|
On June 16 2015 06:09 ruXxar wrote: If for any reason sulfurus flips and he's red, you can lynch me next night 100%, I won't even be mad.
I'm that confident in my read. Ruxxar do you know what TMI means?
|
On June 16 2015 06:10 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 06:09 ruXxar wrote: If for any reason sulfurus flips and he's red, you can lynch me next night 100%, I won't even be mad.
I'm that confident in my read. 1 post ago you just explained that sulfurus flipping red makes you town. Even though you were wrong wtf even is this?
Please quote the post where I said this:
|
On June 16 2015 06:12 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 06:09 ruXxar wrote: If for any reason sulfurus flips and he's red, you can lynch me next night 100%, I won't even be mad.
I'm that confident in my read. Ruxxar do you know what TMI means?
In mafia speak, no.
In daily speak : Too much information?
|
On June 16 2015 06:12 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 06:10 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:09 ruXxar wrote: If for any reason sulfurus flips and he's red, you can lynch me next night 100%, I won't even be mad.
I'm that confident in my read. 1 post ago you just explained that sulfurus flipping red makes you town. Even though you were wrong wtf even is this? Please quote the post where I said this:
ARE YOU SERIOUS???
On June 16 2015 06:05 ruXxar wrote: Because if he's mafia and i'm mafia and I still try to protect him despite the fact that he has given up then I'm an idiot no?
Basically what wave said.
|
On June 16 2015 06:14 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 06:12 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:10 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:09 ruXxar wrote: If for any reason sulfurus flips and he's red, you can lynch me next night 100%, I won't even be mad.
I'm that confident in my read. 1 post ago you just explained that sulfurus flipping red makes you town. Even though you were wrong wtf even is this? Please quote the post where I said this: ARE YOU SERIOUS??? Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 06:05 ruXxar wrote: Because if he's mafia and i'm mafia and I still try to protect him despite the fact that he has given up then I'm an idiot no?
Basically what wave said.
You misunderstood completely.
That sentence says that if he's a mafia given up the game, and I'm also a mafia, then I'm idiot for defending him. Ergo only an idiot mafia would defend sulfurus if he's red. I'd like to think I'm better than that so I would've bussed sulfur a long time ago if I actually was his mafia buddy.
As for why sulfur isn't mafia in an isolated scope, I've already made that argument before.
|
On June 16 2015 06:21 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 06:14 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:12 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:10 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:09 ruXxar wrote: If for any reason sulfurus flips and he's red, you can lynch me next night 100%, I won't even be mad.
I'm that confident in my read. 1 post ago you just explained that sulfurus flipping red makes you town. Even though you were wrong wtf even is this? Please quote the post where I said this: ARE YOU SERIOUS??? On June 16 2015 06:05 ruXxar wrote: Because if he's mafia and i'm mafia and I still try to protect him despite the fact that he has given up then I'm an idiot no?
Basically what wave said.
You misunderstood completely. That sentence says that if he's a mafia given up the game, and I'm also a mafia, then I'm idiot for defending him. Ergo only an idiot mafia would defend sulfurus if he's red. I'd like to think I'm better than that so I would've bussed sulfur a long time ago if I actually was his mafia buddy. As for why sulfur isn't mafia in an isolated scope, I've already made that argument before. You're right about the earlier stuff, and it isn't all that convincing, but I've already explained why your case for Sulf being town is pretty worthless.
The more convincing argument is actually the TMI, and even though I have a hard time believing you're right, it still makes you look scummy either in which case the play would be to lynch you first.
I'm going to hold off for now and let some other people comment on this because it's been beaten to death. Damdred and Scott I'm particularly interested in what you two have to say.
|
On June 16 2015 06:14 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 06:12 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:10 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:09 ruXxar wrote: If for any reason sulfurus flips and he's red, you can lynch me next night 100%, I won't even be mad.
I'm that confident in my read. 1 post ago you just explained that sulfurus flipping red makes you town. Even though you were wrong wtf even is this? Please quote the post where I said this: ARE YOU SERIOUS??? Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 06:05 ruXxar wrote: Because if he's mafia and i'm mafia and I still try to protect him despite the fact that he has given up then I'm an idiot no?
Basically what wave said.
Me saying I'm confident in my read on sulfurus being town has nothing to do with me being mafia together with him.
|
On June 16 2015 06:24 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 06:21 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:14 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:12 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:10 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:09 ruXxar wrote: If for any reason sulfurus flips and he's red, you can lynch me next night 100%, I won't even be mad.
I'm that confident in my read. 1 post ago you just explained that sulfurus flipping red makes you town. Even though you were wrong wtf even is this? Please quote the post where I said this: ARE YOU SERIOUS??? On June 16 2015 06:05 ruXxar wrote: Because if he's mafia and i'm mafia and I still try to protect him despite the fact that he has given up then I'm an idiot no?
Basically what wave said.
You misunderstood completely. That sentence says that if he's a mafia given up the game, and I'm also a mafia, then I'm idiot for defending him. Ergo only an idiot mafia would defend sulfurus if he's red. I'd like to think I'm better than that so I would've bussed sulfur a long time ago if I actually was his mafia buddy. As for why sulfur isn't mafia in an isolated scope, I've already made that argument before. You're right about the earlier stuff, and it isn't all that convincing, but I've already explained why your case for Sulf being town is pretty worthless. The more convincing argument is actually the TMI, and even though I have a hard time believing you're right, it still makes you look scummy either in which case the play would be to lynch you first. I'm going to hold off for now and let some other people comment on this because it's been beaten to death. Damdred and Scott I'm particularly interested in what you two have to say.
