|
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On July 04 2012 17:19 r.Evo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 04 2012 17:17 imallinson wrote:On July 04 2012 17:10 NeoLearner wrote:Whoa, nice job on the 5 sigma. I''m going to jump on this physics-bandwagon and claim Higgs-boson confirmed  So now we have confirmed the model, I have 2 questions: 1) Anyone have an idea what's next? A collider the size of the planet to confirm even more elimentary particles? 2) When can I expect my gravity gun? Discovered is accurate as 5 sigma is the normal threshold used for "you definitely found something" but it isn't definitely the Higgs. They found a boson that acts like the Higgs and is at near the predicted mass for the Higgs. So it's likely but not definite. 1) Confirming this data and improving on the result. The LHC should be able to find other particles besides the Higgs. 2) Nobody knows when episode 3 will be released. You should probably add that "likely but not definite" sounds like 90% when you think about daily language, not like the 99.9999% their 5 sigma implies. =P
The likely but not definite is about what the particle they found is not if it is actually there which is the 5 sigma value.
|
blablabla sigma blablabla sigma !
|
The scientific community is very skeptical of new results so to be conservative, we usually don't accept a discovery until you're past the 5 sigma level.
A general person would have already accepted this.
Imagine, if you wanted to go to a casino and gamble all of your money. You might like a 5:1 that you win. Maybe you won't bet until it's 2:1 odds that you win.
Particle physicists demand a 3.5 million : 1 before they bet.
|
These slides are somehow hard to follow T_T
|
On July 04 2012 17:23 OptimusYale wrote: I understand most of this.....like 'the' 'and' 'a' etc, however when they're strung together with all this gobbledygook It makes a mess in my brain.
What I'm getting is they used some method to make the higgs, not sure IF it's higgs, but it seems similar This is what people who have never heard of SC hear when we talk about it in front of them :p
|
This has to be the ugliest presentation of all time if you consider its importance.
|
So does this mean we can make mass relays now?
|
|
On July 04 2012 17:23 kingjames01 wrote: The scientific community is very skeptical of new results so to be conservative, we usually don't accept a discovery until you're past the 5 sigma level.
A general person would have already accepted this.
Imagine, if you wanted to go to a casino and gamble all of your money. You might like a 5:1 that you win. Maybe you won't bet until it's 2:1 odds that you win.
Particle physicists demand a 3.5 million : 1 before they bet.
As long as you don't expect a 3.5mil : 1 payment for an hour of your time compared to an average person..
As a poker player I'm used to taking 51:49 bets, so you guys always confuse the hell out of me. =(
|
We're zeroing in on the mass range of interest.
|
On July 04 2012 17:28 imJealous wrote:So does this mean we can make mass relays now? 
Nope, we must find out first what gravity is
|
I just want to point out that they DO NOT know if this is the Higgs boson. They know it's a Boson, and that it shares some characteristics of the Higgs, like its high mass. All of this data they are showing is proving that the Boson exists. Not that it is in fact the Higgs boson.
|
What I want to know is if they have been able to confirm that this Boson does what the Higgs is suppose to do or if they havnt gotten that far yet?
|
A little anecdote:
I was doing a coop placement with a University in Canada. There was a group that was collaborating with the ATLAS detector and they were in danger of falling behind with a shipment. They came to my group to ask for a volunteer to string tungsten slugs before they were shipped away.
I volunteered and maybe, just maybe, my contribution helped! =)
|
Inspiring to see such an international effort at work. If only people watched this instead of Jersey Shore.
|
On July 04 2012 17:32 Uncultured wrote: I just want to point out that they DO NOT know if this is the Higgs boson. They know it's a Boson, and that it shares some characteristics of the Higgs, like its high mass. All of this data they are showing is proving that the Boson exists. Not that it is in fact the Higgs boson.
Well, the whole analysis was based on the theoretical expectations of how a Higgs would behave. All observed properties match the theoretical Higgs boson. While that's not sufficient to say with absolute certainty that it can't be something else, it's extremely likely that the new particle is the Higgs boson.
|
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On July 04 2012 17:32 Adreme wrote: What I want to know is if they have been able to confirm that this Boson does what the Higgs is suppose to do or if they havnt gotten that far yet?
It looks very Higgs like but they need more data to confirm it.
|
On July 04 2012 17:32 Uncultured wrote: I just want to point out that they DO NOT know if this is the Higgs boson. They know it's a Boson, and that it shares some characteristics of the Higgs, like its high mass. All of this data they are showing is proving that the Boson exists. Not that it is in fact the Higgs boson.
That's very true. However, it's in the mass range where the Higgs should be. There are no bosons predicted to be there other than the Higgs.
Even if it turns out to not do anything that the Higgs should, it's still convenient to label it as the Higgs for now.
|
|
|
|
|
|