EPT
[Trick] The Broken Temple Imbalance - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
DoWork
United States33 Posts
| ||
|
Lucius22
172 Posts
or get like a giganto buff to already stupid MM drops on metal tanks to the new smoke. that is perfectly fine too i guess. User was banned for this post. | ||
|
Aim Here
Scotland672 Posts
On March 05 2011 23:54 lindn wrote: this is overreacting. how would they know that you could do that? it's not like they should go around with stalkers to see what they can abuse. Well Blizzard hires people to test their games. And going around abusing stalkers/reapers/colossi to make sure the map works as intended is exactly the sort of thing any good game tester ought to be trying. Of course, being the abusive Protoss scrub I am, I fully intend to use this discovery to the max, while it still exists... | ||
|
Arcanewinds
United Kingdom197 Posts
On March 06 2011 02:30 Lucius22 wrote: ye sure this is op as fuck and needs balancing asap when terran sends 1 thor/tank to a cliff on LTand ends the game. sure thing or get like a giganto buff to already stupid MM drops on metal tanks to the new smoke. that is perfectly fine too i guess. Please stop complaining, people in this thread don't need to read your crying just because you lost a few games on ladder. Perhaps you could try to learn how to get better instead of venting anger on a forum, where no one wants to read it. Anyway... @OP, that was a pretty cool find, I don't think there'll be too much of it on the ladder, but it'd be funny if it turned up in a tournament XD. To those saying that an observer is cheaper than 2 stalkers, you forget the price of a robo bay. TvZ, this could be a bit of an issue, especially with zerg static defence at the natural. Its quite abusable, but if the opponent is going blink stalkers, you'd have to prepare for that anyway. I'm not sure how quickly it'll get patched however  . | ||
|
Lucius22
172 Posts
On March 06 2011 02:36 Arcanewinds wrote: Please stop complaining, people in this thread don't need to read your crying just because you lost a few games on ladder. Perhaps you could try to learn how to get better instead of venting anger on a forum, where no one wants to read it. Anyway... @OP, that was a pretty cool find, I don't think there'll be too much of it on the ladder, but it'd be funny if it turned up in a tournament XD. To those saying that an observer is cheaper than 2 stalkers, you forget the price of a robo bay. TvZ, this could be a bit of an issue, especially with zerg static defence at the natural. Its quite abusable, but if the opponent is going blink stalkers, you'd have to prepare for that anyway. I'm not sure how quickly it'll get patched however .first off all i didnt lose any ladder games, because i didnt play any ladder lateley. its just the terran hate. everything they get is fine (tricks as this). what other races get is broken and imbalanced. that is my whole point | ||
|
Geiko
France1961 Posts
On March 06 2011 02:36 Arcanewinds wrote: To those saying that an observer is cheaper than 2 stalkers, you forget the price of a robo bay. It's actually just one stalker ^^ | ||
|
MrTortoise
1388 Posts
anyway its easy to fix, but adjust the knob of land but people build something there anyway to spot both sides of the trees ... now that building placements value just went up more. | ||
|
MuTT
United States398 Posts
Its also good that blizzard is the slowest company in existence so i can continue to enjoy it for at least 4 months. | ||
|
DusTerr
2520 Posts
On March 06 2011 00:07 ilikeLIONZ wrote: hmm, has anyone thought of the possibility that this MIGHT be intentional? IF it was... you'd be able to do it on all 4 bases. As it is, it doesn't work on the 3o'clock base! | ||
|
MrMotionPicture
United States4327 Posts
| ||
|
PepperoniPiZZa
Sierra Leone1660 Posts
| ||
|
monitor
United States2409 Posts
On March 06 2011 02:46 PepperoniPiZZa wrote: Maybe it's intended? No its not intended.... you can't do it on the 3o'clock main (as the above poster points out). | ||
|
DusTerr
2520 Posts
On March 06 2011 02:30 Lucius22 wrote: ye sure this is op as fuck and needs balancing asap when terran sends 1 thor/tank to a cliff on LTand ends the game. sure thing or get like a giganto buff to already stupid MM drops on metal tanks to the new smoke. that is perfectly fine too i guess. what are you talking about now? | ||
|
dLKnighT
Canada735 Posts
| ||
|
TemplarCo.
Mexico2870 Posts
| ||
|
Zlasher
United States9129 Posts
| ||
|
Chicane
United States7875 Posts
On March 05 2011 23:38 cocosoft wrote: Great find, but it leaves 2 stalkers behind which effectively costs more than an observer which nullifies any direct imbalance other than map-imbalance. It acually leaves no stalkers behind so long as you have at least 2 blink stalkers. One goes to spot the tower while another blinks up. Then the one from the tower goes and blinks up into their base. Then the one spotting from the high ground blinks down and then blinks up into their base. All your stalkers are now in their base, though it does take some time. | ||
|
FeyFey
Germany10114 Posts
But blink stalkers ? don't care it would be damn fun to have this viable on a map. But it kind of destroys the ramp advantage in pvp so it would be 4 gate heaven map. Also defending with a bunker would be a bit harder heh. So it will probably get removed imo. | ||
|
fatalities
United States91 Posts
On March 06 2011 02:09 hmunkey wrote: Unless your opponent has a turret or patrolling overseer and is actively denying the observer, only to have 20 stalkers in their main instantly one second later. This glitch puts the risk of a big attack on the other player unnecessarily and adds an unfair risk to anyone vs Protoss since they can't move out nearly as safely. As far as I know, Observer vision outranges pretty much all units and even turrets, so if you just get vision of the corner, you can blink a stalker up there and then the rest of the army can blink up too, so it doesn't matter much? | ||
|
dezi
Germany1536 Posts
| ||
| ||
