• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:07
CEST 00:07
KST 07:07
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed14Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Who will win EWC 2025? The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Server Blocker Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Soulkey Muta Micro Map? [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
Starcraft Superstars Winner/Replays [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread We are Ready to Testify: Emergence Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 607 users

Morrow and Sjow Matchfixing? - Page 40

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 38 39 40 41 42 49 Next All
metzGRR
Profile Joined December 2010
Sweden86 Posts
December 22 2010 15:52 GMT
#781
Illegal or not, they are now players I wont route for.
Danjoh
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden405 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 15:58:42
December 22 2010 15:53 GMT
#782
On December 23 2010 00:44 Treemonkeys wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 23 2010 00:38 Longshank wrote:
On December 23 2010 00:30 Treemonkeys wrote:
On December 23 2010 00:11 dakalro wrote:
On December 23 2010 00:02 Treemonkeys wrote:
On December 22 2010 23:46 TrainFX wrote:
Seems to me that the root of the problem is the way the grand prize in the tournament has been organized. As sjow pointed out the way things work, match fixing is encouraged. None of this would have happened if you simply needed the most wins in order to win the laptop.

Something to keep in mind for tournament organizers out there, we're only human after all...


There a a few posts like this and IMO it is a ridiculous sense of entitlement. No one has to sponsor a tournament. No on has to throw up a $6000 computer as a prize. Pro gaming NEEDS these sponsors to survive but this thread is full of people complaining about how they offer a prize. How about if you don't like the terms, you don't play in the tournament? How about if you don't like how the tournament is run, get your own $6000 to give away however you like?


It's not sponsorship. It's one company (i-cafe type) pulling a publicity stunt while encouraging non-competition. They make the contest to bring in players to come spend money at their place. Period. They're not throwing $6K, they're throwing $2K and the best way for good players to win here is only for one to play so in the end that's what they're doing, not playing because it's the best chance to win maximum amount of the prizes. Better read the damn thread before posting, will you?


Uh yeah, I know it's not a sponsorship, and the prize is a $6000 computer. I am not defending how well the tournament is run, if they don't like it, don't participate. It's that simple. The are not entitled to match fix to make the tournament more desirable to them. No one is forcing them to come in and spend their money.


That's exactly what one of them is doing, and benefits from doing so compared to winning it all in tough competition.


Yeah, after they got caught.

Achiving the exact same result. Except one of them doesn't have to pay the tournament entry fees this way. So it's even more profitable for them. Yet, this is considered ok?

edit:
On December 23 2010 00:52 NtG wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 23 2010 00:31 aristarchus wrote:
Everyone keeps saying "They asked the tournament staff if it was ok and were told no, so they didn't do it. No problem." I would totally agree that this doesn't sound like it's a problem at all.

However, what it actually sounds like to me was happening was that they were making plans to do something that they knew was unacceptable. If they really saw nothing wrong with it, they wouldn't have worried about what they were said being seen. They were then caught planning to cheat. Their response was "What? this? we were just talking about maybe doing this." And then they went to the tournament staff and said "Are we allowed to cheat?" and the tournament staff said no, so they decided not to.

Is there any reason to believe that they were actually planning to ask the tournament staff permission to do this before they were caught? If so, then I for one am willing to entirely forget the whole thing.... but that really doesn't sound like it was their plan. And unless that was, all of this "they asked the organizers" and "they didn't actually do it" stuff is totally irrelevant.


I was watching Morrow's stream at the time and Morrow said something like "Make sure it's ok, I don't want to cheat". I can't remember the exact words since I didn't know what they were talking about at the time (and thus didn't care that much), but I strongly remember "I don't want to cheat", so I don't think they were "caught".

EDIT: Seeing vOdToasT's post, maybe it was SjoW who said it. At least one of them did

Yea, it was show, I was discussing the event on vent for some time, and when I decided to join the stream, my first comment on vent was "Someone named Jeffrey is whispering MorroW something about not wanting to cheat."
To wich I got the response "Yea, Jeffrey is SjoW."
oXoCube
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada197 Posts
December 22 2010 15:53 GMT
#783
Regardless of what their intentions were(to abuse the system), the damage is done. A black mark is left on both of them and it's not going to go away. They've certainly lost my respect, anyway.
butchji
Profile Joined September 2009
Germany1531 Posts
December 22 2010 15:54 GMT
#784
Why do you care?
Frankon
Profile Joined May 2010
3054 Posts
December 22 2010 15:54 GMT
#785
On December 22 2010 22:18 TotalBiscuit wrote:
I'm going to leave one post on this and one alone.

