|
I think this would be a good format for the national championship, but I don't know about using it for the regular season. Having a Championship bracket for the regular season events along with the prize pool, seems like it will be very difficult for overseas players who are new to MLG (and it sounds like there may be a lot of these players). I hope it doesn't reduce the interest from top overseas players, but I fear that some may decide it's not worth it given the following:
- The huge advantage the top 16 get in each tournament
- The difficulty of getting enough points to get into the top 16 with such a large open tournament.
- The decent, but not large prize pool for the regular season
- Only the top 8 get money
Given the large costs of flying overseas and hotel room, a lot of teams may think it's not worth it to send their players. I hope I'm wrong, though.
|
Ehrrr..
inControl missed the cut by 55 points, good luck man, at least there's upside that Machine made the cut so you won't have to play him early data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt=""
Honestly though, I agree with most people this format seems so favourable for top 16 and hard to break..
Either way it should make for a fun State of the Game at least.
|
On February 26 2011 10:04 hugman wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2011 10:01 MLG-Lies wrote:On February 26 2011 09:55 hugman wrote: If a new player came to the next MLG event, went through the Open Bracket and placed 3rd overall in the tournament he or she would still not be seeded into the Championship Bracket at the next event. That is crazy. I think the history of past performance goes back way too far. In SC2 you are only as good as you are right now, not as good as you were 3 months ago, not as good as you were a year ago. I don't have the time to put math together to dispute this with numbers, but I know for a fact that's false. It's right there in Slasher's post The 16th seed player is EG.Machine with 975 points. 3rd place at a season event nets you 900 points.
*2010 Starcraft 2 Pro Circuit Rank Points will be used as the highest priority Rank Points in seeding the Starcraft 2 Event at the 2011 Dallas Competition. After the Dallas Competition, 2011 Starcraft 2 Pro Circuit Rank Points will replace all 2010 Starcraft 2 Pro Circuit Rank Points. 2011 Starcraft 2 Pro Circuit Rank Points may be used as Rolling Rank Points in 2012.
http://pro.majorleaguegaming.com/competitions/16#event_33_competition_format
|
United States123 Posts
On February 26 2011 10:04 hugman wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2011 10:01 MLG-Lies wrote:On February 26 2011 09:55 hugman wrote: If a new player came to the next MLG event, went through the Open Bracket and placed 3rd overall in the tournament he or she would still not be seeded into the Championship Bracket at the next event. That is crazy. I think the history of past performance goes back way too far. In SC2 you are only as good as you are right now, not as good as you were 3 months ago, not as good as you were a year ago. I don't have the time to put math together to dispute this with numbers, but I know for a fact that's false. It's right there in Slasher's post The 16th seed player is EG.Machine with 975 points. 3rd place at a season event nets you 900 points.
Points from the previous Season depreciate at a certain rate. Like I said, I don't have time tonight to put the exact math together, but I know that a player who takes third place at the first Event will indeed be seeded within the Top 16.
|
On February 26 2011 09:17 hmunkey wrote: I don't really see the whole issue with extended series. Yeah, if the games were held at entirely different times where training between matches mattered, it would be a problem. In MLG however, they're held in the same or next day.
The problem with extended series is that if you lose the first round and have to come out of the losers bracket you have to do something ridiculous like 13-0 in your matches from there on out to win the tournament. If you win every game and get to the championship you're something like 8-0 and you have the grace of going 1-1 in the finals. That grace is earned, but why do you need to add the detriment of 4 more matches to the first loser AND then have him start off something like 0-2 in his last games.
