EPT[GSL] Blizzard Cup Grand Finals - Page 479
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
beast3
United States23 Posts
| ||
|
Swiv
Germany3674 Posts
| ||
|
ElephantBaby
United States1365 Posts
On December 17 2011 23:11 SilverLeagueElite wrote: A person can nitpick and dis-assemble every game to point out every mistake. Replace MMA & DRG with any two players in the same situations and guess how many mistakes will be made. In any game, it's the person who makes the least mistakes, wins. Especially when 2 people are evenly matched. If you can actually think of some people could play more 'perfect', makes me wonder why they aren't there. Even if they are the best players in the world. It doesn't mean they will play every game without mistakes. If amateur players can see possible improvements in their games, they are certainly worth to point out for pros to improve. | ||
|
nokz88
Brazil1253 Posts
On December 17 2011 23:18 Giriath wrote: Because I'm not of the opinion that this set was perfect, I'm butthurt about NaNiWa? Uh. See, this is why poking fun at people who call anything perfect is fun; you get all kinds of hilarious retorts, even if you openly agree that it may be the best thing ever. Get the fuck off your high horse man. Let me try to show you what kind of douchebaggery you are doing: 1. Beauty contest, points at winner and says "Hey, I've seen much prettier girls." 2. A friend got A in a test. Says "why no A+?" 3. Someone buys a car. Says "pfft... Ferraris piss all over this" ...and to top it off, annoys everyone by saying "look, I'm just telling these are not PERFECT, am I wrong?" What will it take to realize that your stupid remarks are not welcome here, even if they are true? Go post it in your blog, write a huge paragraph telling us why you thought this finals sucked, whatever. Don't piss off people in the LR thread celebrating a great series to close the year. I hope there aren't many people like you when I'm celebrating my graduation in a few weeks. "hey, where's the magna cum-laude?" sigh.... User was warned for this post | ||
Fruscainte
4596 Posts
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF | ||
|
Derez
Netherlands6068 Posts
On December 17 2011 23:13 Giriath wrote: MVP and Jjakji both often build three CCs in their main base. MMA often puts on pressure from two-base before getting his third, then takes a long while to set up his forth, preferring to either set up a very good defense or put on more pressure. MMA was ahead in expansions after forcing the cancel on DRG's fourth, and had a very stellar defense mid-map; he had ample time to research and build ghosts. If you are referring to the shakuras game, you are wrong. Ghost transitions are only really viable from being ahead. At the point where MMA killed the fourth, he himself was still on a 2 base, with only just getting his 3rd up. He was in no way ahead of DRG in expansions. Ghosts might look rather cheap, but they only work in larger numbers. Which means a significant gas investment (academy + academy upgrades, plus a ghost or 8, runs at 1k already and that's not enough of them to hardcounter BL's), which cuts into both your tanks and upgrades. Watch MVP do ghost transitions some more, they're only possible (and he only does them) when he's taken an early third or managed to kill a 3rd, so his gas income is actually ahead of the Z. Ghosts aren't some magic 'i win'-button where you can just get a 'few'. You need to plan for it all game long and its incredibly fragile (if not impossible) to switch to from an equal economy. | ||
|
PrimeTimey
Canada369 Posts
He has made so much cash! http://www.sc2earnings.com/player/184/mun-seong-won | ||
|
SkyBlaze
Canada191 Posts
i know what song he's talking about but i don't know the name of it or the artist but the chorus goes like this sort of Tasteless time, Artosis time, for GSL/ we are the boys SC2 every hour. Breaking haerts and breaking records, as we own. Alpha nerds and your objection is overthrown. [edit] I found it. It was at the top left of the screen on the video[good thing I have ticket year pass] SC2 ANthem - matthew anipen http://ch.gomtv.com/450/28385/464997 | ||
|
MCMXVI
Norway1193 Posts
On December 17 2011 23:04 TheQforce wrote: MMA's tank placement inthe last game was amzing, i guess you could say it was "Puts on sunglasses" on another level Hahaha!! The whole train carriage is wondering why i'm laughing so hard lol)))) Nicely done, sir! | ||
|
chesshaha
United States1117 Posts
| ||
|
drezi
Iceland72 Posts
| ||
|
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
On December 17 2011 23:47 chesshaha wrote: Where are the recommended games?? :/ Games 2 and 7 were the best games personally. Game 7 is without a doubt the best game in terms of intensity, action and drama ever in SC2 history. (yes it was even better than any of the Jjakji/Leenock games) | ||
|
Utopi
Denmark176 Posts
 !! felt bad for loser-.- | ||
|
AxionSteel
United States7754 Posts
On December 17 2011 23:18 Giriath wrote: Because I'm not of the opinion that this set was perfect, I'm butthurt about NaNiWa? Uh. See, this is why poking fun at people who call anything perfect is fun; you get all kinds of hilarious retorts, even if you openly agree that it may be the best thing ever. It was the perfect game, not for it's overall flawless play, but for the drama it created. Couldn't be scripted better than that. The drama, excitement, tension etc...the storyline, 3-0 into 3-3. Amazing, back and forth final game, incredibly nerve wracking climax, it was the perfect game for me But obviously everyone is different. | ||
|
SilverLeagueElite
United States626 Posts
On December 17 2011 23:32 ElephantBaby wrote: Even if they are the best players in the world. It doesn't mean they will play every game without mistakes. If amateur players can see possible improvements in their games, they are certainly worth to point out for pros to improve. You are making my point. Even if you are the best, you will make mistakes. And if your mindset is, 'that was a mediocre game, they make several mistakes', it can be applied to any game. Take any 'perfect' game, put it through analysis and all of the sudden it's mediocre. Then every game is mediocre. Context... | ||
|
KimJongChill
United States6429 Posts
| ||
|
Reasonable
Ukraine1432 Posts
 Those were good games, I trust. | ||
|
boxturtle
United States224 Posts
If we had skynet playing perfect sc2 games in front of us, it'd get boring kind of fast. | ||
|
FallDownMarigold
United States3710 Posts
On December 17 2011 23:18 Giriath wrote: I don't consider the last set or the finals bad. It may even well be the best GSL finals ever, with such an amazing come-back situation. I also don't think it's hard to understand that this was far from a perfect game from either player, though I can see how the tension and excitement of the finals could make one say so. In essence you're saying nothing, just so you know. You're arguing that the games were not perfectly played -- that's a fallacy. No one can argue against it. It's a plain truth. You can't argue for a plain truth while attempting to conflate it with something else, such as that the finals were amazing quality. The finals were "perfect" in people's opinion as spectators. They were not perfect on the basis of perfect execution/macro/micro/decisions/whatever -- why would you even bother attempting to argue that? | ||
|
Orcasgt24
Canada3238 Posts
On December 17 2011 23:59 Reasonable wrote: DRG Those were good games, I trust. Honestly, it was 6 games of nerd bashing and then game 7 was epic epic epic. By far the single best game of SC2 played TvZ so far. | ||
| ||
