• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 23:49
CEST 05:49
KST 12:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20253Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202576RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced18BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 ETH RECOVERY EXPERT \\ TECHY FORCE CYBER RETRIEVAL #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 What tournaments are world championships?
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 WardiTV Mondays FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Dewalt's Show Matches in China
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 592 users

MLG statement on Providence Code S spot - Page 32

Forum Index > SC2 General
1158 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 30 31 32 33 34 58 Next
Lpspace
Profile Joined April 2011
4 Posts
December 16 2011 00:43 GMT
#621
Divorcing this completely from the Naniwa situation, unilaterally changing the agreement they had with MLG is exceptionally unprofessional and, to be frank, as a consumer of GOM's products (I do buy GSL passes somewhat regularly) I feel cheated. I don't care about the Blizzard Cup any more than I care about the dozens of weekly tournaments that are not GSL. I did not pay for it, I am not watching it, and I would have been less interested the last few rounds of Providence had I known that the highest ranking non-code S player would not be getting a code S spot.

I will probably continue to watch MLG (though with less enthusiasm now that there is no code S spot at stake) and pay for the actual GSL, but my view of GOM's professionalism took a major hit here.
Slike
Profile Joined April 2011
Greece127 Posts
December 16 2011 00:44 GMT
#622
What naniwa did is pretty bad and although I find the punishment stupid , I could see it as the stricter punishment he could recieve and get over it. What GOM managed to do , is somehow worse. If they just announced their punishment and kept it within the rules (and not make anything up just to punish naniwa) nobody would complain - or well only the fanboys would. What they did , in my eyes , is lie to cover up a punishment that they wanted to enforce but didnt have the rules to. Changing their rules to fit their needs and twitching the prize pools of finished tournaments to get their way seems really , really unprofessional to me.
rotegirte
Profile Joined April 2011
Germany2859 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-16 00:49:02
December 16 2011 00:47 GMT
#623
On December 16 2011 09:32 Packawana wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 09:30 DyEnasTy wrote:
On December 16 2011 05:08 terranmoccasin wrote:
We really need to drop this and move on. For anyone that doesn't want to support GOM, so be it. I feel like all of this drama impacts every organization and the fans negatively. The best anyone can do is to avoid situations like this altogether in the future.

Let's just enjoy some SC2!


This is a little bigger than the typical petty squabbles. Its not ok to support someone (GOM) that is publicly doing something wrong just because everyone wants to watch koreans. Because now GOM can get away with almost anything they want, and people still are willing to support them so they can watch koreans.


If you want to hurt GOM, then don't give them your business. That's simply the only way to do it -- they won't and shouldn't care about what the public thinks unless it is hurting them significantly. You don't run a business off of public opinion at all times -- otherwise things such as health insurance or the government wouldn't exist.


It is no laughing matter to retract on tournament prizes, and even more less of arbitrary opinion. Fact is however, no player is financially able to sue them over this nor would it be worth the effort.

No one would have cared if it had been communicated before Providence. Whether it's NaNiwa or not, any other player would have "lost" that Code S spot he was being told to receive initially.
Petrina
Profile Joined December 2010
United States178 Posts
December 16 2011 00:50 GMT
#624
On December 16 2011 09:43 Lpspace wrote:
Divorcing this completely from the Naniwa situation, unilaterally changing the agreement they had with MLG is exceptionally unprofessional and, to be frank, as a consumer of GOM's products (I do buy GSL passes somewhat regularly) I feel cheated. I don't care about the Blizzard Cup any more than I care about the dozens of weekly tournaments that are not GSL. I did not pay for it, I am not watching it, and I would have been less interested the last few rounds of Providence had I known that the highest ranking non-code S player would not be getting a code S spot.

I will probably continue to watch MLG (though with less enthusiasm now that there is no code S spot at stake) and pay for the actual GSL, but my view of GOM's professionalism took a major hit here.


