• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:15
CEST 12:15
KST 19:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt2: All Star10Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists16[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow9[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0
Community News
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers14Maestros of the Game 2 announced82026 GSL Tour plans announced14Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail1MaNa leaves Team Liquid24
StarCraft 2
General
Maestros of the Game 2 announced Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists MaNa leaves Team Liquid 2026 GSL Tour plans announced Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool
Tourneys
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 522 Flip My Base The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 521 Memorable Boss Mutation # 520 Moving Fees
Brood War
General
Pros React To: ASL S21, Ro.16 Group C ASL21 General Discussion Data needed BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [TOOL] Starcraft Chat Translator
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro16 Group C [ASL21] Ro16 Group D [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro16 Group B
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Diablo IV Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Best Vape & Smoke Shop in Rendon, Mansfield Area Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Sexual Health Of Gamers
TrAiDoS
lurker extra damage testi…
StaticNine
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1579 users

Work In Progress Melee Maps - Page 96

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 94 95 96 97 98 217 Next
Keep our forum clean! PLEASE post your WIP melee maps in this thread for initial feedback. -Barrin
iamcaustic
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada1509 Posts
January 03 2014 18:31 GMT
#1901
On January 03 2014 12:55 moskonia wrote:
3v3, bottom vs top:

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Mains are bases with CC's. 2v1 and 1v2. a path can be open via the middle gold, the gas on each side is rich.

omfg... I feel bad for the two dudes that get stuck playing a 1v2 match. x_x
Twitter: @iamcaustic
ConCentrate405
Profile Joined November 2013
Brazil71 Posts
January 03 2014 20:10 GMT
#1902
Made some changes in layout, put some trees and messed with the lightning.
[image loading]
The upper left side has a lot more of choke points than the botton right, and also high ground behind the mineral lines, maybe this can force players from different races to expand in opposite directions.
I'm considering in making the 6 o'clock low ground expo a more open, maybe no obstacle between it and the bridge. This would highlight the differrence in taking this 3rd as zerg and not the other, that would be better for protoss or terran. Any suggestions.
I look like someone's uncle after a hard life
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
January 03 2014 20:49 GMT
#1903
On January 04 2014 03:19 moskonia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 04 2014 02:47 RFDaemoniac wrote:
I really like the idea of coming up with a 2v1 map concept that is win-able for the 1. Seems like a good way to practice making intensely defensive terrain. Dunno if it's possible though.

Maybe if we were to really explore this option you could have a gold or semi gold in-base expo for the 1 player, maybe with a layout similar to Altarzim Stronghold, while the 2 players have very far expansions with even more things like the cliff behind the natural.

You have to be careful about terran floating when you have a gold close to the main. IMO just make the main gold, though.
all's fair in love and melodies
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
January 03 2014 22:26 GMT
#1904
I like the idea of the 2-player team sort of being able to help the one, like have a cliff that they can cover that would help protect a third, but for the most part it being separate.
moskonia
Profile Joined January 2011
Israel1448 Posts
January 03 2014 22:26 GMT
#1905
On January 04 2014 05:49 Gfire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 04 2014 03:19 moskonia wrote:
On January 04 2014 02:47 RFDaemoniac wrote:
I really like the idea of coming up with a 2v1 map concept that is win-able for the 1. Seems like a good way to practice making intensely defensive terrain. Dunno if it's possible though.

Maybe if we were to really explore this option you could have a gold or semi gold in-base expo for the 1 player, maybe with a layout similar to Altarzim Stronghold, while the 2 players have very far expansions with even more things like the cliff behind the natural.

You have to be careful about terran floating when you have a gold close to the main. IMO just make the main gold, though.

That sounds very interesting, maybe even remove the whole 3v3 aspect and just make it a 1v2 map, with vast advantages for the 1 player like having some or all of the main minerals as gold and having much easier expansions, it still might be very hard to balance it out, but would be very interesting. The 3v3 format does help it so that you don't have to have ridiculous advantages for the 1 player, but both should make for cool games.
The_Templar
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
your Country52797 Posts
January 04 2014 14:41 GMT
#1906
&#91;image loading&#93;

160x160
Main is wall-able with two 3x3 and one 2x2 building.
Moderatorshe/her
TL+ Member
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
January 07 2014 11:58 GMT
#1907
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

@mosk with the 2v1 vs 2v1 map, that seems horrible in a lot of situations. For example, if a 2v1 spawns as triple zerg, that single player is just done for, there's nothing they can do. They should have collapsible rocks on their ramp, and an in-base expansion, minimum. Maybe even a gold base. Interesting concept, but I'd also point out that 2v1 dynamics happen in 3v3 anyway. If the idea is that people use air units to harass or lend some weight in a fight, that is a normal thing for how 3v3 games go so it's kind of weird to enforce it so strictly. But of course it would be different like this, and I'd love to see how it works if you can iron out obvious problems in the various 2v1 scenarios.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
The_Templar
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
your Country52797 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-07 15:39:27
January 07 2014 15:38 GMT
#1908
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.
Moderatorshe/her
TL+ Member
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
January 08 2014 00:31 GMT
#1909
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.

