|
On November 06 2012 14:45 Rad wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2012 14:43 Djodref wrote:On November 06 2012 14:26 Rad wrote:On November 06 2012 13:55 da0ud wrote:I was busy this morning and just finished catching up. One first thing that comes to mind since the night kill is Djo's really insisting on pushing for a Clarity lynch. This seems pretty obvious to me as his defense on the role claim is pretty bad. Best example about it is : He says : On November 05 2012 23:26 Clarity_nl wrote:
I never claimed VT, I never claimed anything. But right after CC's second role claim he adds : On November 05 2012 08:32 Clarity_nl wrote:
I can do that too. I don't wanna pay for no porn man. I don't think that saying that proves anything, can't make an assumption based on the host's behavior. Cheese why did you claim VT? If this is not role claiming ! However I find Rad's position on the subject smarter. He is a clear target, We should stop tunneling him for some time. There is someone else in the scum team (or two other people if Clarity is not). I have not read your filter like I said I would Rad (remember my gut feeling on you), but recently you have looked really town to me, so I am not that concerned Djo, however, I would still like people to look at him closely. Only two things he has been doing is: - tunnel Clarity, hence retaining information to the town, not trying to diversify the targets. - blue hunting as well big time during all N1 and since the beginning of D2. I really believe he could be bussing his mate to gain town credit or just keep the attention on him. @da0udMy big issue with djo right now is his persistence in blue hunting. I hate it. He really needs to stop and his point about "doesn't matter if we win!" is terrible. debears also blue hunted during the cheese case but turns out that was just an accident. I hate that we keep having to point out to djo that he needs to stop blue hunting and he's ignoring it. I'll be honest with you though. I'm null on him now, or maybe leaning town. He's ridiculously passionate about his clarity tunneling, or at least that's how I read it, and that feels townie to me. Not that I'd get a scum read from him if he wasn't being like this, but I dunno, that's just how I'm feeling atm. I want him to stop tunneling clarity for a bit and move on. He was shitty town last game and I refuse shitty djo town this game, but I think he's just blinded with rage right now. I agree with djo on your thoughts of him gaining super town credit if clarity flips scum, in the case of djo clarity scum team. I think we only worry about that if we end up lynching clarity and he flips scum (or visa versa I suppose?). Also, on my list of possible scum teams, djo clarity isn't one of them (not that I have an actual list, but this one hasn't really come to mind, seems way too elaborate to be real). @ RadI was not shitty town last game, I've been pushing for a Dandel Ion lynch all D2 and I even doubted his fakeclaim. My case against him was spot on, and my case against Clarity is quite good I think right now. Of course, I've been looking scummy as well, but this is something you have to expect when someone is posting without paying attention to his posts and is taking strong stances. I promise to stop the blue hunting. By shitty town, I meant you didn't look town at all last game. Do you disagree? Don't really care how good your reads are if I can't believe a word you say. I was looking like shit because all the scumteam was pushing for my lynch. I have been also posting a lot of shit but that's something that you have to expect as town. I think that your actions and your general attitude is what is the most important. Anyway, calling me shitty town in my last game is not helping the atmosphere to get better  Show nested quote +On November 06 2012 14:43 Djodref wrote:
I'll move on when you vote Clarity though...
Do you promise? If you vote Clarity, I'm going to address daoud's case against me at first then I'm going to see what I can find. I'm interested in sylver and Alsn.
@ Rad
My comments in bold font in your quote
|
On November 06 2012 14:23 sylverfyre wrote:I like what da0ud's doing. It basically amounts to "If we're so sure about clarity, why don't we stop focusing on him and find the second scum?" + Show Spoiler [Inactivity Warning] +Can't post more tonight, have to be up early in the morning (or I won't get a chance to vote in the election all day) and I might not post much tomorrow at all - I have class AND work.