I totally agree with this. I think GOM should appologize of how they have dealt with the situation. Regardless of what is happening to Naniwa or whether removing him from Code S is good or not, they have acted unprofessionally, and they need to be accounted for.

furymonkey
Profile Joined December 2008
New Zealand1587 Posts
December 16 2011 00:52 GMT
#625
To be honest all this wouldn't happen if naniwa didnt cause the shitstorm. He would've accepted into code S, right now GOM just exercise their rights based on his attuide. The communcation between GSL and MLG that is another case.
Leenock the Punisher
Ercster
Profile Joined August 2011
United States603 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-16 01:00:21
December 16 2011 00:57 GMT
#626
Unfortunately, the change was made without notification to MLG, but it is within GSL's jurisdiction to adjust placement.



Since some people don't understand what this means, due to the blatant ignorance in some of the posts, I will explain it to you. This is saying that while MLG didn't know that GOM was going to give Naniwa a spot in the Blizzard Cup instead of code S because of the 2012 format change, it was GOM's choice to do so. The contract didn't state that this was going to happen, but it allowed GOM to change it if they wanted to.
I hope this cleared a lot of things up, and I hope people will stop posting without actually knowing what the OP said or meant.
“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” -Neil deGrasse Tyson
tapk69
Profile Joined January 2011
Portugal264 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-16 00:59:21
December 16 2011 00:58 GMT
#627
if Gomtv is the Devil , who is Naniwa ?

The sad thing is , no one can dodge this one now and its bad publicity..
ja foste
Hall0wed
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States8486 Posts
December 16 2011 01:01 GMT
#628
Both sides are wrong. Really lazy statement on MLG's part, making GOM look way worse that it is and causing the fanboys that were already freaking out to freak out more.
♦ My Life for BESTie ♦ 류세라 = 배 ♦
MrCon
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
France29748 Posts
December 16 2011 01:03 GMT
#629
On December 16 2011 08:55 seiferoth10 wrote:
Seems to me like they're telling their Korean audience one story, and they're scrambling to try to make the story fit for their international audience, which they've been telling a different story the whole time.

That's a very good point that hadn't occurred to me before reading your post.
Foreign seeds are extremely unpopular for korean fans and players, so what you say is very plausible.
Jarmam
Profile Joined June 2010
Denmark140 Posts
December 16 2011 01:03 GMT
#630
"So guys, how about those Code S spots we agreed with MLG upon? How about... no?"

"Hmmm... what would KeSPA do if they were all drunk, high and have had a full frontal lo..."

"How about going out being massive, *massive* drama queens and preach professionalism to those foreign dogs like its the lifeblood of our organisation - even if its obviously wrong even before we do this - and then recall the agreed-upon spots for no apparent reason"

"Sure, to make it more path... blatant we'll call it a miscommunication and just say we already gave them their reward"

"1-upd, KeSPA. Looking forward to working with ya".
"Freedom for Colossus" - White-Ra
narkissos
Profile Joined December 2011
198 Posts
December 16 2011 01:03 GMT
#631
Wow great statement by MLG really clears things up.

Although as a law student I have to say that I´m a bit surprised that they had entered a contract which could unilaterally be changed by one party. As I think most have guessed this is not exactly the norm and can in some places even be grounds for declaring a contract null and void. On the other hand there are of course situations were it can be perfectly reasonable with this types of contracts. And luckily for MLG this time it worked out very well for them. If GOM hadn´t had the right to change the contract unilaterally people might have thought that they had a responsibility to pursue legal actions against a valued business partner that has helped them provide the most competitive SC2 tournament in the west on behalf of a player they probably don´t like very much. Would have put them in kind of an iffy spot. It of course also makes it clear why they was under the impression that Naniwa had received a code S spot just a miscommunicationf rom GOM:s part.

Funny how things can work out
Devolved
Profile Joined April 2008
United States2753 Posts
December 16 2011 01:03 GMT
#632
On December 16 2011 09:47 rotegirte wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 09:32 Packawana wrote:
On December 16 2011 09:30 DyEnasTy wrote:
On December 16 2011 05:08 terranmoccasin wrote:
We really need to drop this and move on. For anyone that doesn't want to support GOM, so be it. I feel like all of this drama impacts every organization and the fans negatively. The best anyone can do is to avoid situations like this altogether in the future.

Let's just enjoy some SC2!


This is a little bigger than the typical petty squabbles. Its not ok to support someone (GOM) that is publicly doing something wrong just because everyone wants to watch koreans. Because now GOM can get away with almost anything they want, and people still are willing to support them so they can watch koreans.


