• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:15
CEST 20:15
KST 03:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection5Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview5[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview2
Community News
[BSL22] Non-Korean Championship from 13 to 28 June2Weekly Cups (May 25-31): Clem doubles, 2v2 circuit heads toward finale0StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th151Weekly Cups (May 18-24): MaxPax wins doubles0Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League6
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview TL Poll: How do you feel about the 5.0.16 PTR balance changes? What kind of tool would you be interested in? Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament GSL Code S Season 2 (2026) WardiTV Mondays Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 529 Opportunities Unleashed Mutation # 528 Infection Detected Welcome to the External Content forum
Brood War
General
25 Years Since Brood War Patch 1.08 FlaSh's ASL S21 Finals Review BW animated web series: seeking contributors BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [BSL22] Non-Korean Championship from 13 to 28 June
Tourneys
[BSL22] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CEST [ASL21] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Why doesn't anyone use restoration? Any training maps people recommend? Muta micro map competition [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction
Other Games
General Games
ZeroSpace Megathread Summer Games Done Quick 2026! Nintendo Switch Thread The Perfect Game Path of Exile
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
Esportsmanship: How to NOT B…
TrAiDoS
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6600 users

Work In Progress Melee Maps - Page 96

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 94 95 96 97 98 217 Next
Keep our forum clean! PLEASE post your WIP melee maps in this thread for initial feedback. -Barrin
iamcaustic
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada1509 Posts
January 03 2014 18:31 GMT
#1901
On January 03 2014 12:55 moskonia wrote:
3v3, bottom vs top:

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Mains are bases with CC's. 2v1 and 1v2. a path can be open via the middle gold, the gas on each side is rich.

omfg... I feel bad for the two dudes that get stuck playing a 1v2 match. x_x
Twitter: @iamcaustic
ConCentrate405
Profile Joined November 2013
Brazil71 Posts
January 03 2014 20:10 GMT
#1902
Made some changes in layout, put some trees and messed with the lightning.
[image loading]
The upper left side has a lot more of choke points than the botton right, and also high ground behind the mineral lines, maybe this can force players from different races to expand in opposite directions.
I'm considering in making the 6 o'clock low ground expo a more open, maybe no obstacle between it and the bridge. This would highlight the differrence in taking this 3rd as zerg and not the other, that would be better for protoss or terran. Any suggestions.
I look like someone's uncle after a hard life
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
January 03 2014 20:49 GMT
#1903
On January 04 2014 03:19 moskonia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 04 2014 02:47 RFDaemoniac wrote:
I really like the idea of coming up with a 2v1 map concept that is win-able for the 1. Seems like a good way to practice making intensely defensive terrain. Dunno if it's possible though.

Maybe if we were to really explore this option you could have a gold or semi gold in-base expo for the 1 player, maybe with a layout similar to Altarzim Stronghold, while the 2 players have very far expansions with even more things like the cliff behind the natural.

You have to be careful about terran floating when you have a gold close to the main. IMO just make the main gold, though.
all's fair in love and melodies
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
January 03 2014 22:26 GMT
#1904
I like the idea of the 2-player team sort of being able to help the one, like have a cliff that they can cover that would help protect a third, but for the most part it being separate.
moskonia
Profile Joined January 2011
Israel1448 Posts
January 03 2014 22:26 GMT
#1905
On January 04 2014 05:49 Gfire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 04 2014 03:19 moskonia wrote:
On January 04 2014 02:47 RFDaemoniac wrote:
I really like the idea of coming up with a 2v1 map concept that is win-able for the 1. Seems like a good way to practice making intensely defensive terrain. Dunno if it's possible though.

Maybe if we were to really explore this option you could have a gold or semi gold in-base expo for the 1 player, maybe with a layout similar to Altarzim Stronghold, while the 2 players have very far expansions with even more things like the cliff behind the natural.

You have to be careful about terran floating when you have a gold close to the main. IMO just make the main gold, though.