On the bright side seeding the top 16 players is pretty sick. Will the points pools ever be reset though? Or does it only include the last 12 months of MLGs into its calculations?
|
On February 26 2011 10:06 Liquid`Tyler wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2011 09:31 JoxxOr wrote: This really fuck up europeans/koreans who wants to go to MLG. Seriously, we have to enter a 256 man tournament where if we're undefeated can enter another 16 man tournament where we possibly can win some money. It almost feels like rolling a dice. You can lose a match in the open bracket and still win the whole thing. If you don't lose a match in the open bracket, you can skip a bunch of rounds by doing well in group play. Show nested quote +I can also imagine how boring it will be from a spectator view watching these games... Exactly the opposite actually. Top players play each other on all 3 days. To give fans something interesting to watch instead of pros beating newbs for 2 days until you finally get worthwhile matches on the 3rd day. Show nested quote +While this might help getting better players into top brackets and giving us some better game in the end. It can also be solved by seeds, allowing top tier players facing newbs with no ranking points..... Like what the hell MLG. ..... MLG's top 16 doesn't seem particularly harder than GSL/NASL/TSL. The only difference is that MLG compresses it all into one weekend, so it does take some endurance, but it's not unreasonable.
Tyler to the rescue!
|
On February 26 2011 10:06 Liquid`Tyler wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2011 09:31 JoxxOr wrote: This really fuck up europeans/koreans who wants to go to MLG. Seriously, we have to enter a 256 man tournament where if we're undefeated can enter another 16 man tournament where we possibly can win some money. It almost feels like rolling a dice. You can lose a match in the open bracket and still win the whole thing. If you don't lose a match in the open bracket, you can skip a bunch of rounds by doing well in group play. Show nested quote +I can also imagine how boring it will be from a spectator view watching these games... Exactly the opposite actually. Top players play each other on all 3 days. To give fans something interesting to watch instead of pros beating newbs for 2 days until you finally get worthwhile matches on the 3rd day. Show nested quote +While this might help getting better players into top brackets and giving us some better game in the end. It can also be solved by seeds, allowing top tier players facing newbs with no ranking points..... Like what the hell MLG. ..... MLG's top 16 doesn't seem particularly harder than GSL/NASL/TSL. The only difference is that MLG compresses it all into one weekend, so it does take some endurance, but it's not unreasonable.
I think i got really confused and made a stupid and uninformed post sorry protoss legend <3.
But just to make things clear:
There are one open tournament and then there are one where top 16 seeded plays.
The TOP 16 From Open and the 16 seeded in championship bracket will go into another bracket that where the winner from that can call themself the champion?
Well that makes a lot more sense and i can see now from a spectator how that might be even more funnier to watch. However, i just cant imagine how hard it will be trying to get all those games played, one 256, one 16, and one 32 man tournament over 3 days. I cant imagine what will happen if B.Net 2.0 starts to appear and delays all the games
|
This format as AWFUL; I really can't put it any nicer. I'd like to at least see some explanations on why they chose the things they did rather than saying "this is how it's going to be," when they know that a lot of the ideas they're implementing are highly unpopular.