@ sylverfyre
I want to secure a Clarity lynch today more than anything else. Do you understand that I have some doubts about it when you have your vote on my back ?
|
On November 06 2012 14:11 Obzy wrote:With regards to Sylverfyre - He said he'd be around for the day post and wasn't, but - that's just more of a note, and has absolutely nothing to do with my voting him. He made noise early in the game about a debears/djo (one of the above) as scum, particularly focusing debears. Looks at a scumteam of CC and debears during the role PM... stuff. Eventually switches his vote onto CC from debears, puts suspicion on Clarity [and db, of course]. Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 10:01 sylverfyre wrote:If cheese flips town, it's clarity or debears. Probably both. It clearly isn't debears. He shows a strong town read on Rad, although I think that's fairly obvious, personally. (And now that I'm refreshing the last page to make sure I'm not missing something, he's shown up and redirects suspicion at Djo because debears flipped town.) I'm really a bit less certain what to think of this lol. If Clarity is town, and da0ud is town, it leaves Djo Sylv.. /shrug. Sylv's not addressing my vote on him at all, still. And apparently he just voted Djo too lol. If Djo/Sylv have a shootout, I'm okay with that at the moment, unless Clarity can be shown [by Rad or Alsn or da0ud, preferably] to have clear mafia signs.
@ Obzy
If you do not trust me, please check again debears cases and points against Clarity during D1/N1...
|
On November 06 2012 15:25 Obzy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2012 15:02 da0ud wrote:On November 06 2012 14:11 Obzy wrote:With regards to Sylverfyre - He said he'd be around for the day post and wasn't, but - that's just more of a note, and has absolutely nothing to do with my voting him. He made noise early in the game about a debears/djo (one of the above) as scum, particularly focusing debears. Looks at a scumteam of CC and debears during the role PM... stuff. Eventually switches his vote onto CC from debears, puts suspicion on Clarity [and db, of course]. On November 05 2012 10:01 sylverfyre wrote:If cheese flips town, it's clarity or debears. Probably both. It clearly isn't debears. He shows a strong town read on Rad, although I think that's fairly obvious, personally. (And now that I'm refreshing the last page to make sure I'm not missing something, he's shown up and redirects suspicion at Djo because debears flipped town.) I'm really a bit less certain what to think of this lol. If Clarity is town, and da0ud is town, it leaves Djo Sylv.. /shrug. Sylv's not addressing my vote on him at all, still. And apparently he just voted Djo too lol. If Djo/Sylv have a shootout, I'm okay with that at the moment, unless Clarity can be shown [by Rad or Alsn or da0ud, preferably] to have clear mafia signs. @ObzyI have a hard time considering what you say seriously when you keep putting "lol" everywhere. Could you be more assertive ? I feel like you tell your thoughts but don't want to take any real positions. Not very townie behaviour. Push your reads please ! I was trying to. I voted Sylver, that was me attempting to push Sylver as a read and apparently I am just horrible at it because not a single person noticed or cared until now, at which point I'm told by you that it's not good enough. The lol is just how I type, I apologize for any confusion. I'll try to stop using it until I forget =l I had a strong Clar-is-scum read that got sort of shot down by doubts from Rad and Alsn, and not really being able to question adequately(apparently) earlier this morning.. Now there are votes on Clar and we're ignoring Sylv - ??? I don't understand. Until tomorrow afternoon (or maybe while I'm at work tomorrow), my vote is parked on Sylv and I think that other people should be voting Sylv too. If there's zero chance of a Sylv lynch because of lack of interest, lack of caring, lack of response to my attempt at a case from both other players and Sylv himself, I'll reconsider then, but seriously what the heck. I just don't get it. I'm not implying that Rad isn't town, it just astonishes me how the tide of opinion shifts, and in less than 30 minutes. This morning I would've been more than happy to vote Clarity, it was my intention to do so, and I feel like I was talked/intimidated out of it. Now, here we are again.
@ Obzy
Rad is doing this because I promised him to focus on someone else if he voted Clarity 
|
Sylverfyre
Too scummy to be scum ? Or am I fooling myself ?
