• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:37
CEST 20:37
KST 03:37
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou18Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four3BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET7Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)81
StarCraft 2
General
RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou The New Patch Killed Mech! 5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)
Tourneys
Tenacious Turtle Tussle RSL Season 3 Qualifier Links and Dates $1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st) SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 INu's Battles #13 - ByuN vs Zoun
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers
Brood War
General
Is there anyway to get a private coach? SnOw's Awful Building Placements vs barracks BW General Discussion BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL20] Semifinal B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues 300$ 3D!Community Brood War Super Cup #4 Azhi's Colosseum - Anonymous Tournament
Strategy
Roaring Currents ASL final Current Meta BW - ajfirecracker Strategy & Training [I] Funny Protoss Builds/Strategies
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Chess Thread Men's Fashion Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Benefits Of Limited Comm…
TrAiDoS
Sabrina was soooo lame on S…
Peanutsc
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Certified Crazy
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1963 users

[M] 6m Devolution by Barrin - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3230 Posts
March 21 2012 00:54 GMT
#21
On March 21 2012 01:44 Barrin wrote:
Mineral/Gas Counts: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


6m1g= 6 minerals, 1 gas.
6m1hyg= 6 minerals, 1 high yield gas.
This is very much just straight 1 gas. Also, much of the strategy of SC2 is built around the principle of how many gas geysers you get at what time, since this produces more options for managing economies, and thus, more varied and diverse gameplay options. With 1 gas per base, every race is pretty much constantly starved for gas, resulting in much less interesting gameplay. And with 1 high yield gas per base, there's pretty much a choice between gasless play and very gas-heavy play, since the middle options have been removed. More options = more interesting gameplay, which is why 2g was put in the game in the first place.
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
RumbleBadger
Profile Joined July 2011
322 Posts
March 21 2012 01:10 GMT
#22
On March 21 2012 09:20 -NegativeZero- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2012 09:04 ChristianS wrote:
I thought you were advocating for 6m/2g? 8m may be replaceable in Starcraft II, but 2g is essential to pretty much everything in the development of SCII up to this point. And honestly, 2g generates a lot of interesting strategy that wasn't present in brood war. In your other article you were advocating for 7m/2g shifting towards 6m/2g to reduce the suddenness of transition, and I'm all in favor, but a sudden jump to 6m/1g just won't happen (and maybe shouldn't). Pro players won't do such a drastic change just to play in tournaments that won't switch to them, and tournaments won't switch and alienate all their players that practiced for 8m/2g. A tournament might consider announcing 7m/2g beforehand and then playing on it (a 12.5% reduction in minerals), maybe transitioning to 6m/2g later (a 25% reduction in minerals), but I don't see any transition to 1g (a 50% reduction in gas!) in the near future.

tl;dr:
IMHO, 7m2g and/or 6m2g are both a viable change in the future and a good change in the future. 7m1g or 6m1g are both not viable and not necessarily good for the game. All the same, good luck to you, Barrin, as I'm certain you know more about map-making than me.


I'm pretty sure on the 1g maps it's a high yield gas (6 gas per trip), creating a 25% reduction in gas which is exactly proportional to the removal of 2 mineral patches.

This is true. ^

I will say though that right now there is a lot more flexibility with the 2 gas set up, like stretching out gas income by only taking one at a time or taking gases at different times to suit build orders neatly. I think though people will just have to get used to counting how many drones they put in gas (2 or 1) if they want to fine tune their gas income. Overall I'm just really interested in how this style of mapping will affect gameplay. I'll have to watch some of those handy replays there...
Games before dames.
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
March 21 2012 03:45 GMT
#23
On March 21 2012 09:54 ChristianS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2012 01:44 Barrin wrote:
Mineral/Gas Counts: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


6m1g= 6 minerals, 1 gas.
6m1hyg= 6 minerals, 1 high yield gas.
This is very much just straight 1 gas. Also, much of the strategy of SC2 is built around the principle of how many gas geysers you get at what time, since this produces more options for managing economies, and thus, more varied and diverse gameplay options. With 1 gas per base, every race is pretty much constantly starved for gas, resulting in much less interesting gameplay. And with 1 high yield gas per base, there's pretty much a choice between gasless play and very gas-heavy play, since the middle options have been removed. More options = more interesting gameplay, which is why 2g was put in the game in the first place.

lol in the very picture you quoted it specifically says gas = high yield...
vibeo gane,
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
March 21 2012 04:00 GMT
#24
--- Nuked ---
FeyFey
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany10114 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-21 04:29:59
March 21 2012 04:29 GMT
#25
oh it would be really cool if balanced for 6/2 maps would come out of this. I always had fun on 6/2 modded maps (though i switched the gas return time so 2 workers are optimal, not changing up the mineral/gas income ration but keeping the 2 geyser mechanic and reducing workers needed too). Only switched up a few Blizzard maps for personal use though.