I don't dislike it, just not convinced it's necessary. Although having a bit more vulnerability with an inbase exp might be good.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
skdeimos
Profile Joined May 2013
Canada155 Posts
January 08 2014 05:58 GMT
#1910
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?
The_Templar
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
your Country52797 Posts
January 08 2014 16:27 GMT
#1911
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.
Moderatorshe/her
TL+ Member
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
January 10 2014 03:24 GMT
#1912
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

That's an axiom that's not always true, though it does make you sound like a Vulcan. Doing stuff for the hell of it is a world all its own sometimes.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
skdeimos
Profile Joined May 2013
Canada155 Posts
January 10 2014 03:45 GMT
#1913
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
January 10 2014 03:53 GMT
#1914
On January 10 2014 12:45 skdeimos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Daedalus_Point

I beg to differ.
vibeo gane,
iamcaustic
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada1509 Posts
January 10 2014 07:01 GMT
#1915
On January 10 2014 12:53 -NegativeZero- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 10 2014 12:45 skdeimos wrote:
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Daedalus_Point

I beg to differ.

I have to admit, this post gave me a good laugh. To be fair, though, I'm not sure if it's possible to make worse competitive maps than the folks at Blizzard. It's a historical weakness of theirs, stretching back well before SC2.
Twitter: @iamcaustic
skdeimos
Profile Joined May 2013
Canada155 Posts
January 10 2014 08:14 GMT
#1916
On January 10 2014 12:53 -NegativeZero- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 10 2014 12:45 skdeimos wrote:
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Daedalus_Point

I beg to differ.


Huh. Fair enough.
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
January 10 2014 20:47 GMT
#1917
On January 10 2014 17:14 skdeimos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 10 2014 12:53 -NegativeZero- wrote:
On January 10 2014 12:45 skdeimos wrote:
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Daedalus_Point

I beg to differ.


Huh. Fair enough.

That, and your argument sorta boiled down to he's just not a good mapmaker. True or not, at that point you just leave it be. It's weird, and kinda douchey, to argue that someone's a bad mapmaker, when you can just give advice instead.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
January 10 2014 21:32 GMT
#1918
On January 11 2014 05:47 NewSunshine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 10 2014 17:14 skdeimos wrote:
On January 10 2014 12:53 -NegativeZero- wrote:
On January 10 2014 12:45 skdeimos wrote:
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Daedalus_Point

I beg to differ.


Huh. Fair enough.

That, and your argument sorta boiled down to he's just not a good mapmaker. True or not, at that point you just leave it be. It's weird, and kinda douchey, to argue that someone's a bad mapmaker, when you can just give advice instead.

AKA, at least you have to say why so that people can learn, and if you can't say why then you don't have a point. (This is meant from the point of view of discussion, not ad hominem.) Re: the main entrance, it makes some sense as an extra vulnerability for a map with an in-base expansion that also offers highground covering part of the main entrance, but it causes problems in certain cases like ZvZ where you can't block "the ramp" with 2 queens anymore, stuff like that.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Aircooled
Profile Joined July 2012
United States79 Posts
January 10 2014 22:52 GMT
#1919
Haha let's get this thread back on point.
[image loading]
144x144
Been trying to make a layout like this work for a while off and on, and on these bounds. It could use a bit more airspace ofc. Should I make the middle bases gold?
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
January 10 2014 23:48 GMT
#1920
Really not a fan of the positional differences. One 3rd is cliffable and the other is tucked against the side of the map. What is the strongest part of the concept that you are trying to promote? Also it's just so big and open, feels like a less interesting entombed valley, which is saying something. =\
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Prev 1 94 95 96 97 98 217 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
KCM Race Survival
10:00
Week 2
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 503
LiquipediaDiscussion
The PondCast
10:00
Episode 91
CranKy Ducklings18
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 176
SortOf 85
BRAT_OK 19
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 6926
Hyuk 6784
Sea 1678
Jaedong 1037
BeSt 312
Zeus 209
Stork 171
Pusan 123
Dewaltoss 116
Leta 102
[ Show more ]
ZerO 100
ToSsGirL 96
Aegong 78
Backho 74
Larva 61
Soulkey 57
Sharp 33
910 32
Last 27
scan(afreeca) 21
SilentControl 21
[sc1f]eonzerg 19
JulyZerg 18
Barracks 17
sorry 11
zelot 10
GoRush 8
Terrorterran 5
Light 0
Dota 2
XaKoH 505
XcaliburYe143
NeuroSwarm96
League of Legends
JimRising 417
KnowMe51
Counter-Strike
olofmeister2744
shoxiejesuss1135
allub265
x6flipin87
edward76
markeloff15
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King140
Other Games
singsing1578
ceh9642
crisheroes117
Livibee27
Trikslyr18
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream12280
Other Games
gamesdonequick681
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP3
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos870
• TFBlade748
• Stunt567
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
45m
Gerald vs herO
Clem vs Cure
ByuN vs Solar
Rogue vs MaxPax
ShoWTimE vs TBD
OSC
4h 45m
CranKy Ducklings
13h 45m
Escore
23h 45m
RSL Revival
1d 6h
Replay Cast
1d 13h
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
2 days
Universe Titan Cup
2 days
Rogue vs Percival
Ladder Legends
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
3 days
Ladder Legends
3 days
BSL
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Soma vs hero
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Leta vs YSC
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-04-22
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W4
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.