Part I --- The votes
I personally find that sylverfyre is using his votes quite lightly. The reasons he is presenting for his votes are not documented enough and he is not giving us what he is trying to achieve with his votes. Please also note that he has only voted for town players until now (yes, I'm including myself in the town players). Here are some examples...
On November 03 2012 14:44 sylverfyre wrote:
<snip>
##Vote debears
Your fluff, and your reaction against Alsn seem odd to me. Also, your claim of always being perfect about on at lynchtime. Now we can't even use it (in the future) as a scumtell on you because it'd turn into WIFOM.
Here he is voting the most active town player for poor reasons. You cannot accuse someone being full or fluff without supporting it. This is just discrediting debears if you do it this way. The early FoS had been discarded by debears and the "always present at lynch" point was minor. Please note that he doesn't state that he wants to prevent debears from posting fluff with his vote. There is no clear motivation stated.
On November 06 2012 13:44 sylverfyre wrote:
This most recent post by you is even more ridiculously scummy. Don't care if you have to out all the blues while scumhunting? Maybe because you're actually blue-hunting?
##Vote Djodref
Here he is voting me because I'm blue-hunting. No more explanation given, I don't know what he is expecting to do with his vote. Does he want me dead today ? Am I his top scum read ? Does he want me to stop blue hunting ? I do not know !
My biggest issue with his votes is that his MOTIVATIONS ARE NOT CLEAR ! Does he want to lynch, does he want to pressure ? I don't understand and I have a bad feeling about this...
Advice to Sylverfyre - If you are town and your goal is to cast suspicion, I advice you to start making some real cases with good content against your scum reads and push them. Your (random) voting style makes you look suspicious.
Part II --- The scumtells
I don't know if sylverfyre is understanding the difference between the word "townies" and "players" but the way he is using "townie(s)" is some posts could be scumslips. I've decided that he must be the worst mafia player ever (in term of slipping) or that he is really genuine in his posts, regardless of his alignment. Here are some examples...
On November 03 2012 14:44 sylverfyre wrote:
Holy shit, this flavor. What.
If we're gonna lynch a lurker, I'd rather it be early game than late, at least. But I think that we have more... dedication among the townies this game. There wasn't a long wait for the last few signups - everyone here seems pretty pumped to play some mafia seriously. I don't think lurker policy lynch will come up at all.
<snip>
Should have used players...
On November 04 2012 16:27 sylverfyre wrote:
@Obzy - I made a pressure vote. Debears responded to it. We went back and forth at each other for a while. When we started to get into a loop of OMGUS, I was starting to feel like it was a waste of time and space that wasn't bringing a lot to the town, I let the vote drop. Scum love nothing more than when two townies are at each others throats constantly without looking at other people.
<snip>
Would this sentence not make debaers and him 2 townies ? Yet he keeps on tunneling debears...
HERE COMES THE ICING ON THE CAKE !
On November 05 2012 10:01 sylverfyre wrote:
My chance following cheesecake voting debears?
If cheese flips town, it's clarity or debears. Probably both.
This post, one minute before Cheese flips town, while sylver has still his vote parked on him. Biggest scum tell ever, you can find him in all the scum hunting guidebooks for beginners.
Advice to Sylverfyre: If you are town, please learn the difference between "townies" and "players" and try not to slip. Town players can be lynched for slips.
Part III --- Activity and Scumhunting
Both of them lack of consistence. Seriously, you cannot go on like this, sylver, you are going to get lynched...
I don't want to go into the details for this part, I'm waiting for him to step up
Part IV --- Why I still think he might be town
Too scummy to be scum
Sylverfyre obviously stands out
Sylverfyre is the only one really going after me, which shows some originality
|
I have town reads on Obzy and daoud. I'm not going to consider them at scum nor focus on them unless someone brings a golden case against them on the table.