Will be fun to play on maps build for those resources, so thanks alot for this map <3 and any future one !
HypertonicHydroponic
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
437 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-21 05:26:55
March 21 2012 04:52 GMT
#26
I just wanted to say that infestors may become partcularly formidable to the 1hyg version of this map. I will check back with a more exact build, but basically you 10 pool, 9 gas, drone back up to 10, put three on gas as soon as it pops, pop an overlord, start lair, drone up to 15 (12 on minerals), plant infestor pit, 3-5 spines (re-droning back to 12 with each one), get a queen and 3 infestors by the time the Very Hard AI pops it's attack with any race. This pretty using destiny's "fungal field" you can pretty much wipe up this initial attack force and expand at will. Again, this is just messing around with funky timings with AI so it might not matter against another player, but it seems like the really fast infestors are not very punishable.

I think two geysers will help to fix this, but I like the idea of making them low yield as FoxyMayhem mentioned in the BoGiSC2 thread. Also, 1875 per geyser, but that's just nitpicking.

Edit: Also, archons.

[P] The Watery Archives -- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=279070
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
March 21 2012 05:09 GMT
#27
i think its too early to decide between 1hyg and 2g. i personally feel reverting to 2g is counter intuitive; i thought the original point of this all was to force more strategic gameplay into the game? i dont believe ending up with only a reduction of 160-180mineral/min/base is that much of a change from vanilla.
starleague forever
Zandar
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Netherlands1541 Posts
March 21 2012 05:41 GMT
#28
I still would like to see a 6m map with bases with 2 gas but 25% further away.
Yes that means you can put 4 drones in them and still get the same amount of gas.
But drones are costly, with fewer mineral patches, so that's an extra strategic choice, allowing more flexibility
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-21 16:10:00
March 21 2012 05:54 GMT
#29
EDIT: I felt bad for being off topic, so I moved my post to the appropriate thread here.

As for the map itself however, there isn't too much I can say about it. You can't really argue the map is too chokey, too big, etc because the game is entirely different. Thus you really just don't know what needs to be done to the map itself to suit the new gameplay until we understand it well enough. Again, great idea Barrin. Cheers!
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-21 06:22:28
March 21 2012 06:18 GMT
#30
On March 21 2012 08:41 emc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2012 07:57 EatThePath wrote:
On March 21 2012 06:46 Natespank wrote:
First impressions:

1- awesome awesome awesome


critique:
2- gas steals.

Specifically, in PvP, a protoss who gas steals and follows up with a 4 gate would be terrifying, or a terran gas stealing a protoss and then 5rax marine rushing him. The only way to defend such strategies is to use gas units.

Might be fine, just saying, it's the first thing that comes to mind for me


3 gate is the max amount of production you can do on 1 base. I'm not sure what the best response would be for a gas steal, but I have a feeling it might be expand with cannons. Really you shouldn't let it happen because it's so important.

Terran couldn't steal effectively because you can kill the scv as it builds, but it'd be worth testing as a cheese option. You should go try it out! So many things to check. ;D

Oh, and Barrin, the version of 6m1hyg Devolution up now has a doodad malfunction at the natural in the bottom left. There's a giant floating mar sara dead tree. It's spooky! And also distracting.


I'm going to gas steal every game as zerg, see how fun it is


Sounds good, I'll be FFEing.

About 1hyg vs 2g, I don't think it's possible to choose yet. If you maintain 6m, 2g skews the game a lot farther towards tech based. Part of the appeal for me thus far in 6m1hyg is that I feel like I'm still in the development stages of the game with a saturated natural base. I need a 3rd before I can start any freewheeling multi-teching. (As protoss I should say.) This does put protoss in a pinch sometimes, but maybe there are ways to adjust how you play the matchups?

