Sex = OP in society? - Page 31

On August 31 2011 16:12 InTheCloudss wrote:
society is stupid , thats just how it is, alot of times the masses are easy manipulated just as in this case,

one of the first posts was that i ( yes im almost 20 and virgin ) was either ugly, bad whit women or gay, and im neither of those (just your average guy >.>), im just not actively seeking it because i have other prioritys right now, i got problems i need to take care of and it just hasnt happend for me, why do i need to have sex now?

but the same problem is there on alot of fields, for example: oww you play video games for a living... Nerd, loser,, i bet thats what most people would say (outside of tl) but really is that so wrong?

Ps to the guy that said people are either ugly, bad whit women or gay,,, you probaly watch to much jersey shore,,,

On August 31 2011 16:23 FearTheReaperMan wrote:


First time Ive felt in a while that someone actually knows what they are talking about. (among this thread at least). lol

Most chicks, actually people want to be 'cool' and by achieving that they go clubbing, etc. I am 'good' looking and could excel somewhat easily in that environment. But personally I just dont like that atmosphere, Id rather talk with people in a intellectual form. Not to mention dealing with drunk peope. sigh. But actually learn something instead of shit just flying out my mouth.

Therefore, I read a lot of books and play video games and I am not considered 'cool' by the 'cool' people. But Id rather be the 'smartest' person in the world than the 'coolest'. I know that one day I will really find a girl that I will really like. Not picking some chick up from the bar/club that doesnt really have a mind just to have sex. Hell, if I really wanted sex that bad Id just go get a hooker, basically the same thing anyways.

On July 22 2011 11:38 heroyi wrote:
"Why is everything about sex?"
-40 year old virgin

On August 31 2011 16:35 itstheTB wrote:

what this has to do in a SC2 site is beyond me, but...

Everything is about sex because humanbeings are turning into animals were the
primal needs are starting to take over. Only 50 years ago, sex was something private,
beautiful and something one was ashamed of talking about only to be strictly between the two
who made love. Nowadays, you see sex or sexiness / half naked women anywhere
you look.

Since I was a small boy, I have been considered sort of a "ladies man", and as a civilized
person I don't speak about what happens between two of the opposite sex beyond closed doors.
And women themselves do not like this sex-revolution because women are looking for way
more from a relationship than just sex, I guarantee you that. It's man who is degenerate.

The worst thing a woman knows is when you reduce her only to a sex-tool, rather than seeing
the beautiful, humble, helpful and loving person she is. Thats why many guys sort of "fail" with
women, and others are successful.

Man moves toward that which some scientists (Darwin) claim man originates from: monkeys.

Civilized behaviour decreases over time.
Animalistic behaviour increases.

On August 31 2011 16:43 squattincassanova wrote:



FYI, we never originated from monkeys. We shared a common primate ancestor with monkeys. Big difference. Its in a biology, book, look it up. And its not "some" scientists. Its 97% across the globe.

On August 31 2011 16:45 itstheTB wrote:

Scientists just as myself do not necessary have to agree with a theory when discussing it, thats the product of a college education - agree to disagree, whilst uneducated people think that scientific theories are "true" or "false", trying to discuss theories (which do many many times completely contradict eachother) with political arguing of the likes of Democrats -vs- Republicans. I don't agree with Darwin at all, I reject all levels of human association to monkeys, neanderthals or the like, but that is nevertheless what Darwin and many evolutionists do believe happened.

On August 31 2011 16:45 itstheTB wrote:

Scientists just as myself do not necessary have to agree with a theory when discussing it, thats the product of a college education - agree to disagree, whilst uneducated people think that scientific theories are "true" or "false", trying to discuss theories (which do many many times completely contradict eachother) with political arguing of the likes of Democrats -vs- Republicans. I don't agree with Darwin at all, I reject all levels of human association to monkeys, neanderthals or the like, but that is nevertheless what Darwin and many evolutionists do believe happened.

On July 22 2011 11:42 ClysmiC wrote:
I've always had the following view on sex: Save it till you meet your wife and it will be a million times more satisfying than it would be just hooking up with some random girls.


Or he has been tempted just like everyone else, but has the self-control to make the smarter choice.

On August 31 2011 17:05 TerlocSG wrote:
I think the point of this thread might have fallen between the cracks of some of the discussion taking place here.

The word I focus on the most in the title is "Society." We all know sex is fun (porn) and its important (reproduction), but the idea about looking at it in a social context brings up a different issue. I guess how I read the question is: Is sex too important in today's society? Important might be a bad word but I have a horrible vocabulary and if I think of the right word I'll change it.

What I think about with this question is more along the lines of how young adults are acting towards sex. I choose young adults for 2 reasons: 1. I'm one of them, I'm 19, and 2. They're the "next" generation as I see it (I kind of see the world as children [0-17], young adults [18~25], older adults [25~65], and seniors [65+]), so soon the young adults will be the main force in the workforce, voting more, and generally running the world. That might be a gross oversimplification of how the world works, but its how I've recently started seeing the world.

Anyway, the way I've noticed young adults treating sex as of late is scary to me. It seems like sex dominates people's minds in college (again, using college because I'm in college). I don't know how college was 30 years ago, and I don't know how it will be 30 years from now, but right now sex seems to be in everyone's top 3 priorities in college. I'm not saying this should change, but maybe the balance should shift a little (OP reference? eh, eh?). It seems like to the majority of students it goes: 1. Party, 2. Sex, 3. School, where 1 and 2 are interchangeable depending on what the person prefers. This isn't a bad list, I guess mine is similar, but the order and %'s involved frighten me. Of course I'm speculating here and I have no proof, but it seems like its a 40/40/20 split for these options.

Now this leads me back to my original idea of what the thread is asking. I say a 40/40/20 split with school taking the 20 is horrible for society. I would prefer to see something more to a 70/15/15 split with school in the number one spot. I think sex, and partying/drinking/drugs, are extremely OP in society. Sex and partying has become the main goal for most students.* This could be a problem, but since I cannot compare this to my experience with college 30 years ago, for obvious reasons, I have no idea how this will effect the world once my generation becomes the most powerful generation.
.

On August 31 2011 17:21 positron. wrote:


I wish that 40/40/20 spit were true. The guys who place sex and party ahead of school are dumb. We all should be thankful that they are that dumb. There will be way less competition later on. "In this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the women." How do you make money without resorting to the way of Tony Montana? Be good at school.