EPT[HOTS] Ladder Map Pool - Page 7
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Bagi
Germany6799 Posts
| ||
|
Kal_rA
United States2925 Posts
 | ||
|
BaDMannerS
Bulgaria57 Posts
| ||
|
myRZeth
Germany1047 Posts
On March 12 2013 17:02 Bagi wrote: Everyone complaining about the lack of CK should play against a korean terran abusing speedvacs on it. lol, the other maps are far far more speedvac friendly | ||
|
algue
France1436 Posts
Guys, it's gonna be hard to make a map where the medivac speed boost isn't efficient. It's a new tool to the terran arsenal you should try to deal with it instead of whining on the map. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
| ||
|
Arceus
Vietnam8333 Posts
| ||
|
BaDMannerS
Bulgaria57 Posts
On March 12 2013 17:52 algue wrote: It's a new tool to the terran arsenal you should try to deal with it instead of whining on the map. I agree. It is more likely that they nerf the sick speedvac instead of removing maps. But before that happens we will see some terran domination by those, who do multi-drops. But seriously, don't they check how stupid leaving close position on some maps is? | ||
|
kinsky
Germany368 Posts
| ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12053 Posts
On March 12 2013 19:16 kinsky wrote: I want Cloud Kingdom and Ohana back!! Why? They're so old at this point and lead to very stale games. Why don't you want new maps instead? Especially Ohana, that map is really horrible to play/watch as it's so narrow. I hate it for the same reasons I hate Daybreak, but Daybreak will hopefully be removed next season. | ||
|
thezanursic
5500 Posts
| ||
|
kinsky
Germany368 Posts
On March 12 2013 19:21 Qikz wrote: Why? They're so old at this point and lead to very stale games. Why don't you want new maps instead? Especially Ohana, that map is really horrible to play/watch as it's so narrow. I hate it for the same reasons I hate Daybreak, but Daybreak will hopefully be removed next season. Are you seriously asking me this?! Why I like those maps instead of other maps?!! Funny guy...I just like them, DEAL WITH IT! | ||
|
Thrillz
4313 Posts
Most of these maps would be consider huge a year or two ago. Maybe that WoL map/metagame influenced it too much... | ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12053 Posts
On March 12 2013 19:37 Thrillz wrote: Anyone else feel that maps are STILL getting bigger? Most of these maps would be consider huge a year or two ago. Maybe that WoL map/metagame influenced it too much... I think it could be down to the fact where units move so fast, you can't have a good map with spread out bases without it being massive. Maps being too small means base trades happen far more often as well (as e.g. Ohana, your bases are all on top of each other), as by the time you get home to defend you've lost everything. | ||
|
Azurues
Malaysia5612 Posts
but other than that, all the maps are fine for me | ||
|
Melwach
Germany176 Posts
I don't think I'll vote down any map. Never did that, don't know why I should start now. | ||
|
pprrii
Russian Federation216 Posts
| ||
|
NaldoR
Singapore2198 Posts
i was horrible of the map... but it was a great map to watch games on. Well, but the map pool is pretty great now, with korhall, star station and newkirk downvoted... | ||
|
jdsowa
405 Posts
| ||
|
JDub
United States976 Posts
On March 12 2013 17:18 BaDMannerS wrote: Star Station has close positions, even closer than the Steppes of war. WTF? Clearly someone has never played Steppes of War, or at least not recently enough to remember it. I really like the map pool. I'm not sure why Newkirk gets so much hate on the forums, it's a really solid map imo. I also like Korhal City for the variety it brings. Star Station is probably my least favorite map on there, but I have never vetoed a map and I won't start now. | ||
| ||