I'll definitely be willing to test 6m2g as well to compare, but I don't like it on paper. If you were going that direction, I'd prefer something like 7m2g with geysers that require 3.5 harvesters to saturate, and some distance mineral patches (5 squares) that require 3 harvesters to saturate.

I can imagine an SC2 landscape with maps that vary these things somewhat freely in order to play up certain map features later in the game further out on the map, or just to adjust how the early game is played. I think it's completely reasonable to expect competitive players to know how to open off 6m1hyg, 6m2g, and 7m2g, with a natural that could be any of those as well. This style of mapping creates a higher burden of game knowledge to create balanced maps without getting lucky, but the variation it would provide would be great for spectators! And the dimension of innovation would be much more highly rewarded in a pro player, something I've always missed, coming from the competitive MTG scene.

Oh, I also wanted to mention that extra geysers covered with rocks might be a useful way to modulate potential vespene income. Of course this would be much harder to use and unelegant for the main base. The starting vespene situation is probably the most important for basic balance.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
March 21 2012 07:05 GMT
#31
On March 21 2012 14:09 a176 wrote:
i think its too early to decide between 1hyg and 2g. i personally feel reverting to 2g is counter intuitive; i thought the original point of this all was to force more strategic gameplay into the game? i dont believe ending up with only a reduction of 160-180mineral/min/base is that much of a change from vanilla.

I agree with this. Plus, wouldn't changing the ratio of minerals to gas by using 6m/2g upset the balance even more, favoring tech and gas heavy units? It seems the game is balanced heavily around the current ratio, hence the reason there aren't min only bases and other unusual arrangements. Although, this problem could be solved if the nat has 1 gas or if either the 3rd or 4th is min only.
vibeo gane,
cristo1122
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Australia505 Posts
March 21 2012 11:55 GMT
#32
so what are the changes between 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 just for interest
ZvP imbalanced blizzards solution nerf terran
Surili
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United Kingdom1141 Posts
March 21 2012 12:57 GMT
#33
On March 21 2012 13:52 HypertonicHydroponic wrote:
I just wanted to say that infestors may become partcularly formidable to the 1hyg version of this map. I will check back with a more exact build, but basically you 10 pool, 9 gas, drone back up to 10, put three on gas as soon as it pops, pop an overlord, start lair, drone up to 15 (12 on minerals), plant infestor pit, 3-5 spines (re-droning back to 12 with each one), get a queen and 3 infestors by the time the Very Hard AI pops it's attack with any race. This pretty using destiny's "fungal field" you can pretty much wipe up this initial attack force and expand at will. Again, this is just messing around with funky timings with AI so it might not matter against another player, but it seems like the really fast infestors are not very punishable.

I think two geysers will help to fix this, but I like the idea of making them low yield as FoxyMayhem mentioned in the BoGiSC2 thread. Also, 1875 per geyser, but that's just nitpicking.

Edit: Also, archons.



Personally until it is explored more i don't think we should worry about balance too much, because we have to remember that we will be playing the game WRONG. In small scale battles the way that units can be split up is completely different, units like the stalker, that are fast, heal and long ranged become SO powerful. I fear for a terran against HerO on this map, with his stalker micro...

I'd like to note that it should be mandatory for posts to finish like this:

Also, archons.
The world is ending what should we do about it?
ihasaKAROT
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4730 Posts
March 21 2012 13:19 GMT
#34
This is a very chokey map compared to your normal style Nice tho, needs some crisp paint
KCCO!
opisska
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Poland8852 Posts
March 21 2012 14:39 GMT
#35
This is finally a big reason to support FRPB - it leads to wonderful maps! SO many bases, everywhere, so much space to conquer... I know that SC2 is supposed to be and RTS, but I still like the exploration feeling from this kind of maps.
"Jeez, that's far from ideal." - Serral, the king of mild trashtalk
TL+ Member
TheFish7
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States2824 Posts
March 21 2012 15:00 GMT
#36
On March 21 2012 13:52 HypertonicHydroponic wrote:
I just wanted to say that infestors may become partcularly formidable to the 1hyg version of this map. I will check back with a more exact build, but basically you 10 pool, 9 gas, drone back up to 10, put three on gas as soon as it pops, pop an overlord, start lair, drone up to 15 (12 on minerals), plant infestor pit, 3-5 spines (re-droning back to 12 with each one), get a queen and 3 infestors by the time the Very Hard AI pops it's attack with any race. This pretty using destiny's "fungal field" you can pretty much wipe up this initial attack force and expand at will. Again, this is just messing around with funky timings with AI so it might not matter against another player, but it seems like the really fast infestors are not very punishable.

