• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:16
CEST 17:16
KST 00:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!9[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Evil Geniuses - shutting down14ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier5Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League57Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.167
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? REPORT: StarCraft 2: Remastered In Development Evil Geniuses - shutting down How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted
Tourneys
ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WORTEX Challenger Series — Open SC2 LAN in Budapes
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands
External Content
Mutation # 548 Shining Bright The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train
Brood War
General
Starcraft player cRuZa Passed away. Young Players Tournament Announced by SOOP Battle.net abbreviations list Bot on ladder Do we even care about balance?
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [BSL23] RO24 Group C Small VOD Thread 2.0 2v2v2v2 Tournament
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) 50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Armies of Exigo - YesYes? General RTS Discussion Thread Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Artificial Intelligence Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9675 users

MLG statement on Providence Code S spot - Page 24

Forum Index > SC2 General
1158 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 22 23 24 25 26 58 Next
hmunkey
Profile Joined August 2010
United Kingdom1973 Posts
December 15 2011 22:48 GMT
#461
Who's unprofessional now?

What GOM's been doing is far worse than anything Naniwa's done.
LorDo
Profile Joined December 2008
Sweden485 Posts
December 15 2011 22:49 GMT
#462
On December 16 2011 07:40 Bluemagic2121 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 07:36 LorDo wrote:
On December 16 2011 07:10 Bluemagic2121 wrote:
They just didn't communicate to MLG about change in Seeding spot, that is all.

and this whatever change Gom happened just about a month after the Providence, so change happened before Blizzard cup.



and what I don't understand from a couple of people out there keep saying Gom did dirty work and what not,

Did they take away code S spot for no reason? you think they just took it away from naniwa for no reason?



THEY DID NOT CHANGE THE RULE BECAUSE OF CHILDISH ACT OF NANIWA but coincidentally the change for 2012 was ALREADY MADE, even thought a lot of you out there sees or feels like the change was made on the next day after Naniwa's act.


And also like MLG said, the power is in Gom's hand, not from MLG. WITH THE NEW RULE MADE BEFORE BLIZZ CUP,

Gom was to GIVE code S spot as A GIFT, but Naniwa with CHILDish ACT BLEW IT AWAY, this. why is this so hard to understand?????????????????????

ABOVE im just saying as in facts,

now below is my opinion.


ALSO in Providence, Naniwa only won 3 Matches, 3 Matches to get into the final. because of some type seeding system which MLG has that I can not understand.

I was actually expecting the same format just like any other MLG, from pool game and on.


GUYS, 3 Matches to get into the final, JUST 3 Matches. and also he only had to win 2 GAMES! whereas leenock had to win 4.


and with Naniwa's history in code A, where he never passed above round 16 or 32, whichever is the lowest, is 0-10 or something.

in my opinion, the rule change Gom, even though it was last minute change and happened before blizz cup, was REALLY GOOD.

becuase Naniwa is no where near, in skill wise, to compete in Code S



Could you provide sources for your "facts" since "the new rule made before blizz cup" (in all caps) wasn't made public until after said cup, therefore one might think it was because what happened in the cup that triggered this response from GOM.





source is when they announced the new format for 2012 GSL, which of course had this changed along with it.

you can search and check the date if you want.

though I do understand that you find "when exactly this changed occured" suspicious,

you are Swedish, no way im talking to biased person


STFU with the biased shit. It doesn't matter, GOM changed something without telling anyone, we don't know when they changed it, at all. Might have been pre Providence, or after Blizz Cup. We don't know.
Biane
Profile Joined April 2011
Australia645 Posts
December 15 2011 22:50 GMT
#463
On December 16 2011 07:48 Kieofire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 07:47 DeliCiousVP wrote:
It should be an upset GOM had an emotional reaction and showed lack of respect for Foreigners and their culture this effect us all. What they wrote about Nainwa was unacceptable aswel? Calling nainwa a pricehunter when we have Koreans traveling to foreigner events only to collect the money aswel as not speaking one drop of english. Very ironic! NAINWA was inmature it just shock me that GOM choose to travel the road of inmaturity aswel.


You must not have got the memo that what was translated was mistranlated and the person has apologized for the mistanslation.


