| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS |
|
PVJ
Hungary5221 Posts
On September 21 2012 05:33 Asha` wrote: How do you even crowbar a battle hellion into being biological lore wise lol. yay firebats at least mines got buffed It think they stopped caring about these things a long time ago. I mean reapers are now passively regenerating as any Zerg unit does. | ||
|
xeqwist
55 Posts
| ||
|
sM.Zik
Canada2553 Posts
| ||
|
baba1
Canada355 Posts
On September 21 2012 07:29 the_business_og wrote: if some wise soul can shed some clarity: the helion/battle helion dynamic isnt making sense to me? the helion from WOL will remain reactor-buildable whereas the battle helion isnt, and needs an upgrade so that it can be built from a tech lab? can't you just build them from reactor twice as fast and transform them? are they separate units or can they still go between each other? and the helion isnt bio, but the battle helion is? so medivacs can heal one form and not the other? Looks like I'm not the only one who is really confused on wtf the hellion has become. Blizzard forgot to put sense in this whole thing, they probably lost it somewhere. | ||
|
Indolent
Poland137 Posts
| ||
|
Account252508
3454 Posts
| ||
|
TigerKarl
1757 Posts
| ||
|
bgx
Poland6595 Posts
| ||
|
Alryk
United States2718 Posts
On September 21 2012 07:30 Ramiz1989 wrote: Or you can, make 2 Hellions in Battle Mode and other 2 in normal mode. Call me a genius. Mothership Core's purifier was actually nerfed. Yes, it got increase in damage, but the duration is a lot shorter and energy cost is pretty big too. Well, maybe it wasn't even a nerf, but it was a change, not actual buff either. My thoughts pretty much exactly. I shouldn't have called it a buff, I didn't mean it to be heh. I think the mothership core should have an energy cost per attack (maybe slightly higher than the "average energy/attack over 25 seconds") so that like each attack costs 10 energy (find a good amount, just an example.) And give the mothership a leash range (22 or something, long but not long enough to attack) to the nexus, halve its movement speed, and bring back teleport, so it becomes more of a dynamic defensive unit. And increase range on purify imo, since movement speed + leash range are changed. Is this true? What is the current damage vs armored? I don't think the tank is any different from the WoL tank. I haven't clicked on one, but it doesn't feel any more powerful. | ||
|
Account252508
3454 Posts
| ||
|
renaissanceMAN
United States1840 Posts
On September 21 2012 07:52 bgx wrote: I used to be negative about all of this, but now im actually smiling when i read those balance updates. Thank you blizzard. but are you smiling because of the absurdity or because blizzard is actually trying to make this game better? can't believe I actually typed the last half of that sentence. | ||
|
Ramiz1989
12124 Posts
On September 21 2012 07:54 monkybone wrote: At first I was in disbelief, but then I realized how awesome this is. Good guy blizzard, good patches all around. Well, as usual, most of the Terran players right now are whining without even realizing how good this patch is for Terran players. Both buffs are just straight buffs, and are pretty huge, and makes new units more than dynamic and viable. | ||
|
SarcasmMonster
3136 Posts
On September 21 2012 07:52 Alryk wrote: My thoughts pretty much exactly. I shouldn't have called it a buff, I didn't mean it to be heh. I think the mothership core should have an energy cost per attack (maybe slightly higher than the "average energy/attack over 25 seconds") so that like each attack costs 10 energy (find a good amount, just an example.) And give the mothership a leash range (22 or something, long but not long enough to attack) to the nexus, halve its movement speed, and bring back teleport, so it becomes more of a dynamic defensive unit. And increase range on purify imo, since movement speed + leash range are changed. I don't think the tank is any different from the WoL tank. I haven't clicked on one, but it doesn't feel any more powerful. ![[image loading]](http://imageshack.us/a/img843/4582/screenshot2012092022434.jpg) By Garmer | ||
|
pmp10
3397 Posts
On September 21 2012 07:52 Alryk wrote: I don't think the tank is any different from the WoL tank. I haven't clicked on one, but it doesn't feel any more powerful. Only damage scaling vs. armored in siege mode was different by 2 or 3 more damage per weapon upgrade. It might have been rolled back per 'bug fixing' tho. | ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12042 Posts
On September 21 2012 07:57 Ramiz1989 wrote: Well, as usual, most of the Terran players right now are whining without even realizing how good this patch is for Terran players. Both buffs are just straight buffs, and are pretty huge, and makes new units more than dynamic and viable. I don't even think it's whining, I think they're complaining about something that really doesn't change anything *I'm a terran player and I think BH becoming Bio gives it more survivability against collosus (as a mech player)* The only issue I have is that they still refuse to allow Terran to have a good cornerstone unit in the tank. | ||
|
Tomasy
Poland80 Posts
Putting battle hellion as bio aside this change is actually interesting. Becouse mech mostly work like protoss army (great in big numbers) now we might see some non camping to 200/200 mech style. | ||
|
Account252508
3454 Posts
| ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
| ||
|
althaz
Australia1001 Posts
| ||
|
Account252508
3454 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
OSC
Big Brain Bouts
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Serral vs Bunny
ByuN vs GgMaChine
CranKy Ducklings
Afreeca Starleague
Snow vs Jaedong
YSC vs hero
IPSL
Dragon vs Ret
RSL Revival
Solar vs Rogue
Maru vs NightMare
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