Are you going to explain what TMI is in the context of mafia?
I did not find any reference acronym in the mafiascum wiki.
|
On June 16 2015 06:27 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 06:24 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 16 2015 06:21 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:14 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:12 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:10 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:09 ruXxar wrote: If for any reason sulfurus flips and he's red, you can lynch me next night 100%, I won't even be mad.
I'm that confident in my read. 1 post ago you just explained that sulfurus flipping red makes you town. Even though you were wrong wtf even is this? Please quote the post where I said this: ARE YOU SERIOUS??? On June 16 2015 06:05 ruXxar wrote: Because if he's mafia and i'm mafia and I still try to protect him despite the fact that he has given up then I'm an idiot no?
Basically what wave said.
You misunderstood completely. That sentence says that if he's a mafia given up the game, and I'm also a mafia, then I'm idiot for defending him. Ergo only an idiot mafia would defend sulfurus if he's red. I'd like to think I'm better than that so I would've bussed sulfur a long time ago if I actually was his mafia buddy. As for why sulfur isn't mafia in an isolated scope, I've already made that argument before. You're right about the earlier stuff, and it isn't all that convincing, but I've already explained why your case for Sulf being town is pretty worthless. The more convincing argument is actually the TMI, and even though I have a hard time believing you're right, it still makes you look scummy either in which case the play would be to lynch you first. I'm going to hold off for now and let some other people comment on this because it's been beaten to death. Damdred and Scott I'm particularly interested in what you two have to say. Are you going to explain what TMI is in the context of mafia? I did not find any reference acronym in the mafiascum wiki.
It means you have too much information about the alignments of other players i.e. there is no way you should be confident in sulfur's alignment if you are town because sulfur has not provided enough information to make that determination. You especially should not be confident enough to risk your place in the game for sulfur. A common mafia tell is giving out townreads for unsound reasons.
|
On June 16 2015 06:31 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 06:27 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:24 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 16 2015 06:21 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:14 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:12 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:10 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:09 ruXxar wrote: If for any reason sulfurus flips and he's red, you can lynch me next night 100%, I won't even be mad.
I'm that confident in my read. 1 post ago you just explained that sulfurus flipping red makes you town. Even though you were wrong wtf even is this? Please quote the post where I said this: ARE YOU SERIOUS??? On June 16 2015 06:05 ruXxar wrote: Because if he's mafia and i'm mafia and I still try to protect him despite the fact that he has given up then I'm an idiot no?
Basically what wave said.
You misunderstood completely. That sentence says that if he's a mafia given up the game, and I'm also a mafia, then I'm idiot for defending him. Ergo only an idiot mafia would defend sulfurus if he's red. I'd like to think I'm better than that so I would've bussed sulfur a long time ago if I actually was his mafia buddy. As for why sulfur isn't mafia in an isolated scope, I've already made that argument before. You're right about the earlier stuff, and it isn't all that convincing, but I've already explained why your case for Sulf being town is pretty worthless. The more convincing argument is actually the TMI, and even though I have a hard time believing you're right, it still makes you look scummy either in which case the play would be to lynch you first. I'm going to hold off for now and let some other people comment on this because it's been beaten to death. Damdred and Scott I'm particularly interested in what you two have to say. Are you going to explain what TMI is in the context of mafia? I did not find any reference acronym in the mafiascum wiki. It means you have too much information about the alignments of other players i.e. there is no way you should be confident in sulfur's alignment if you are town because sulfur has not provided enough information to make that determination. You especially should not be confident enough to risk your place in the game for sulfur. A common mafia tell is giving out townreads for unsound reasons.
I found my reasons to be very sound.
I imagined myself in sulfurus position, and not in a million years would I have made that same play that he has as mafia.
|
On June 16 2015 06:33 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 06:31 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:27 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:24 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 16 2015 06:21 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:14 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:12 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:10 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:09 ruXxar wrote: If for any reason sulfurus flips and he's red, you can lynch me next night 100%, I won't even be mad.
I'm that confident in my read. 1 post ago you just explained that sulfurus flipping red makes you town. Even though you were wrong wtf even is this? Please quote the post where I said this: ARE YOU SERIOUS??? On June 16 2015 06:05 ruXxar wrote: Because if he's mafia and i'm mafia and I still try to protect him despite the fact that he has given up then I'm an idiot no?
Basically what wave said.
You misunderstood completely. That sentence says that if he's a mafia given up the game, and I'm also a mafia, then I'm idiot for defending him. Ergo only an idiot mafia would defend sulfurus if he's red. I'd like to think I'm better than that so I would've bussed sulfur a long time ago if I actually was his mafia buddy. As for why sulfur isn't mafia in an isolated scope, I've already made that argument before. You're right about the earlier stuff, and it isn't all that convincing, but I've already explained why your case for Sulf being town is pretty worthless. The more convincing argument is actually the TMI, and even though I have a hard time believing you're right, it still makes you look scummy either in which case the play would be to lynch you first. I'm going to hold off for now and let some other people comment on this because it's been beaten to death. Damdred and Scott I'm particularly interested in what you two have to say. Are you going to explain what TMI is in the context of mafia? I did not find any reference acronym in the mafiascum wiki. It means you have too much information about the alignments of other players i.e. there is no way you should be confident in sulfur's alignment if you are town because sulfur has not provided enough information to make that determination. You especially should not be confident enough to risk your place in the game for sulfur. A common mafia tell is giving out townreads for unsound reasons. I found my reasons to be very sound. I imagined myself in sulfurus position, and not in a million years would I have made that same play that he has as mafia.