At least we can tell easily who is coming in here just to post their opinions and get out (without reading at least the last 2 pages of post and catchup on the flow of discussion here)
Medrea
Profile Joined May 2011
10003 Posts
December 15 2011 22:50 GMT
#464
On December 16 2011 07:46 Severedevil wrote:
So...

Naniwa: honestly broke an implicit agreement.

GOM: dishonestly broke an implicit agreement.


Actually because GOM themselves wrote that Providence would grant a Code S spot you can say Gom broke an explicit agreement.
twitch.tv/medrea
mememolly
Profile Joined December 2011
4765 Posts
December 15 2011 22:51 GMT
#465
doesn't exactly instill faith for future players in future tourneys, very unprofessional of GOM, which is surprising how seriously they take professionalism and all that
nevercomingback
Profile Joined December 2011
11 Posts
December 15 2011 22:51 GMT
#466
okay okay. im quite confused about the seeding GSL thing. anyone kind enough to clear that up for me?
Gobe
Profile Joined November 2010
210 Posts
December 15 2011 22:51 GMT
#467
It's within their jurisdiction because it's probably more of an agreement rather than a contract. MLG isn't in a position to force GOM to seed players based on MLG's tournaments.

Which makes what GOM did incredibly unprofessional and it will be hard for anyone to make a deal with them in the future without the use of a binding contract. The agreement was obviously made in good faith that MLG though GOM would respect, and GOM slapped them in the face for it. MLG isn't even being harsh to GOM about it either so far.
darkscream
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Canada2310 Posts
December 15 2011 22:51 GMT
#468
Man, people stick up for naniwa so much. He even admits he was in the wrong and will change his behavior accordingly, so why are people still talking shit about GomTV (Who by the way, are pretty much responsible for SC2 esport success, lending their brand and talent (tastosis) to other tournaments, etc).
Owl
Profile Joined April 2005
145 Posts
December 15 2011 22:52 GMT
#469
Naniwa got blizzard cup spot for his providence event,why is anyone bitching for him not getting code s also?

Naniwa is so special that he should get 10 code s spots for his providence placement unlike other players who only get 1 spot into 1 tourney,also if theres any other tour hosted by gom naniwa should get spot into that one also based on his providence performance.
LorDo
Profile Joined December 2008
Sweden485 Posts
December 15 2011 22:52 GMT
#470
On December 16 2011 07:46 leungwk01 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 07:44 LorDo wrote:
On December 16 2011 07:37 Govou wrote:
On December 16 2011 07:36 LorDo wrote:
On December 16 2011 07:10 Bluemagic2121 wrote:
They just didn't communicate to MLG about change in Seeding spot, that is all.

and this whatever change Gom happened just about a month after the Providence, so change happened before Blizzard cup.



and what I don't understand from a couple of people out there keep saying Gom did dirty work and what not,

Did they take away code S spot for no reason? you think they just took it away from naniwa for no reason?



THEY DID NOT CHANGE THE RULE BECAUSE OF CHILDISH ACT OF NANIWA but coincidentally the change for 2012 was ALREADY MADE, even thought a lot of you out there sees or feels like the change was made on the next day after Naniwa's act.


And also like MLG said, the power is in Gom's hand, not from MLG. WITH THE NEW RULE MADE BEFORE BLIZZ CUP,

Gom was to GIVE code S spot as A GIFT, but Naniwa with CHILDish ACT BLEW IT AWAY, this. why is this so hard to understand?????????????????????

ABOVE im just saying as in facts,

now below is my opinion.


ALSO in Providence, Naniwa only won 3 Matches, 3 Matches to get into the final. because of some type seeding system which MLG has that I can not understand.

I was actually expecting the same format just like any other MLG, from pool game and on.


GUYS, 3 Matches to get into the final, JUST 3 Matches. and also he only had to win 2 GAMES! whereas leenock had to win 4.


and with Naniwa's history in code A, where he never passed above round 16 or 32, whichever is the lowest, is 0-10 or something.

in my opinion, the rule change Gom, even though it was last minute change and happened before blizz cup, was REALLY GOOD.

becuase Naniwa is no where near, in skill wise, to compete in Code S



Could you provide sources for your "facts" since "the new rule made before blizz cup" (in all caps) wasn't made public until after said cup, therefore one might think it was because what happened in the cup that triggered this response from GOM.




http://www.gomtv.net/forum/view.gom?topicid=208740&cid=0&kind=8

http://www.thisisgame.com/board/view.php?id=940944&board=0&category=13438&subcategory=&page=4&best=&searchmode=title&search=&orderby=&token=

watch the date of both article


GOM has other sources on their own site that says he should get a Code S spot. There's nothing there saying "Hey, btw we changed the deal with MLG, Providence winner does NOT get a spot"

The other one is a news-site with question-marks all over it. It says it is unclear if he receives one.