I don't know about Rad and Alsn. I'm very worried about Rad stance on Clarity and I want Alsn to explain how he came off with a scum Cheese case in 2 hours just before the lynch.
My read on sylverfyre is null.
I want Clarity dead today.
@ Clarity
If you are town, the only way to redeem yourself is to seriously scumhunt from now on. Don't waste your time on defense and I would recommend you to not waste your time on me, but that's up to you.
|
@ Rad
Why did you call me scum at the beginning of D2 ?
On November 06 2012 10:13 Rad wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2012 10:11 Djodref wrote:On November 06 2012 10:03 Rad wrote:
Wow scum, you couldn't read that debears was a VT? LOL. Why do you think he high fived cheese? @ RadThe mafia priority is not blue sniping. Debears was a good choice... While being active and all, debears was kind of a town leader, even if he was controversial. Him being gone makes life easier for scum. Also, we can make some assumptions - mafia wanted to frame sylver
- You and/or sylver are in the mafia team and you wanted debears gone
- mafia wanted to frame the people suspicious of debears
Feeling stupid, scum?
and now I see in your filter
On November 06 2012 14:26 Rad wrote:
<snip>
I'll be honest with you though. I'm null on him now, or maybe leaning town. He's ridiculously passionate about his clarity tunneling, or at least that's how I read it, and that feels townie to me. Not that I'd get a scum read from him if he wasn't being like this, but I dunno, that's just how I'm feeling atm.
<snip>
You didn't even explain the FoS you had against me this morning ? What's happening ?
Why the sudden changes of heart ?
|
@ Rad
Could you please give me a summary of your actions during D1 ?
I'm interested to know your point of view...
|
@ Rad
On November 05 2012 15:23 Rad wrote:
<skip>
What if clarity PM'd the host asking about this before the cheese incident? What if he just realized that you can't read into the flavor too much because, well, it's true, you can't read into the flavor too much? Why must "he's scum!" be the answer? Null read to me.[/QUOTE]
How did you know that Clarity had sent a PM to the host about this subject before he told us ?
|
On November 06 2012 17:49 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2012 16:56 Djodref wrote:
@ Clarity
If you are town, the only way to redeem yourself is to seriously scumhunt from now on. Don't waste your time on defense and I would recommend you to not waste your time on me, but that's up to you. Now that you're finally giving me the chance. Or no it's not even that, it's that you're being forced to give me the chance. Why would you add that I shouldn't make a case on you? please explain.
@ Clarity
I'm town, you would just waste your time.
Could you tell us how you came with the idea to ask the host a question about the VT flavor ?
|
On November 06 2012 17:51 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2012 17:50 Djodref wrote:@ RadOn November 05 2012 15:23 Rad wrote:
<skip> What if clarity PM'd the host asking about this before the cheese incident? What if he just realized that you can't read into the flavor too much because, well, it's true, you can't read into the flavor too much? Why must "he's scum!" be the answer? Null read to me. How did you know that Clarity had sent a PM to the host about this subject before he told us ?
Because of the time it took me to reply in the thread, and the hours upon hours it takes for marv to get back to you (just kidding marv)[/QUOTE]
@ Clarity
How could it be possible for you to answer this for Rad ?
|
On November 06 2012 17:53 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2012 17:52 Djodref wrote:On November 06 2012 17:49 Clarity_nl wrote:On November 06 2012 16:56 Djodref wrote:
@ Clarity
If you are town, the only way to redeem yourself is to seriously scumhunt from now on. Don't waste your time on defense and I would recommend you to not waste your time on me, but that's up to you. Now that you're finally giving me the chance. Or no it's not even that, it's that you're being forced to give me the chance. Why would you add that I shouldn't make a case on you? please explain. @ ClarityI'm town, you would just waste your time. Could you tell us how you came with the idea to ask the host a question about the VT flavor ? I have said this, a million times. The VT flavor in the PM is different than the flavor in the OP. Please read my posts, stop repeating questions and accusations if you actually believe they have merit.