Now that I think about it again, what made the play seems very bad from sulfur is the fact that we thought he was associated with Rels.
But imagine for a second that rels isn't mafia.
Now what the situation was earlier was that Sulfurus was leading in votes, and then Trfel makes a read on rels that actually steals votes away from bats who had equal votes as Sulfurus, but was not about to be lynched.
In the scenario that rels is town it actually makes sense that sulfur is mafia, and he knew that Rels was town.
Holy shit I just had an epiphany, goosebumps down my spine.
Give me a few minutes to put together a case.
|
On June 16 2015 06:33 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 06:31 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:27 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:24 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 16 2015 06:21 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:14 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:12 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:10 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:09 ruXxar wrote: If for any reason sulfurus flips and he's red, you can lynch me next night 100%, I won't even be mad.
I'm that confident in my read. 1 post ago you just explained that sulfurus flipping red makes you town. Even though you were wrong wtf even is this? Please quote the post where I said this: ARE YOU SERIOUS??? On June 16 2015 06:05 ruXxar wrote: Because if he's mafia and i'm mafia and I still try to protect him despite the fact that he has given up then I'm an idiot no?
Basically what wave said.
You misunderstood completely. That sentence says that if he's a mafia given up the game, and I'm also a mafia, then I'm idiot for defending him. Ergo only an idiot mafia would defend sulfurus if he's red. I'd like to think I'm better than that so I would've bussed sulfur a long time ago if I actually was his mafia buddy. As for why sulfur isn't mafia in an isolated scope, I've already made that argument before. You're right about the earlier stuff, and it isn't all that convincing, but I've already explained why your case for Sulf being town is pretty worthless. The more convincing argument is actually the TMI, and even though I have a hard time believing you're right, it still makes you look scummy either in which case the play would be to lynch you first. I'm going to hold off for now and let some other people comment on this because it's been beaten to death. Damdred and Scott I'm particularly interested in what you two have to say. Are you going to explain what TMI is in the context of mafia? I did not find any reference acronym in the mafiascum wiki. It means you have too much information about the alignments of other players i.e. there is no way you should be confident in sulfur's alignment if you are town because sulfur has not provided enough information to make that determination. You especially should not be confident enough to risk your place in the game for sulfur. A common mafia tell is giving out townreads for unsound reasons. I found my reasons to be very sound. I imagined myself in sulfurus position, and not in a million years would I have made that same play that he has as mafia.
Well your reasons aren't sound.
The best case for sulfurus being town is him defending Rels when voting Rels would have been more likely to save him, and I was the first to point this out. The problem with this is that doing this does not help him as either alignment. If sulfurus is town then he should be more confident in his own alignment than Rels' alignment, so he should vote Rels so save himself.
|
Alright it's getting late so the last filters are gonna be rushed.
batsnacks I have no idea. He could be town because: 1. meta. I'll quote my post in spoiler. + Show Spoiler +On June 13 2015 18:08 Rels wrote:I went through batsnacks past games and I have two things to share with you all. First thingShow nested quote +On June 13 2015 09:39 batsnacks wrote:On June 13 2015 09:34 n00bKing wrote:On June 13 2015 09:03 batsnacks wrote:On June 13 2015 09:00 Rels wrote: Last game D1 you didn't do a whole lot either if I remember correctly. In both game you also posted a nonsense post to gauge reactions. Yeah you're totally wrong and that is points against you. The only time I posted nonsense that game was at night and that's because I was the cop and did not want to get killed. Definitely not true. I expect he is talking about this steaming pile here, which was posted early in Day 1, and not at night: batsnacks wrote: above is THE JOYOUS, LAKE below is KEEPING STILL, MOUNTAIN
Influence. Success.
When a weak element is above (the lake) and a strong element is below (the mountain), their powers attract each other so that they unite. This brings about success, for all success depends on the effect of mutual attraction
Perseverance furthers.
By keeping still within while experiencing joy without, one can prevent the joy from going to excess and hold it within proper bounds. This is the meaning of, "Perseverance furthers."
To take a maiden to wife brings good fortune
Heaven and earth attract each other and thus all creatures come into being. From the attractions they exert we can learn the nature of all beings in heaven and on earth.
A lake on the mountain: The image of influence. Thus the superior man encourages people to approach him By his readiness to receive them.
A mountain with a lake on its summit is stimulated by the moisture from the lake. It has this advantage because its summit does not jut out as a peak but is sunken. The image counsels that the mind should be kept humble and free, so that it may remain receptive to good advice. People soon give up counseling a man who thinks that he knows everything better than anyone else.
The influence shows itself in the calves of the legs. Misfortune. Tarrying brings good fortune.
