• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:14
CEST 02:14
KST 09:14
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live!17Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters2Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)87Reynor: GSL Loss Wasn't About Preparation Format16[IPSL] Spring 2026 Grand Finals - This Weekend!18
StarCraft 2
General
How would you feel about frequent/monthly balance patches for SC2? Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Clem: "I don't have that much hope in Blizzard" Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters [D] Wireframe Casting Removed
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) WardiTV Summer Cup 2026 GSL CK #5 Race War HomeStory Cup 29
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Industrial Park New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate
External Content
Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 534 Burning Evacuation Mutation # 533 Die Together
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Animated Gateway HORROR STARCRAFT MOVIE How Famous was FlaSh before his Debut?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [IPSL] Spring 2026 Grand Finals - This Weekend! Escore Tournament - Season 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers PvT advise for noobs Fighting Spirit mining rates Creating a full chart of Zerg builds
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread Diablo IV ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread How to buy a book - shipping from Korea to Europe The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
Northern Ireland Global Starcraft The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Hello guys!
LIN1s
Role of Gaming on Mental Hea…
TrAiDoS
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 3988 users

MajOr and HerO forced to play WCS Matches on NA? - Page 10

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 56 Next
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
May 01 2013 03:08 GMT
#181
On May 01 2013 12:00 kubiks wrote:
Well...thanks mlg for prodiving the best admins evear.

Admins don't change rules on their own. They can take a complaint to their boss, but their job is to enforce the rule as written. People and players who expect admins to do so are unreasonable.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Sabu113
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States11089 Posts
May 01 2013 03:08 GMT
#182
On May 01 2013 12:00 aksfjh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2013 11:56 Rostam wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:51 aksfjh wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:45 raf3776 wrote:
dont complain about NA if you signed up for NA tourney

This. No real excuse or legitimate complaint. You can cry that they're "hurting esports" all you want, but these damn proxy entrants into WCS have to have "penalties" to encourage players to reside across the world. I don't want WCS Korea 1, 2, and 3, and I'd bet I'm not alone.


Yeah, the penalty is that they have to deal with a latency disadvantage when they face players who actually live in NA. Now tell me what's gained by forcing two players who live in KR to play against each other on NA.

The integrity of the tournament and distinction that it's WCS NA and not WCS Korea Code B.


Thank you.

Bit of a farce if WCS NA isn't played on NA.
Biomine is a drunken chick who is on industrial strength amphetamines and would just grab your dick and jerk it as hard and violently as she could while screaming 'OMG FUCK ME', because she saw it in a Sasha Grey video ...-Wombat_Ni
Taronar
Profile Joined December 2011
Netherlands177 Posts
May 01 2013 03:09 GMT
#183
I think it's ok to play on KR if it makes the quality of the games beter. I'd rather watch a really really exciting game on KR than a boring lagging game on NA. Rules are rules and people are people.
SKT1.Rain | SKT1.PartinG | Liquid TaeJa | Startale Life
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-01 03:10:57
May 01 2013 03:10 GMT
#184
On May 01 2013 12:02 NonY wrote:
Having KR vs KR played on NA isn't an acceptable practice. There are other ways to encourage participants to reside in NA. It seems like a lot of people here are in favor of anything that discourages non-NA residents from playing WCS NA. But the thing is, the enforcement of this particular rule in this particular case is SO bad that it is immune to that argument. This isn't the proper way to do that. Let's get the best games we can out of these players.

Not just anything, just sensible rules. By all means, people from Antarctica to Mongolia can enter whatever tournament they want, but if you're not even going to host the games on NA, what's the point of calling it WCS NA? Especially in 2-3 seasons when half of EU and NA become Korean.
Blargh
Profile Joined September 2010
United States2103 Posts
May 01 2013 03:10 GMT
#185
On May 01 2013 12:07 aksfjh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2013 12:02 Rostam wrote:
On May 01 2013 12:00 aksfjh wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:56 Rostam wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:51 aksfjh wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:45 raf3776 wrote:
dont complain about NA if you signed up for NA tourney

This. No real excuse or legitimate complaint. You can cry that they're "hurting esports" all you want, but these damn proxy entrants into WCS have to have "penalties" to encourage players to reside across the world. I don't want WCS Korea 1, 2, and 3, and I'd bet I'm not alone.


Yeah, the penalty is that they have to deal with a latency disadvantage when they face players who actually live in NA. Now tell me what's gained by forcing two players who live in KR to play against each other on NA.

