EPTfucking best answer ever >.>
plz never let this person answer questions to community ever again blizzard
Blizzard: "No plans for chatrooms, crossrealm play" - Page…
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Chen
United States6344 Posts
fucking best answer ever >.> plz never let this person answer questions to community ever again blizzard | ||
|
Oddysay
Canada597 Posts
| ||
|
KameZerg
Sweden1769 Posts
You guys are raging to much. | ||
|
hifriend
China7935 Posts
On May 29 2010 07:41 petered wrote: All I personally care about is that Blizzard create awesome core gameplay. No chat channels? I am pretty sure I can figure out how to talk to my own friends, thank you. No LAN? A necessity for today's technological environment. This will probably become standard for most new games. I fully expect that once a pro gaming league becomes more established that Blizzard will allow for the largest of the tournaments to be played on LAN. Besides, with today's technology fast internet is becoming more and more affordable and common. Also, you really want Blizzard to be profitable, trust me. People complain about Blizzard trying to get the most money out of the game, but if Blizzard is profitable then they can continue to make excellent games. If they start losing money then they will be forced to release half assed games like most other companies do. All this stuff really isn't a big deal in my mind. I just want a fun, balanced game that is good for high level competitive play(still asking for a lot). I think they are delivering on that. Honestly maintaining good relations with your loyal customers is a better long term investment than the money spent/profit gained from lack of lan, unwillingness to develop chat channels and stubborn attempts at garnering small profits from a declining E-sports market they didn't even play much of a role in creating in the first place. | ||
|
tnud
Sweden2233 Posts
On May 29 2010 08:02 Oddysay wrote: who the 122 people who voted yes btw ? lol 80% missclicks 20% "#(/&"#heads | ||
|
Elefanto
Switzerland3584 Posts
what happened to the fucking blizzard i knew, hell this piece of fucking shit trash ass retarded fuck company cant be blizzard man | ||
|
Brad
2754 Posts
On May 29 2010 08:02 Oddysay wrote: who the 122 people who voted yes btw ? lol BW players who want SC2 to die a grizzly death probably. | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
| ||
|
ExO_
United States2316 Posts
| ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
 | ||
|
ohIdentity
United States52 Posts
| ||
|
ccdnl
United States611 Posts
On May 29 2010 07:38 CryGirl1921 wrote: I would like to point that beta was delayed for like 1-2 years cos of bnet 2.0 developing :DDDDD Would like to second this quote just to bump it. On May 29 2010 07:41 petered wrote: All I personally care about is that Blizzard create awesome core gameplay. No chat channels? I am pretty sure I can figure out how to talk to my own friends, thank you. No LAN? A necessity for today's technological environment. This will probably become standard for most new games. I fully expect that once a pro gaming league becomes more established that Blizzard will allow for the largest of the tournaments to be played on LAN. Besides, with today's technology fast internet is becoming more and more affordable and common. Also, you really want Blizzard to be profitable, trust me. People complain about Blizzard trying to get the most money out of the game, but if Blizzard is profitable then they can continue to make excellent games. If they start losing money then they will be forced to release half assed games like most other companies do. All this stuff really isn't a big deal in my mind. I just want a fun, balanced game that is good for high level competitive play(still asking for a lot). I think they are delivering on that. Petred, the positives from having channels outweighs an infinite amount of positives by not having one. You bring to our attention that you can talk to your own friends through your own ways. Okay what about the other players who enjoy talking or meeting new friends through their hobby--Starcraft/gaming? From personal experience--I definitely enjoy meeting people from chatrooms. Course there are the occasional spammers/flamers but I rather have a spammer and be able to meet some awesome new people than not have either of them. Plus one of the reasons why MMOs are the most popular games because of this aspect. The ability to meet random people and play with them. And if Blizzard is all about listening to the community and making money then why not support a feature that is seriously appreciated by all, except for you, obviously. No lan...I don't think you see the full spectrum of this concerning issue. First of all you yourself have spoken about competitive play and secondly Blizz has made many statements that they want to popularize ESports. Concerning this, a key aspect is how can you popularize a competition when you hinder their capabilities? I don't know if you follow any sports but I'm sure you can sympathize with this concept: how can any sport be popular when its best potentials and moments can't be displayed because of hindrances caused by its owners? People are excited over sports because of the spectacular moments they create. Now imagine all those moments and cut them by half because there was lag. Yes, I want Blizzard to be profitable...well I don't necessarily want that specifically but I will support a company that produces good content. But when they say they listen to the community and don't address a very valid issue posed by the community that is just bullocks. When they say they listen and a guy representing them says in an interview "Do you REALLY want chat channels?", then that is just...ignorant and infuriating. Finally I'd like to point out that I understand your standpoint. That as long as things are balanced you don't care about the other things mentioned. You aren't part of the community of gamers that enjoy features like channels or cross realms. That is totally fine. But the part that is convoluted in your post is that you are using your attitude towards something that you don't care about to argue against it. That is saying...I don't give birth; it doesn't affect me so I don't think women should be allowed to seek abortions. | ||
|
sjh
Canada136 Posts
| ||
|
CagedMind
United States506 Posts
| ||
|
Brad
2754 Posts
| ||
|
norbertg
Hungary40 Posts
http://www.joystiq.com/contact/tips/ http://www.destructoid.com/elephant/rebirth-tips.phtml?t=tips tips@kotaku.com | ||
|
e4e5nf3
Canada599 Posts
I know game site reviews should all be taken with a grain of salt, but a vast number of people base their purchasing plans on such reviews. | ||
|
iloahz
United States964 Posts
| ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
On May 29 2010 08:11 e4e5nf3 wrote: I know game site reviews should all be taken with a grain of salt, but a vast number of people base their purchasing plans on such reviews. If only there was some way to show potential buyers that BNET 2.0 has serious problems... | ||
|
deth
Australia1757 Posts
| ||
| ||