That sounds very interesting, maybe even remove the whole 3v3 aspect and just make it a 1v2 map, with vast advantages for the 1 player like having some or all of the main minerals as gold and having much easier expansions, it still might be very hard to balance it out, but would be very interesting. The 3v3 format does help it so that you don't have to have ridiculous advantages for the 1 player, but both should make for cool games.
The_Templar
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
your Country52798 Posts
January 04 2014 14:41 GMT
#1906
&#91;image loading&#93;

160x160
Main is wall-able with two 3x3 and one 2x2 building.
ModeratorI am still alive, somehow
TL+ Member
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
January 07 2014 11:58 GMT
#1907
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

@mosk with the 2v1 vs 2v1 map, that seems horrible in a lot of situations. For example, if a 2v1 spawns as triple zerg, that single player is just done for, there's nothing they can do. They should have collapsible rocks on their ramp, and an in-base expansion, minimum. Maybe even a gold base. Interesting concept, but I'd also point out that 2v1 dynamics happen in 3v3 anyway. If the idea is that people use air units to harass or lend some weight in a fight, that is a normal thing for how 3v3 games go so it's kind of weird to enforce it so strictly. But of course it would be different like this, and I'd love to see how it works if you can iron out obvious problems in the various 2v1 scenarios.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
The_Templar
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
your Country52798 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-07 15:39:27
January 07 2014 15:38 GMT
#1908
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.
ModeratorI am still alive, somehow
TL+ Member
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
January 08 2014 00:31 GMT
#1909
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.

I don't dislike it, just not convinced it's necessary. Although having a bit more vulnerability with an inbase exp might be good.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
skdeimos
Profile Joined May 2013
Canada155 Posts
January 08 2014 05:58 GMT
#1910
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?
The_Templar
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
your Country52798 Posts
January 08 2014 16:27 GMT
#1911
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.
ModeratorI am still alive, somehow
TL+ Member
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
January 10 2014 03:24 GMT
#1912
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

That's an axiom that's not always true, though it does make you sound like a Vulcan. Doing stuff for the hell of it is a world all its own sometimes.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
skdeimos
Profile Joined May 2013
Canada155 Posts
January 10 2014 03:45 GMT
#1913
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
January 10 2014 03:53 GMT
#1914
On January 10 2014 12:45 skdeimos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Daedalus_Point

I beg to differ.
vibeo gane,
iamcaustic
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada1509 Posts
January 10 2014 07:01 GMT
#1915
On January 10 2014 12:53 -NegativeZero- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 10 2014 12:45 skdeimos wrote:
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Daedalus_Point

I beg to differ.

I have to admit, this post gave me a good laugh. To be fair, though, I'm not sure if it's possible to make worse competitive maps than the folks at Blizzard. It's a historical weakness of theirs, stretching back well before SC2.
Twitter: @iamcaustic
skdeimos
Profile Joined May 2013
Canada155 Posts
January 10 2014 08:14 GMT
#1916
On January 10 2014 12:53 -NegativeZero- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 10 2014 12:45 skdeimos wrote:
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Daedalus_Point

I beg to differ.


Huh. Fair enough.
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
January 10 2014 20:47 GMT
#1917
On January 10 2014 17:14 skdeimos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 10 2014 12:53 -NegativeZero- wrote:
On January 10 2014 12:45 skdeimos wrote:
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Daedalus_Point

I beg to differ.


Huh. Fair enough.