So.. I wouldn't scream about facts when it's actually extremely unclear if they even had a plan that excluded the MLG seed up until 2 days ago.

When your own partner had no idea about the switch you can't really say they've been clear with it.


Source?


http://www.gomtv.net/2011gslsponsors3/news/65291

"
Pro Circuit Players Competing in the GSL

At MLG Columbus, the Top 3 non-Korean finishers will each be placed into GSL Code A.

At every 2011 Pro Circuit Live Competition after MLG Columbus, GSL placement will occur as follows:

Code S status will be awarded to the highest placing player, regardless of country of origin, who doesn't already have Code S status.
"
Ponchey
Profile Joined August 2011
Sweden89 Posts
December 15 2011 22:52 GMT
#471
My thoughts, as stated on the GOM forum (hence talking "to" GOM):

I am also extremely disappointed. Not only with the unfair punishment of Naniwa that seems to have been too quickly provoked by Korean public opinion. But also because of the very unprofessional and disrespectful way in which you handled the GSL/MLG partnership.

You changed the specifics of that deal without telling MLG. While watching one of the most important foreign tournaments, all the players, casters and teams involved, not to mention the HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of fans and viewers, believed that a Code S seed was one of the prizes. Just as had been stated in your official announcements. Do you not feel that you have any responsibility here? Do you not feel that you had an obligation of honesty and consistency to all those fans and professionals?

How can we trust GOM as an organization, when you change rules without public announcements? Or more importantly, without telling you BUSINESS PARTNER - that ran the tournament and does now look like complete idiots for unknowingly lying to the entire e-sports community?

You talk about professionalism, spirit and mutual respect - claiming Naniwa violated those things. Well maybe he did. But so have you. And if you have the slightest dignity and honor, you will apologize to MLG, Naniwa, all teams, players and casters at MLG Providence, and to all fans that followed the event.
Govou
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada1072 Posts
December 15 2011 22:52 GMT
#472
On December 16 2011 07:44 LorDo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 07:37 Govou wrote:
On December 16 2011 07:36 LorDo wrote:
On December 16 2011 07:10 Bluemagic2121 wrote:
They just didn't communicate to MLG about change in Seeding spot, that is all.

and this whatever change Gom happened just about a month after the Providence, so change happened before Blizzard cup.



and what I don't understand from a couple of people out there keep saying Gom did dirty work and what not,

Did they take away code S spot for no reason? you think they just took it away from naniwa for no reason?



THEY DID NOT CHANGE THE RULE BECAUSE OF CHILDISH ACT OF NANIWA but coincidentally the change for 2012 was ALREADY MADE, even thought a lot of you out there sees or feels like the change was made on the next day after Naniwa's act.


And also like MLG said, the power is in Gom's hand, not from MLG. WITH THE NEW RULE MADE BEFORE BLIZZ CUP,

Gom was to GIVE code S spot as A GIFT, but Naniwa with CHILDish ACT BLEW IT AWAY, this. why is this so hard to understand?????????????????????

ABOVE im just saying as in facts,

now below is my opinion.


ALSO in Providence, Naniwa only won 3 Matches, 3 Matches to get into the final. because of some type seeding system which MLG has that I can not understand.

I was actually expecting the same format just like any other MLG, from pool game and on.