The integrity of the tournament and distinction that it's WCS NA and not WCS Korea Code B.


The integrity of the tournament is positively affected by having the players play a weaker series and having a 9+ page thread on TL complaining about the decision? Are you sure?

I can't control the insatiable entitled idiots on TL that find every moment to complain about anything that Blizzard has a hand in, nor can anybody else. I can only argue that rules are rules, and for SC2 and WCS to remain credible, rules have to be followed.

If they want to be credible, they'd accommodate as many players as possible. If they want to be seen as a "great" tournament, then allowing things like this would be in their best interest. This situation is a lose-lose-lose-lose, I'm afraid...
BathTubNZ
Profile Joined December 2011
New Zealand2556 Posts
May 01 2013 03:14 GMT
#186
I think it would be fine for the game to played on KR, however it's a bit of a cheek for players in KR to complain if their request isn't automatically granted straight away. It strikes me as similiar as Koreans complaining about the time of day they were having to play for the qualifiers.
Adreme
Profile Joined June 2011
United States5574 Posts
May 01 2013 03:14 GMT
#187
WCS NA should be played on the NA server. Its the inherent advantage that the NA players get just as im sure EU gets the same advantage and while Korea is an entirely different circumstance (LAN vs Online) its also played entirely on Korean server.
Ricoic
Profile Joined May 2012
39 Posts
May 01 2013 03:14 GMT
#188
Why is this an issue? They chose to play WCS NA while living in Korea, if they wanted no latency issues, they should have chosen play WCS KR or come to NA during this time.

I could understand an Issue if Major was in NA and HerO was in KR. But they are still on even footing, just latent even footing.
"Take what you can, Give nothing back!"
mongmong
Profile Joined November 2011
Korea (South)1389 Posts
May 01 2013 03:15 GMT
#189
I actually recall Huk bitching about having to play on NA server (dont remember what tourney it was ) against his opponent even though both of them live in Korea.
어헣 ↗ 어헣 ↗
Rostam
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States2552 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-01 03:19:34
May 01 2013 03:15 GMT
#190
On May 01 2013 12:07 aksfjh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2013 12:02 Rostam wrote:
On May 01 2013 12:00 aksfjh wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:56 Rostam wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:51 aksfjh wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:45 raf3776 wrote:
dont complain about NA if you signed up for NA tourney

This. No real excuse or legitimate complaint. You can cry that they're "hurting esports" all you want, but these damn proxy entrants into WCS have to have "penalties" to encourage players to reside across the world. I don't want WCS Korea 1, 2, and 3, and I'd bet I'm not alone.


Yeah, the penalty is that they have to deal with a latency disadvantage when they face players who actually live in NA. Now tell me what's gained by forcing two players who live in KR to play against each other on NA.

The integrity of the tournament and distinction that it's WCS NA and not WCS Korea Code B.


The integrity of the tournament is positively affected by having the players play a weaker series and having a 9+ page thread on TL complaining about the decision? Are you sure?

I can't control the insatiable entitled idiots on TL that find every moment to complain about anything that Blizzard has a hand in, nor can anybody else. I can only argue that rules are rules, and for SC2 and WCS to remain credible, rules have to be followed.


I think it's a pretty extreme stretch to suggest that the tournament's credibility would be hurt by letting two players who live in Korea play a bo3 on the Korean server. I'd say the current situation is decidedly worse for them.

On May 01 2013 12:10 aksfjh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2013 12:02 NonY wrote:
Having KR vs KR played on NA isn't an acceptable practice. There are other ways to encourage participants to reside in NA. It seems like a lot of people here are in favor of anything that discourages non-NA residents from playing WCS NA. But the thing is, the enforcement of this particular rule in this particular case is SO bad that it is immune to that argument. This isn't the proper way to do that. Let's get the best games we can out of these players.

Not just anything, just sensible rules. By all means, people from Antarctica to Mongolia can enter whatever tournament they want, but if you're not even going to host the games on NA, what's the point of calling it WCS NA? Especially in 2-3 seasons when half of EU and NA become Korean.


