EPT
EG Master's Cup Final Bracket & Schedule - Page 23
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Scodia
United Kingdom588 Posts
| ||
|
Adila
United States874 Posts
On October 31 2010 08:42 Astans wrote: Torch never seems to build any planetary fortresses. One planetary at the gold and this would have been a different game. He doesn't seem to defend much at all. Add in the fact he's so aggressive with his army placement too. Lz really took advantage of that with drops in game 3 and helions in game 4. No Sensor Towers, no spotters, and no planetary fortresses means he has to get lucky to catch a drop in time to stop the major damage. | ||
|
GenoZStriker
United States2914 Posts
| ||
|
attenzionee
Germany40 Posts
| ||
|
miNix
Turkey156 Posts
| ||
|
SmoKim
Denmark10305 Posts
| ||
|
gaizka
United States991 Posts
| ||
|
Sfydjklm
United States9218 Posts
On October 31 2010 08:47 SmoKim wrote: gogo Slush, win the whole tournament! + Show Spoiler [gg koth] + kiwi 4-0ed him yesterday;*( | ||
|
Duravi
United States1205 Posts
because a commentator cant just say 'holy shit these guys are awful' when they are probably getting paid to cast? Yes they can. Just look at Artosis he does it all the time in GSL. | ||
|
Talin
Montenegro10532 Posts
On October 31 2010 08:39 On_Slaught wrote:Just because some people in this thread can't do better, it doesn't make them wrong. But it tends to make them not understand WHY things are happening the way they're happening. The mechanics are sloppy, yes. Nobody can argue against that. However, the argument that mechanics are sloppy because these two players are horrible is ridiculous and pretty much identifies anybody who claims that as not quite competent to judge the players at that level. | ||
|
starcraft2leverage
United States207 Posts
On October 31 2010 08:48 gaizka wrote: that commercial is so good, now I want an msi Is MSI owned by someone? Or just an independent company? Never heard of them. | ||
|
SmoKim
Denmark10305 Posts
I believe in Slush! | ||
|
javy_
United States1677 Posts
On October 31 2010 08:45 Adila wrote: Add in the fact he's so aggressive with his army placement too. Lz really took advantage of that with drops in game 3 and helions in game 4. No Sensor Towers, no spotters, and no planetary fortresses means he has to get lucky to catch a drop in time to stop the major damage. Exactly. I don't understand why he wanted so many orbital commands. It's not as if he was able to keep his money so low with all of those mules. If he had some planetary fortresses, he wouldn't have to pull his army back to defend his base so many times due to a small drop | ||
|
javy_
United States1677 Posts
On October 31 2010 08:49 starcraft2leverage wrote: Is MSI owned by someone? Or just an independent company? Never heard of them. they are a big motherboard and video card manufacture but are relatively new in the notebook market | ||
|
MLG.Shrew
United States79 Posts
After That: Slush/Kiwi vs. Spades | ||
|
Goshawk.
United Kingdom5338 Posts
| ||
|
SmoKim
Denmark10305 Posts
| ||
|
Bear4188
United States1797 Posts
| ||
|
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
On October 31 2010 08:59 Goshawk. wrote: Slush takes g1, kinda fail timing push from kiwi imo. I'm a huge kiwi fan, but this strategy is...well....let's just say I don't like it at all; dunno why day9 thought it was brilliant, but kiwi just went +1 mainly-zealots vs almost pure roach, no way this can work if slush plays standard (meaning no idra-esque super hard droning + teching) | ||
|
mierin
United States4943 Posts
| ||
| ||
