe employ them in their home country so this can count as a 'work visit', which is probably easier to get. IMHO after a dropout, #17 should get a spot, so no-one gets the advantage of a walkover, and we get to see more matches  Work visas are super expensive. Like $5,000-$10,000 expensive. And they dont give you one for a week long event.
|
|
|
|