EPT[HOTS] Ladder Map Pool - Page 6
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Emzeeshady
Canada4203 Posts
| ||
|
bGr.MetHiX
Bulgaria511 Posts
| ||
|
monitor
United States2409 Posts
They're actually using Korhal City, Newkirk, Star Station? These maps fucking suck and are a disgrace to the game. The other maps, Whirlwind and Daybreak, are boring and old (albeit Whirlwind is more boring/imba than old). Blizzard shouldn't have incorporated them. And they're not using Cloud Kingdom? That's the only old map I'd like back... Seriously not impressed by this map pool. Ladder maps determine competition play, and these are not suited for competition. Get some real maps! | ||
|
Valon
United States329 Posts
| ||
|
Valon
United States329 Posts
On March 12 2013 07:31 Nerv3 wrote: +1 I'd much rather have a lot more variety than 100% balance on all maps, makes it so much for fun especially for observers. As long as we have an average balance of nearly 50% some small imbalances in favor of variety should definitely be accepted. Variety isn't the same as bad gameplay, don;t confuse the two. Desert, Scrap, Korhal,all are bad for gameplay. | ||
|
negativedge
4279 Posts
| ||
|
Koosalakoopakoop
United States17 Posts
 | ||
|
felisconcolori
United States6169 Posts
On March 12 2013 11:20 monitor wrote: Wtf? They're actually using Korhal City, Newkirk, Star Station? These maps fucking suck and are a disgrace to the game. The other maps, Whirlwind and Daybreak, are boring and old (albeit Whirlwind is more boring/imba than old). Blizzard shouldn't have incorporated them. And they're not using Cloud Kingdom? That's the only old map I'd like back... Seriously not impressed by this map pool. Ladder maps determine competition play, and these are not suited for competition. Get some real maps! I think you're somewhat wrong... ladder maps determine absolutely crap for competitive play, because the tournament map pools are remarkably slim on ladder maps. Unless they're maps that were added to the ladder AFTER being in competitive play. (Or, I guess, when WoL first came out.) Also, what's wrong with an in-base expansion?  | ||
|
fuzzylogic44
Canada2633 Posts
| ||
|
Bagi
Germany6799 Posts
I'm vetoing korhal city and star station so far. Didn't like those maps to begin with and games in the beta didn't convince me otherwise. | ||
|
AxionSteel
United States7754 Posts
Always loved watching TvT on Whirlwind, so hopefully it's as fun to play also. Personally, I never really saw what the fuss is about with Cloud Kingdom, always seemed like a rather boring map to me, but I guess i'm in the minority there | ||
|
negativedge
4279 Posts
On March 12 2013 15:57 Bagi wrote: Neo planet is one of those maps that would be called "worst map ever" if it was made by Blizzard. Hard to get/keep a third, small, and the middle is just plain weird. But hey its made by Kespa, must be good huh? I'm vetoing korhal city and star station so far. Didn't like those maps to begin with and games in the beta didn't convince me otherwise. So you think Planet S is one of the worst maps ever...but you won't veto it? | ||
|
Bagi
Germany6799 Posts
On March 12 2013 16:10 negativedge wrote: So you think Planet S is one of the worst maps ever...but you won't veto it? I actually like smaller and more involving maps, but the general opinion has always been against them. | ||
|
gronnelg
Norway354 Posts
| ||
|
Taefox
1533 Posts
| ||
|
MHT
Sweden1026 Posts
| ||
|
ilbh
Brazil1606 Posts
| ||
|
zhurai
United States5660 Posts
| ||
digmouse
China6333 Posts
On March 12 2013 16:44 ilbh wrote: why would someone veto newKirk? seems really good to me Boring split map play, hard to defend main against drops. | ||
|
igay
Australia1178 Posts
| ||
| ||