GUYS, 3 Matches to get into the final, JUST 3 Matches. and also he only had to win 2 GAMES! whereas leenock had to win 4.


and with Naniwa's history in code A, where he never passed above round 16 or 32, whichever is the lowest, is 0-10 or something.

in my opinion, the rule change Gom, even though it was last minute change and happened before blizz cup, was REALLY GOOD.

becuase Naniwa is no where near, in skill wise, to compete in Code S



Could you provide sources for your "facts" since "the new rule made before blizz cup" (in all caps) wasn't made public until after said cup, therefore one might think it was because what happened in the cup that triggered this response from GOM.




http://www.gomtv.net/forum/view.gom?topicid=208740&cid=0&kind=8

http://www.thisisgame.com/board/view.php?id=940944&board=0&category=13438&subcategory=&page=4&best=&searchmode=title&search=&orderby=&token=

watch the date of both article


GOM has other sources on their own site that says he should get a Code S spot. There's nothing there saying "Hey, btw we changed the deal with MLG, Providence winner does NOT get a spot"

The other one is a news-site with question-marks all over it. It says it is unclear if he receives one.

So.. I wouldn't scream about facts when it's actually extremely unclear if they even had a plan that excluded the MLG seed up until 2 days ago.

When your own partner had no idea about the switch you can't really say they've been clear with it.




I'm just pointing out that the announcement was made before the Blizzcup and was not made 2 days go. To me, the second news article seems very clear. Unless you purposely want to ignore it.
DeliCiousVP
Profile Joined September 2011
Sweden343 Posts
December 15 2011 22:53 GMT
#473
On December 16 2011 07:48 Kieofire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 07:47 DeliCiousVP wrote:
It should be an upset GOM had an emotional reaction and showed lack of respect for Foreigners and their culture this effect us all. What they wrote about Nainwa was unacceptable aswel? Calling nainwa a pricehunter when we have Koreans traveling to foreigner events only to collect the money aswel as not speaking one drop of english. Very ironic! NAINWA was inmature it just shock me that GOM choose to travel the road of inmaturity aswel.


You must not have got the memo that what was translated was mistranlated and the person has apologized for the mistanslation.


Im basing it of the "official" statement by GOM there is no question the Status QUO of Progamer in Korea dont have any high hopes for foreigners, It just suprising GOM dont step above this also read through the lines and suddenly you see the emotion sipping through always assuming that the "Korean Progaming way" is the only way.
www.youtube.com/user/DeliCiousTZM
JoeSchmoe
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada2058 Posts
December 15 2011 22:54 GMT
#474
On December 16 2011 07:52 LorDo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 07:46 leungwk01 wrote:
On December 16 2011 07:44 LorDo wrote:
On December 16 2011 07:37 Govou wrote:
On December 16 2011 07:36 LorDo wrote:
On December 16 2011 07:10 Bluemagic2121 wrote:
They just didn't communicate to MLG about change in Seeding spot, that is all.

and this whatever change Gom happened just about a month after the Providence, so change happened before Blizzard cup.



and what I don't understand from a couple of people out there keep saying Gom did dirty work and what not,

Did they take away code S spot for no reason? you think they just took it away from naniwa for no reason?



THEY DID NOT CHANGE THE RULE BECAUSE OF CHILDISH ACT OF NANIWA but coincidentally the change for 2012 was ALREADY MADE, even thought a lot of you out there sees or feels like the change was made on the next day after Naniwa's act.


And also like MLG said, the power is in Gom's hand, not from MLG. WITH THE NEW RULE MADE BEFORE BLIZZ CUP,

Gom was to GIVE code S spot as A GIFT, but Naniwa with CHILDish ACT BLEW IT AWAY, this. why is this so hard to understand?????????????????????

ABOVE im just saying as in facts,

now below is my opinion.


ALSO in Providence, Naniwa only won 3 Matches, 3 Matches to get into the final. because of some type seeding system which MLG has that I can not understand.

I was actually expecting the same format just like any other MLG, from pool game and on.


GUYS, 3 Matches to get into the final, JUST 3 Matches. and also he only had to win 2 GAMES! whereas leenock had to win 4.


and with Naniwa's history in code A, where he never passed above round 16 or 32, whichever is the lowest, is 0-10 or something.

in my opinion, the rule change Gom, even though it was last minute change and happened before blizz cup, was REALLY GOOD.

becuase Naniwa is no where near, in skill wise, to compete in Code S



Could you provide sources for your "facts" since "the new rule made before blizz cup" (in all caps) wasn't made public until after said cup, therefore one might think it was because what happened in the cup that triggered this response from GOM.




http://www.gomtv.net/forum/view.gom?topicid=208740&cid=0&kind=8

http://www.thisisgame.com/board/view.php?id=940944&board=0&category=13438&subcategory=&page=4&best=&searchmode=title&search=&orderby=&token=

watch the date of both article


GOM has other sources on their own site that says he should get a Code S spot. There's nothing there saying "Hey, btw we changed the deal with MLG, Providence winner does NOT get a spot"

The other one is a news-site with question-marks all over it. It says it is unclear if he receives one.