That, and your argument sorta boiled down to he's just not a good mapmaker. True or not, at that point you just leave it be. It's weird, and kinda douchey, to argue that someone's a bad mapmaker, when you can just give advice instead.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
January 10 2014 21:32 GMT
#1918
On January 11 2014 05:47 NewSunshine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 10 2014 17:14 skdeimos wrote:
On January 10 2014 12:53 -NegativeZero- wrote:
On January 10 2014 12:45 skdeimos wrote:
On January 09 2014 01:27 The_Templar wrote:
On January 08 2014 14:58 skdeimos wrote:
On January 08 2014 00:38 The_Templar wrote:
On January 07 2014 20:58 EatThePath wrote:
^ A very templar-esque map and easily one of the best you've ever posted here. I love the ramp angles and the preponderance of bases on cliff edges. Not sure the main entrance needs to be weird with a hole but eh, the rush distance is long enough for it to be okay imo. I like how the inside nat is very vulnerable and the outside nat is very doable but neither feels like a "free base" due to the cliff and air vulnerabilities.

The main entrance is basically one of those things I just do for no particular reason, haha. Might change it to one entrance if enough people dislike it.


Why do you do things for no particular reason? You should do things that make sense and have been thought through. If you don't have a good reason to do it, then why are you doing it?

If I did stuff that was thought through I would be making maps that were similar to those currently played, except worse.


But now you're making maps that are different that maps that are currently played, and they're still worse.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Daedalus_Point

I beg to differ.


Huh. Fair enough.

That, and your argument sorta boiled down to he's just not a good mapmaker. True or not, at that point you just leave it be. It's weird, and kinda douchey, to argue that someone's a bad mapmaker, when you can just give advice instead.

AKA, at least you have to say why so that people can learn, and if you can't say why then you don't have a point. (This is meant from the point of view of discussion, not ad hominem.) Re: the main entrance, it makes some sense as an extra vulnerability for a map with an in-base expansion that also offers highground covering part of the main entrance, but it causes problems in certain cases like ZvZ where you can't block "the ramp" with 2 queens anymore, stuff like that.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Aircooled
Profile Joined July 2012
United States79 Posts
January 10 2014 22:52 GMT
#1919
Haha let's get this thread back on point.
[image loading]
144x144
Been trying to make a layout like this work for a while off and on, and on these bounds. It could use a bit more airspace ofc. Should I make the middle bases gold?
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
January 10 2014 23:48 GMT
#1920
Really not a fan of the positional differences. One 3rd is cliffable and the other is tucked against the side of the map. What is the strongest part of the concept that you are trying to promote? Also it's just so big and open, feels like a less interesting entombed valley, which is saying something. =\
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Prev 1 94 95 96 97 98 217 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 45m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 374
ProTech122
BRAT_OK 98
trigger 97
mouzStarbuck 52
JuggernautJason25
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 2757
Mini 911
Shuttle 751
EffOrt 691
Britney 482
ggaemo 197
Soulkey 161
Rush 97
actioN 89
hero 53
[ Show more ]
Rock 25
GoRush 21
soO 10
Dota 2
qojqva3101
Fuzer 197
League of Legends
Reynor76
Counter-Strike
fl0m6838
zeus319
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu326
Other Games
gofns41433
tarik_tv11627
Grubby1993
FrodaN968
uThermal307
byalli301
C9.Mang0140
QueenE139
RotterdaM137
Mew2King74
Trikslyr57
CosmosSc2 22
MindelVK7
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV228
StarCraft 2
angryscii 12
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 22
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota247
Other Games
• imaqtpie683
• WagamamaTV667
• Shiphtur181
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
5h 45m
Replay Cast
14h 45m
Kung Fu Cup
16h 45m
Maestros of the Game
20h 45m
Classic vs Lambo
Clem vs Maru
Replay Cast
1d 5h
The PondCast
1d 15h
Maestros of the Game
1d 20h
Serral vs Rogue
herO vs SHIN
OSC
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Maestros of the Game
2 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
OSC
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 22
2026 GSL S2
Heroes Pulsing #1

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
Acropolis #4 - GSB
SCTL 2026 Spring
WardiTV Spring 2026
Maestros of the Game 2
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Murky Cup 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026

Upcoming

BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Douyu Cup 2026
Heroes Pulsing #3
Heroes Pulsing #2
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.