Accusations against Eclypsia - Page 10

On May 04 2012 05:21 nkr wrote:


"Eclypsia conditions to recruiting a team included capacities to stream and generate a specified audience.
A verbal agreement was found with Mystress ‘ Danish team to be transferred to Eclypsia on the base of the understanding and the acceptation of these conditions."

On May 04 2012 05:34 inermis wrote:
why the drama ? you people want drama, go to reddit. get a grip, in my opinion it is like this: you got a contract you can come to forums, cry and whine that the team has broken the terms of the contract. you don't have anything but what you say against what they say, all you do is create unnecessary drama which helps no one involved. i believe that if there was something wrong with eclypsia we would already hear about it from the players they signed already like DesRow, Scarlet...
as long as their already SIGNED players are not complaining I know that they are an OK organization.

We're talking about potentially screwing with teams contracts and players livelihoods through ignorance and/or negligence. Eclypsia made an offer to a team, the team accepted it, Eclypsia contacted Quantic to arrange a release of the current contract, and then started to add more terms on to the agreement.

On May 04 2012 05:36 DeepElemBlues wrote:


Coming back with additional terms to a contract after one side believes that some kind of agreement has been reached is a dick move but it happens all the time in business negotiations. Sides jockey for advantage until a final deal is hammered out. Unless the new terms are outrageous it usually doesn't cause much resentment. Trying to rile up a pitchfork brigade over it as some people (not you) seem to want to do is childish and counterproductive, as it generates a lot of light and usually very little heat, just drama-filled discussions at places like TL. It's a matter to be handled at the professional level. If Eclypsia can't act professionally then they will be starved out of the community by the other, truly professional organizations refusing to get involved with them.

On May 04 2012 05:36 DeepElemBlues wrote:


Coming back with additional terms to a contract after one side believes that some kind of agreement has been reached is a dick move but it happens all the time in business negotiations. Sides jockey for advantage until a final deal is hammered out. Unless the new terms are outrageous it usually doesn't cause much resentment. Trying to rile up a pitchfork brigade over it as some people (not you) seem to want to do is childish and counterproductive, as it generates a lot of light and usually very little heat, just drama-filled discussions at places like TL. It's a matter to be handled at the professional level. If Eclypsia can't act professionally then they will be starved out of the community by the other, truly professional organizations refusing to get involved with them.

On May 04 2012 05:43 rANDY wrote:
I wonder what the odds are on this being a joke to get some publicity? The dota 2 team will turn around in a few days and say something to the effect of "Lol j/k Eclypsia are great, give everything they promise we are now part of their organisation we just did it for hype!"

On May 04 2012 05:47 Acronysis wrote:
It seems hard to really make any fair judgements about eclypsia in this. how much do we even know about this mystress? Idk, give the team the benefit of the doubt until its proven otherwise, otherwise it can just screw up the team for possibly no reason.

On May 04 2012 05:47 WolfintheSheep wrote:

Depending on the laws of the country, the fact that Eclypsia already effected their existing contract could make the original offer binding.

It would be like a company telling you to give your current employer 2 weeks notice, and then try to change their offer to you once you've done so.

On May 04 2012 05:51 Acronysis wrote:


What, do you mean the april fools?

On May 04 2012 05:54 windzor wrote:


If it's under danish law, a verbal agreement is legal binding. As most of this information is properly handled via email and/or skype you also have proof. But that's IF it's under danish law. And nobody has the money to sue them, so discussing such stuff is stupid.