If you want to hurt GOM, then don't give them your business. That's simply the only way to do it -- they won't and shouldn't care about what the public thinks unless it is hurting them significantly. You don't run a business off of public opinion at all times -- otherwise things such as health insurance or the government wouldn't exist.


It is no laughing matter to retract on tournament prizes, and even more less of arbitrary opinion. Fact is however, no player is financially able to sue them over this nor would it be worth the effort.

No one would have cared if it had been communicated before Providence. Whether it's NaNiwa or not, any other player would have "lost" that Code S spot he was being told to receive initially.

I think the main problem is that if it was any other player, they would have received that Code S spot. Naniwa had his Code S spot up until the probe rush, and it was only after this incident that they announced the prize had changed for MLG Providence. If Nani had not probe rushed, then GOM would not have changed the prize after the fact. The Code S spot was allocated for this, which can be seen in the fact that Sen is replacing Nani for the spot, where Sen never earned it through any pre-arranged agreement as Nani did.
$♥$
MrCon
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
France29748 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-16 01:05:55
December 16 2011 01:04 GMT
#633
On December 16 2011 10:01 Hall0wed wrote:
Both sides are wrong. Really lazy statement on MLG's part, making GOM look way worse that it is and causing the fanboys that were already freaking out to freak out more.

What can MLG say more ? If they say more it'll be even worse for GOM imo.
coverpunch
Profile Joined December 2011
United States2093 Posts
December 16 2011 01:06 GMT
#634
A couple notes:

1. Let's face it, Naniwa acted unprofessionally. This is impossible to deny - GOM, Quantic, and Naniwa himself all say as much.

2. GOM changed the format of GSL and this was going to affect MLG's Code S spots. This originally was not a problem for Providence because Naniwa was going to get a Code S invite. GOM and MLG have not discussed the ramifications for future MLG winners.

3. GOM is punishing Naniwa but trying to not to cross MLG. They do some strange legal yoga that wouldn't make sense if Naniwa or MLG really fought it. However, it's moot because Naniwa has voluntarily withdrawn from January GSL even though he could play and requalify and MLG is implicitly supporting GOM's decision.

4. Quantic asks GOM to "forgive" Naniwa and allow him a Code S invite in the GSL after January's. This is not decided. It is unknown if GOM would give it to Naniwa. This might also be moot if Naniwa competes in a foreign tournament and wins or plays in GSL and qualifies. If things get ugly, MLG could press GOM and demand that GOM honor the terms of the exchange program - it seems unlikely and I think both MLG and GOM are just hoping Naniwa wins on his own (or flames out so badly that nobody thinks he deserves Code S).
SnoLys
Profile Joined August 2011
149 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-16 01:10:08
December 16 2011 01:07 GMT
#635
On December 16 2011 09:39 Fungal Growth wrote:
Here's the thing...I don't think GOM is worried too much about losing subscribers...more so about sponsors. Guess who on of MLG's biggest sponsor is? Ericsson. Guess where Ericsson is based out of? Sweden. Do you think a a large corporation like Ericsson would want to support GOM after it has enraged so many Swedish fans? (who by my unscientific estimate are some of the most vocal about Gom's time traveling rules) If these big corporations get word that their favorite demographic is upset with their advertising platform they could very well pull the plug.


Guess the main sponsor of GSL, Sony Ericsson!

[image loading]
xxgeffxx
Profile Joined September 2011
United States119 Posts
December 16 2011 01:09 GMT
#636
So naniwa is wrong but technically didn't violate any rules and gom is wrong but technically didn't violate any rules either?
rotegirte
Profile Joined April 2011
Germany2859 Posts
December 16 2011 01:12 GMT
#637
On December 16 2011 09:57 Ercster wrote:
Show nested quote +
Unfortunately, the change was made without notification to MLG, but it is within GSL's jurisdiction to adjust placement.



Since some people don't understand what this means, due to the blatant ignorance in some of the posts, I will explain it to you. This is saying the while MLG didn't know that GOM was going to give Naniwa a spot in the Blizzard Cup instead of code S because of the 2012 format change, it was GOM's choice to do so. The contract didn't state that this was going to happen, but it allowed GOM to change it if they wanted to.
I hope this cleared a lot of things up, and I hope people will stop posting without actually knowing what the OP said or meant.


