Newbie Mini Mafia XXIX - Page 81

1)Neutrality was most definitely true for d1 for cheese. He had a tendency of stating the obvious in terms of policy early on. As time progressed, his suspicions moved to 1)Djo and 2) Inig. He found his suspicions on Inig alleviated shortly.

However, he did stay focused on Djo. He pursued unanswer questions from Djo (reading the thread). He put input on my case on specific parts, quoting which he agreed and disagreed with (as I recall very few people in this game have done so) and saying why. He attempted to make an ill-founded smiley meta case on Djo, but rescinded after being pointed out why he was wrong, but stood by the rest of his concerns of Djo.

He had further suspicions on Djo due to Djo's refusal to change his views on policy and Djo's display of confusion.

Before the lynch, he went MIA for a while and came back to the thread with a little time before lynch, switching his vote off Djo and onto Dau0d (explained his reasoning for voting Dau0d over Inig). His reasons were that he did not want to waste a vote on someone not getting lynched. Others had asked him to move his vote off Djo.

So, for d1, nothing special, nothing that sticks out. Neutral. However, also remember that Cheese's top scumread was Djo. Djo's lynch never gained momemtun. Everyone wanted to take a wait a see approach. That could explain the rest of his d1 (except the afk).

N2 - night 2 was a little bit of a different story. He became more active with the fill in of Kush. One thing I saw that he did was give kush a meta read on me. He had not been asked in any way to do so. Kush was rampaging about my meta, yet the only one to do a meta read was Cheese. This, in my eyes, is a town tell. He went beyond this game with his investigation. Also, he found kush's scumslip about nk's from kush's previous games before I even did, when I actually played that game.

Something I noticed by Djo is that he defended kush against bad cases (rad's pre-game talk case).

Also, during this time, Djo was attacking Cheese for Cheese's voteswitch at the end of day 1 off of Djo. The problem with that accusation, though, was that Djo himself asked Cheese to not waste the vote. Djo continued to argue this point for a while.

Djo's accusations over a bad point led Cheese to believe Djo was scum during N2. He makes a formal case against Djo with his own points.

D2 - 2) From d1 on, Djo never made himself seem town by his comments. Pretty much everyone was saying "Djo is scum". In n1, Djo pushed Cheese's suspicions with Djo's constant attack over an invalid point. Cheese keeps his vote on Djo, stating the "95% scum, 5% SK" argument, which, based off of Djo's actions in the night, and how Cheese's suspicion seemed to keep building, make sense. Cheese was also the second to vote Djo. Also, with the case he made, I wouldn't case his suspicion of Djo "sheeping" after the interactions between the two n1.

Meanwhile, after Dandel flamed on, Cheese stated that he was willing to vote Dandel is Dandel refused to defend himself and keep flaming.

Around this point, he said the hurricane was moving in.

After a while, he posted a bit on Inig's "blending in". Also, he noticed how I somehow managed to quote his post in the middle of my Djo case while addressing the other points in the case. The quote from CC that I acccidentally put in the Djo case was in a spoiler, meaning that Djo was pretty likely reading my long case. Him reading the thread was a common theme that showed up in his filter.

At the end of day2, he became more suspicious after Roco's and Inig's votes on Dandel without reasoning. He makes a final statment about Djo being scum, and disappears (saying it was the hurricane).

Alright, that's the whole context of his posting.