Good Manner on Ladder - Page 23
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Taeng
37 Posts
| ||
CajunMan
United States823 Posts
| ||
aFganFlyTrap
Australia212 Posts
| ||
DoubleReed
United States4130 Posts
I try to be civil, but there's no reason sometimes. Play the game, have fun. That's what it's all about. | ||
Champi
1422 Posts
its so easy, never give in to temptation, im never baited into losing my cool, im never affected in game, and its even possible to ladder on NA because u dont have to deal with the attitude on that ladder if u cant hear them :D plus u can see their bm if u watch the replay later and its funny a lot of times when bm is met with no response, some people try very hard to get your attention through bm at the end of the day. i win ![]() | ||
Houkka
Finland51 Posts
If someone leaves a game without a gg against me, I don't think they're being bad mannered. Hey, they're surrendering and not building shit all over the map or floating all their buildings, right? Just because you win doesn't mean THE GUY YOU JUST BEAT will necessarily be happy about it. So I don't know, I don't think it's bm to not say glhf or gg at all. Honestly, does anyone ever think it's a "good game" situation when you just die within 3 minutes to a 6 pool? Really? So why lie about it instead of just leaving the game? | ||
Crispin
Brazil8 Posts
On October 20 2011 07:55 DoubleReed wrote: Eh, I've had people say "no gg no skill" after 6pooling me. I mean it's just a little ridiculous sometimes. Hell I've been bmed at the beginning of the game and then they expect a friendly gg when they all-in me? I try to be civil, but there's no reason sometimes. Play the game, have fun. That's what it's all about. Indeed, their attitude is dumb as fuck... But than again, people need to get off this behavior like "if he flame me, why should I be mannered?"... I think that's pretty much the logic... If you don't like the fact that a person is bm, why would you just be as bm as he is, or stay quiet, and let him have all the fun... Remember, you can always put yourself a step ahead on this matter... | ||
Arnfasta
United States183 Posts
On October 20 2011 07:58 Houkka wrote: Honestly, does anyone ever think it's a "good game" situation when you just die within 3 minutes to a 6 pool? Really? So why lie about it instead of just leaving the game? Fair point but I wanted to offer a counter opinion: I do think it's a good game. Why? Because they took a risk and it paid off. I'm the one at fault because I didn't scout and react properly. One of the aspects about SCII 1v1 that I absolutely love is the fact that every loss is on my shoulders. I can't blame teammates or a ref for a bad call, I made a mistake(s). So when I'm beaten, the opponent played better. That might be smarter, better micro, better macro, or have better game sense. So do I enjoy losing to 6 pool? Of course not. But I'm the one who lost and so I do consider it a good game because it pointed out another thing I need to improve upon. Just a different opinion. | ||
SoulScream
Bulgaria44 Posts
| ||
Chriamon
United States886 Posts
![]() | ||
Renegade_cro
Croatia11 Posts
| ||
pAzand
Sweden539 Posts
On October 20 2011 08:09 Chriamon wrote: I read all of OP's quotes as sarcastic ![]() Haha, me too.. I would have thought douchebag to myself.. | ||
Houkka
Finland51 Posts
On October 20 2011 08:07 Arnfasta wrote: Fair point but I wanted to offer a counter opinion: I do think it's a good game. Why? Because they took a risk and it paid off. I'm the one at fault because I didn't scout and react properly. One of the aspects about SCII 1v1 that I absolutely love is the fact that every loss is on my shoulders. I can't blame teammates or a ref for a bad call, I made a mistake(s). So when I'm beaten, the opponent played better. That might be smarter, better micro, better macro, or have better game sense. So do I enjoy losing to 6 pool? Of course not. But I'm the one who lost and so I do consider it a good game because it pointed out another thing I need to improve upon. Just a different opinion. Sure, sounds completely reasonable. I pretty much agree with everything you said, I was just making the point that if you don't consider a game good for any reason at all, I don't see why one should still say good game. But of course, if you consider a game good, then say gg, by all means. <3 | ||
Volrod
Australia21 Posts
| ||
Maxd11
United States680 Posts
| ||
Champi
1422 Posts
tapping gg is the most fun part of losing | ||
WarSame
Canada1950 Posts
On October 20 2011 08:18 Champi wrote: imo tapping gg is the most fun part of losing I always get pissed off and raqe quit and feel bad 5 seconds later. I remember at one point I literally focused 100% on gging when I lost for about 15-20 games. | ||
Durn
Canada360 Posts
On October 20 2011 08:13 Houkka wrote: Sure, sounds completely reasonable. I pretty much agree with everything you said, I was just making the point that if you don't consider a game good for any reason at all, I don't see why one should still say good game. But of course, if you consider a game good, then say gg, by all means. <3 I like both of your arguments a lot, but I'd like to add a point. In competitive sports, let's use Hockey as it is the one I am most familiar with, the post-game line up and bump fists and shake hands is customary. It isn't so much an acknowledgement that the game WAS good, but rather that the other team played hard regardless of the outcome. Even though in most lines, the words "good game" are uttered, they are more customary than meaningful. When the Canucks go down 1-9 against Chicago because Luongo played like crap, the teams will still line up and shake hands. So I do agree that even a cheese game deserves a gg. It might not have been your best game, and it maybe is not representative of your true skill, but you have to recognize that in that one instance, you were outplayed. | ||
Thebbeuttiffulland
Brazil288 Posts
On October 20 2011 07:46 Taeng wrote: No point gg'ing when you dont mean it. Many people are just following the gg'ing since its the norm? And not saying it makes you a bad mannered person? imo if you think its a good game then gg, doesnt really hurt not having a gg. But facing players who rage before leaving is horrible and not acceptable. different people has different standards about what is gg so if for me its never a good game where i lose i never gg? | ||
Tomfour
United States173 Posts
I mean after every game you can click on your opponents name on the score screen and you have a plethora of things to do, most importantly block communication lol, but what if they added to things that were like +good manner and +bad manner. Maybe they could make some gay achievements for it whatever, I dunno just a thought, I'm sure others can build off of it. | ||
| ||