EPTOn January 06 2011 02:39 BC.KoRn wrote:
channel sex
asl anyone?
channel sex
asl anyone?
I've got fungal growth and buried roachs baby.
1.2 out in January - Page 17
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
vdek
United States267 Posts
I've got fungal growth and buried roachs baby. | ||
|
Neo.NEt
United States785 Posts
On January 06 2011 02:28 vdek wrote: Have you ever worked on a communication system that handles millions of communications a day? No. Has Blizzard? Yes. 12 years ago. Don't get me wrong I'm just glad that we'll finally have chat channels but seriously it's pathetic that we didn't have them to begin with. I love Blizzard but they should be embarrassed, ashamed of themselves, etc. | ||
|
Joroth
United States318 Posts
 | ||
|
vdek
United States267 Posts
What's your point? The old battle.net chat system is incompatible with the new Battle.net. | ||
|
Snowbear
Korea (South)1925 Posts
On January 06 2011 02:31 Proto_Protoss wrote: Chat channels is not an idea they have built from the ground up. They had it in BW so its not like they don't know how to a chat channel works but form what i've seen on PTR these chat channels are unimpressive but at least we have them. It was sarcasm, sorry  . | ||
|
Neo.NEt
United States785 Posts
On January 06 2011 03:05 vdek wrote: What's your point? The old battle.net chat system is incompatible with the new Battle.net. Sorry forgot you work for Bliz and know every little detail about their chat. Point is, when cars have cup holders in 1998, you expect the cars that you buy in 2010 to have cup holders as well. And when SC1 came out, the situation was no different than it is now (it was harder if anything) yet they did just fine. | ||
|
Sqq
Norway2023 Posts
On January 06 2011 03:06 Neo.NEt wrote: Sorry forgot you work for Bliz and know every little detail about their chat. Point is, when cars have cup holders in 1998, you expect the cars that you buy in 2010 to have cup holders as well. And when SC1 game out, the situation was no different than it is now (it was harder if anything) yet they did just fine. Is it possible that Blizzard intended battlenet 2.0 to have chat, but the time limit they gave for the release was to tight to implement it ? Sure they could have delayed it even more, but for chat functions ? Just a theory tho. | ||
|
lofung
Hong Kong298 Posts
On January 06 2011 03:08 Sqq wrote: Is it possible that Blizzard intended battlenet 2.0 to have chat, but the time limit they gave for the release was to tight to implement it ? Sure they could have delayed it even more, but for chat functions ? Just a theory tho. are you sure that you want chatrooms?? chat rooms are so 2002. | ||
Zelniq
United States7166 Posts
Patch 2: · It is possible to "push" held position units via rapid Move commands. We are aware of an issue with Zealots and Zerglings where in they can be pushed out of the way even when commanded to hold position. We are working towards a solution and are sorry for the inconvenience, thank you for your patience. | ||
|
Neo.NEt
United States785 Posts
On January 06 2011 03:08 Sqq wrote: Is it possible that Blizzard intended battlenet 2.0 to have chat, but the time limit they gave for the release was to tight to implement it ? Sure they could have delayed it even more, but for chat functions ? Just a theory tho. Anything is possible but I seem to remember hearing about how this game was coming out "next year" for like 6 years... it's not like all of a sudden they decided SC2 was gonna come out and they just had to throw out what they had ready. I'll be as happy as anyone when chat channels come out but I'm just puzzled that it took this long and now they have to push it back ANOTHER week? Hopefully their pushing it back for a different reason than the chat channels. On a related note, why does Blizzard say anything about when these things will happen when they are ALWAYS wrong. This is their only flaw. If they would just keep us in the dark, I'd be happier... | ||
|
Deleted User 108965
1096 Posts
On January 06 2011 03:06 Neo.NEt wrote: Sorry forgot you work for Bliz and know every little detail about their chat. Point is, when cars have cup holders in 1998, you expect the cars that you buy in 2010 to have cup holders as well. And when SC1 came out, the situation was no different than it is now (it was harder if anything) yet they did just fine. cup holders and chat rooms are completely different. cup holders are a simple feature, where chat rooms take a lot of thought and coding. pretty illogical to compare the two. On January 06 2011 03:16 Zelniq wrote: this is great because that annoyed the balls off of me | ||
|
Tritonus
Denmark125 Posts
On January 06 2011 03:26 FrankWalls wrote: cup holders and chat rooms are completely different. cup holders are a simple feature, where chat rooms take a lot of thought and coding. pretty illogical to compare the two. this is great because that annoyed the balls off of me -_- You completely missed the point. It is not the cup holder IT SELF that is the point, it's the fact that it's a feature that we've gotten used to, and as such, you expect it to be there. | ||
|
PartyBiscuit
Canada4525 Posts
| ||
|
floor exercise
Canada5847 Posts
On January 06 2011 03:06 Neo.NEt wrote: Sorry forgot you work for Bliz and know every little detail about their chat. Point is, when cars have cup holders in 1998, you expect the cars that you buy in 2010 to have cup holders as well. And when SC1 came out, the situation was no different than it is now (it was harder if anything) yet they did just fine. Don't tell me you still drink out of cups? Ever heard of Facebook gramps? | ||
|
KiF1rE
United States964 Posts
On January 06 2011 03:45 Tritonus wrote: -_- You completely missed the point. It is not the cup holder IT SELF that is the point, it's the fact that it's a feature that we've gotten used to, and as such, you expect it to be there. meh and the thing that is awkward about chat channels is that theoretically they were already technically done. as the format and layout is nearly the same as the already implemented party chat =/ just that these chat channels are on a larger scale (and they still fill up) but you can now have multiple lobbies and create them. one other feature that we gotten used to was every gateway being accessible to everyone =/ as i still cant find anyone willing to share their EU account with me so i can try the TSL 3 qualifiers lol. | ||
|
Dark-Storm
Canada334 Posts
| ||
|
CyberPitz
United States428 Posts
It's like nothing is ever good enough for some of you people. | ||
|
cowsrule
United States80 Posts
On January 06 2011 03:50 floor exercise wrote: Don't tell me you still drink out of cups? Ever heard of Facebook gramps? Thanks for the laugh . | ||
|
Azzur
Australia6253 Posts
But then again, I'm not really that surprised since I work in the software development industry. To the users, the interface forms over 30% of the user's impression of the system whilst the developers usually feel that the interface consists of like 5% of it. | ||
|
DerNebel
Denmark648 Posts
On January 06 2011 04:17 CyberPitz wrote: I thought we were over complaining about the trivial "Chat channel should have been released right away!!" nonsense. It wasn't there, it's coming, less QQ, more "Thanks Blizzard for listening to us". It's like nothing is ever good enough for some of you people. Chat channels is good enough for us. But we ARE going to hold Blizzard to the fire and tell them when they made a mistake. We want our Blizzard games top-notch, as they should be. | ||
| ||