|
8748 Posts
On February 26 2011 10:16 JoxxOr wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2011 10:06 Liquid`Tyler wrote:On February 26 2011 09:31 JoxxOr wrote: This really fuck up europeans/koreans who wants to go to MLG. Seriously, we have to enter a 256 man tournament where if we're undefeated can enter another 16 man tournament where we possibly can win some money. It almost feels like rolling a dice. You can lose a match in the open bracket and still win the whole thing. If you don't lose a match in the open bracket, you can skip a bunch of rounds by doing well in group play. I can also imagine how boring it will be from a spectator view watching these games... Exactly the opposite actually. Top players play each other on all 3 days. Confusing, stupid and just.... like what purpose does this serve? To give fans something interesting to watch instead of pros beating newbs for 2 days until you finally get worthwhile matches on the 3rd day. While this might help getting better players into top brackets and giving us some better game in the end. It can also be solved by seeds, allowing top tier players facing newbs with no ranking points..... Like what the hell MLG. ..... MLG's top 16 doesn't seem particularly harder than GSL/NASL/TSL. The only difference is that MLG compresses it all into one weekend, so it does take some endurance, but it's not unreasonable. I think i got really confused and made a stupid and uninformed post sorry protoss legend <3. But just to make things clear: There are one open tournament and then there are one where top 16 seeded plays. The TOP 16 From Open and the 16 seeded in championship bracket will go into another bracket that where the winner from that can call themself the champion? Well that makes a lot more sense, however i still find it quite confusing You're getting closer lol
top 16 are put into 4 groups Group A: HuK (1), Jinro (8), SLush (9), Machine (16) Group B: KiWiKaKi (2), Tyler (7), qxc (10), Agh (15) Group C: TT1 (3), Drewbie (6), IdrA (11), TLO (14) Group D: SeleCt (4), PainUser (5), Socke (12), Ret (13)
Open bracket is double elimination. They don't play it all the way through. They play it until there are 4 people in the upper bracket and 12 people in the lower bracket. The 4 people in the upper join the groups Group A: HuK (1), Jinro (8), SLush (9), Machine (16), Open1 Group B: KiWiKaKi (2), Tyler (7), qxc (10), Agh (15), Open2 Group C: TT1 (3), Drewbie (6), IdrA (11), TLO (14), Open3 Group D: SeleCt (4), PainUser (5), Socke (12), Ret (13), Open4
And the 12 people from the lower bracket start out a new bracket (they're in the lower bracket of this new bracket). 8 of them are in round 1, 4 of them are in round 2. In round 3 wait the 5th place players from each group. In round 4 wait the 4th place players from each group. In round 5 wait the 3rd place players from each group. In round 6 wait the 2nd place players from each group. The first place players in each group are in the upper bracket round 1.
|
8748 Posts
On February 26 2011 10:17 OTL wrote: This format as AWFUL; I really can't put it any nicer. I'd like to at least see some explanations on why they chose the things they did rather than saying "this is how it's going to be," when they know that a lot of the ideas they're implementing are highly unpopular. it's so you can get to see these players play each other on day 1 Group A: HuK (1), Jinro (8), SLush (9), Machine (16) Group B: KiWiKaKi (2), Tyler (7), qxc (10), Agh (15) Group C: TT1 (3), Drewbie (6), IdrA (11), TLO (14) Group D: SeleCt (4), PainUser (5), Socke (12), Ret (13)
then you get to see the final rounds of the open bracket on day 2, as well as the winners of the open bracket play these players Group A: HuK (1), Jinro (8), SLush (9), Machine (16) Group B: KiWiKaKi (2), Tyler (7), qxc (10), Agh (15) Group C: TT1 (3), Drewbie (6), IdrA (11), TLO (14) Group D: SeleCt (4), PainUser (5), Socke (12), Ret (13) on day 2.
then on day 3 you get to watch the championship bracket play out, where everyone is good and all the matches are interesting
when you seed the top players into a bracket mixed with the open players, you are pretty much guaranteeing a ton of newb bashing on days 1-2. the top players dont want to travel to a tournament to newb bash and fans dont want to watch that.