In movement, the calf of the leg follows the foot; by itself it can neither go forward nor stand still. Since the movement is not self-governed, it bodes ill. One should wait quietly until one is impelled to action by a real influence. Then one remains uninjured. Your philosophical post about danger in this game looks a bit like a forced attempt to duplicate the same kind of nonsense you kicked off the last game with (since it was very recent, and people will remember you were Town). Meanwhile, you never answered my question about approximately how many times you've been assigned a scum role in these games. [...] Also I only provide iching commentary when I'm town so I thank you for bringing this up. That's true. I found 3 games where I did something similar, all of them town. Posts in spoiler if you're curious. + Show Spoiler +Second thingShow nested quote +On June 13 2015 08:23 batsnacks wrote:On June 13 2015 08:18 Trfel wrote:On June 13 2015 08:14 batsnacks wrote:On June 13 2015 08:11 Trfel wrote: First, my computer internet died, so I am on my phone.
Second, Moosy, I do think that ruX could be mafia, but I feel that Rels is more likely.
Though I might actually want to lynch bats instead. His quick agreement with me is unexpected, his play doesnt feel like his town meta. Your case is the best most compelling thing that has been posted yet??? Also you can't meta me remember what happened last time you tried? Last time I tried was the Ver game and I was right. I have learned a thing or two since my first game of mafia ever, thank you very much. You don't have to believe this is my normal town meta because it's not, but you can't believe my scum meta is to post this much. I am a 1 page per day scum poster not a post more than anyone else scum poster. That's not as extreme as he's saying, but it is true. In particular, look at the size of the filters of these two games. In both he got lynched D1. Can you guess in which one he was scum ? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/474082-imperial-mafia?user=batsnackshttp://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/469267-fantasy-football-mafia-mini-2?user=batsnacksIf you don't wanna play the guessing game: he has two times more post in the first game, where he was town. ConclusionBy meta I don't think BS is mafia this game. ##Unvote 2. The two cases he did were pretty good I felt. I mean, there were on geript and me, so they were wrong; but the cases themselves were good, exploiting contradiction each time. + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 05:38 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2015 05:33 MoosyDoosy wrote:On June 14 2015 05:32 batsnacks wrote: Bat Traps™ mafia traps. The highest quality traps for your scum hunting needs. We'll see how right we are after Sulfurus, Rels, and getrip. You don't understand. geript just claimed mafia. Here is geript saying he will sheep Trfel's amazing case on Rels: + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 04:54 geript wrote: Actually, I think I'm going to sheep too. Here is sulfurus's bold post defending Rels: + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 05:00 Sulfurus wrote:I didn't want to say anything about trfel before because his vote on Bats was protecting me but he is just straight up wrong on Rels. He makes a post here where he says rels made a bad town read on ruXxar even though (IMO) ruXx is one of the towniest players in the game. He also keeps saying that Rels is tunneled on Plant's only post and he basically dismisses the rest of his filter when in fact it's really good and shows a town who is focused on trying to solve the game. Here is me saying sulfurus's post is bold, I ask why mafia would post such a thing: + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 05:04 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2015 05:00 Sulfurus wrote:I didn't want to say anything about trfel before because his vote on Bats was protecting me but he is just straight up wrong on Rels. He makes a post here where he says rels made a bad town read on ruXxar even though (IMO) ruXx is one of the towniest players in the game. He also keeps saying that Rels is tunneled on Plant's only post and he basically dismisses the rest of his filter when in fact it's really good and shows a town who is focused on trying to solve the game. This is bold. Why does mafia post this? Here geript explains that sometimes mafia like to defend town poorly. geript knows that Rels is town, yet he would sheep Trfel's case on Rels: + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 05:08 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2015 05:04 batsnacks wrote:On June 14 2015 05:00 Sulfurus wrote:I didn't want to say anything about trfel before because his vote on Bats was protecting me but he is just straight up wrong on Rels. He makes a post here where he says rels made a bad town read on ruXxar even though (IMO) ruXx is one of the towniest players in the game. He also keeps saying that Rels is tunneled on Plant's only post and he basically dismisses the rest of his filter when in fact it's really good and shows a town who is focused on trying to solve the game. This is bold. Why does mafia post this? It's not uncommon for mafia to defend town badly. Especially newer mafia. On June 15 2015 05:12 batsnacks wrote:Alright Rels is mafia. His read progression on sulfurus goes like this: - First I voted sulfurus for voting me opportunistically. Rels responds to me saying that if it were anyone but sulfurus then he would consider this scummy, but since sulfurus voted opportunistically last game then it is not scummy.
Rels wrote:+ Show Spoiler +If it was any other person I would have agree with you about voting opportunistically. But Sulfu played exactly like that last game.
- Rels posts a list post where sulfurus is a town lean.
- Rels repeats that if anyone but sulfurus had voted me the way that sulfurus did, he would consider it scummy. However since sulfurus voted SL and Breshke opportunistically last game as town, then he is not scum reading sulfurus for it.
Rels wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Yeah I would have agreed if someone else voted you like that. But Sulfu did that day 1 last game. On Breshke and SL.
- Rels suddenly says he is suspicious of sulfurus for voting opportunistically, directly contradicting two posts he made earlier explaining that sulfurus voting opportunistically does not make him mafia since he did the same thing in his last game.
Rels wrote:+ Show Spoiler +No idea who I want to lynch. Two of my three town reads are voting sulfurus. I'm suspicious of Sulfu for two reasons: - The "case" on KS on his first post doesn't exist - The vote on BS is opportunist
- Rels votes geript and says if the wagon on geript doesn't go anywhere, that he will be switching to sulfurus.
Rels wrote:+ Show Spoiler +If nobody changes vote and I have to choose between the two wagons I'll vote Sulfu.
