EPTMajOr and HerO forced to play WCS Matches on NA? - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
SoBeDragon
United States192 Posts
| ||
|
14fighter
United States226 Posts
| ||
|
oBlade
United States6497 Posts
On May 01 2013 11:01 Spektor wrote: It's their choice. Also, the rules. People complain about it not being complete region lock, and when they lock the region people play, people continue to complain. Obviously people complain when they have different opinions. That's like pointing out that even though people cheered when Real Madrid scored a goal, they also cheered when Barcelona scored a goal. Just because in both cases it was "people" doing the cheering or complaining doesn't mean the groups are the same sets of individuals. | ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On May 01 2013 11:07 Sub40APM wrote: by definition when a Code S Korean plays a foreigner not named Naniwa or Stephano the games will be sub par. hero's not even code s anyway haha | ||
|
covetousrat
2109 Posts
| ||
|
Xahhk
Canada540 Posts
 | ||
|
Synche
United States1345 Posts
On May 01 2013 11:08 heyoka wrote: Everyone understands that once this series is over the player who wins will be playing on NA next round in what will be a cross server match right? This has literally no effect other than ensuring the best player wins, and the fans get the best game possible for this particular match. It's completely in a vacuum, it would be a rather silly decision to knowingly lower the potential of your games for no reason other than because your rule book didn't consider it beforehand. No one has presented a reason for this to be on NA that makes the least bit of sense. Are you kidding? The reason is it's a NA tournament. You are giving way too much credit to the best game possible. We can find better games in ZOTAC VODs. WCS NA is interesting for an entirely different reason. | ||
|
Empirimancer
Canada1024 Posts
| ||
|
kju
6143 Posts
| ||
|
TylerThaCreator
United States906 Posts
Their match, as mentioned earlier by heyoka and waxangel, is essentially in a vacuum because the server that they play on doesn't affect any of the other players. Of course vs the other people in the group they're going to play on NA, I don't see any problem with that - it's WCS NA so of course it should be on that server. But to force them to play with high latency just for that? It's ridiculous. | ||
|
Taefox
1533 Posts
| ||
Waxangel
United States33699 Posts
| ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland27377 Posts
If you want to maintain the 'NA' part, by all means go that way. If you're going that route don't INVITE HerO to your tournament, and then make him play on Kr, fuck sake. | ||
|
Highwinds
Canada955 Posts
this only hurts the players and fans. | ||
|
Mordiford
4448 Posts
On May 01 2013 11:08 heyoka wrote: Everyone understands that once this series is over the player who wins will be playing on NA next round in what will be a cross server match right? This has literally no effect other than ensuring the best player wins, and the fans get the best game possible for this particular match. It's completely in a vacuum, it would be a rather silly decision to knowingly lower the potential of your games for no reason other than because your rule book didn't consider it beforehand. No one has presented a reason for this to be on NA that makes the least bit of sense. Because it sets the clear standard that if you want to play in WCS NA, you play on the NA server. The effect of the region locking is already questionable but I'm all for making it as obnoxious and inconvenient for people outside the region to play in what seemed to be region specific tournaments. In other words, I'm okay with both Major and HerO having to deal with lag if the final result is them reconsidering choosing a region other than their own to compete in. | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10342 Posts
On May 01 2013 10:59 Verator wrote: I actually support this, it further punishes people for playing outside of their home region. Such a choice should be at a personal deficit, as it encourages home competition. The only people it punishes are the viewers, who get to watch top players play safe and possibly boring games due to risk of lag. One of them is going to advance regardless, why not have the highest possible quality games? Makes no sense given how trivial it is to switch regions in HotS. | ||
|
Hrrrrm
United States2081 Posts
On May 01 2013 11:07 MrCash wrote: MLG can't win. If they allow KR server play, people will blame them for ruining the "NA WCS" for not being NA friendly etc etc. I completely understand why MLG doesn't bother responding to most of these drama-esque complaints, unless they hit critical mass. What are you talking about? They just want to play using the KR server at whatever time MLG wants. Nothing changes except just connecting to KR server for the matches where both players are living in KR instead of NA. Or if both players had been in EU for Dreamhack then both use the EU server for that specific match. Nobody loses anything and in fact we get better quality games since there is less lag between the players. I just don't get why people are for this other than "rules are rules". | ||
|
mcgriffin
Canada81 Posts
On May 01 2013 11:08 heyoka wrote: Everyone understands that once this series is over the player who wins will be playing on NA next round in what will be a cross server match right? This has literally no effect other than ensuring the best player wins, and the fans get the best game possible for this particular match. It's completely in a vacuum, it would be a rather silly decision to knowingly lower the potential of your games for no reason other than because your rule book didn't consider it beforehand. No one has presented a reason for this to be on NA that makes the least bit of sense. Then let the games be played in the NA server to select the one best at ADAPTING to playing in NA server, for the viewability of all the subsequent matches. | ||
|
looknohands119
United States815 Posts
| ||
|
eronica
175 Posts
Advantage to play on NA when both are in korea: "i'm following a rule so i can sleep at night thinking i'm doing something good..." | ||
| ||