@ Clarity
Did you think, as Cheese did, that VT claim could be imb4 in this game ?
|
Ok, I'll make a better post where the timestamps are going to be emphasized. I'll let you post what you want without jumping at you for a while.
|
@ Clarity
I want to secure a lynch on you before anything else. You have already escaped your lynch yesterday and I don't want this to happen again. I'm disappointed that people are denying me information because it might out the blues. Scumhunting should come first, the best way to protect the blues is to pose a greater threat to the mafia as green than the blue themselves.
I didn't find anyone showing such anti-town behavior as you. You didn't take a single stance before debears case against you and your interactions with me and Cheese don't make any sense if you were town.
I might be wrong so I'll give you a chance to redeem yourself. Go on and make the best case of your life
|
On November 05 2012 14:02 da0ud wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 07:00 Clarity_nl wrote:
@ debears
I have the case in hand, I will post it if it looks like I'll be lynched, otherwise I will post it tomorrow.
Djo was trying to pressure me into posting my case on him, starts adding that he won't be around for lynchtime, that's fine.
I come back, you and him both have cases on me, and turns out Djo is in South Korea(??) so he's not around for 7 hours before lynchtime.
He then points out that I just don't want him to put up a defense, says he's going to bed, replies to my post 10 minutes later emphasizing that if I post a case on him it just means I don't want him to be there to defend himself. I feel set up, but nothing I can do.
I didn't go from "this" to "that". Notice how I said: "Yes Djo my case was going to be about you" I have not finished reading the thread, but this is exactly the way I feel about Djo's attitude that lynch. -> He asked to be put on the list of lynch candidates to prove his innocence.
However this comes at 1.11am his time in Seoul, Korea (for those who still don't know. Btw Djo would be good if you could update your profile to show Korea instead of France, I am french as well though showing HK in my profile, we lost too much time with this confusion). Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 01:11 Djodref wrote:I would like sylver to be considered as a lynch candidate for today as well. I have no problem with me being also a candidate (even if I would have preferred to address the possible cases against me not while waking up) because being mislynched last game allowed me to clearly see who was pushing me for bad reasons. I'm confident that you could recognize my innocence this time And why nobody has yet commented on the newest slip from sylver ? This is pretty late for him to ask to be put as a lynch candidate and have time to prepare his defense. He has even used this trick against Clarity, saying he cannot defend himself on a case that is suppose to come. When I proposed to be a lynch candidate, this was an act of bravado. It was to test the confidence of my detractors into their case against me. Do they really believe I'm scum and post a case against me while looking bad because I'm not going to be able myself ? The result is that nobody made a case against me. So I guess that nobody really believed that I was scum. Clarity and Alsn have threatened to make case against me so I know now that it was empty threats.-> Moreover, Djo is the one who keeps quoting scum slips here and there subjectively. + Show Spoiler +On November 03 2012 20:22 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2012 15:30 sylverfyre wrote:@ObzyI'm casting suspicion with my vote. I find it far more effective than FOS, which can be more difficult to keep track of. Votes, the mod will keep track of for us. I understand he's the most active person. If that was 3 pages of posts with useful content, I'd have no issue. It's like 2 pages of fluff and 1 page of content, and the 1 page of content could be condensed if he didn't jam the "post" button after finishing a sentence, when he fully intends to immediately write another one. @Rad - you were friggin brilliant D2/N2 last game. It's a shame you used your only bullet N1.  @ sylverfyreSo let me sum up the situation. You join the thread and directly vote for debears mainly because there is a lot of fluff in it. Then you say that you are voting him to "cast suspicion with your vote". I'm sorry but I'm voting somebody when I find them suspicious, not to cast suspicion on him. Do you know who is voting innocent players to cast suspicion on them ? Mafia. (Not sure if debears is innocent in this case, I have seen things I don't really like in his filter) I'm taking this for a scumslip and the most suspicious thing I have seen in this thread so far. ##Vote sylverfire
@ ClarityIt answers your question On November 04 2012 00:06 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2012 23:59 debears wrote:
@Djo
What do you think of my points on Sylver? Well, I have voted for sylver before you for a different scumslip so I definitively agree Anyway they are good points, the scumslip you have found is better than mine, his vote on you is quite unfounded and he has also totally forgot to mention me jumping on Cheese in his post. I think the chances for him to be scum are great. On November 04 2012 03:30 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On November 04 2012 02:05 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On November 04 2012 02:01 Djodref wrote:I would like to add a point regarding sylver's scumslip. Please take note how he reacted to it. On November 04 2012 01:08 sylverfyre wrote:
/snip
And finally, on your final point:
I'm not saying townies will be more dedicated this game. I'm saying PLAYERS will be more dedicated this game. Why? The game filled up instantly and we don't have anyone from last game who lurked like crazy except for da0ud (who was on vacation, and is presumably more available now. I hope.) We have no Roco69 players this game, even da0ud has posted some content now. I don't think we'll have a day 1 lynch with anything less than 9 votes cast.
