| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
On January 16 2012 22:36 Jackal58 wrote: Just got to work and getting caught up. Layabout - Wtf is up with your vote. BH is so freaking town it's not even funny. Your vote hits me as a PSA from scum screaming "here I am" Eh? Lay haven't voted yet... do you mean it the other way around? | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On January 16 2012 23:27 Dirkzor wrote: Eh? Lay haven't voted yet... do you mean it the other way around? Wow did I read that wrong. Ya. Teach me to post before coffee takes effect. I retract my statement regarding Layabout. | ||
|
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
On January 14 2012 13:25 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: Oh hai bandwagon. I am the sage. So no. He did not claim Seer. He claimed sage. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9835 Posts
On January 16 2012 23:41 Refallen wrote: HoD claimed Seer**** the demon DT. Angel DT hasn't claimed yet, I think he should claim now if he's still alive. If he's not, that means syllo was the angel DT, which means time to look for his posts for breadcrumbs (again) If syllo was the seer you're wasting your time. He was roleblocked both nights, there would be no breadcrumbs to find. We want to lynch an Angel today, deal with the demons at night. I trust that HoD is the sage, and I don't like the fact that Layabout was twisted. I think there is pretty good chance that he is a demon. For the night actions tomorrow HoD needs to cleanse BH, and I feel that DH should shoot layabout. Demons can't twist both of them. | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9835 Posts
| ||
|
Refallen
452 Posts
And Grack, that's a good point. Syllo wouldn't have had a chance to peek. So we have a real high chance of not having any DT peeks this game, except for HoD's Grack not demon peek. What a retarded situation. Right, I'm going to bed. I'll like to hear thoughts on lynching Grackaroni. | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
If we believe that HoD is the sage, he is not a demon. He might still be angel but it just overall lowers our chance of hitting scum. If we do not believe HoD is sage, we should lynch HoD. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On January 17 2012 00:52 Refallen wrote: Uh, sorry, yes I got mixed up with sage and seer again. What I'm trying to say is, do you agree, Jackal, that the seer should claim if he's still alive? And Grack, that's a good point. Syllo wouldn't have had a chance to peek. So we have a real high chance of not having any DT peeks this game, except for HoD's Grack not demon peek. What a retarded situation. Right, I'm going to bed. I'll like to hear thoughts on lynching Grackaroni. We apparently no longer have our channeler so if the Seer does claim he will die. So unless the Seer has positively identified an Angel I think it's best for him to keep his mouth shut ftm. I also think Grack is a bad lynch. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On January 16 2012 19:07 Blazinghand wrote: ##Vote: Layabout LAYABOUT WHERE ON GODS GREEN EARTH ARE YOU The night post happened at 1:30 am and i just got home, it is now 5:20 pm On January 16 2012 22:36 Jackal58 wrote: Just got to work and getting caught up. Layabout - Wtf is up with your vote. BH is so freaking town it's not even funny. Your vote hits me as a PSA from scum screaming "here I am" If RoL was an Angel they might. If RoL was Channeler and there are still 3 Angels remaining I wouldn't count on it. I'm gonna call it now. Dirkzor and Layabout are the Demons. Bluelightz is an Angel. I have no clue yet as to who the remaining one or two are. On December 28 2011 15:42 ZBot wrote: Vote count for the Day 4 Lynch. With 10 alive, 6 votes are required to lynch. Current votes: layabout (1): Blazinghand Refallen (0): The Day 4 deadline is at 2012-01-18 10:00:00 KST. (That's approximately 1 day, 7:43:18 from now.) What on earth are you talking about Jackal? +so yesterday we nearly lynched HoD but decided to banish him and lynch RoL. During the night i post a big case about why HoD is scum. No banish happens and HoD claims that i have been twisted. (the sage and Angels are the only players that can tell if a player is twisted). How does that make me a demon? | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On January 16 2012 18:56 Refallen wrote: Votes first, apparently, then quotes in the thread, where in previous days he's always voting through his posts. ^^ This is how he voted on previous days ^ Then he says this. And misses the lynch. Gives the reason for this as "not wanting to ruin town atmosphere" sounds like a soft claim to me. So what I want to know is, if he really was the corrupted townie or if there is someone else out there. Do you not agree that if he wasn't the corrupted townie, and HoD claiming he was twisted, that demons would hardly have reason to be twisting layabout? Do you not agree, that wiggles was much more likely to be the fucking channeler than fucking RoL? And if that's the case, would HoD's sage claim not gain some credibility, seeing as there is no counterclaim? What the fuck is this? Yes, RoL was probably a fucking angel. Not the AoD obviously, and since there's a pretty damn good chance the acolyte is dead I rather the ctownie claim now so we have a clear target in the form of layabout. That's what I think. But before that, we can ask ourselves first if demons have