This kind of bullshit harms the reputation of eSports and sets the cause of getting it taken seriously by sponsors, spectators and the world as a whole back.

This same thing happened at the i41 finals. The two finalists agreed to split the pot, went random, played lazy games because there was no competitive drive there and made a mockery of the tournament. They did this for £5000, a larger prize than this laptop. The fact that there was not more of a stink thrown about it is ridiculous. There is a reason prizes are tiered, to ensure there is a strong incentive to play to the best of your ability in order to win the larger prize.

If you are not willing to play in the spirit of the tournament, do not play at all. I personally find this behaviour extremely distasteful and harmful to the scene as a whole. The fact that people are siding with the players on this issue rather than the sponsors just goes to show how little people really understand about the synergy between sponsors and players, required to create a successful eSports scene. The behaviour of both players is deplorable, particularly in the language they used, it is embarrassing. It is good that one of them stepped out of the tournament but the fact that some people don't see the problem with this behaviour is mindboggling and shows a fairly clear bias towards the players, which has no rational basis.


OP also needs this...


Tegin
Profile Joined November 2010
United States840 Posts
December 22 2010 15:55 GMT
#786
Lost some respect and doubt I'll view their live streams from now on. I can only imagine whats said/planned when the stream isn't running.
Pain is weakness leaving the body.
Sewi
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Germany1697 Posts
December 22 2010 15:55 GMT
#787
On December 23 2010 00:54 butchji wrote:
Why do you care?


Because we care about esports and its development. If you dont care, dont post.
"Well, things were going ok until he lost all his stuff" - Tasteless, 17.02.2016
VoirDire
Profile Joined February 2009
Sweden1923 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 15:58:38
December 22 2010 15:55 GMT
#788
On December 23 2010 00:49 Treemonkeys wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 23 2010 00:45 vOdToasT wrote:
How can people be so god damned fucking stupid?

We KNOW for a fact that they checked with the admins first. They did NOT ask the admins later on once being caught " in the act " to " clear their hands ".

The ONLY thing you can accuse them for is that they wanted to do this. Other than that they have done nothing. And in my personal opinion thats not even anything wrong considering the stupid format of the tournament. But even though they wanted to do it, they checked to see if it was OK first.

SjoW, on the chat: "I don't want to cheat"

And the only reason anyone thinks they matchfixed or did anything bad in the first place is because of that retarded rakkaka article.

Jesus tittyfucking christ.

As for why they would want to hide their conversation - look at this thread for why.


No they did not ask "the admins" they asked one admin who obviously didn't have the authority to allow this because they made one drop out.

They logically asked the tournament manager. Rakaka.se then texted the owner of Inferno Online on his cell phone (Presumably, the message was something like this "omg we have breaking news, matchfixing, cheating, haxx!!") He then answered "no throw away games. If we suspect anyhing they will get banned for life". Rakaka then reports EXTRA! IO condemns their behavior like they've actually did something yet.

The whole thing has been blown out of proportion by the sensationalist online newspaper rakaka.se.

I'll quote one of my previous posts:
On December 22 2010 22:12 VoirDire wrote:
What really disappoints me though is rakaka.se, posting a large banner screaming: "Thrown games in the swedish SC2-elite" and then "BUSTED!" with big red capital letters.

http://rakaka.se/images/746-busted_sc2_morrow_sjow_BANTHEM4LIFE.jpg

"BANTHEM4LIFE.jpg", seriously? What happened to journalistic neutrality? The whole article reeks with spite. They talk about the hot-headed Morrow, and their plans to rig the tournament and also takes the chance of poking at the tournament admin Maven who approved the upcoming throw match.

They apparently talked to Maven via battle.net (WoW), but they didn't give Sjow or MorroW any chance to give their side of the story. The news article was posted 20:41, I'm pretty sure one, if not both players were on battle.net by then.

They did talk to the head of Dignitas ODEE though. Who said he couldn't comment until he heard from his players. Was that an attempt to give both parties a chance to comment and thereby smooth some of the extreme bias over? What the hell would he know about an internal swedish agreement?

Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 19:05 Liquid`TLO wrote:
I wouldn'd take news that origins from rakaka too seriously though. They are basically the sun of e-Sports so always read their posts with caution.

Indeed.

Rakaka should post an official apology to both the slander against sjow and morrow and for the unprofessional journalism presented to their readers.


Also, read Ipps post edited into the OP.
IamAnton
Profile Joined January 2010
Canada335 Posts
December 22 2010 15:56 GMT
#789
Ofcourse they were caught, and ofcourse they knew it was cheating.. I'm sure they aren't that stupid.. then again spewing that on stream is pretty fail.. In the end anytime you purposely lose or win with a friend or team-mate to get more money or prizes its CHEATING.
"Man created God in his own image." - Ludwig Feuerbach
Zuprah
Profile Joined July 2010
Sweden16 Posts
December 22 2010 15:57 GMT
#790
Okay, just to clear some things up.
The tournament requires you to win the "nattgibb" 11 times to get access to the grand prize so there is not a 100% chance that the computer worth 6000$ will be handed out.
So if MorroW and SjoW reaches the finals 11 times there is not a verry high chance of anyone winning 100% of the finals which means that the chance of a grand prize being handed out is verry small, meaning that there will not be much to split between the two players.

However if MorroW decides to forfeit/play horrific all of the 11 finals the chance of SjoW getting the computer will go from verry small to certain.

Shorter version: This is not something about placing first one time but winning many times to get the grandprize so cooperation yields more than the prefomance of one individual.

This and the fact that matchfixing should never be tolerated in any sport, is why it should be treated not as cheating perhaps but abusing the system?

I wouldn't call these guys douchbags just yet, atleast not untill the whole story emerges.
"Every minute outside SC is a minute someone else improves."
butchji
Profile Joined September 2009
Germany1531 Posts
December 22 2010 15:58 GMT
#791
On December 23 2010 00:55 Sewi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 23 2010 00:54 butchji wrote:
Why do you care?


Because we care about esports and its development. If you dont care, dont post.


It's not like it's GSL...
heishe
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany2284 Posts
December 22 2010 15:58 GMT
#792
sure, financially it's a no brainer, but it's still collusion. 100% not discussable. it's abusing the system in a way it's not meant to be abused, and both of them should be banned from the tournament from that.

every poker player in here probably understands better why this is a really bad thing to do by morrow or sjow. I won't explain it in any depth though, since I need to pack my stuff now and leave in about 5 min.
If you value your soul, never look into the eye of a horse. Your soul will forever be lost in the void of the horse.
Treemonkeys
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2082 Posts
December 22 2010 15:59 GMT
#793
On December 23 2010 00:53 Danjoh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 23 2010 00:44 Treemonkeys wrote:
On December 23 2010 00:38 Longshank wrote:
On December 23 2010 00:30 Treemonkeys wrote:
On December 23 2010 00:11 dakalro wrote:
On December 23 2010 00:02 Treemonkeys wrote:
On December 22 2010 23:46 TrainFX wrote:
Seems to me that the root of the problem is the way the grand prize in the tournament has been organized. As sjow pointed out the way things work, match fixing is encouraged. None of this would have happened if you simply needed the most wins in order to win the laptop.

Something to keep in mind for tournament organizers out there, we're only human after all...


There a a few posts like this and IMO it is a ridiculous sense of entitlement. No one has to sponsor a tournament. No on has to throw up a $6000 computer as a prize. Pro gaming NEEDS these sponsors to survive but this thread is full of people complaining about how they offer a prize. How about if you don't like the terms, you don't play in the tournament? How about if you don't like how the tournament is run, get your own $6000 to give away however you like?


It's not sponsorship. It's one company (i-cafe type) pulling a publicity stunt while encouraging non-competition. They make the contest to bring in players to come spend money at their place. Period. They're not throwing $6K, they're throwing $2K and the best way for good players to win here is only for one to play so in the end that's what they're doing, not playing because it's the best chance to win maximum amount of the prizes. Better read the damn thread before posting, will you?


Uh yeah, I know it's not a sponsorship, and the prize is a $6000 computer. I am not defending how well the tournament is run, if they don't like it, don't participate. It's that simple. The are not entitled to match fix to make the tournament more desirable to them. No one is forcing them to come in and spend their money.


That's exactly what one of them is doing, and benefits from doing so compared to winning it all in tough competition.


