The China Politics Thread - Page 3
Forum Index > General Forum |
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
Sermokala
United States13730 Posts
We've seen fantastical production numbers come from China but they've never been verified by any independent source. We've seen the bad numbers and failures out of the west because they're unable to stop the truth from getting out. | ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16378 Posts
On May 18 2022 05:42 maybenexttime wrote: The party calls itself communist (and North Korea calls itself "democratic", by the way), but neither China nor the USSR ever claimed to be communist, afaik. They only tell their people that they're striving to one day become a communist society. A country called the Union of Soviet Socalist Republics that had a hammer and sickle on their flag was NOT claiming it was communist? really? | ||
RvB
Netherlands6189 Posts
On May 18 2022 02:37 JimmiC wrote: Their political system is certainly authoritarian. Communism does not have a shit ton of billionaires. Billionaires who only exist by grace of the party. If they do something which the party deems unacceptable they get cut down to size (like for example Jack Ma from Alibaba who started critizing the government). And this is what Deng's reforms were about. The economy was partly liberalised and private citizens are allowed to enjoy these economic freedoms but the political system is still in firm hands of the party. On May 18 2022 07:08 maybenexttime wrote: I think we're roughly on the same page. The reason why I objected is because classifying China as "communist" rests on the assumption that they are genuinely striving to reach a communist society one day. I don't think that's the case. As you put it, communism for China is just a brand. They use it to fool their own citizens and people like GH. In addition, aside from a top-down approach to building a communist society, there are various bottom-up approaches, such as anarcho-communism and such. Whatever China's failing are, they are not inherent to communism itself (that has never been reached) but rather to their top-down approach. The analysis you shared is also missing an important aspect, imo. The distinction between capitalism and communism is not only about who controls the means of production, but also about the motives in the system. In capitalism, but goal is making profit. In communism, it's meeting the needs of the society. In capitalism, the latter is a by-product. The inverse is true in communism. Lastly, the question of ownership of the means of production is additionally muddied by the fact that state control over the economy is not the same as social control over the means of production. You can't have the latter if the society does not democratically control the government. The situation in China is somewhat similar to republican Rome, where the state owned large swaths of property but the political elites treated it as their private property. Mao and his revolutionary buddies certainly were striving for a communist society. I don't think this was just a brand back then and I don't think it is now. That their reforms did not end up in the ideal communist society is true but also not a very interesting observation. Reality doesn't change just because you have thought out a nice theory. The practical implementation will always differ from the theoretical framework. More interesting is looking at why these communist revolutions always end up in an authoritarian dictatorship. | ||
Ardias
Russian Federation605 Posts
On May 18 2022 14:13 JimmyJRaynor wrote: A country called the Union of Soviet Socalist Republics that had a hammer and sickle on their flag was NOT claiming it was communist? really? That's true. Even the last constitution of USSR (in 1977) in the first chapter stated that "The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is the socialist state of the people, expressing the will and interests of peasants, workers and intelligentsia, working people from all nations and peoples of the state". Communism there represented as an ideal to be strived for, as in preamble "The highest goal of the Soviet state is building declassified communist society with a developed communist self-governance". There is a difference between Socialism and Communism (well, theoretical one at least), because communist ideal is kinda unreachable. It's an idealistic utopia, requiring a perfect human being who will work overtime just for the enjoyment of it, and take the minimal resources necessary for him to exist with a bit of comfort. Since human nature isn't exactly that, it still remains an utopia. USSR, Cuba, Venezuela, DPRK, Maoist China - they all are/were socialist, not communist. But as was correctly stated above, they all turned into that state from a not-very-developed agrarian society, and often after a great turmoil (World War 1 and Civil War in Russia, World War 2 and Civil War in China, World War 2 in DPRK, overall poverty and revolutions/coups in Cuba/Venezuela) which leads to authoritarian tendencies, and that differs this socialism from the continuous peaceful process happening in, lets say, Scandinavia, whose internal policies are often described as socialistic (despite them still being capitalist countries, of course), since the end goal of Socialism is creating a maximum possible equality in the society (without completely removing the need for state and personal property, as Communism proposes). The difference is, either people will be equally poor or equally rich. | ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16378 Posts