So.. I wouldn't scream about facts when it's actually extremely unclear if they even had a plan that excluded the MLG seed up until 2 days ago.

When your own partner had no idea about the switch you can't really say they've been clear with it.


Source?


http://www.gomtv.net/2011gslsponsors3/news/65291

"
Pro Circuit Players Competing in the GSL

At MLG Columbus, the Top 3 non-Korean finishers will each be placed into GSL Code A.

At every 2011 Pro Circuit Live Competition after MLG Columbus, GSL placement will occur as follows:

Code S status will be awarded to the highest placing player, regardless of country of origin, who doesn't already have Code S status.
"


also says:


GSL Pro Players Competing on the MLG Pro Circuit
MLG will invite four Korean pro players to each Pro Circuit Live Competition.
These players will be placed directly into the Championship Pools, one into each Pool.
Their placement in the Pools will be determined by their GSL rank.
All travel and accommodation expenses for these players will be provided by MLG.
For MLG Columbus, we will also be inviting the winner of the CSN tournament, currently in progress. This player will be seeded into the Open Bracket, and their travel and accommodation expenses will be covered by CSN.


stop deliberately ignoring the facts.

Spaceneil8
Profile Joined February 2011
United States317 Posts
December 15 2011 22:54 GMT
#475
On December 16 2011 07:35 Kieofire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 07:33 slicknav wrote:
Didn't Naniwa say on LO3 that MLG admins told him he earned Code S spot?


Yes, but GOM never told him he got the Code S spot.

GOM said a code S spot would be given out for every event not including Columbus. So they just never told anyone they are switching the spot for the blizzard cup spot.
labbe
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden1456 Posts
December 15 2011 22:55 GMT
#476
Of course they changed this afterwards. Gom realized that their deal with MLG would get Naniwa(a player who they don't like) into Code S. Then they used the probe rush as an excuse to break what they had promised, and then they lied to everyone about it.

User was temp banned for this post.
rd
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States2586 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-15 22:59:20
December 15 2011 22:55 GMT
#477
On December 16 2011 07:51 darkscream wrote:
Man, people stick up for naniwa so much. He even admits he was in the wrong and will change his behavior accordingly, so why are people still talking shit about GomTV (Who by the way, are pretty much responsible for SC2 esport success, lending their brand and talent (tastosis) to other tournaments, etc).


No one is saying he was right. What he did was wrong. What GOM did/is doing is much, much worse, and a vast overreaction to what was a trivial offense in the first place.

And hop off the dicks of the Koreans, it doesn't justify what GOM did.
1st_Panzer_Div.
Profile Joined November 2010
United States621 Posts
December 15 2011 22:56 GMT
#478
Curious why MLG posted this. The shitstorm was finally dieing down and they just threw on another log, potentially harming their relationship with business partner GOM?
Manager, Team RIP ZeeZ
leungwk01
Profile Joined September 2010
United Kingdom1260 Posts
December 15 2011 22:56 GMT
#479
On December 16 2011 07:52 LorDo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 07:46 leungwk01 wrote:
On December 16 2011 07:44 LorDo wrote:
On December 16 2011 07:37 Govou wrote:
On December 16 2011 07:36 LorDo wrote:
On December 16 2011 07:10 Bluemagic2121 wrote:
They just didn't communicate to MLG about change in Seeding spot, that is all.

and this whatever change Gom happened just about a month after the Providence, so change happened before Blizzard cup.



and what I don't understand from a couple of people out there keep saying Gom did dirty work and what not,

Did they take away code S spot for no reason? you think they just took it away from naniwa for no reason?



THEY DID NOT CHANGE THE RULE BECAUSE OF CHILDISH ACT OF NANIWA but coincidentally the change for 2012 was ALREADY MADE, even thought a lot of you out there sees or feels like the change was made on the next day after Naniwa's act.