any motivation to twist layabout if he wasn't a demon. I'll ask that to you, what do you think? On January 15 2012 07:06 ZBot wrote: End of Day 3 Lynched: RebirthOfLeGenD (7): Current votes: HarbingerOfDoom (2): Bluelightz (1): Jackal58 Spaackle (0): Blazinghand (0): The third day brought a new dimension of suffering. There was no wind, nor heat, but thick grey clouds covered the sky. The temperature dropped quickly, and soon everyone was shivering and huddling in whatever clothes they had left. A thin layer of frost covered the ground, every breath condensed immediately in the cold air. Still, those that remained persevered. Some thought of their loved ones, elsewhere in the universe. Others remembered good times in the past. Still others drew upon an inner reserve of pure will. Everyone continued to talk and accuse, in hopes of identifying the spirits that blended in among them. As the day continued, those that remained would eventually come to a mental consensus, and a figure was pulled towards the center of the town square, where the throne and spire stood ready. But a swirling ball of emptiness appeared and hid everything from sight. In no time, a scream of pain pierced the air, but nothing could be seen in the darkness. RebirthOfLeGenD, the ??? was lynched Day 3! It is now Night 3. The night will end 2012-01-16 10:00:57. (That's approximately 1 day, 2:54:00 from now.) When i said i would vote at 8:00 my vote was on HoD, I was waiting for RoL to make a defence which i could respond to. He didn't I said i would vote at 8:00. The lynch happened at 7:06. That was not a "soft claim" in any way. You call it a soft claim and then ask for a corrupted townie to claim so that i can be a target because you have decided that i was trying to soft claim corrupted town. You then try to support HoD's sage claim. And then say that this makes me a target because HoD says i was twisted, HoD is a player player who STILL stands a very high chance of being the AoD If he is an Angel he has either 1 or 2 team-mates who have night-actions that can fail if they are on a player who is twisted. Who was more likely to target me last night if HoD is an Angel. The sage or an angel? How does being twisted make me a better lynch target than HoD in any way? + Show Spoiler + I am going to quote wiggles now: About voting: On January 05 2012 07:05 Mr. Wiggles wrote: -cut- Don't Hammer. While we don't have to worry about corruption until day three, we should still be careful of keeping the lynch under our control. Always check the vote-count before voting, and always vote in the thread along with your PM to ZBot, so that we can see when you voted, as well as who you voted for, before Zbot the count. No one should be hammering a lynch until later in the day if we can help it, as this will give us the most time for discussion and information gathering. Those are my thoughts so far after reading the set-up again, and through the thread once. I'm going away for a little bit, but I'll read through the thread again and be back later. Anyway Refallen: On January 09 2012 02:30 layabout wrote: Trying to figure out who was voting for who and when, is quite a pain. I think it would be helpful if players would vote, then announce that vote in the thread and attach the zbot vote count at that time to the post, (with their vote in it). That way we can look back only events clearly and actually analyse it. However this might lead to or force corrupted town to reveals themselves, which they might not wish to do and which might not be in town's best interests. I suggest that every every 3 votes somebody should attach the vote count at that time (possibly in a spoiler), so that we can look back and have a clear picture of what happened. @at everyone Do you agree? Should we have a different interval?(for instance 5 votes or every 12 hours) Night 1 i said that players should vote and then attach the zbot count including their vote to the post in which they vote. By "On previous days" i suppose you mean on day 1? BEFORE I SAID THAT I WOULD CHANGE HOW I VOTE? You are deliberately misleading people and you have been calling me a demon. Why would you do this as town? On January 08 2012 01:43 layabout wrote: Conclusion: risk.nuke's play does not math the town risk.nuke you may have come to know and love. He was willing to offer thoughts at the start when doing so was not useful and when it was easy for scum to do so. He has made excuses and promised content. He has yet to deliver that content. He has not been aggressive in calling people out as he has previuosly and has criticised syllogism for calling him out. He avoided has provided a very fluffy answer to HoD's question. He has contradicted his own declarations of good town play. He has avoided making any serious contributions now that we actuaaly have to decide who we are lynching. He has not made an effort to defend himself, but has called everybody voting for him scum. Vote risk.nuke filters in past games: Election mafia (town) Tl Mafia XLVII (town) Steamship (Tl mafia 46) (town) Newbie mini mafia (town)+ nice hotbid post TL Mafia XLV (town) almost no posts day1 You removed the date stamp on my post, here is the quote with the time and date attached plus a link to it http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=13039009 | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On January 16 2012 12:06 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: Re: Layabout's case You're