Your scumslip is grasping at straws and making up scum tells is really bad for town. Leaving my vote on you.
/snip
He denies the fact that he used the word "townies". In my opinion, a town player would have said "I've used the word townies but I meant players, I've slipped, my bad". Last game, I've accepted my slip and explained why I've slipped. I think it is mafia reaction to deny it like that. He's not denying using the word townies. He's denying the connotation of the word townies. There is no motivation for anyone to outright deny that they used a word, because, well, it's written in stone.On November 04 2012 01:59 debears wrote:
@CC
What do you think of Djo's seriousness attitude this game?
His personality seems different from last game in that regard, where he seemed much more amicable Top scumread atm (Woa, is this last game already?) He's still smileydjo, but seasoned with something I can't recognize this game. He's contradicting his own town play and, previously, trying to nitpick at me for little to no reason. @ CheeseThe word "townies" doesn't connote as "players". Kush helped me to understand this in my very first game on these forums. People don't use townies when they can use players. The meaning is different. It is a slip, so now we have to decided if it is a scumslip or not. The way sylver reacted to it makes me thing that it is a scumslip indeed. On November 04 2012 16:55 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On November 04 2012 16:27 sylverfyre wrote:
@Obzy - I made a pressure vote. Debears responded to it. We went back and forth at each other for a while. When we started to get into a loop of OMGUS, I was starting to feel like it was a waste of time and space that wasn't bringing a lot to the town, I let the vote drop. Scum love nothing more than when two townies are at each others throats constantly without looking at other people.
I'm not going to random vote first half of day 1 and follow it through all the way to lynchtime unless my target makes some SERIOUS scumtells under pressure. While debears doesn't exactly look pristine, I need to look at (and scumhunt sniff) more than 1 person on day 1. @ sylverSo are you saying that debears is a townie ? Slipping again ? I'm not sure what you want to say by "he doesn't exactly look pristine". Could you elaborate ? -> Finally, Djo as jumped on the case against Cheese as soon as he slept.Not budging from his position. I was wrong saying that Debears sheeped on this one. He votes CC first, fair enough, then Djo voted again. Here are three of his consecutive posts : + Show Spoiler +On November 05 2012 09:02 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 09:00 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
I claimed because the OP isn't indicative of flavor. I assumed Marv made a boo-boo, but apparently not since scum got role PM's too. Debears caught it right away. It also was a moment of fun in this thread xD @ Cheese So, it's ok for you to get the thread derailed for a joke at one hour before the lynch ? Why did you claim, for real ? On November 05 2012 09:03 Djodref wrote:I still want my Clarity lynch by the way On November 05 2012 09:19 Djodref wrote:
WHY DID YOU CLAIM AT THIS MOMENT, CHEESE ?
MOTIVATIONS ?