##Vote geript
Chronological order: + Show Spoiler +On June 13 2015 09:00 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 08:57 batsnacks wrote: Trfel's case is still good but I'm now voting sulfur for misrepresenting my play last game (twice) and now voting me opportunistically.
##unvote ##vote Sulfurus If it was any other person I would have agree with you about voting opportunistically.But Sulfu played exactly like that last game. On June 13 2015 09:07 Rels wrote: Town lean Trfel Sulfu Oats ruxxar
On June 13 2015 09:11 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 09:07 batsnacks wrote:On June 13 2015 09:00 Rels wrote:On June 13 2015 08:57 batsnacks wrote: Trfel's case is still good but I'm now voting sulfur for misrepresenting my play last game (twice) and now voting me opportunistically.
##unvote ##vote Sulfurus If it was any other person I would have agree with you about voting opportunistically. But Sulfu played exactly like that last game. And I don't think he misreprented your plays. Last game D1 you didn't do a whole lot either if I remember correctly. In both game you also posted a nonsense post to gauge reactions. You just voted me for saying something you agree with!!! Yeah I would have agreed if someone else voted you like that. But Sulfu did that day 1 last game. On Breshke and SL. On June 13 2015 18:33 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 18:17 Oatsmaster wrote: Did you see the quality of those posts though. Cause in this game, there is quantity but practically no quality. I agree. But quality is not the reason I'm unvoting him. Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 18:19 Oatsmaster wrote: I think it's pretty unlikely we have a PGO. Hey rels, what made you look through bats last few games? Also, who do you want to lynch now? No idea who I want to lynch. Two of my three town reads are voting sulfurus. I'm suspicious of Sulfu for two reasons: - The "case" on KS on his first post doesn't exist - The vote on BS is opportunist On June 13 2015 20:59 Rels wrote: If nobody changes vote and I have to choose between the two wagons I'll vote Sulfu.
##Vote geript 3. Damdred's post about him being town. + Show Spoiler +On June 13 2015 22:42 Damdred wrote: Yeah bats is a completely stupid lynch, here. (Never use this again bats is to smart a player)
If you look at bats last scum/town games you see a few things crop up.
1) as scum once it's clear that he is going to,be one of,l the leading wagons his care factor diminishes to a few posts randomly complaining without doing anything about it or pushing his own thoughts.
In comparison here he is pushing what he thinks explaining why he's town,and,not giving,up. I liked bats when I first read his filter. He keeps pushing the thread.
2) as scum, he has developed an ability to have weak scum reads to a point.
Here he has well reasoned or seemingly well reasoned reasons for calling people out.
3) resorts to trolling as scum when he's caught.
He's not doing this here.
Bats is town, besides meta. Biggest filter, most controversial figure d1. Okish reads.
Leave the bats alone
BUT There is a lot of things that could be wrong with him. They are: 1. The only two cases he made were wrong. In fact, I liked his case on me, but noobking didn't like it at all. + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 06:06 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2015 05:38 batsnacks wrote:Here is geript saying he will sheep Trfel's amazing case on Rels: + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 04:54 geript wrote: Actually, I think I'm going to sheep too. Here is sulfurus's bold post defending Rels: + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 05:00 Sulfurus wrote:I didn't want to say anything about trfel before because his vote on Bats was protecting me but he is just straight up wrong on Rels. He makes a post here where he says rels made a bad town read on ruXxar even though (IMO) ruXx is one of the towniest players in the game. He also keeps saying that Rels is tunneled on Plant's only post and he basically dismisses the rest of his filter when in fact it's really good and shows a town who is focused on trying to solve the game. Here is me saying sulfurus's post is bold, I ask why mafia would post such a thing: + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 05:04 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2015 05:00 Sulfurus wrote:I didn't want to say anything about trfel before because his vote on Bats was protecting me but he is just straight up wrong on Rels. He makes a post here where he says rels made a bad town read on ruXxar even though (IMO) ruXx is one of the towniest players in the game. He also keeps saying that Rels is tunneled on Plant's only post and he basically dismisses the rest of his filter when in fact it's really good and shows a town who is focused on trying to solve the game. This is bold. Why does mafia post this? Here geript explains that sometimes mafia like to defend town poorly. geript knows that Rels is town, yet he would sheep Trfel's case on Rels: + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 05:08 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2015 05:04 batsnacks wrote:On June 14 2015 05:00 Sulfurus wrote:I didn't want to say anything about trfel before because his vote on Bats was protecting me but he is just straight up wrong on Rels. He makes a post here where he says rels made a bad town read on ruXxar even though (IMO) ruXx is one of the towniest players in the game. He also keeps saying that Rels is tunneled on Plant's only post and he basically dismisses the rest of his filter when in fact it's really good and shows a town who is focused on trying to solve the game. This is bold. Why does mafia post this? It's not uncommon for mafia to defend town badly. Especially newer mafia. How is any of that supposed to be difficult to explain? Geript has at times thought Sulfurus looked scummy. And he has at times thought Rels looked scummy. Most recently, his vote has been on Rels, so that is presumably his top scum read. You ask geript why Sulfurus would defend Rels if Sulfurus were scum. geript at this point participates in a discussion that PRE-ASSUMES Sulfurus is scum. And he hypothesizes that Sulfurus could be defending a Town player poorly. This would require him to be wrong about Rels being scum. I see nothing wrong with geript acknowledging the possibility that he could be wrong about Rels being scum, and answering a hypothetical question about why Sulfurus would act as he has if HE were scum. This is almost as hollow as the reasoning Trfel used against Rels. Not quite as hollow. But almost. 