right layabout, I should have been cared about the lynch day 2 as much as you did and not place a vote at any point during the day. That shows you care a lot more than I do. I also liked that part where you didn't include this day 1 post of mine and then claim I never gave reasons for why Tyrran was scummy until the large day 2 post I made. Don't comment on things you don't know about, it makes you look bad. If we lynched them all in one day the platform collapses and nobody gets lynched instead of all of them getting lynched, wasting an entire day. The OP hinted at this by saying there were dangers in store for a town that lynches too many people in one day, but RoL suggested lynching 7 at once. You think a vague question that requires a contribution to answer it is useless, but a vague challenge to make a contribution is good, I see, I see. And not a lot of people here have played 4 out of 4 of their games with risk in them either. What's your point? So earlier you thought it made sense from a town perspective, now you disagree with it? Earlier it was weak to use it, now it is fine, I see... The above was a statement I made day 1. The demon role-blocker is dead, and I had about 45 minutes to defend myself from a lynch before I had to leave again, clearly I should have not claimed and died instead. Makes perfect sense. I needed something that started with a g to continue my breadcrumb. Keyboard mashing was the easiest g beginning I could come up with that made sense in the context It clearly states scum reads, but I guess I should know by now not to expect much reading comprehension from you. ...in fact in the same post you post the correct interpretation: Why contradict yourself within the same post? I can respond to more points of it if needed, but I think that is sufficient for now. DOES ANYBODY BUY ANY OF THIS CRAP? DID ANYBODY READ MY CASE? WHY AREN'T YOU VOTING FOR HOD? | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
read through his filter and look at what he has been saying and feel ashamed of yourselves http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=298603&user=102651¤tpage=All | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On December 28 2011 15:42 ZBot wrote: Vote count for the Day 4 Lynch. With 10 alive, 6 votes are required to lynch. Current votes: layabout (1): Blazinghand HarbingerOfDoom (1): layabout Refallen (0): The Day 4 deadline is at 2012-01-18 10:00:00 KST. (That's approximately 1 day, 6:42:30 from now.) ##Vote HoD | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
You're right layabout, I should have been cared about the lynch day 2 as much as you did and not place a vote at any point during the day. That shows you care a lot more than I do. I also liked that part where you didn't include this day 1 post of mine and then claim I never gave reasons for why Tyrran was scummy until the large day 2 post I made. statements like this only make sense if the reader does not posses the ability to think critically. He insinuates that because he voted for Tyrran (who was NOT getting lynched in a month of sundays) and that i didn't vote that that mean that he cared about the lynch more than i did. On January 11 2012 01:12 layabout wrote: I will be voting for risk nuke. I am going to wait until closer to the deadline before i vote. I dislike the reasons given for lynching RoL. Now I need to go do some work. On January 11 2012 01:41 layabout wrote: careful adding more votes, it would be stupid to end the day so soon I then spent time criticising the case against RoL at the time. RoL had 5 votes and the case was just bad, i tried to explain this. On January 11 2012 04:52 layabout wrote: EBWOP that was meant to be a spoiler not a quote-tag my last post before the lynch. On January 12 2012 01:19 layabout wrote: Hey guys! mind explaining to me why you hammered the lynch 10+ hours early? the time i get back to the thread I had expressed my opinions very clearly. I had no control over the lynch, it happened while i did not get computer access. you placed a throw-away vote on tyrran and avoided mentioning risk nuke or RoL like the plague. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On January 16 2012 12:06 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: Re: Layabout's case You're right layabout, I should have been cared about the lynch day 2 as much as you did and not place a vote at any point during the day. That shows you care a lot more than I do. I also liked that part where you didn't include this day 1 post of mine and then claim I never gave reasons for why Tyrran was scummy until the large day 2 post I made. statements like this only make sense if the reader does not posses the ability to think critically. EBWOP ^ + HoD's defence is misleading and i have posted in great detail why i think he is scum. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On January 17 2012 04:36 layabout wrote: ARE ANY OF YOU FUCKERS THERE? I'm at work. I get in here when I can. And if you notice I already went back on the comment you quoted. I read the vote wrong. | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War |
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Invitational
Spirit vs SHIN
Clem vs SKillous
herO vs TBD
TBD vs GuMiho
AI Arena 2025 Tournament
Replay Cast
Clem vs Zoun
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
PiGosaur Monday
Replay Cast
SOOP
SKillous vs Spirit
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