##Unvote
##Vote Cheese What happened to you wanting your "Clarity lynch " ? When everybody started to focus on Cheese and his ill-timed claim, I thought that the momentum to lynch Clarity was lost. So I had no problem to switch on Cheese when this guy was not making any sense and was proclaiming my top scumread "confirmed town". I thought it was part of a plan to save Clarity. Check the thread and you can see that I was on the same line that obzy at that time and that I was thinking that the scumteam was Clarity/Cheese.Conclusion : I think Djo is blending in, attacking people on small things (nitpicking himself while pointing out we should not nitpick in his post), and try to prove his innocence by showing his is able to fight his way against a lynch while bullying people who would actually do it because he won't be here to do so. Me ? Blending in ?
I'm the one with the biggest number of cases so far. I don't attack people on small things. I didn't set up Clarity, he gave him a fair warning. People didn't take a chance against me because they didn't have the balls to do it, which is not very townie.
@ daoud
My comments in bold font in your quote.
|
On November 05 2012 15:23 Rad wrote:
<snip>
What if clarity PM'd the host asking about this before the cheese incident? What if he just realized that you can't read into the flavor too much because, well, it's true, you can't read into the flavor too much? Why must "he's scum!" be the answer? Null read to me.
On November 05 2012 21:01 Clarity_nl wrote:
<snip>
I asked marv about the flavor role PMs way before Cheese claimed. The reason I sounded so "condescending" (as you put it) is because I wanted him to shut up and explain why he claimed, and to try and stop others from claiming, but things went to shit fast. The reason I didn't say this earlier was because I had to check with marv if I was allowed to post this.
@ Rad
How did you know that Clarity send a PM to marv before he admitted it himself for the first time ? Please look at the timestamps.
|
@ Clarity
On November 06 2012 03:00 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2012 02:32 Djodref wrote:
@ Clarity
Could you at least tell me when you asked marv your question ?
I'm only asking for when right now ^^ Date: 11/5/12 2:48 <snip>
I'm not sure what time you are talking about in your answer... Is it KST ?
Could you give me the time again with a post you have sent to the thread around the same time when you sent your question to marv ?
|
On November 06 2012 19:01 da0ud wrote:And Djo, I agree that not too many people are currently around, but you were supposed to switch focus for some time. As far as I know apart from one (nicely formatted ) case on Sylver there is nothing else than extra tunnelling on Clarity. At least find other new arguments against him to bring to the table. Who cares about the time of the PM with Marv. Marv himself said there wont be any copy paste of anything so Clarity will obviously give you an answer that satisfy you. You are flooding the thread here.
@ daoud
I think that I'm investing myself more than you in this game so I'm not going to accept your critic for the fact that I did only focus on sylver.
I'll answer your case again though...
|
@ Clarity
Night or Day, I'm expecting a fake blue claim from you. I wanted to force you to produce it and try to show how your blue claim is fake. I did not manage to do it last time for dandel but I should get my revenge
Given your experience in this game, I doubt that you actually went for marv to ask your infamous question about the flavor, in the case where you are VT.
|
On November 06 2012 20:11 da0ud wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2012 19:09 Djodref wrote:On November 06 2012 19:01 da0ud wrote:And Djo, I agree that not too many people are currently around, but you were supposed to switch focus for some time. As far as I know apart from one (nicely formatted ) case on Sylver there is nothing else than extra tunnelling on Clarity. At least find other new arguments against him to bring to the table. Who cares about the time of the PM with Marv. Marv himself said there wont be any copy paste of anything so Clarity will obviously give you an answer that satisfy you. You are flooding the thread here. @ daoudI think that I'm investing myself more than you in this game so I'm not going to accept your critic for the fact that I did only focus on sylver. I'll answer your case again though... Again not what I said at all : I said since you announced you would stop tunneling clarity you had only one post (a case against sylver) before shifting back to tunnelling clarity. Nothing against your investment in that game. I see you have not slept much indeed. Ps : sorry phone posting
ok, I got your point. I couldn't control myself ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
