EPTHiggs Particle Announcement Incoming!!! - Page 21
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Corrosive
Canada3741 Posts
| ||
|
Gowa
France133 Posts
| ||
|
IronManSC
United States2119 Posts
| ||
|
felisconcolori
United States6169 Posts
Where the standard model predicts that the Higgs bosun would occur, they have in fact proven that there is A bosun that occurs there. Which means it probably is the Higgs bosun, but that they need more data. And applause because - very clear, unambiguous data presented in graphs spiking which shows yes, there's something there. And it would appear to be exactly what they are looking for. | ||
|
Rannasha
Netherlands2398 Posts
On July 04 2012 17:36 IronManSC wrote: So...... does this mean the big bang theory is true now? The two are not really related. | ||
|
StoRm_res
Switzerland891 Posts
On July 04 2012 17:36 felisconcolori wrote: So what I'm hearing is... Where the standard model predicts that the Higgs bosun would occur, they have in fact proven that there is A bosun that occurs there. Which means it probably is the Higgs bosun, but that they need more data. And applause because - very clear, unambiguous data presented in graphs spiking which shows yes, there's something there. And it would appear to be exactly what they are looking for. pretty much, except its called a boson  | ||
|
xxpack09
United States2160 Posts
On July 04 2012 17:36 IronManSC wrote: So...... does this mean the big bang theory is true now? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background_radiation On July 04 2012 17:37 IronManSC wrote: But if the big bang came from a massive explosion, essentially from nothing... and here we discover what comes from mass... I mean, i'm not a scientist or anything, and science and math were my worst subjects in high school, so... I don't know, I just somehow found that they correllated someway. You misunderstand--the big bang is not a creation of mass, but rather an expansion of what we call the "universe" from an infinite dense, hot singularity. | ||
|
IronManSC
United States2119 Posts
But if the big bang came from a massive explosion, essentially from nothing... and here we discover what comes from mass... I mean, i'm not a scientist or anything, and science and math were my worst subjects in high school, so... I don't know, I just somehow found that they correllated someway. | ||
|
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
On July 04 2012 17:36 felisconcolori wrote: So what I'm hearing is... Where the standard model predicts that the Higgs bosun would occur, they have in fact proven that there is A bosun that occurs there. Which means it probably is the Higgs bosun, but that they need more data. And applause because - very clear, unambiguous data presented in graphs spiking which shows yes, there's something there. And it would appear to be exactly what they are looking for. Exactly. They predicted something to be there. They found something where they were looking. They found it using methods that would only work if it was such a particle. There will still be more work to prove that it does EVERYTHING that it's supposed to but for now, I think we're all going to call it the Higgs. | ||
|
Boblion
France8043 Posts
Too much numbers, sigmas, and comic sans. I'm off. | ||
|
virpi
Germany3599 Posts
On July 04 2012 17:39 Boblion wrote: Well Science is quite boring. Lack of space rockets and bombs imo. Too much numbers, sigmas, and comic sans. I'm off. you are underestimating the devastating power of comic sans. | ||
|
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
On July 04 2012 17:39 Boblion wrote: Well Science is quite boring. Lack of space rockets and bombs imo. Too much numbers, sigmas, and comic sans. I'm off. haha, well, science lead to the development of space rockets and bombs... | ||
|
sheaRZerg
United States613 Posts
| ||
|
Gowa
France133 Posts
On July 04 2012 17:37 IronManSC wrote: But if the big bang came from a massive explosion, essentially from nothing... and here we discover what comes from mass... I mean, i'm not a scientist or anything, and science and math were my worst subjects in high school, so... I don't know, I just somehow found that they correllated someway. well this confirms our standard model, and since the big bang also fits in the standard model you could imagine a link somewhere. There is other evidence for the big bang, like the one you were linked to | ||
|
iXphobos
Germany1465 Posts
On July 04 2012 17:39 Boblion wrote: Too much numbers, sigmas, and comic sans. I'm off. Hahaha. That cracked me up. Although i don't agree. | ||
|
Rannasha
Netherlands2398 Posts
On July 04 2012 17:37 IronManSC wrote: But if the big bang came from a massive explosion, essentially from nothing... and here we discover what comes from mass... I mean, i'm not a scientist or anything, and science and math were my worst subjects in high school, so... I don't know, I just somehow found that they correllated someway. The conditions surrounding the big bang far exceed the range in which the standard model (= the theory of elemetary particles, including the Higgs boson) can make predictions. At the energy levels present in the big bang, distinctions between elementary forces of nature start to fade away. | ||
|
Diavlo
Belgium2915 Posts
How the fuck are they going to split the Nobel prize between Higgs, Englert, Brout, Guralnik, Hagen, and Kibble when you can only have 3 people named for a nobel Prize? Someone is going to be sad. Like really really sad. | ||
|
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
mass of Higgs boson ~ 126.5 GeV at the 5 sigma level. | ||
|
SpiffD
Denmark1264 Posts
So, in very simple language. ATLAS and CMS have independently discovered a new particle mass ~ 126 GeV which behaves like SM Higgs | ||
|
Archybaldie
United Kingdom818 Posts
 | ||
| ||
