EPTShorter Ladder Seasons - Page 7
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Tommylew
Wales2717 Posts
| ||
|
skatbone
United States1005 Posts
On September 27 2011 03:47 RoboBob wrote: Uhhh shorter seasons will make all divisions more competitive, not less. Shorter seasons = less bonus pool less bonus pool = players more equally measured against each other The longer that the season goes on, the more that bonus pools screws up actual ranking. So shortening the season is good. This is a step towards removing the bonus pool entirely. I think it's tough to argue against that. Whether you have bonus points or not, you are still paired up against people with a similar MMR. So this change will not ensure that "players [are] more equally measured against each other." | ||
|
iAmJeffReY
United States4262 Posts
| ||
|
Termit
Sweden3466 Posts
As long as they put in some GSL or maps from former CCup mapteam I wouldn't mind at all to learn them, but if they are going to remove ~3 maps every other month and add 3 new bad maps made by Blizzard themself that I have to learn I will get pissed probably lol. | ||
|
Holcan
Canada2593 Posts
| ||
|
Madera
Sweden2672 Posts
| ||
|
BondGamer
61 Posts
What is someone can't play the first ~2 weeks of a season, they might think "well I'll just wait to jump in on the next one in a month" and not play at all. Or if they get off to a poor start they could give up and wait for the reset. How about the fact that there are going to be 6 seasons per year. The honor of being ranked highly in a season is reduced dramatically. "Hey, I was rank 1 in Master in June-July of 2013" seems a lot less of an accomplishment than "I was rank 1 Master fall 2013". I am just tossing some ideas out there why it is not a good idea to turn seasons into a assembly line. In my opinion, there will be a lot of negative consequences which will drive away people more then encouraging them to play. | ||
|
Tula
Austria1544 Posts
Frankly the idea "i was XY in Season XY" is something I have never cared about, so from that point of view i really don't care. I agree with the change mostly because i like playing different maps, so more map changes is better for me than less, the danger in this area though is that the new maps might be sub-par (as we've had happen in the past). | ||
|
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
| ||
|
Ben...
Canada3485 Posts
Also, they should shrink the map ladder pool but change the entire thing each time, but still include vetos and maybe experiment with community or GSL maps. I would love to have Daybreak on ladder. Though I'm sure it would have to be covered in destructible rocks before it could be used in ladder. | ||
|
Kimla
Sweden400 Posts
| ||
|
akaname
United Kingdom599 Posts
this is a good thing, far better than spending months in a stacked league, etc. | ||
|
akaname
United Kingdom599 Posts
On September 27 2011 05:49 Ben... wrote: I would love to have Daybreak on ladder. i fully agree with what Ben.... says. Probably the best map ever based on the quality of the games i see on it. edit: i know it's a pro/macro map, people can TD it if they want quicker games. | ||
|
Angelbelow
United States3728 Posts
| ||
|
stormchaser
Canada1009 Posts
On September 27 2011 05:40 CoR wrote: three was perfect dont see a reason to change it Same here, I don't see any problem with the current situation for seasons. Unless they start adding GSL maps  | ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16118 Posts
| ||
|
IronSaint
United States13 Posts
As some have said that accomplishments won't be as recognized now with the shorter seasons since it will all disappear, but with the careers tab everything you need to know about how much you've progressed over the past few seasons will be there. | ||
|
decaf
Austria1797 Posts
| ||
|
Vetrocide
Norway600 Posts
| ||
|
Phanekim
United States777 Posts
2 months sounds ok but seriously who cares about ladder? seriously.... i'm number 1 masters in 2s and 3s and like half of my league just did placements and tahts it. | ||
| ||
