EPT2021 - 2022 Football Thread - Page 122
| Forum Index > Sports |
New Thread Is Live - Click Here | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18481 Posts
| ||
|
Bacillus
Finland1973 Posts
| ||
|
Harris1st
Germany6972 Posts
On May 05 2022 03:49 WombaT wrote: Man City win, Real aren’t that good I’ve said this 5 legs in a row but I’ll be right eventually. Pep hasn’t picked some bespoke weird formation either, going with what worked well the first leg That aged wonderfully, again!  | ||
|
gTank
Austria2584 Posts
On May 05 2022 16:37 Harris1st wrote: Hahaha Man City hahaha. Real just refuses to die over and over again. This some Deadpool shit right here That aged wonderfully, again! The funny part is also how incredibly weak Man City looked this game compared to the first, wonder if they are strong or Real just played really poorly in the first game. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18481 Posts
Does it make much sense though? Knowing you field a player who cant do the full 90 - yes it brings stability the first 60 or so minutes but then you have someone on the field where the player himself knows he is just 2nd string, no time to get into the game. Because City lost yesterday as they were shocked and were not able to regather their mental fitness (which is understandable). Wouldnt it better to field someone inexperienced the first 60min, if you concede yes you still have time to score goals in return and once you are in a position where you dont want to concede any more goals you bring in the more experienced but not full fit player? Or if the replacement placed a good game, just leave him on the field and dont bring the not fully fit player in at all? | ||
|
Harris1st
Germany6972 Posts
On May 05 2022 21:13 sharkie wrote: I have got a question: So Pep decided to play Kyle Walker knowing he couldnt do full 90min and other managers usually do that too with vital players returning into the team right away. Does it make much sense though? Knowing you field a player who cant do the full 90 - yes it brings stability the first 60 or so minutes but then you have someone on the field where the player himself knows he is just 2nd string, no time to get into the game. Because City lost yesterday as they were shocked and were not able to regather their mental fitness (which is understandable). Wouldnt it better to field someone inexperienced the first 60min, if you concede yes you still have time to score goals in return and once you are in a position where you dont want to concede any more goals you bring in the more experienced but not full fit player? Or if the replacement placed a good game, just leave him on the field and dont bring the not fully fit player in at all? Me personally, I would do it the other way around like you said. Then this player can make a difference in the last 30+ mins But who are we to question Pep's decisions. | ||
|
DropBear
Australia4371 Posts
| ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland25875 Posts
On May 05 2022 16:37 Harris1st wrote: Hahaha Man City hahaha. Real just refuses to die over and over again. This some Deadpool shit right here That aged wonderfully, again! It’s true though! Liverpool to win the final :p That said this leg was considerably tighter and even, and Real showed their mentality once again when it counts. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18481 Posts
On May 05 2022 21:48 Harris1st wrote: Me personally, I would do it the other way around like you said. Then this player can make a difference in the last 30+ mins But who are we to question Pep's decisions. Oh this is definitely not a criticism on Pep from me. I was just wondering how you guys think of this generally because I have seen it so often that not fully fit players return for a game and cant do the full 90 and imo the last 20min are where teams are the most vulnerable anyway and by subbing people off you make it even more vulnerable | ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland25875 Posts
On May 06 2022 00:38 sharkie wrote: Oh this is definitely not a criticism on Pep from me. I was just wondering how you guys think of this generally because I have seen it so often that not fully fit players return for a game and cant do the full 90 and imo the last 20min are where teams are the most vulnerable anyway and by subbing people off you make it even more vulnerable I think Pep’s ordering was correct. I think it’s more generally the sensible order. In this particular instance the main job was dealing with the threat of Vinicius, who is young and fit but will tire over 120 minutes If your 50/50 player is up to speed, great. If they’re not you have plenty of time to respond and make that change. If you start someone else, bring on Walker and he breaks down quickly, or isn’t up to pace then you are running out of time (or subs entirely) to make that change. I think if it’s a gifted attacking player you have who’s just returning from a niggle, you bring them on later when people are tired and more spaces emerge and hope they can do their magic. | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
| ||
|
Bacillus
Finland1973 Posts
| ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
| ||
|
gTank
Austria2584 Posts
| ||
|
sharkie
Austria18481 Posts
On May 06 2022 04:27 gTank wrote: That is over for West Ham, calling it. How dumb do you have to be to get a red like that baffles me in professional football ^^ Well thats why that player plays for west ham and not a big club?^^ | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
| ||
|
gTank
Austria2584 Posts
| ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
But i wouldn't call them bad bad. | ||
|
plasmidghost
Belgium16168 Posts
| ||
|
gTank
Austria2584 Posts
On May 06 2022 05:04 Pandemona wrote: I would say they are same level as Frankfurt right? Produce some good players, have good spells in the league and in history etc. But i wouldn't call them bad bad. Yeah same. Frankfurt is 11th only because they dont give a crap about the league when they are in the semi finals of the EL ^^ | ||
| ||