What would be the point of calling it WCS NA? I can think of some reasons

- The tournament is being run by an NA-based organization
- Every game that involves an NA resident would still be played on NA
- The last rounds will be played offline in NA

Really, I would have to say that KR vs KR games being played on the NA server would be pretty low on my list of reasons to call the tournament WCS NA
BW forever || Thall
Crisco
Profile Joined March 2011
1170 Posts
May 01 2013 03:16 GMT
#191
don't mind forcing everyone in WCS NA to play on the NA server. I mean otherwise, doesn't that mean, eventually all the WCS NA games are gonna end up being played on the Korean server? Considering the later parts will end up being more and more Korean vs Koreans with time.
eronica
Profile Joined October 2012
175 Posts
May 01 2013 03:16 GMT
#192
People who put out the "NA is NA, so it has to be NA server" forget that this logic is already broken by letting not-NA players in it.
faintz
Profile Joined June 2010
United States47 Posts
May 01 2013 03:17 GMT
#193
100% agree with the decision. Good on MLG. If you chose to play on NA qualifier, you should have to play on NA server regardless.
HeavenResign
Profile Joined April 2011
United States702 Posts
May 01 2013 03:18 GMT
#194
On May 01 2013 12:15 Rostam wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2013 12:07 aksfjh wrote:
On May 01 2013 12:02 Rostam wrote:
On May 01 2013 12:00 aksfjh wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:56 Rostam wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:51 aksfjh wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:45 raf3776 wrote:
dont complain about NA if you signed up for NA tourney

This. No real excuse or legitimate complaint. You can cry that they're "hurting esports" all you want, but these damn proxy entrants into WCS have to have "penalties" to encourage players to reside across the world. I don't want WCS Korea 1, 2, and 3, and I'd bet I'm not alone.


Yeah, the penalty is that they have to deal with a latency disadvantage when they face players who actually live in NA. Now tell me what's gained by forcing two players who live in KR to play against each other on NA.

The integrity of the tournament and distinction that it's WCS NA and not WCS Korea Code B.


The integrity of the tournament is positively affected by having the players play a weaker series and having a 9+ page thread on TL complaining about the decision? Are you sure?

I can't control the insatiable entitled idiots on TL that find every moment to complain about anything that Blizzard has a hand in, nor can anybody else. I can only argue that rules are rules, and for SC2 and WCS to remain credible, rules have to be followed.


I think it's a pretty extreme stretch to suggest that the tournament's credibility would be hurt by letting two players who live in Korea play a bo3 on the Korean server. I'd say the current situation is decidedly worse for them.


I don't see why, reading this thread the number of people mad about this decision are in the minority.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-01 03:20:32
May 01 2013 03:18 GMT
#195
So did Major escalate the complaint with MLG and blizzard? Or did he ask an admin, find out he had to play on NA and then instantly post on twitter? Because admins are never going to over ride rules that are given to them by Blizzard.

We can't have a full blown drama fest every time an admin has to enforce a rule that may need a second look. Or if matches have already been played on other players in the same situation who didn't also happen to be members Team Liquid.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
NonY
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
8751 Posts
May 01 2013 03:19 GMT
#196
On May 01 2013 12:10 aksfjh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2013 12:02 NonY wrote:
Having KR vs KR played on NA isn't an acceptable practice. There are other ways to encourage participants to reside in NA. It seems like a lot of people here are in favor of anything that discourages non-NA residents from playing WCS NA. But the thing is, the enforcement of this particular rule in this particular case is SO bad that it is immune to that argument. This isn't the proper way to do that. Let's get the best games we can out of these players.

Not just anything, just sensible rules. By all means, people from Antarctica to Mongolia can enter whatever tournament they want, but if you're not even going to host the games on NA, what's the point of calling it WCS NA? Especially in 2-3 seasons when half of EU and NA become Korean.

It's a technicality. I don't give a shit that the geographical location of the game server doesn't match up with the name of the tournament. It's extremely straightforward and obvious that the server that does its job the best should be the one used. I don't know how you can think symbolism is so much more important than a significant difference in latency. You anti-competition types that somehow got interested in professional SC2 are really stretching it with this kind of shit.
"Fucking up is part of it. If you can't fail, you have to always win. And I don't think you can always win." Elliott Smith ---------- Yet no sudden rage darkened his face, and his eyes were calm as they studied her. Then he smiled. 'Witness.'
opterown *
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Australia54784 Posts
May 01 2013 03:19 GMT
#197
it's not even WCS NA guys, it's WCS AM
ModeratorRetired LR Bonjwa
TL+ Member
Rostam
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States2552 Posts
May 01 2013 03:20 GMT
#198
On May 01 2013 12:18 HeavenResign wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2013 12:15 Rostam wrote:
On May 01 2013 12:07 aksfjh wrote:
On May 01 2013 12:02 Rostam wrote:
On May 01 2013 12:00 aksfjh wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:56 Rostam wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:51 aksfjh wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:45 raf3776 wrote:
dont complain about NA if you signed up for NA tourney

This. No real excuse or legitimate complaint. You can cry that they're "hurting esports" all you want, but these damn proxy entrants into WCS have to have "penalties" to encourage players to reside across the world. I don't want WCS Korea 1, 2, and 3, and I'd bet I'm not alone.