I think two geysers will help to fix this, but I like the idea of making them low yield as FoxyMayhem mentioned in the BoGiSC2 thread. Also, 1875 per geyser, but that's just nitpicking.

Edit: Also, archons.



It seems logical that infestor builds will be OP with 1hyg, but I just watched a diamond zerg who was rushing to infestors get absolutely murdered by early marine aggression from a platinum terran. The AI does not know how to build off 6 minerals, and furthermore the AI has the worst micro ever, which is more important on this kind of map so testing things vs the AI is not a good benchmark.

In general, as Barrin stated in is original post, teching is generally slowed down because you need to expand more often, and teching opens you up to getting overwhelmed by T1 units. I really dont think rushing to gas units is going to be an issue on 6m 1hyg maps, but I DO think it could be an issue on 6m2g maps because you will have an abundance of gas units some of which are countered by mineral units/buildings. of course, this is my completely untested opinion.
~ ~ <°)))><~ ~ ~
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
March 21 2012 16:13 GMT
#37
--- Nuked ---
Vul
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States685 Posts
March 21 2012 16:19 GMT
#38
On March 21 2012 15:18 EatThePath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2012 08:41 emc wrote:
On March 21 2012 07:57 EatThePath wrote:
On March 21 2012 06:46 Natespank wrote:
First impressions:

1- awesome awesome awesome


critique:
2- gas steals.

Specifically, in PvP, a protoss who gas steals and follows up with a 4 gate would be terrifying, or a terran gas stealing a protoss and then 5rax marine rushing him. The only way to defend such strategies is to use gas units.

Might be fine, just saying, it's the first thing that comes to mind for me


3 gate is the max amount of production you can do on 1 base. I'm not sure what the best response would be for a gas steal, but I have a feeling it might be expand with cannons. Really you shouldn't let it happen because it's so important.

Terran couldn't steal effectively because you can kill the scv as it builds, but it'd be worth testing as a cheese option. You should go try it out! So many things to check. ;D

Oh, and Barrin, the version of 6m1hyg Devolution up now has a doodad malfunction at the natural in the bottom left. There's a giant floating mar sara dead tree. It's spooky! And also distracting.


I'm going to gas steal every game as zerg, see how fun it is


Sounds good, I'll be FFEing.

About 1hyg vs 2g, I don't think it's possible to choose yet. If you maintain 6m, 2g skews the game a lot farther towards tech based. Part of the appeal for me thus far in 6m1hyg is that I feel like I'm still in the development stages of the game with a saturated natural base. I need a 3rd before I can start any freewheeling multi-teching. (As protoss I should say.) This does put protoss in a pinch sometimes, but maybe there are ways to adjust how you play the matchups?

I'll definitely be willing to test 6m2g as well to compare, but I don't like it on paper. If you were going that direction, I'd prefer something like 7m2g with geysers that require 3.5 harvesters to saturate, and some distance mineral patches (5 squares) that require 3 harvesters to saturate.

I can imagine an SC2 landscape with maps that vary these things somewhat freely in order to play up certain map features later in the game further out on the map, or just to adjust how the early game is played. I think it's completely reasonable to expect competitive players to know how to open off 6m1hyg, 6m2g, and 7m2g, with a natural that could be any of those as well. This style of mapping creates a higher burden of game knowledge to create balanced maps without getting lucky, but the variation it would provide would be great for spectators! And the dimension of innovation would be much more highly rewarded in a pro player, something I've always missed, coming from the competitive MTG scene.

Oh, I also wanted to mention that extra geysers covered with rocks might be a useful way to modulate potential vespene income. Of course this would be much harder to use and unelegant for the main base. The starting vespene situation is probably the most important for basic balance.


Even if you FFE gas steal will be pretty powerful if you only have one gas geyser. It would take a hell of a lot longer for you to get your cyber core out with no increase in cost to me (still only 25 minerals and Zerg is going to FE too, btw).

