EPTAnyways, i hope they upgrade stuff. I'm sure it'll come, they're probably waiting for HotS though or something =/ really a shame
here's looking forward to a hopeful future!
SC2 UI, prepare to be Dota 2's bitch. - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10366 Posts
Anyways, i hope they upgrade stuff. I'm sure it'll come, they're probably waiting for HotS though or something =/ really a shame here's looking forward to a hopeful future! | ||
|
Silencioseu
Cyprus493 Posts
On February 05 2012 08:24 Ooshmagoosh wrote: In dota, you right click and press 3 or 4 hotkeys while occasionally waiting for HP / MP to regen. Your teammates yell at you if you do something wrong. In Starcraft 2, I don't have time to pay attention to my chatboxes or adjust settings after 2 minutes into the game. There is much more to the game than controlling one unit. This is comparing almonds and oranges read the title and the op its comparing fucking UI(user interface if you dont know which you probably dont know) and NOT gameplay User was warned for this post | ||
|
Ettick
United States2434 Posts
On February 05 2012 07:52 atwar wrote: who the fuk cares about dota 2 ? everything is copied from HoN. I actually facepalmed irl when I read this | ||
|
Bengui
Canada775 Posts
| ||
|
KimJongChill
United States6429 Posts
| ||
|
PineapplePizza
United States749 Posts
On February 05 2012 09:24 Silencioseu wrote: read the title and the op its comparing fucking UI(user interface if you dont know which you probably dont know) and NOT gameplay I read the OP. The SC2 UI is fine for the game. | ||
|
Brett
Australia3822 Posts
Bnet 2.0 is such ass.... | ||
|
Jedclark
United Kingdom903 Posts
| ||
|
Bengui
Canada775 Posts
On February 05 2012 09:41 KimJongChill wrote: I know people complain about the UI, but I honestly don't see what's so bad. Maybe it's because sc2 is the first game I've really played besides rpgs, but it does do it's job right? No it doesn't :/ It's missing key features, and even more depressing : key features that were present in earlier Blizzard games. | ||
|
mrRoflpwn
United States2618 Posts
| ||
|
Eknoid4
United States902 Posts
| ||
|
nekoconeco
Australia359 Posts
| ||
|
Fealthas
607 Posts
On February 05 2012 07:31 SkaPunk wrote: Some competition for sc2 would literally be the greatest thing ever for Starcraft . Only if blizzard decides to fight. The starcraft UI should be ashamed of itself being used in such a great game. I soooo miss finding new cool maps and sharing them with my friends in BW and wc3. | ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
im pretty sure no one decides to play a game simply based on the user interface | ||
|
tronix
United States95 Posts
1v1 competition versus team play. ofc dota2 is going to maintain a large focus on clan/team functions. especially chat related due to the glaring mistakes of past team games where the community had to resort to outside mediums to function properly on any competitive level (mIRC for example). these design ideas are also congruent with the idea that games tend to be on the long side (if they are good); meaning players will inevitably HAVE to keep good contact with consistent players to have any sort of stable mass competition/ranking system. relying on pick up games for the majority of regular players is what inevitably led to the horrible image the dota community currently holds. as far as im concerned. interfaces are designed for their utility and practicality. so much emphasis on "learning" techniques is due to the nature of the game; a large amount of heroes, items, spells, etc creates a steep learning curve for the game because of the sheer amount of "things" you need to memorize to be any good at the game. where as a game like starcraft is easily learned through repetition; especially made easy with the fact that you play single relatively short games one after the other where the scope of mechanics is smaller albeit refined. dota also doesnt have the third party community that sc:bw/sc2 has. they NEED to have the features like "top live matches" or else the competitive scene would naturally take longer to mature as that sort of information can be found in so few places. anywho; im just playing devils advocate as dota2's chat and team features are indeed "better" than bnet 2.0's. but, id still like to remind people that the ui designers keep the average user in mind. sc2 players want to jump on bnet and get in and out of however many games they want to play; where as dota requires a much larger time investment to play. there is a reason the "find ladder game" button is one of the largest and brightest on the screen. | ||
|
Diizzy
United States828 Posts
| ||
|
Ryhn
United States509 Posts
The features in particular that I sorely miss in SC2 after playing 200 games of the DotA beta are: + Spectating Games in Progress + In-Client search engine for finding replays + Ease of spectating friend's games (Click + Watch Game) + Directed Spectating camera (AI driven spectator that never misses a kill) + Player Perspective (Spectating Camera Option -- Shows the selected player's screen & mouse movements) + Cross-Region Play + Developer Console for Customizing My Game Experience (Changing minimap dot size, right click deny, etc) + And Lastly, sort of unfair comparison, integration with Steam for friendslist/chat systems | ||
|
Mataza
Germany5364 Posts
DotA2 essentially just took WC3 UI and improved upon it, because DotA was on WC3 TFT. The piss poor thing is, that Battlenet 2.0 fails against Battlenet 1.0 It´s completely beyond reason why they don´t have things they already had years ago. Yes, LAN is removed for copyright reasons. I can live with that. But why were all the other things removed? | ||
|
emc
United States3088 Posts
But if you want to convince Blizzard this isn't the place either and they are well aware of the complaints they recieve on their own forums. and Dota 2 still isn't on par with HoN, it needs a god damn voting system. | ||
|
jinorazi
Korea (South)4948 Posts
| ||
| ||