Yeah, the penalty is that they have to deal with a latency disadvantage when they face players who actually live in NA. Now tell me what's gained by forcing two players who live in KR to play against each other on NA.

The integrity of the tournament and distinction that it's WCS NA and not WCS Korea Code B.


The integrity of the tournament is positively affected by having the players play a weaker series and having a 9+ page thread on TL complaining about the decision? Are you sure?

I can't control the insatiable entitled idiots on TL that find every moment to complain about anything that Blizzard has a hand in, nor can anybody else. I can only argue that rules are rules, and for SC2 and WCS to remain credible, rules have to be followed.


I think it's a pretty extreme stretch to suggest that the tournament's credibility would be hurt by letting two players who live in Korea play a bo3 on the Korean server. I'd say the current situation is decidedly worse for them.


I don't see why, reading this thread the number of people mad about this decision are in the minority.


Would a thread exist if they had been allowed to play the games out on KR?
BW forever || Thall
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
May 01 2013 03:20 GMT
#199
On May 01 2013 12:15 Rostam wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2013 12:07 aksfjh wrote:
On May 01 2013 12:02 Rostam wrote:
On May 01 2013 12:00 aksfjh wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:56 Rostam wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:51 aksfjh wrote:
On May 01 2013 11:45 raf3776 wrote:
dont complain about NA if you signed up for NA tourney

This. No real excuse or legitimate complaint. You can cry that they're "hurting esports" all you want, but these damn proxy entrants into WCS have to have "penalties" to encourage players to reside across the world. I don't want WCS Korea 1, 2, and 3, and I'd bet I'm not alone.


Yeah, the penalty is that they have to deal with a latency disadvantage when they face players who actually live in NA. Now tell me what's gained by forcing two players who live in KR to play against each other on NA.

The integrity of the tournament and distinction that it's WCS NA and not WCS Korea Code B.


The integrity of the tournament is positively affected by having the players play a weaker series and having a 9+ page thread on TL complaining about the decision? Are you sure?

I can't control the insatiable entitled idiots on TL that find every moment to complain about anything that Blizzard has a hand in, nor can anybody else. I can only argue that rules are rules, and for SC2 and WCS to remain credible, rules have to be followed.


I think it's a pretty extreme stretch to suggest that the tournament's credibility would be hurt by letting two players who live in Korea play a bo3 on the Korean server. I'd say the current situation is decidedly worse for them.

It's a matter of precedence. When we move to a more Korean populated tournament, whether it's next round or 3 WCS regionals from now, there needs to be some distinction that each region is actually based in that region.
Crisco
Profile Joined March 2011
1170 Posts
May 01 2013 03:22 GMT
#200
I got a great idea. Let's send like.. 60 Koreans to NA server, then the last 48 or so will all be Koreans. then we can play all the matches on the Korean server and just call it WCS Korea 2
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 56 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
00:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #20
CranKy Ducklings18
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft370
ViBE202
Ketroc 35
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 3097
Artosis 496
NaDa 34
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm139
League of Legends
Doublelift3821
Counter-Strike
minikerr58
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox782
AZ_Axe51
Other Games
summit1g7466
tarik_tv6546
Day[9].tv1305
Coldzera 948
shahzam504
JuggernautJason130
ROOTCatZ126
Trikslyr89
SpeCial44
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1223
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 92
• davetesta13
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP11
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 13
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21066
Other Games
• Day9tv1305
• imaqtpie973
Upcoming Events
CrankTV Team League
10h 46m
Replay Cast
23h 46m
CrankTV Team League
1d 10h
Big Brain Bouts
1d 15h
Soulspirit vs goblin
TriGGeR vs Bunny
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Serral vs SHIN
herO vs Solar
Online Event
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Clem vs ByuN
Rogue vs Lambo
[ Show More ]
OSC
3 days
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Patches Events
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-07-22
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E3

Ongoing

CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
SCTL 2026 Spring
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W4
ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 2
Escore Tournament S3: W5
ASL Season 22: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 22: Qualifier #2
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.