That said, my concern is that these changes also make inject larva much less powerful throughout the early and mid game because you wouldn't be able to use all of that larva anyway. Inject larva might not stack up very well to chronoboost and MULE.
tjosan
Profile Joined January 2010
Sweden120 Posts
March 21 2012 17:05 GMT
#39
On March 22 2012 01:19 Vul wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2012 15:18 EatThePath wrote:
On March 21 2012 08:41 emc wrote:
On March 21 2012 07:57 EatThePath wrote:
On March 21 2012 06:46 Natespank wrote:
First impressions:

1- awesome awesome awesome


critique:
2- gas steals.

Specifically, in PvP, a protoss who gas steals and follows up with a 4 gate would be terrifying, or a terran gas stealing a protoss and then 5rax marine rushing him. The only way to defend such strategies is to use gas units.

Might be fine, just saying, it's the first thing that comes to mind for me


3 gate is the max amount of production you can do on 1 base. I'm not sure what the best response would be for a gas steal, but I have a feeling it might be expand with cannons. Really you shouldn't let it happen because it's so important.

Terran couldn't steal effectively because you can kill the scv as it builds, but it'd be worth testing as a cheese option. You should go try it out! So many things to check. ;D

Oh, and Barrin, the version of 6m1hyg Devolution up now has a doodad malfunction at the natural in the bottom left. There's a giant floating mar sara dead tree. It's spooky! And also distracting.


I'm going to gas steal every game as zerg, see how fun it is


Sounds good, I'll be FFEing.

About 1hyg vs 2g, I don't think it's possible to choose yet. If you maintain 6m, 2g skews the game a lot farther towards tech based. Part of the appeal for me thus far in 6m1hyg is that I feel like I'm still in the development stages of the game with a saturated natural base. I need a 3rd before I can start any freewheeling multi-teching. (As protoss I should say.) This does put protoss in a pinch sometimes, but maybe there are ways to adjust how you play the matchups?

I'll definitely be willing to test 6m2g as well to compare, but I don't like it on paper. If you were going that direction, I'd prefer something like 7m2g with geysers that require 3.5 harvesters to saturate, and some distance mineral patches (5 squares) that require 3 harvesters to saturate.

I can imagine an SC2 landscape with maps that vary these things somewhat freely in order to play up certain map features later in the game further out on the map, or just to adjust how the early game is played. I think it's completely reasonable to expect competitive players to know how to open off 6m1hyg, 6m2g, and 7m2g, with a natural that could be any of those as well. This style of mapping creates a higher burden of game knowledge to create balanced maps without getting lucky, but the variation it would provide would be great for spectators! And the dimension of innovation would be much more highly rewarded in a pro player, something I've always missed, coming from the competitive MTG scene.

Oh, I also wanted to mention that extra geysers covered with rocks might be a useful way to modulate potential vespene income. Of course this would be much harder to use and unelegant for the main base. The starting vespene situation is probably the most important for basic balance.


Even if you FFE gas steal will be pretty powerful if you only have one gas geyser. It would take a hell of a lot longer for you to get your cyber core out with no increase in cost to me (still only 25 minerals and Zerg is going to FE too, btw).

That said, my concern is that these changes also make inject larva much less powerful throughout the early and mid game because you wouldn't be able to use all of that larva anyway. Inject larva might not stack up very well to chronoboost and MULE.

But creep tumours do!
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
March 21 2012 19:46 GMT
#40
--- Nuked ---
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 16h 23m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 666
UpATreeSC 115
BRAT_OK 63
MindelVK 40
Railgan 27
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 1290
Bisu 604
EffOrt 338
BeSt 181
zelot 117
Dewaltoss 107
Soulkey 97
PianO 59
Backho 51
Mong 42
[ Show more ]
Free 24
Sexy 18
scan(afreeca) 13
HiyA 11
Dota 2
qojqva4327
Fuzer 243
Counter-Strike
fl0m2204
ScreaM1450
FunKaTv 36
Super Smash Bros
Chillindude18
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu296
Other Games
Grubby1548
FrodaN1230
Beastyqt643
ceh9525
Skadoodle289
KnowMe141
Mew2King55
Trikslyr50
QueenE37
ViBE26
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL258
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 13
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV653
Other Games
• imaqtpie1112
• Shiphtur226
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
16h 23m
Online Event
21h 23m
RSL Revival
1d 7h
RSL Revival
1d 15h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 16h
OSC
1d 20h
SKillous vs goblin
Spirit vs GgMaChine
ByuN vs MaxPax
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
CrankTV Team League
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
CrankTV Team League
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
CrankTV Team League
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.