EPTPatch 1.5 thoughts? - Page 55
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
pedduck
Thailand468 Posts
| ||
|
TwilightRain
Germany351 Posts
| ||
|
Schlendrian
49 Posts
Does Blizzard really think their players are too stupid to hit the start button themselves, when players told each other that they are ready... It's still impossible to play a custom 1on1 in public against a race and league you desire...why, I ask you...why?? | ||
|
Kurr
Canada2338 Posts
They had good intentions, and overall I agree with a lot of the changes... but the bugs and the performance issues? So much crap that they should've fixed with QA. | ||
|
aeN
Italy92 Posts
| ||
|
TwilightRain
Germany351 Posts
| ||
|
trueblue_swe
Sweden25 Posts
| ||
|
SpecKROELLchen
Germany150 Posts
On August 05 2012 02:57 Schlendrian wrote: Why on earth did they still not remove the autostart for public custom games? Does Blizzard really think their players are too stupid to hit the start button themselves, when players told each other that they are ready... It's still impossible to play a custom 1on1 in public against a race and league you desire...why, I ask you...why?? That is 100% of what i thought, when the patch came out! I mean f*ck off new design and so on.I don`t need that. Why cooldown?Customgame should have the advantage, that you can play the map and the race u want.And now it takes longer for me to log in again. Cause u cannot just leave the game when cooldown starts, no u need to leave the battlenet.... you are master,dia or platin and get a bronze player and want to leave, ok relog. What did they think to invent that? I mean there is NO REASON to do this. | ||
|
Mrvoodoochild1
United States1439 Posts
On August 05 2012 02:57 Schlendrian wrote: Why on earth did they still not remove the autostart for public custom games? Does Blizzard really think their players are too stupid to hit the start button themselves, when players told each other that they are ready... It's still impossible to play a custom 1on1 in public against a race and league you desire...why, I ask you...why?? They were probably afraid of the afk host scenario. I know in BW in some cusom games, I had to wait 5 mins + for games to start with full lobbies because the host was talking a shit or something. But this is one small reason. Just remember, blizzard is incompetent. | ||
|
[F_]aths
Germany3947 Posts
At an earlier patch, Blizzard added a new mode above "Ultra". That "Extreme" mode does not alter the actual gaming experience compared to Ultra, it just improves the quality of the 3D cutscenes and Hyperion rooms in the campaign. Now with 1.5, Blizzard gives the users on the low-end new textures which give the non-shaded textures a look as if they were bumpmapped. No-one really asked for those additions, but we get them. Also the map editor got several improvements which are great. | ||
|
Schlendrian
49 Posts
On August 05 2012 04:30 Mrvoodoochild1 wrote: They were probably afraid of the afk host scenario. I know in BW in some cusom games, I had to wait 5 mins + for games to start with full lobbies because the host was talking a shit or something. But this is one small reason. Just remember, blizzard is incompetent. well, yeah...I know that stuff from Dota 1 too, but you could at least rejoin a couple of times to get a new host. This could even be circumvented if they implemented a feature to right-click the afk-host and mark him as "afk" or something like that, so you don't rejoin his game, and after 3-5 marks his game gets closed...how about that  . But what we have now is still much worse than bnet 1.0 (I'm probably the 1st one to say this ^^). | ||
|
Killmouse
Austria5700 Posts
(fps drop) | ||
|
zhurai
United States5660 Posts
On August 05 2012 04:30 Mrvoodoochild1 wrote: They were probably afraid of the afk host scenario. I know in BW in some cusom games, I had to wait 5 mins + for games to start with full lobbies because the host was talking a shit or something. But this is one small reason. Just remember, blizzard is incompetent. here's a fix: kick the host if they don't do anything for X seconds-1minute | ||
|
wcr.4fun
Belgium686 Posts
And more fukcing bullshit. | ||
|
Day9notdead
Russian Federation501 Posts
On August 03 2012 01:54 dynwar7 wrote: Sorry I dont really get that  So basically, the new "low" is better than the old "low"? And thatthe new "low" is equivalent to the old "medium"? yeah, thats what i felt as well : new "low" is the old "medium" and my PC feels it too .. (( | ||
|
LSF
469 Posts
| ||
|
ReaperStackS
Netherlands41 Posts
| ||
|
EvanC
Canada130 Posts
| ||
|
AirbladeOrange
United States2571 Posts
| ||
|
Parcelleus
Australia1662 Posts
| ||
| ||
