Russo-Ukrainian War Thread

Russo-Ukrainian War Thread - Page 857

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.

Husyelt

United States834 Posts

3 hours ago

#17121

On August 27 2025 09:49 WombaT wrote:

Show nested quote +

What is their argument there?

I’ve heard many anti-Churchill arguments in the past, many that seem to have validity to me that he’s a bit of a monster (India for example), but his anti-Hitler stance isn’t generally one I’ve run into.

Tucker carlson and some pseudo historians cant seem to think that genocide and ethnic purity and plans to conquer Europe and eventually Russia were well documented in the nazi plannings. surely churchhill was the big bad. the whole point is to muddy the waters for dumbasses to question WW2. ww2 is about as black and white as things get in terms of the main players, Japan invades in 1937 on their own ethnic cleansing horror show, Nazi's follow a few years later

Uldridge

Belgium4808 Posts

10 minutes ago

#17122

It's all part of the "just asking questions" and "both sides" crew where they look at stuff "objectively" and then give a little bit of context and then just throw up their hands and raise their eyebrows while looking intensely at you with a smirk that says: how about that, hmmmm?? Isn't that weird, hmmmmm?
Then when pressed they claim they're not an expert and weasel their way out of it like that.
Dave Smith's antics were exposed on a JR podcast by Douglas Murray and they just couldn't grapple with what they were doing. It was quite interesting to see the twists and turns he was attempting to defend himself.
In any case, it's always funny that people can just come in a room, claim: but what if 1+1 was actually 3, completely undermining established, centuries fundaments, but don't want to do the work to prove how that works out for all the rest of maths.
We're living in a world where these people can make these claims, get a platform, get exposure and then muddy the established narrative because asking questions is now something that we can and should do? It's extremely insidious. It seems history and psychology and social sciences are easier targets because it's softer and easier to destabilize scientific consensus so let's shake the tree and see what falls down I guess?

Also, it's hilarious to me that these Russian puppets come into these threads talking about a "I see both sides" and "what about the West?", blaming us for not being able to see both sides when they are literally allowed to do exactly that here. I wonder how both sidesing it in Russia would go, lol. That's of the the differences.

Prev 1 855 856 857

Please or register to reply.

Russo-Ukrainian War Thread - Page 857

Completed

Ongoing

Upcoming