EPTmy first post:
fucking pearce of shit.
Blizzard: "No plans for chatrooms, crossrealm play" - Page…
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
NexOs
Austria24 Posts
my first post: fucking pearce of shit. | ||
|
Amnesia
United States3818 Posts
On May 29 2010 07:10 Tef wrote: Nice! I really dont want public chat channels. They should focus on the game instead. ...clueless. On May 29 2010 08:15 NexOs wrote: wow. thats, just sick. my first post: fucking pearce of shit. best first post EVER LOL | ||
|
coldmath
United States13 Posts
If Blizzard decides not to implement the features the fans want, are we going to have the same thing happen here? If so, it seems like it will do a lot of damage to the community. Instead of having one place where everyone plays, suddenly there's one place where people who care about these things play, a place where these things are somehow implemented by the community (think iccup 2.0), and one place where everyone else plays. | ||
|
Alethios
New Zealand2765 Posts
You know, when SC2 was announced, I was just so incredibly excited. I just couldn't wait. I volunteered for a prominent fansite as a news reporter, and spent time every day trawling through the internet for scraps of information. Since then day, with each announcement, my enthusiasm for this game has slowly ebbed away. I realise now that the only thing that's been keeping me going on this game is my faith in Blizzard to get the job done, and do it right. I have has more trust in Blizzard than any other company, ever. But reading this, I just can't help but feel my faith has been misplaced. They have no intention of fixing any of the major problems with b.net 2.0, and the game simply isn't good enough for me to overlook that. The hundred tiny cuts have finally slain me. I'll be spending my money elsewhere. | ||
|
ccdnl
United States611 Posts
On May 29 2010 08:15 NexOs wrote: wow. thats, just sick. my first post: fucking pearce of shit. I Second the guy above me saying that your post was best First post ever. I enjoyed your creativity  . | ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
On May 29 2010 08:15 NexOs wrote: wow. thats, just sick. my first post: fucking pearce of shit. ROFL!!!!! | ||
|
oN_Silva
197 Posts
| ||
|
Ramsing
Canada233 Posts
On May 29 2010 08:15 NexOs wrote: wow. thats, just sick. my first post: fucking pearce of shit. Win. Pure Win lol. | ||
|
FeLonius
61 Posts
Bnet 2.0 sucks so bad at the moment that I wouldn't be at all surprised to find myself going back to Quake 3/Live if there aren't some marked improvements in the release version. Despite the fact that I really enjoy the game itself, I find myself never playing more than 4 games in a row.. just because I hate the platform so much. I'm also incredibly pissed that I won't be able to get my old highschool friends together to LAN some SC2; I really hope the hackers have been hard at work on this. I suspect a single cable connection will be GARBAGE for getting 4-8 people playing SC2 on bnet. tl;dr: QQ | ||
|
Saturnize
United States2473 Posts
On May 29 2010 05:04 Immersion_ wrote: Instead of whining about it do something and refuse to buy this crap. Pre-order cancelled I'll wait for an alternative . | ||
|
MidKnight
Lithuania884 Posts
On May 29 2010 08:06 ccdnl wrote: Would like to second this quote just to bump it. Petred, the positives from having channels outweighs an infinite amount of positives by not having one. You bring to our attention that you can talk to your own friends through your own ways. Okay what about the other players who enjoy talking or meeting new friends through their hobby--Starcraft/gaming? From personal experience--I definitely enjoy meeting people from chatrooms. Course there are the occasional spammers/flamers but I rather have a spammer and be able to meet some awesome new people than not have either of them. Plus one of the reasons why MMOs are the most popular games because of this aspect. The ability to meet random people and play with them. And if Blizzard is all about listening to the community and making money then why not support a feature that is seriously appreciated by all, except for you, obviously. No lan...I don't think you see the full spectrum of this concerning issue. First of all you yourself have spoken about competitive play and secondly Blizz has made many statements that they want to popularize ESports. Concerning this, a key aspect is how can you popularize a competition when you hinder their capabilities? I don't know if you follow any sports but I'm sure you can sympathize with this concept: how can any sport be popular when its best potentials and moments can't be displayed because of hindrances caused by its owners? People are excited over sports because of the spectacular moments they create. Now imagine all those moments and cut them by half because there was lag. Yes, I want Blizzard to be profitable...well I don't necessarily want that specifically but I will support a company that produces good content. But when they say they listen to the community and don't address a very valid issue posed by the community that is just bullocks. When they say they listen and a guy representing them says in an interview "Do you REALLY want chat channels?", then that is just...ignorant and infuriating. Finally I'd like to point out that I understand your standpoint. That as long as things are balanced you don't care about the other things mentioned. You aren't part of the community of gamers that enjoy features like channels or cross realms. That is totally fine. But the part that is convoluted in your post is that you are using your attitude towards something that you don't care about to argue against it. That is saying...I don't give birth; it doesn't affect me so I don't think women should be allowed to seek abortions. QFT. I mean, what is their reasoning for NOT having chat rooms? If what people were asking was some sort of super advanced and hard to implement feature, fine, but chat channels? How hard can it be to make them? And his response to why chat channels aren't needed was "If we make a good matchmaking system, you shouldn't want to do anything other than play".. That's plain out dumb | ||
|
e4e5nf3
Canada599 Posts
Don't want to sound like a downer but people have been temp banned for short derogatory statements like this in the past. I admit it's funny though. lol | ||
|
Mr.Maestro
42 Posts
| ||
|
frontliner2
Netherlands844 Posts
| ||
|
Brett
Australia3820 Posts
On May 29 2010 07:29 Motiva wrote: ROFL an interesting challenge? WELL HOW ABOUT YOU DON'T CREATE CHALLENGES FOR YOURSELF arg sorry... This is really sad. Blizzard is dumb. HAHAHAHAHA bolded for absolute truth. Remove the restriction that you have imposed upon yourself blizzard (you've had cross realm play on all previous titles) and the 'challenge' is non-existent. Seriously what the fuck? "Do you really want chat channels?" ...... How disconnected are you from your user base blizz? EVERYONE I know playing the beta, is completely bemoaning the state of bnet 2.0. Get a fucking clue... | ||
|
tnud
Sweden2233 Posts
The brand new facebook page should be on every page too. Irony~~~~! | ||
|
Brett
Australia3820 Posts
On May 29 2010 07:39 Archerofaiur wrote: ![[image loading]](http://reinventingthenewsroom.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/treebeard.jpg) A Blizzard should know better! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Holy shit, I'm crying from laughter. | ||
|
GizmoPT
Portugal3040 Posts
| ||
|
KameZerg
Sweden1747 Posts
Because theyre evil masterminds (LOL!) | ||
|
InFi.asc
Germany518 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i45.tinypic.com/6z9729.jpg) I think I do. | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://i45.tinypic.com/28vrep2.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.ingame.de/pics//82877.png)
