ohlol, I meant players.
You can take that as a scumslip but I'm not scum :D
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
grush57
Korea (South)2582 Posts
On January 30 2013 10:18 debears wrote: Show nested quote + On January 30 2013 10:15 grush57 wrote: Oh, Oats I forgot about you. It's pretty funny how the 2 least useful townies this game(besides myself ofc) ask me the questions. Of course I am, thats why I'm playing it. So sure they are town are you? ohlol, I meant players. You can take that as a scumslip but I'm not scum :D | ||
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On January 29 2013 17:20 mkfuba07 wrote: This was so long ago... Did you get those significant scums reads... >the first thing I decided upon that I would call a significant scumread was vivax. I actually had my own reasoning behind it. I later decided he wasn't scum for reasons already in the thread. Are you a player that in your experience is likely too... >To have scumreads? Every so often I'll mention one. You may notice one right above your post. If not why promise what wont be coming? >See the answer above. […..deletia....] Poke holes in what I've said, and I'll try to fill them in. With reference to his case and an invitation for me to defend someone else... his scum read... MkFuba : Poke holes in what I've said, and I'll try to fill them in. Axle : NO. MkFuba: the first thing I decided upon that I would call a significant scumread was vivax. Please, Refesh my mind what did you base your significant scum read of Vivax on? | ||
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On January 30 2013 08:40 annul wrote: yeah, mafia have to achieve one less mislynch, so they get a jack, gf, at least 2 masons, and probably an rb and framer, right? Can you give me the time stamp on the first PM you sent to Mocsta? Thanks. | ||
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
Picked it up: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=393344¤tpage=155#3082 Dropped it: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=393344¤tpage=174#3473 My "invitation for you to defend someone else" was not directed at you. The entire second half of my post was directed at the entire thread. No one responded, which is an outcome that I've grown accustomed to due to my playstyle, not to mention how poorly written the posts were. It was mostly directed to those opposing an austin lynch. I think they'll respond the post I'm in the process of writing now, though. | ||
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
So there are two scenarios, either Annul told the truth and he’s town, or he lied and he’s scum. We’re actually somewhat fortunate in that his alignment comes down to a single decision in the game. I feel a lot of confusion in the thread regarding what he says he did. This is his explanation, as I believe many/some people understand it:
Now is this the work of town annul, or scum annul? Let’s start with scum. What does scum Annul know? He knows Chezinu is scum, and BKE is town. He knows he is not actually a Mad Hatter, and can only appear as one a maximum of one time (if the final scum is the framer). He also knows that he breadcrumbed Mad Hatter from the beginning of the game for some reason. Who would he choose to “bomb”? Chezinu, of course. What are the possible outcomes of this scenario (convincing town to vote someone other than Chezinu)? Given that he knows BKE is town, he knows that town is likely headed for a mislynch D3. Probably two, if he is able to switch people off of Chez. He knows he will look quite suspicious if he succeeds in his ploy. He would be in much the same position he is now. So many people were sure of Chez’s scumminess that, having saved him the previous day and leading town to two mislynches, Annul would be right up there with him. They would have one more KP that night, but they would likely sacrifice both their lives. If he failed, what has happened, happens. It becomes known that he tried to save (likely) scum. He has, at most, one night of safety from DT checks. He has drawn a significant amount of attention to himself, and has earned nothing from it. Now let’s look at town Annul. What does town Annul know? He knows he is Mad Hatter. He knows that he finds BKE and Chezinu both to be incredibly likely scum. Who would he choose to bomb? Doesn’t matter, because town Annul thinks they’re both scum. What are the possible outcomes of this scenario (convincing town to vote someone other than Chezinu)? If he fails, he loses his bomb, and two scum flip (oops). Town might be suspicious of him because of it, but nowhere near as much as we were today due to the BKE flip (oops). But if he succeeds, then he's given town the opportunity to lynch an additional person D3. Whether or not the second person is scum, the KP would still be reduced to 1 permanently because we were still lynching BKE (oops). In addition, town has effectively