On May 18 2022 15:30 Ardias wrote: There is a difference between Socialism and Communism (well, theoretical one at least), because communist ideal is kinda unreachable. It's an idealistic utopia, requiring a perfect human being who will work overtime just for the enjoyment of it, and take the minimal resources necessary for him to exist with a bit of comfort. Since human nature isn't exactly that, it still remains an utopia. USSR, Cuba, Venezuela, DPRK, Maoist China - they all are/were socialist, not communist. ah , interesting. In North America, the USSR was considered a communist country. They had no "professional hockey players" they were all amateurs who were in the army and paid by the government. There were no profits made by any hockey teams. No profits + No Private Run Hockey Teams = Communism www.youtube.com Ron Ellis: "it was like war ... it was Canada against Russia ... democracy against Communism" "Excelling in athletics was proof the communist system is the better system"... this is the stuff fed to Canadians during the USSR's existence. The implication being.... USSR IS a communist country. The fans chanted at Phil Esposito "communism is best" when the USSR defeated Canada in Game 4 of an 8 game series. Canadians viewed the USSR as a communist state. Communism had just won. www.youtube.com BTW, I hope Ovechkin breaks Gretzky's goal record. Gretzky is a whiner and Ovechkin is a more pure goal scorer any way. ![]() | ||
Manit0u
Poland17182 Posts
It is kind of amusing that pretty much all countries that were striving towards communism have ended up as isolationist dictatorships (China, Russia, NKR, Cuba). It seems that the happiest people are in countries where you have a healthy mixture of systems - consistently winning in happiness rankings seems to be Denmark, which is a socialist country with free market etc. | ||
plated.rawr
Norway1675 Posts
Nothings ever gotten past the "strong state"-part without breaking though, no matter if countries have labelled themselves as, or been labelled as, communist, and as thus, there has been no communist countries in accordance to the philosophy dictating the term. As with all other utopian ideologies, itd at best work within a segregated, self-sufficient microsociety. | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
maybenexttime
Poland5411 Posts
On May 18 2022 08:51 GreenHorizons wrote: Fool us into what exactly? Into shilling for China. Takes some serious brainwashing to convince a far left person to support the closest thing we've had to a fascist state in modern days (until Russia's recent descent into fascism). fwiw the Sinophobia that dominates around here is not universal. Some of us recognize that while China isn't perfect, it's working relentlessly to at least leave a habitable planet for future generations because it recognizes capitalism's endless profit seeking is not in and of itself a path to meeting societies needs. In fact, capitalism often explicitly stands in the way of meeting societies needs as exemplified by the WHO vaccine patent waiver. It nakedly prioritizes profit at the expense of societies needs. Sorry to break it to you, but China has had a capitalist economy for a few decades now, lol. | ||
pmh
1351 Posts
The majority of the population seems to be happy with how things are beeing ran. Who are we to critizise them? This thread is nothing but China bashing,the openings post clearly sets the tone. Its like one of those threads you see on reddit. A very one sided and negative discussion about another country. China has its flaws like any country but it has also done many great things. I am not "shilling" for China. (another constructed narrative to counter anyone who doesnt go along with the bashing). Its the mindless bashing ,straight up propaganda,that bothers me in the discussions that you see on the internet these days. Its very one sided. Everyone who posts negative about China gets upvotes (not on this forum luckily) and everyone who doesnt fully go along with it gets downvoted and called beeing a "shill". There is no room for a nuanced position,you have to either bash or you are a shill. | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16378 Posts
On May 19 2022 02:58 pmh wrote: China has lifted over 100 million people out of poverty. The majority of the population seems to be happy with how things are beeing ran. Who are we to critizise them? This thread is nothing but China bashing,the openings post clearly sets the tone. Its like one of those threads you see on reddit. A very one sided and negative discussion about another country. China has its flaws like any country but it has also done many great things. I am not "shilling" for China. (another constructed narrative to counter anyone who doesnt go along with the bashing). Its the mindless bashing ,straight up propaganda,that bothers me in the discussions that you see on the internet these days. Its very one sided. Everyone who posts negative about China gets upvotes (not on this forum luckily) and everyone who doesnt fully go along with it gets downvoted and called beeing a "shill". There is no room for a nuanced position,you have to either bash or you are a shill. I think China's economic renaissance is inspiring. bravo. Germany's coal imports are set to rise 8% this year. India and China coal based electricity production are going up 9 to 12 percent. USA will also start burning coal like crazy again. So I don't see why everyone is ragging on China. I'd like to see Canada start more coal based electricity production as well. The province of Ontario had the cheapest electricity prices in NA when the government run energy company "Ontario Hydro" burned lots of coal. stupidly cheap electricity helped make Ontario an economic juggernaut in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s. Russia's coal consumption and production rose from 2014 to 2016. What did the world do? Nuttin. In fact, I think Germany imported even more Russian coal during 2016. If the world won't directly intervene in Russia taking over the Ukraine what is the world really going to do about Russia consuming more coal? The same thing the world has already been doing: nothing. Again, I don't see why everyone is ragging on China about its coal use. All we hear from the rest of the world is a lot of yapping about cutting back on coal. They are talking the talk.. they sure ain't walking the walk. On May 18 2022 20:08 plated.rawr wrote: As with all other utopian ideologies, itd at best work within a segregated, self-sufficient microsociety. the only way to be a utopia level happy adult is for that adult to possess high self esteem. high self esteem is built on choices and hard work executed by the individual and can't be given to them by any government or any other human for that matter. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/79352.Six_Pillars_of_Self_Esteem https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/277820.How_to_Raise_Your_Self_Esteem www.youtube.com For 30s to 90s the turbulence of our times demands strong selves with a clear sense of identity, competence, and worth. with the breakdown of cultural consensus , an absense of worthy role models, little in the public arena to inspire our allegiance ,,,, and disorientingly rapid change a permanent feature of our lives.. with all that ... it is a dangerous moment in history not to know who we are... or not to trust ourselves. The stability we can not find in the world we must create in our own persons. If you have low self esteem your life is lousy no matter how good the social safety net is. | ||