|
On February 26 2011 10:22 Liquid`Tyler wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2011 10:16 JoxxOr wrote:On February 26 2011 10:06 Liquid`Tyler wrote:On February 26 2011 09:31 JoxxOr wrote: This really fuck up europeans/koreans who wants to go to MLG. Seriously, we have to enter a 256 man tournament where if we're undefeated can enter another 16 man tournament where we possibly can win some money. It almost feels like rolling a dice. You can lose a match in the open bracket and still win the whole thing. If you don't lose a match in the open bracket, you can skip a bunch of rounds by doing well in group play. I can also imagine how boring it will be from a spectator view watching these games... Exactly the opposite actually. Top players play each other on all 3 days. Confusing, stupid and just.... like what purpose does this serve? To give fans something interesting to watch instead of pros beating newbs for 2 days until you finally get worthwhile matches on the 3rd day. While this might help getting better players into top brackets and giving us some better game in the end. It can also be solved by seeds, allowing top tier players facing newbs with no ranking points..... Like what the hell MLG. ..... MLG's top 16 doesn't seem particularly harder than GSL/NASL/TSL. The only difference is that MLG compresses it all into one weekend, so it does take some endurance, but it's not unreasonable. I think i got really confused and made a stupid and uninformed post sorry protoss legend <3. But just to make things clear: There are one open tournament and then there are one where top 16 seeded plays. The TOP 16 From Open and the 16 seeded in championship bracket will go into another bracket that where the winner from that can call themself the champion? Well that makes a lot more sense, however i still find it quite confusing You're getting closer lol top 16 are put into 4 groups Group A: HuK (1), Jinro (8), SLush (9), Machine (16) Group B: KiWiKaKi (2), Tyler (7), qxc (10), Agh (15) Group C: TT1 (3), Drewbie (6), IdrA (11), TLO (14) Group D: SeleCt (4), PainUser (5), Socke (12), Ret (13) Open bracket is double elimination. They don't play it all the way through. They play it until there are 4 people in the upper bracket and 12 people in the lower bracket. The 4 people in the upper join the groups Group A: HuK (1), Jinro (8), SLush (9), Machine (16), Open1 Group B: KiWiKaKi (2), Tyler (7), qxc (10), Agh (15), Open2 Group C: TT1 (3), Drewbie (6), IdrA (11), TLO (14), Open3 Group D: SeleCt (4), PainUser (5), Socke (12), Ret (13), Open4 And the 12 people from the lower bracket start out a new bracket. 8 of them are in round 1, 4 of them are in round 2. In round 3 wait the 5th place players from each group. In round 4 wait the 4th place players from each group. In round 5 wait the 3rd place players from each group. In round 6 wait the 2nd place players from each group. The first place players in each group are in the upper bracket round 1.
Okay i think i got it now, but man. How confusing is this....... While its true that this might be the most fair way for the players, something needs to be said from a specating view as well. I guess its just something you have to grow custom to i guess.
With this format i atleast guess that the games will be better, i think the only part that will be harder is following all the different brackets, but <3 for explaining things for us mental retarted europeans
|
Looks like MLG dropped the ball. The new format is more convoluted than ever. Starcraft doesn't fit into the Halo mold, so why force it onto people. I'll wait and see how this shakes out in Dallas before I pass any judgment. However, MLGs unwillingness to adopt a more widely accepted Starcraft tournament structure doesn't instill me with much confidence.
|
Looks good. Maps are the question now
|
This format is good and bad at the same time, depending on perspective. I was always of the understanding that group play eliminated the need for double elimination, as those advancing from the group had multiple games to prove their worth (aka, how the GSL does Code S).
|
still way too confused -______-
|
.....i am quite confused at how the brackets work....and i actually got the gsl format first time i looked at it so....this is really complicated....what if the seeded players decide not to show up like jinro who weighs gsl over any other tournament if the schedule overlaps?
|
On February 26 2011 10:29 Agh wrote: still way too confused -______-
Read Tylers post
|
On February 26 2011 10:32 zaii wrote:Read Tylers post
didnt help, so we just play 'showmatches' for the stream on the first day?
|
On February 26 2011 10:33 Agh wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2011 10:32 zaii wrote:On February 26 2011 10:29 Agh wrote: still way too confused -______- Read Tylers post didnt help, so we just play 'showmatches' for the stream on the first day? No those factor into the end tourmanet where depending on how good you played there, the more rounds you can pass.... i think :D
|
On February 26 2011 10:30 TicketoHELL wrote: .....i am quite confused at how the brackets work....and i actually got the gsl format first time i looked at it so....this is really complicated....what if the seeded players decide not to show up like jinro who weighs gsl over any other tournament if the schedule overlaps?
It's really not that confusing. Put a modicum of effort into reading the OP.
|
|
|
|