taken Chezinu hostage, guaranteeing annul's survival as long as Chezinu is alive. That would be 3 guaranteed townies who couldn't be NK'd (FT, toad, and annul) and one "free" scum, leaving us in that 0.000001% situation annul mentioned when he claimed. You will note that all three times I wrote (oops) were times his assumption of BKE flipping scum screwed him over. This perfectly explains why he says his only mistake was BKE. I don't believe that scum annul would risk his own life to save Chezinu given what he would have known. The pros don't outweigh the cons, as he looks suspicious either way. The town annul explanation is far more feasible. I'm about 95% more inclined to believe that town annul had a significant oversight and had trouble explaining himself than I am to believe that scum annul risked his life quite blatantly to save someone who ultimately was likely going to be lynched anyway. Add to that other small things, like the fact that he breadcrumbed his role, and that he could have gotten gonzaw elected but kept his vote on himself, and I think it's pretty conclusive. So, the way I understand the situation is more like this:
| ||
BinOnFire
Laos123 Posts
also, who do you want to lynch and why? | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On January 30 2013 14:31 BinOnFire wrote: Why did you just explain for him? also, who do you want to lynch and why? SO MANY TIMES. | ||
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
Do you agree, or disagree with my conclusion? As for who I want to lynch today, I'm not completely sure, if you can believe that. I've been on this annul/austin/axle filterdive for the last day or so and it's got me questioning some previous light townreads. My vote has been on axle since this morning following toad's posts, but I feel myself inching away from voting for him. I took down some posts during class that I wanted to respond to, so I'll get those up eventually. If I had to say who I feel most likely to flip scum at the moment, I would say austin. | ||
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On January 30 2013 14:22 mkfuba07 wrote: Annul The town annul explanation is far more feasible. I'm about 95% more inclined to believe that town annul had a significant oversight and had trouble explaining himself than I am to believe that scum annul risked his life quite blatantly to save someone who ultimately was likely going to be lynched anyway. Without commenting on the accuracy or presence or lack of holes in your argument. Why did you make it, or more specifically why did you post it in the thread? | ||
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On January 30 2013 15:25 AxleGreaser wrote: + Show Spoiler + On January 30 2013 14:22 mkfuba07 wrote: Annul The town annul explanation is far more feasible. I'm about 95% more inclined to believe that town annul had a significant oversight and had trouble explaining himself than I am to believe that scum annul risked his life quite blatantly to save someone who ultimately was likely going to be lynched anyway. Without commenting on the accuracy or presence or lack of holes in your argument. Why did you make it, or more specifically why did you post it in the thread? | ||
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On January 30 2013 14:49 mkfuba07 wrote: I explained for him because he wasn't doing a good job explaining it himself. It's dumb to waste time thinking about lynching town, and some people are significantly misunderstanding him. This includes vivax, yamato, toad, and marv. These are people I don't want focusing on someone who isn't flipping scum. They've driven the conversation for most of the game, and this is my way to keep them on track. Do you agree, or disagree with my conclusion? As for who I want to lynch today, I'm not completely sure, if you can believe that. I've been on this annul/austin/axle filterdive for the last day or so and it's got me questioning some previous light townreads. My vote has been on axle since this morning following toad's posts, but I feel myself inching away from voting for him. I took down some posts during class that I wanted to respond to, so I'll get those up eventually. If I had to say who I feel most likely to flip scum at the moment, I would say austin. Why has it been doing that.... ? Ahh because you are currently not voting for your top scum read... " If I had to say who I feel most likely to flip scum at the moment, I would say austin. " | ||
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
Do you have anything to say about the Vivax stuff I linked for you before? Or did you find nothing and are therefore searching through what I felt were my two best posts of the game trying to find something scummy? And what is with this shit, "Without commenting on the accuracy or presence or lack of holes in your argument."? What I see is "While ignoring your actual contribution." The argument is the point of the entire post! Do you agree or disagree with my conclusion? Why did you two have to be the only ones online when I posted this? Whatever, I'm going to bed. Anyone voting for annul right now, I want to hear what you think of my post before the deadline. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
| ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 30 2013 19:34 AxleGreaser wrote: Which might explain why I didn't vote for double Lynch. I don't like your attitude right now ![]() As in: I think you're mafia | ||
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 30 2013 14:22 mkfuba07 wrote: Annul So there are two scenarios, either Annul told the truth and he’s town, or he lied and he’s scum. We’re actually somewhat fortunate in that his alignment comes down to a single decision in the game. I feel a lot of confusion in the thread regarding what he says he did. This is his explanation, as I believe many/some people understand it:
Now is this the work of town annul, or scum annul? Let’s start with scum. What does scum Annul know? He knows Chezinu is scum, and BKE is town. He knows he is not actually a Mad Hatter, and can only appear as one a maximum of one time (if the final scum is the framer). He also knows that he breadcrumbed Mad Hatter from the beginning of the game for some reason. Who would he choose to “bomb”? Chezinu, of course. What are the possible outcomes of this scenario (convincing town to vote someone other than Chezinu)? Given that he knows BKE is town, he knows that town is likely headed for a mislynch D3. Probably two, if he is able to switch people off of Chez. He knows he will look quite suspicious if he succeeds in his ploy. He would be in much the same position he is now. So many people were sure of Chez’s scumminess that, having saved him the previous day and leading town to two mislynches, Annul would be right up there with him. They would have one more KP that night, but they would likely sacrifice both their lives. If he failed, what has happened, happens. It becomes known that he tried to save (likely) scum. He has, at most, one night of safety from DT checks. He has drawn a significant amount of attention to himself, and has earned nothing from it. Now let’s look at town Annul. What does town Annul know? He knows he is Mad Hatter. He knows that he finds BKE and Chezinu both to be incredibly likely scum. Who would he choose to bomb? Doesn’t matter, because town Annul thinks they’re both scum. What are the possible outcomes of this scenario (convincing town to vote someone other than Chezinu)? If he fails, he loses his bomb, and two scum flip (oops). Town might be suspicious of him because of it, but nowhere near as much as we were today due to the BKE flip (oops). But if he succeeds, then he's given town the opportunity to lynch an additional person D3. Whether or not the second person is scum, the KP would still be reduced to 1 permanently because we were still lynching BKE (oops). In addition, town has effectively taken Chezinu hostage, guaranteeing annul's survival as long as Chezinu is alive. That would be 3 guaranteed townies who couldn't be NK'd (FT, toad, and annul) and one "free" scum, leaving us in that 0.000001% situation annul mentioned when he claimed. You will note that all three times I wrote (oops) were times his assumption of BKE flipping scum screwed him over. This perfectly explains why he says his only mistake was BKE. I don't believe that scum annul would risk his own life to save Chezinu given what he would have known. The pros don't outweigh the cons, as he looks suspicious either way. The town annul explanation is far more feasible. I'm about 95% more inclined to believe that town annul had a significant oversight and had trouble explaining himself than I am to believe that scum annul risked his life quite blatantly to save someone who ultimately was likely going to be lynched anyway. Add to that other small things, like the fact that he breadcrumbed his role, and that he could have gotten gonzaw elected but kept his vote on himself, and I think it's pretty conclusive. So, the way I understand the situation is more like this:
I've essentially agreed with you already: On January 30 2013 01:45 FiveTouch wrote: Show nested quote + On January 30 2013 01:26 Stutters695 wrote: This is pure WIFOM but the only thing that gives me pause about an annul lynch is how obviously of a bad play it was for scum if he knew BKE would flip town. He pretty much asked us to keep scum at 2kp another night without suggesting a solid case for the double lynch. Surely he'd know how bad that would bite him in the ass as soon as the flip happened? But his lack of truly explaining why he kept his bomb on chez and the convenience of his claim from a scum perspective (no way to verify other than role cop) doesn't look good. Additionally the whole mason thing with Mocsta didn't sit right with