2. 90% of his posts are not scumhunting. I think everybody agrees to that. Here is some posts from noobking and oats in the subject: + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 04:16 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 21:51 batsnacks wrote: That isn't a scum read. That is me being concerned that ruxxar and n00b are making mistakes that could cost town the game. They should have a dialog with me before the lynch because I'm town and I can convince them I'm town, or at the very least not the best lynch today. Okay? We're waiting. Let's have a dialogue. Convince me that you're Town. Again, I was very excited to see you follow through on your promise to destroy the thread, if you stayed in the vote lead. And the scummiest thing Rels has done this entire game is panic after that promise, and start reading your posts in other games so that he could manufacture a flimsy excuse to move his vote off of you. As a Town player, I couldn't WAIT for you to blow up the thread. But if I were scum, that idea might be pretty concerning to me. And I might try to figure out a way to get you out of the vote lead, so you'll shut up. Show nested quote +batsnacks wrote: I completely disagree that most of what I've posted is useless I think I have easily contributed more to this game than anyone else Clicking the "Post" button a bunch of times does not mean you are making worthwhile contributions. You keep yapping about your long filter, but NOTHING kicks, fights, bites and screams more than a mafia player that is in vote trouble without there being concrete evidence behind it. Staring down the noose MIGHT spur an inactive Town player into action, but not nearly as much (or as consistently) as it spurs mafia players into action. You talk like people are voting against you only because of your poor open, but that they aren't reassessing bases on the posts you've made since. I've read every post you've made. There isn't anything that counteracts your poor open. You've been told this by multiple players already, so it's not like I am blind to what those others see. On June 13 2015 18:17 Oatsmaster wrote: Did you see the quality of those posts though. Cause in this game, there is quantity but practically no quality. 3. Meta is not that decisive on judging people. Trfel made me think twice about it here: + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 03:12 Trfel wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 16:20 n00bKing wrote:On June 13 2015 15:22 Trfel wrote: There is some scum motivation not to do that, but there's a lot more scum motivation TO do it. A whole lot more than the town motivation, anyway. Please explain further. What is the scum motivation to do that? It makes him look active, and makes him look like he's doing stuff. Posts without purpose. Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 16:20 n00bKing wrote: Rels? Dunno, man. He looks a lot to me like he did in Newbie X, when he was Town. But some of the veterans in this game are seeing stuff from him they don't like. I'm not ready to try and pass judgment on Rels, I'll just have to keep watching him. Hm, okay, I'll take a look at that game then.
Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 18:08 Rels wrote:+ Show Spoiler +I went through batsnacks past games and I have two things to share with you all. First thingOn June 13 2015 09:39 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 09:34 n00bKing wrote:On June 13 2015 09:03 batsnacks wrote:On June 13 2015 09:00 Rels wrote: Last game D1 you didn't do a whole lot either if I remember correctly. In both game you also posted a nonsense post to gauge reactions. Yeah you're totally wrong and that is points against you. The only time I posted nonsense that game was at night and that's because I was the cop and did not want to get killed. Definitely not true. I expect he is talking about this steaming pile here, which was posted early in Day 1, and not at night: batsnacks wrote: above is THE JOYOUS, LAKE below is KEEPING STILL, MOUNTAIN
Influence. Success.
When a weak element is above (the lake) and a strong element is below (the mountain), their powers attract each other so that they unite. This brings about success, for all success depends on the effect of mutual attraction
Perseverance furthers.
By keeping still within while experiencing joy without, one can prevent the joy from going to excess and hold it within proper bounds. This is the meaning of, "Perseverance furthers."
To take a maiden to wife brings good fortune
Heaven and earth attract each other and thus all creatures come into being. From the attractions they exert we can learn the nature of all beings in heaven and on earth.
A lake on the mountain: The image of influence. Thus the superior man encourages people to approach him By his readiness to receive them.
A mountain with a lake on its summit is stimulated by the moisture from the lake. It has this advantage because its summit does not jut out as a peak but is sunken. The image counsels that the mind should be kept humble and free, so that it may remain receptive to good advice. People soon give up counseling a man who thinks that he knows everything better than anyone else.
The influence shows itself in the calves of the legs. Misfortune. Tarrying brings good fortune.
In movement, the calf of the leg follows the foot; by itself it can neither go forward nor stand still. Since the movement is not self-governed, it bodes ill. One should wait quietly until one is impelled to action by a real influence. Then one remains uninjured. Your philosophical post about danger in this game looks a bit like a forced attempt to duplicate the same kind of nonsense you kicked off the last game with (since it was very recent, and people will remember you were Town). Meanwhile, you never answered my question about approximately how many times you've been assigned a scum role in these games. [...] Also I only provide iching commentary when I'm town so I thank you for bringing this up. That's true. I found 3 games where I did something similar, all of them town. Posts in spoiler if you're curious. + Show Spoiler +Second thingOn June 13 2015 08:23 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 08:18 Trfel wrote:On June 13 2015 08:14 batsnacks wrote:On June 13 2015 08:11 Trfel wrote: First, my computer internet died, so I am on my phone.
Second, Moosy, I do think that ruX could be mafia, but I feel that Rels is more likely.