Yeah, after they got caught.

Achiving the exact same result. Except one of them doesn't have to pay the tournament entry fees this way. So it's even more profitable for them. Yet, this is considered ok?


No it is not the exact same result. There is one more spot in the tournament for someone who actually wants to compete.
http://shroomspiration.blogspot.com/
Utinni
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada1196 Posts
December 22 2010 16:02 GMT
#794
Everyone knows the media and advertisers are the devil... end of discussion.
“... you don’t have to be Sun freakin Tzu to know that real fighting isn’t about killing or even hurting the other guy, it’s about scaring him enough to call it a day.” - Max Brooks: World War Z
Voronoff
Profile Joined May 2010
United States302 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 16:03:21
December 22 2010 16:02 GMT
#795
I don't think it's much of a big deal, especially if they asked the tournament organizers. There are well documented cases of it being done in MTG with Wizards of the Coast sanctioning it. The players did concede matches to lock up high levels of pro player club or to get a friend into the top 8 of a major tournament (Pro Tour or Grand Prix), and perhaps enough to justify them at least exploring the option by talking to the admins.
NehR
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden87 Posts
December 22 2010 16:03 GMT
#796
I was watching the stream at the time, and there was no talk about throwing away games or not playing with their full potential. 90% of the talk was about if both were going to play in the tournament or if just one of them should. This has been blown way, way out of proportion.
Stop feeding the drama trolls.
'If you keep standing upside down, we'll never get into town.'
Sewi
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Germany1697 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 16:05:04
December 22 2010 16:03 GMT
#797
On December 23 2010 00:58 butchji wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 23 2010 00:55 Sewi wrote:
On December 23 2010 00:54 butchji wrote:
Why do you care?


Because we care about esports and its development. If you dont care, dont post.


It's not like it's GSL...


Where do you put the boundary between "care" and "not care" tournaments?

I have a lot of respect for "smaller" ventures who run tournaments and sponsor a pcrice pool of any kind. They do this for the community, for you, for me, for everyone who likes to play SC. Why do you think it is ok to shit them? Because they dont offer 86.000 cash?

"Well, things were going ok until he lost all his stuff" - Tasteless, 17.02.2016
Silvanel
Profile Blog Joined March 2003
Poland4726 Posts
December 22 2010 16:04 GMT
#798
Shame on them, and anyone who think its ok. Mt feeling are similiar to Totalbiscuit's. This is not acceptable.
Pathetic Greta hater.
Tegin
Profile Joined November 2010
United States840 Posts
December 22 2010 16:04 GMT
#799
On December 23 2010 00:58 butchji wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 23 2010 00:55 Sewi wrote:
On December 23 2010 00:54 butchji wrote:
Why do you care?


Because we care about esports and its development. If you dont care, dont post.


It's not like it's GSL...


That's like saying a preseason NFL game its okay to cheat but once its the Super Bowl its not okay.
Pain is weakness leaving the body.
Excludos
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Norway8063 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 16:06:51
December 22 2010 16:05 GMT
#800
What surprises me is how everyone is spweing "omg cheating!" left and right, when the party spesifically ASKED if they could do it. Cheating is only if you know the rules and willingly decide to break them anyway.

I'm not seeing how they got "caught" either..the admins they asked gave them an "answer". I really thought Team Liquid was a better community than this.
Prev 1 38 39 40 41 42 49 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 11h 53m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ZombieGrub320
Nathanias 177
UpATreeSC 135
JuggernautJason73
ForJumy 42
CosmosSc2 20
StarCraft: Brood War
Larva 1038
scan(afreeca) 165
ZZZero.O 130
Aegong 105
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm122
League of Legends
Grubby4869
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K755
fl0m643
flusha463
byalli355
oskar245
Super Smash Bros
Liquid`Ken50
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu612
Other Games
tarik_tv19761
summit1g8351
shahzam410
C9.Mang0171
Skadoodle138
ViBE84
Trikslyr49
PPMD32
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2837
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• sitaska37
• musti20045 31
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 22
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22605
• Ler88
League of Legends
• TFBlade1028
Other Games
• imaqtpie2171
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
11h 53m
Epic.LAN
13h 53m
CSO Contender
18h 53m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 11h
Online Event
1d 17h
Esports World Cup
3 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
Esports World Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

JPL Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.