GreenHorizons
United States22655 Posts
On May 19 2022 02:58 pmh wrote: China has lifted over 100 million people out of poverty. The majority of the population seems to be happy with how things are beeing ran. Who are we to critizise them? This thread is nothing but China bashing,the openings post clearly sets the tone. Its like one of those threads you see on reddit. A very one sided and negative discussion about another country. China has its flaws like any country but it has also done many great things. I am not "shilling" for China. (another constructed narrative to counter anyone who doesnt go along with the bashing). Its the mindless bashing ,straight up propaganda,that bothers me in the discussions that you see on the internet these days. Its very one sided. Everyone who posts negative about China gets upvotes (not on this forum luckily) and everyone who doesnt fully go along with it gets downvoted and called beeing a "shill". There is no room for a nuanced position,you have to either bash or you are a shill. That about sums it up. At least they have a place that kind of trash "belongs" now | ||
fakovski
China50 Posts
| ||
Djabanete
United States2786 Posts
On May 19 2022 06:48 JimmyJRaynor wrote: If you have low self esteem your life is lousy no matter how good the social safety net is. Perhaps, but neither is self-esteem a substitute for the material necessities that allow for a dignified existence. Also, the idea that you cannot have healthy self-esteem while benefiting from social programs is absurd. Here ends my derailment of this thread about China. On May 19 2022 11:41 fakovski wrote: Urkrainian, when they naively choose a comedian,they put their fate in others' hands. Russia's tragic blundering in Ukraine is not the example I would select if I wanted to portray dictatorships as more powerful than democracies. | ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16378 Posts
On May 14 2022 18:38 Manit0u wrote: 4. A lot of businesses are moving out of China and setting up shop elsewhere (Vietnam mostly), which will probably have huge impact on Chinese economy. It'll be interesting to see what happens. Also, if China really shuts down information flow out of the country it might become impossible to measure the Chinese economy. On May 19 2022 13:30 Djabanete wrote: Also, the idea that you cannot have healthy self-esteem while benefiting from social programs is absurd. You misread my comment. The government can not give any individual high/healthy self esteem. High self esteem is only attainable via an individual's carefully strategized choices and carefully executed actions. Therefore, an "ideal" political system can not create even one single happy healthy solid self esteem individual. Not one. Ultimately, it is up to an individual person to create their own happiness. Such an endeavour is a lot of hard work. On May 19 2022 11:41 fakovski wrote: Both capitalism and socialism has its fatal flaws, and democracy is not a magic drug. ya, good points. IMO, there is no perfect system. Work with what ya got... + Show Spoiler + and if the place you are located is really bad and you can pull it off then move to a different/better country. Toronto, Ontario, Canada is home to 100s of thousands who left a bad situation in a different country. Doing so is pretty tough. Often one must learn a new language and adapt to a completely different culture. That said , hundreds of thousands, even millions manage to pull it off. Neighbouring New York state has tonnes of people from the Toronto area who left and went to New York for even better opportunities than Canada offers. "The money is out there gents... you pick up its yours ... you don't ... i got no sympathy for ya", Blake in GlenGary GlenRoss 1992. | ||
Djabanete
United States2786 Posts
| ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16378 Posts
On May 14 2022 18:38 Manit0u wrote: 1. No more freedom of religion in Hong Kong. They've also arrested a 90 year old Catholic cardinal. 3. Most Chinese people can no longer leave the country. Their passports are being shredded, as well as foreign green cards. 4. A lot of businesses are moving out of China and setting up shop elsewhere (Vietnam mostly), which will probably have huge impact on Chinese economy. I wonder what are other people's thoughts on the current situation in China and where will it lead potentially. I think it will lead to US politicians having more excuses/reasons/rationale for increasing military spending. US politicians can reasonably claim China is becoming like the USSR of the 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s. US politicians can then use this as a reason to spend more money on military to protect against the "Chinese Communist threat". | ||
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
The issue people in the West have with China is more that they reject its system of government. They see it as inherently evil or inferior, because it emphasizes the continued leadership of the Party over any individual rights. Whereas many Chinese do believe that those human rights allegations are excuses to attack China and the Chinese people, and they don't see why they have to follow the rules set by foreigners and that what China does is none of their business. | ||
| ||