Though I might actually want to lynch bats instead. His quick agreement with me is unexpected, his play doesnt feel like his town meta. Your case is the best most compelling thing that has been posted yet??? Also you can't meta me remember what happened last time you tried? Last time I tried was the Ver game and I was right. I have learned a thing or two since my first game of mafia ever, thank you very much. You don't have to believe this is my normal town meta because it's not, but you can't believe my scum meta is to post this much. I am a 1 page per day scum poster not a post more than anyone else scum poster. That's not as extreme as he's saying, but it is true. In particular, look at the size of the filters of these two games. In both he got lynched D1. Can you guess in which one he was scum ? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/474082-imperial-mafia?user=batsnackshttp://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/469267-fantasy-football-mafia-mini-2?user=batsnacksIf you don't wanna play the guessing game: he has two times more post in the first game, where he was town. ConclusionBy meta I don't think BS is mafia this game. ##Unvote Your first point is technically correct, but it doesn't mean anything. It's extremely easy for mafia!batsnacks to post this as scum. One good example of this is Onegu, who was known for a long time to only claim VT as town, and never as scum. Well, one game he did it as scum. If someone has a meta that "makes" them town, it's useless unless there's an actual reason why they can't do the same thing as scum. As for the second point, again, the post quality is important, not just the quantity. Damdred's post on batsnacks is really interesting, those are things that I didn't check. However, comparing the two games that Rels linked, I don't see batsnacks fitting Damdred's description that much. Notably because while he's always been a leading wagon, it's always been very close. Looking at Imperial Mafia (town!batsnacks), I noticed that batsnacks' filter at End of Day was extremely productive and focused, and I'm not seeing that from batsnacks this game. I'll take a look at batsnacks' scum reads now. Show nested quote +On June 14 2015 03:08 batsnacks wrote: Here are the final vote counts from the first two days of newbie X, notice how sulfurus is off doing his own thing Why does this matter? He did something generally considered to be bad, he got lynched for it, and I'd really hope he didn't do the same thing in his next game. Were his reasons for voting those people original, or sheeping others (even if not in the final vote)?
So ... batsnacks has the longest filter in the game, and he's the player I am the least sure about. My opinion of him can change very easily in good or bad depending on his actions and other's reactions. Conclusion: Null
|
Why is bring wrong a negative exactly?
|
Damdred OK this is going to be quick. I cannot read the guy town because he almost didn't do any scumhunting. His only analysis post is this one: + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 12:15 Damdred wrote: Damdreds Late night Reads List:
Firstly i'm going to take out the wagons that ended up with 0 votes to start with, and also the scratched people presently. I'll dedicate a post later to talking about vote changes (maybe in this post on some people) to determine some alignments if I can.
Sulfurus (2): Kickstart, WaveOfShadow Batsnacks (2): n00bKing, sulfurus, geript (8): Rels, Oatsmaster, batsnacks, Trfel, Damdred, MoosyDoosy, ruXxar, scott31337 Rels (1): geript,
This is what we end up with (cleaned up version)
Sulfurus (2): Kickstart, WaveOfShadow Batsnacks (2): n00bKing, sulfurus, geript (8): Rels, Oatsmaster, batsnacks, Trfel, Damdred, MoosyDoosy, ruXxar, scott31337 Rels (1): geript,
First thing I do is color in Geript with a bold and a green since hes flipped to the thread.
Secondly since im not confirmed to the thread but to myself (go me) i'm putting myself as green. I'd rather not have to right out a town case currently for myself so just trust me for now.
Two easiest town reads are now colored in green for me.
Batsnacks I've covered pretty extensively in my earlier filter, if you want the longer case its in my filter go read it a bit. But to add on a bit, Bats made a decent point and pushed it. Thought he found a slip and pushed it, he led the lynch on Geript even fi he flipped town. Scum bats is really back seat he does try to cause confusion. However at this end of day he was really useful he was calm and acted really towny with how he went about the lynch. This guy might be the most town I've ever seen Bats be before, if he did this as scum i'm pretty impressed.
Trfel, is town also. Made some excellent points on Rel, but ended up sheeping Batsnacks around the same time I did. The posts that Trfel did make were some of the longer cases I thought were pretty good and factually sound. Though some people might disagree with them It hought they were really good and showed a clear understanding of what was going on. Also Trfel knows my kryptonite somewhat and how to abuse me in a thread without seeming scummy for it and chose to try to work with me and give me time instead of coming down hard on me. Its also partially a tone read and how the involvement in the thread is going. i'm pretty confident that Trfel is town here.
Sulfurus (2): Kickstart, WaveOfShadow Batsnacks (2): n00bKing, sulfurus, geript (8): Rels, Oatsmaster, batsnacks, Trfel, Damdred, MoosyDoosy, ruXxar, scott31337 Rels (1): geript,
Ruxxar is one of my scum leans currently. I won't take credit for the initial find of the post where he switched votes from bats to Geript. (Wave gets credit for pointing it out) He shows very little consistency with how his reads change and how he approaches the thread, for example when bats makes his push on Geript he showed very little suspicion for someone that was hard scum reading Bats and thought that he was the best lynch in the entire game. Also he gave kickstart a town lean for almost no reason when he was suspicious of him before. He also has expanded his filter with a lot of talk about speculation and about claims and how to handl blues etc. Overall I think hes decently scummy and should be lookd at harder.
