• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 10:26
CET 16:26
KST 00:26
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)15Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7[BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 103SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-1833
StarCraft 2
General
SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Stellar Fest "01" Jersey Charity Auction Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets When will we find out if there are more tournament SC2 Spotted on the EWC 2026 list?
Tourneys
OSC Season 13 World Championship SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Potential Map Candidates How Rain Became ProGamer in Just 3 Months BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! Beyond All Reason Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
Innova Crysta on Hire
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Physical Exercise (HIIT) Bef…
TrAiDoS
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1216 users

Work In Progress Melee Maps - Page 96

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 94 95 96 97 98 217 Next
Keep our forum clean! PLEASE post your WIP melee maps in this thread for initial feedback. -Barrin
iamcaustic
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada1509 Posts
January 03 2014 18:31 GMT
#1901
On January 03 2014 12:55 moskonia wrote:
3v3, bottom vs top:

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Mains are bases with CC's. 2v1 and 1v2. a path can be open via the middle gold, the gas on each side is rich.

omfg... I feel bad for the two dudes that get stuck playing a 1v2 match. x_x
Twitter: @iamcaustic
ConCentrate405
Profile Joined November 2013
Brazil71 Posts
January 03 2014 20:10 GMT
#1902
Made some changes in layout, put some trees and messed with the lightning.
[image loading]
The upper left side has a lot more of choke points than the botton right, and also high ground behind the mineral lines, maybe this can force players from different races to expand in opposite directions.
I'm considering in making the 6 o'clock low ground expo a more open, maybe no obstacle between it and the bridge. This would highlight the differrence in taking this 3rd as zerg and not the other, that would be better for protoss or terran. Any suggestions.
I look like someone's uncle after a hard life
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
January 03 2014 20:49 GMT
#1903
On January 04 2014 03:19 moskonia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 04 2014 02:47 RFDaemoniac wrote:
I really like the idea of coming up with a 2v1 map concept that is win-able for the 1. Seems like a good way to practice making intensely defensive terrain. Dunno if it's possible though.

Maybe if we were to really explore this option you could have a gold or semi gold in-base expo for the 1 player, maybe with a layout similar to Altarzim Stronghold, while the 2 players have very far expansions with even more things like the cliff behind the natural.

You have to be careful about terran floating when you have a gold close to the main. IMO just make the main gold, though.
all's fair in love and melodies
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
January 03 2014 22:26 GMT
#1904
I like the idea of the 2-player team sort of being able to help the one, like have a cliff that they can cover that would help protect a third, but for the most part it being separate.
moskonia
Profile Joined January 2011
Israel1448 Posts
January 03 2014 22:26 GMT
#1905
On January 04 2014 05:49 Gfire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 04 2014 03:19 moskonia wrote:
On January 04 2014 02:47 RFDaemoniac wrote:
I really like the idea of coming up with a 2v1 map concept that is win-able for the 1. Seems like a good way to practice making intensely defensive terrain. Dunno if it's possible though.

Maybe if we were to really explore this option you could have a gold or semi gold in-base expo for the 1 player, maybe with a layout similar to Altarzim Stronghold, while the 2 players have very far expansions with even more things like the cliff behind the natural.

You have to be careful about terran floating when you have a gold close to the main. IMO just make the main gold, though.

That sounds very interesting, maybe even remove the whole 3v3 aspect and just make it a 1v2 map, with vast advantages for the 1 player like having some or all of the main minerals as gold and having much easier expansions, it still might be very hard to balance it out, but would be very interesting. The 3v3 format does help it so that you don't have to have ridiculous advantages for the 1 player, but both should make for cool games.
The_Templar
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
your Country52797 Posts
January 04 2014 14:41 GMT
#1906
[image loading]

160x160
Main is wall-able with two 3x3 and one 2x2 building.
Moderatorshe/her
TL+ Member
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
January 07 2014 11:58 GMT
#1907
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

@mosk with the 2v1 vs 2v1 map, that seems horrible in a lot of situations. For example, if a 2v1 spawns as triple zerg, that single player is just done for, there's nothing they can do. They should have collapsible rocks on their ramp, and an in-base expansion, minimum. Maybe even a gold base. Interesting concept, but I'd also point out that 2v1 dynamics happen in 3v3 anyway. If the idea is that people use air units to harass or lend some weight in a fight, that is a normal thing for how 3v3 games go so it's kind of weird to enforce it so strictly. But of course it would be different like this, and I'd love to see how it works if you can iron out obvious problems in the various 2v1 scenarios.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
The_Templar
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
your Country52797 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-07 15:39:27
January 07 2014 15:38 GMT
#1908
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.
Moderatorshe/her
TL+ Member
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
January 08 2014 00:31 GMT
#1909
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.