And also like MLG said, the power is in Gom's hand, not from MLG. WITH THE NEW RULE MADE BEFORE BLIZZ CUP,

Gom was to GIVE code S spot as A GIFT, but Naniwa with CHILDish ACT BLEW IT AWAY, this. why is this so hard to understand?????????????????????

ABOVE im just saying as in facts,

now below is my opinion.


ALSO in Providence, Naniwa only won 3 Matches, 3 Matches to get into the final. because of some type seeding system which MLG has that I can not understand.

I was actually expecting the same format just like any other MLG, from pool game and on.


GUYS, 3 Matches to get into the final, JUST 3 Matches. and also he only had to win 2 GAMES! whereas leenock had to win 4.


and with Naniwa's history in code A, where he never passed above round 16 or 32, whichever is the lowest, is 0-10 or something.

in my opinion, the rule change Gom, even though it was last minute change and happened before blizz cup, was REALLY GOOD.

becuase Naniwa is no where near, in skill wise, to compete in Code S



Could you provide sources for your "facts" since "the new rule made before blizz cup" (in all caps) wasn't made public until after said cup, therefore one might think it was because what happened in the cup that triggered this response from GOM.




http://www.gomtv.net/forum/view.gom?topicid=208740&cid=0&kind=8

http://www.thisisgame.com/board/view.php?id=940944&board=0&category=13438&subcategory=&page=4&best=&searchmode=title&search=&orderby=&token=

watch the date of both article


GOM has other sources on their own site that says he should get a Code S spot. There's nothing there saying "Hey, btw we changed the deal with MLG, Providence winner does NOT get a spot"

The other one is a news-site with question-marks all over it. It says it is unclear if he receives one.

So.. I wouldn't scream about facts when it's actually extremely unclear if they even had a plan that excluded the MLG seed up until 2 days ago.

When your own partner had no idea about the switch you can't really say they've been clear with it.


Source?


http://www.gomtv.net/2011gslsponsors3/news/65291

"
Pro Circuit Players Competing in the GSL

At MLG Columbus, the Top 3 non-Korean finishers will each be placed into GSL Code A.

At every 2011 Pro Circuit Live Competition after MLG Columbus, GSL placement will occur as follows:

Code S status will be awarded to the highest placing player, regardless of country of origin, who doesn't already have Code S status.
"

nvm, I misread your post. (Thought you meant that GOM had said naniwa has got code S)
TCC
Profile Joined September 2011
46 Posts
December 15 2011 22:56 GMT
#480
this circus is getting old fast.. just give it a rest.
Prev 1 22 23 24 25 26 58 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Patches Events
22:00
Patch Clash S1: Bonus Cup #1
RotterdaM838
Liquipedia
FEL
18:00
ScienceCraft - Day 1
IndyStarCraft 364
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 838
IndyStarCraft 364
Hui .235
Classic 31
BRAT_OK 22
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 2393
Bisu 1840
EffOrt 1073
BeSt 797
Hyuk 708
Stork 412
firebathero 358
ggaemo 219
Rush 213
hero 151
[ Show more ]
Barracks 139
Last 89
Shinee 60
Pusan 52
Mong 41
Bishop 31
Sexy 31
ToSsGirL 26
Aegong 23
Sacsri 21
Terrorterran 20
zelot 20
Rock 14
yabsab 8
Dota 2
Gorgc14250
syndereN373
LuMiX1
League of Legends
Reynor67
Counter-Strike
fl0m3627
Heroes of the Storm
Lowko407
MindelVK12
Other Games
singsing2135
B2W.Neo1235
Liquid`RaSZi929
Beastyqt782
crisheroes211
DeMusliM197
mouzStarbuck163
KnowMe107
Trikslyr29
CosmosSc2 2
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL26039
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 10
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 30
• HeavenSC 8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis3205
• Jankos1658
Upcoming Events
AI Arena Tournament
1h 45m
FEL
18h 45m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
18h 45m
Replay Cast
1d 7h
WardiTV Weekly
1d 19h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
4 days
SHIN vs GuMiho
Clem vs Classic
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
Epic.LAN
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Epic.LAN
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSC
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
BSL Season 23
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2026-27
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.