me. At the time it was hard to explain since he just abruptly stopped talking to Mocsta so he wouldn't potentially get framed. That's all well and good, but why wouldn't he push him after. He said another Mason was scum, voted Mocsta (mason) and tried to save Chez (confirmed scum mason). These are an awful lot of coincidences in addition to not being a very town player in general. There's not that much to say about it because it's essentially correct. I still think he might be town, but I'll feel exceptionally dumb if he turns out to be mafia. It's like he's actively sabotaging himself and I don't understand the mafia motivation for doing so. The whole mad hatter thing drew massive amounts of attention to himself. Was it really worth it for possibly having one extra KP, when even this wasn't likely at all? Why make the play at all? It makes me tentatively lean on townie doing some really fucking stupid things instead. There are two issues. Firstly, annul is an experienced player. He should absolutely not be making the blunder of making the assumption that a player will 100% flip red. annul should god-damn well know that people aren't certain mafia until we've seen their flip. On January 28 2013 01:25 FiveTouch wrote: Because no-one is confirmed red until they flip. Not prplhz, not gonzaw, not BKE, and not Chezinu. On January 30 2013 01:57 FiveTouch wrote: Show nested quote + On January 30 2013 01:55 annul wrote: snore. i did not use my role in a bad way. my role usage is perfectly fine. if i have ANY bad marks on my play, it's not recognizing that the BKE got lynched without a single defender... it was way too easy and i should have picked up on the fact that he had not even one player at his back for the lynch, and thus may not be mafia. but this bad mark is on the entire town, not just me. assuming BKE was mafia, like 100% of the players here did (i may have missed a defender, but i doubt it), then there is literally no reason at all to have killed chez yesterday. none. mafia KP remains at 1 and chez does not hold any town powers, he isn't trusted, he's essentially already dead, just with a voice and one vote. that's it. This is precisely why I told you no-one is confirmed red until they flip. We must lynch our strongest scumreads, because we need to know what they flip for certain. That's why we had to lynch Chezinu, it's really obvious. As for the BKE lynch, do you really think the other two mafia would stick their neck out to defend him? That's an absurd notion. Your thought process is fine, fuba, but it's made on your (oops) assumption that BKE was definitely red, and it is based on what could have been another (oops) assumption in that Chezinu was definitely flipping red. Secondly, his vote on yamato today is just terrible. It was almost enough to make me want to consider moving my vote. | ||
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 30 2013 18:31 Toadesstern wrote: 2 important thigns I thought about while sleeping:
Toad, could you explain this one to me a bit? | ||
annul
United States2841 Posts
i am revoting axle | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 30 2013 21:59 FiveTouch wrote: Show nested quote + On January 30 2013 18:31 Toadesstern wrote: 2 important thigns I thought about while sleeping:
Toad, could you explain this one to me a bit? we want mafia to shoot our bodyguards. Leaving the doublelynch for now gives mafia just one more reason to shoot into the bodyguards. Also Vivax is looking worse and worse for suggesting that we should lynch you for safety. As long as we get a single mafia lynch in the next 6 or so cycles we win as long as the two of us are alive. Mafia knows they can't win by ignoring us and have to deal with us either way. 1 guy left, Marv left, Toad left in lylo is gg :p | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 RotterdaM StarCraft: Brood War![]() TKL ![]() IndyStarCraft ![]() SteadfastSC ![]() BRAT_OK ![]() ![]() UpATreeSC ![]() RuFF_SC2 ![]() ProTech118 Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Grubby7994 B2W.Neo549 shahzam280 Pyrionflax252 Trikslyr79 ZombieGrub30 Dewaltoss29 Maynarde28 JuggernautJason19 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH43 StarCraft: Brood War• MindelVK ![]() • Hupsaiya ![]() • Reevou ![]() ![]() • Kozan • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP League of Legends Other Games |
PiGosaur Monday
OSC
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
Code For Giants Cup
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
The PondCast
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
Replay Cast
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
SC Evo Complete
Classic vs uThermal
[ Show More ] SOOP StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
SOOP
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
[BSL 2025] Weekly
SOOP StarCraft League
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
|
|