I don't dislike it, just not convinced it's necessary. Although having a bit more vulnerability with an inbase exp might be good.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
skdeimos
Profile Joined May 2013
Canada155 Posts
January 08 2014 05:58 GMT
#1910
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?
The_Templar
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
your Country52797 Posts
January 08 2014 16:27 GMT
#1911
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.
Moderatorshe/her
TL+ Member
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
January 10 2014 03:24 GMT
#1912
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

That's an axiom that's not always true, though it does make you sound like a Vulcan. Doing stuff for the hell of it is a world all its own sometimes.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
skdeimos
Profile Joined May 2013
Canada155 Posts
January 10 2014 03:45 GMT
#1913
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
January 10 2014 03:53 GMT
#1914
On January 10 2014 12:45 skdeimos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Daedalus_Point

I beg to differ.
vibeo gane,
iamcaustic
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada1509 Posts
January 10 2014 07:01 GMT
#1915
On January 10 2014 12:53 -NegativeZero- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 10 2014 12:45 skdeimos wrote:
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Daedalus_Point

I beg to differ.

I have to admit, this post gave me a good laugh. To be fair, though, I'm not sure if it's possible to make worse competitive maps than the folks at Blizzard. It's a historical weakness of theirs, stretching back well before SC2.
Twitter: @iamcaustic
skdeimos
Profile Joined May 2013
Canada155 Posts
January 10 2014 08:14 GMT
#1916
On January 10 2014 12:53 -NegativeZero- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 10 2014 12:45 skdeimos wrote:
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Daedalus_Point

I beg to differ.


Huh. Fair enough.
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
January 10 2014 20:47 GMT
#1917
On January 10 2014 17:14 skdeimos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 10 2014 12:53 -NegativeZero- wrote:
On January 10 2014 12:45 skdeimos wrote:
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Daedalus_Point

I beg to differ.


Huh. Fair enough.

That, and your argument sorta boiled down to he's just not a good mapmaker. True or not, at that point you just leave it be. It's weird, and kinda douchey, to argue that someone's a bad mapmaker, when you can just give advice instead.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
January 10 2014 21:32 GMT
#1918
On January 11 2014 05:47 NewSunshine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 10 2014 17:14 skdeimos wrote:
On January 10 2014 12:53 -NegativeZero- wrote:
On January 10 2014 12:45 skdeimos wrote:
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Daedalus_Point

I beg to differ.


Huh. Fair enough.

That, and your argument sorta boiled down to he's just not a good mapmaker. True or not, at that point you just leave it be. It's weird, and kinda douchey, to argue that someone's a bad mapmaker, when you can just give advice instead.

AKA, at least you have to say why so that people can learn, and if you can't say why then you don't have a point. (This is meant from the point of view of discussion, not ad hominem.) Re: the main entrance, it makes some sense as an extra vulnerability for a map with an in-base expansion that also offers highground covering part of the main entrance, but it causes problems in certain cases like ZvZ where you can't block "the ramp" with 2 queens anymore, stuff like that.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Aircooled
Profile Joined July 2012
United States79 Posts
January 10 2014 22:52 GMT
#1919
Haha let's get this thread back on point.
[image loading]
144x144
Been trying to make a layout like this work for a while off and on, and on these bounds. It could use a bit more airspace ofc. Should I make the middle bases gold?
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
January 10 2014 23:48 GMT
#1920
Really not a fan of the positional differences. One 3rd is cliffable and the other is tucked against the side of the map. What is the strongest part of the concept that you are trying to promote? Also it's just so big and open, feels like a less interesting entombed valley, which is saying something. =\
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Prev 1 94 95 96 97 98 217 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
12:00
Season 13 World Championship
YoungYakov vs BabymarineLIVE!
SKillous vs NightMare
WardiTV1170
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko575
LamboSC2 141
BRAT_OK 77
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 31802
Shuttle 1933
Calm 1880
EffOrt 964
Soma 608
Larva 605
Stork 470
BeSt 343
firebathero 260
Rush 241
[ Show more ]
hero 185
Hyun 98
Mong 85
Barracks 71
Sea.KH 67
Leta 46
Yoon 35
Terrorterran 22
Free 21
ivOry 20
910 18
HiyA 17
GoRush 16
yabsab 14
Rock 13
scan(afreeca) 12
Bale 11
Sacsri 8
Shine 8
Dota 2
syndereN344
420jenkins91
Counter-Strike
fl0m1588
kennyS528
markeloff123
Other Games
B2W.Neo1382
Liquid`RaSZi898
DeMusliM420
crisheroes365
Happy300
QueenE104
KnowMe95
Liquid`VortiX74
Mew2King60
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2423
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 8
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos3580
• TFBlade829
Upcoming Events
All-Star Invitational
10h 49m
INnoVation vs soO
Serral vs herO
Cure vs Solar
sOs vs Scarlett
Classic vs Clem
Reynor vs Maru
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
20h 34m
AI Arena Tournament
1d 4h
All-Star Invitational
1d 10h
MMA vs DongRaeGu
Rogue vs Oliveira
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 18h
OSC
1d 20h
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-14
Big Gabe Cup #3
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W5
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Rongyi Cup S3
SC2 All-Star Inv. 2025
Nations Cup 2026
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.