WaveofShadow is another decent town lean currently. He shows genuine interest in figuring out peoples alignments, he pushes on people and is searching to find scum when he is here. One of the negatives I have is that sometimes he feels a little passive in the way that he does things at the same time. I know for instance he asked me several questions that I just didn't answer at the time and still haven't answered (I believe) and even though I've been in the thread with him he just hasn't cared. So he worries me a little bit but i'm generally paranoid of him also, plus he soft pushed geript a little bit.
Sulfurus (2): Kickstart, WaveOfShadow Batsnacks (2): n00bKing, sulfurus, geript (8): Rels, Oatsmaster, batsnacks, Trfel, Damdred, MoosyDoosy, ruXxar, scott31337 Rels (1): geript,
Moosy I think is town, I would look at him more later, and its mostly just a gut feeling. He feels really honest to me and just confused at points. I think hes town.
Tone read on scott, and his postings just feel like his towny self. Good direction I feel like at points.
I am going to end this here for now, I don't have the attention span to go through everything. I'll try to finish reads before the morning on the others. I'm still leaning scum on Rels and kickstarts activity is worrying and lack of real content compared to his other games. And while there is nothing in here scummy, there is only one mafia accusation that I partially disagree with. It's true that I don't like ruxxar's posts about blues, and his vote could be opportunistic. To me that's not enough to make him mafia, especially when several people's vote could be considered opportunistic.
Nevertheless I can not read this guy mafia either because his posts in general seem genuine. In particular, I loved this post:
On June 14 2015 09:09 Damdred wrote: Umm Idk why Geript as confirmed town would have better reads than say... anyone left alive?
Like I can understand parssing what Geript said see who voted him why (good catch wave) but I don't think,scum,bats leads the lynch onto Geript,like this. Nor do I think we should really debate if the big should shoot him or not I feel it is a very good observation.
So ... voilà. I just don't know. Conclusion: Null
|
On June 16 2015 07:11 Damdred wrote: Why is bring wrong a negative exactly?
I think Rels reads on me are less interesting than anything that's happening with ruxxar.
|
On June 16 2015 07:11 Damdred wrote: Why is bring wrong a negative exactly? It doesn't by itself. I just don't want to forget that the only cases you made were wrong. Doesn't make you mafia.
|
What seems genuine or 'observation-y' about that post you highlighted Rels? I just see a post that anyone with common sense and experience would post, of either alignment.
|
On June 16 2015 06:39 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 06:33 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:31 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:27 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:24 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 16 2015 06:21 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:14 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:12 ruXxar wrote:On June 16 2015 06:10 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 06:09 ruXxar wrote: If for any reason sulfurus flips and he's red, you can lynch me next night 100%, I won't even be mad.
I'm that confident in my read. 1 post ago you just explained that sulfurus flipping red makes you town. Even though you were wrong wtf even is this? Please quote the post where I said this: ARE YOU SERIOUS??? On June 16 2015 06:05 ruXxar wrote: Because if he's mafia and i'm mafia and I still try to protect him despite the fact that he has given up then I'm an idiot no?
Basically what wave said.
You misunderstood completely. That sentence says that if he's a mafia given up the game, and I'm also a mafia, then I'm idiot for defending him. Ergo only an idiot mafia would defend sulfurus if he's red. I'd like to think I'm better than that so I would've bussed sulfur a long time ago if I actually was his mafia buddy. As for why sulfur isn't mafia in an isolated scope, I've already made that argument before. You're right about the earlier stuff, and it isn't all that convincing, but I've already explained why your case for Sulf being town is pretty worthless. The more convincing argument is actually the TMI, and even though I have a hard time believing you're right, it still makes you look scummy either in which case the play would be to lynch you first. I'm going to hold off for now and let some other people comment on this because it's been beaten to death. Damdred and Scott I'm particularly interested in what you two have to say. Are you going to explain what TMI is in the context of mafia? I did not find any reference acronym in the mafiascum wiki. It means you have too much information about the alignments of other players i.e. there is no way you should be confident in sulfur's alignment if you are town because sulfur has not provided enough information to make that determination. You especially should not be confident enough to risk your place in the game for sulfur. A common mafia tell is giving out townreads for unsound reasons. I found my reasons to be very sound. I imagined myself in sulfurus position, and not in a million years would I have made that same play that he has as mafia. Now that I think about it again, what made the play seems very bad from sulfur is the fact that we thought he was associated with Rels. But imagine for a second that rels isn't mafia.Now what the situation was earlier was that Sulfurus was leading in votes, and then Trfel makes a read on rels that actually steals votes away from bats who had equal votes as Sulfurus, but was not about to be lynched. In the scenario that rels is town it actually makes sense that sulfur is mafia, and he knew that Rels was town. Holy shit I just had an epiphany, goosebumps down my spine. Give me a few minutes to put together a case.
I said it was gonna take a few minutes, but my head is all full of thoughts right now. I'll sleep on this and reread the filter of those involved, and make the case tomorrow.
One thing I noted was that moosy pushed on sulfur early in the game and also later. I don't find it likely that both sulfur and moosy are mafia together, so there's that.
I'll get back to you guys tomorrow.
|
On June 16 2015 07:14 Rels wrote:It doesn't by itself. I just don't want to forget that the only cases you made were wrong. Doesn't make you mafia. EBWOP Thought I was responding to bats. That should be "he made".
|
|
|
|