And what people like you don't understand is that tournaments are not only a matter between organizing parties, being MLG and GOM. There is a third party called players.

GOM is well within their rights to choose whoever they want for Code S, and how the process goes. MLG and GOM are well within their right to negotiate whatever agreement, allowing any side any degree of freedom they seem fit for their business relationship. However, when you are changing tournament prizes, you do that before the event, not after.

I always thought that to be a simple rule.
MrNomad
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States53 Posts
December 16 2011 01:15 GMT
#638
the real issue now is why this wasn't made known to the public or Naniwa prior to Blizzard Cup. Nearly a month went by since Providence and this is just being stated?
Nerd
dacimvrl
Profile Joined December 2011
Vatican City State582 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-16 01:23:14
December 16 2011 01:21 GMT
#639
On December 16 2011 10:12 rotegirte wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 09:57 Ercster wrote:
Unfortunately, the change was made without notification to MLG, but it is within GSL's jurisdiction to adjust placement.



Since some people don't understand what this means, due to the blatant ignorance in some of the posts, I will explain it to you. This is saying the while MLG didn't know that GOM was going to give Naniwa a spot in the Blizzard Cup instead of code S because of the 2012 format change, it was GOM's choice to do so. The contract didn't state that this was going to happen, but it allowed GOM to change it if they wanted to.
I hope this cleared a lot of things up, and I hope people will stop posting without actually knowing what the OP said or meant.


And what people like you don't understand is that tournaments are not only a matter between organizing parties, being MLG and GOM. There is a third party called players.

GOM is well within their rights to choose whoever they want for Code S, and how the process goes. MLG and GOM are well within their right to negotiate whatever agreement, allowing any side any degree of freedom they seem fit for their business relationship. However, when you are changing tournament prizes, you do that before the event, not after.

I always thought that to be a simple rule.


^ Pretty much.

I still can't fathom why people do not understand this simple issue.

Changing the prize of a tournament is probably okay provided that you announced it BEFOREHAND to all the parties involved; however, changing the prize AFTER the said prize has been won is neither professional nor ethically sound.

Devolved
Profile Joined April 2008
United States2753 Posts
December 16 2011 01:21 GMT
#640
On December 16 2011 10:12 rotegirte wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 09:57 Ercster wrote:
Unfortunately, the change was made without notification to MLG, but it is within GSL's jurisdiction to adjust placement.



Since some people don't understand what this means, due to the blatant ignorance in some of the posts, I will explain it to you. This is saying the while MLG didn't know that GOM was going to give Naniwa a spot in the Blizzard Cup instead of code S because of the 2012 format change, it was GOM's choice to do so. The contract didn't state that this was going to happen, but it allowed GOM to change it if they wanted to.
I hope this cleared a lot of things up, and I hope people will stop posting without actually knowing what the OP said or meant.


And what people like you don't understand is that tournaments are not only a matter between organizing parties, being MLG and GOM. There is a third party called players.

GOM is well within their rights to choose whoever they want for Code S, and how the process goes. MLG and GOM are well within their right to negotiate whatever agreement, allowing any side any degree of freedom they seem fit for their business relationship. However, when you are changing tournament prizes, you do that before the event, not after.

I always thought that to be a simple rule.

This is what it all boils down to. You don't see tennis or golf tournaments or any other professional sport changing their prize after the tournament or saying that, "Oh, this tournament doesn't count for the seeding process because we don't like the attitude of the person who gained the highest seed." It is very unprofessional.
$♥$
Prev 1 30 31 32 33 34 58 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 12m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft511
Nina 235
RuFF_SC2 172
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 4877
Stork 137
NaDa 101
sSak 65
Sexy 60
Sharp 60
Larva 53
Dota 2
LuMiX2
League of Legends
JimRising 794
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor157
Other Games
summit1g13198
tarik_tv10271
ViBE232
kaitlyn18
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1493
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 53
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1017
Upcoming Events
FEL
5h 12m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
10h 12m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
14h 12m
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Online Event
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL 20 Team Wars
FEL Cracov 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.