|
Keep it civil guys.
Alright I am sick of warning people: Trolling, flame baiting, and derailing will result in insta bans. The same goes for conspiracy theorists and stupidity generally.
Confirmation was as follows - On-site DNA test which came back as 99% positive. - photos of face sent to CIA and confirmed with photo analysis - confirmed by 20 year old wife who live in pakistan.
This thread is specifically dedicated to the details surrounding the raid/his death. |
On May 02 2011 18:34 ImFromPortugal wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 18:24 Zerokaiser wrote: It's completely out of the question that the US government would fake the death. The people who believe that are completely wound up in their won conspiracy genetics.
Put aside your silly theories for a second here in favour of, I don't know, common-fucking-sense.
Let's say the government fakes Osama's death. The United States is super pleased and it's being praised as a victory for counter-terrorism and the world in general.
I don't know...it seems like that might not work if...let's say... Osama Bin Laden releases a new video in response. American government exposed, world moral plummets, etc. etc. etc.
Jesus Christ, you people are talking like Bin Laden would be totally cool with the entire world reuniting in victory against Al Qaeda.
I can't even think of a pretty way to write that, it's just god damn obvious. there have been reports saying that bin laden was dead since 2001
Not remotely like this one. The tryhard devil's advocate isn't really helping anything.
Not to mention, he did release videos, and every time he mocked the United States it weakened Bush's government.
|
On May 02 2011 18:35 partisan wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 18:31 vyyye wrote:On May 02 2011 18:28 Fraidnot wrote:On May 02 2011 18:21 Tippereth wrote:On May 02 2011 18:19 Supamang wrote: this is pissing me off.
these assoles who are comparing us Americans celebrating the death of the murderer of thousands of innocent civilians to the bastards celebrating the murder of those thousands of innocent civilians should be warned or temp banned.
i cant believe how anti-american people can be. Silencing opinions you disagree with? How un-American of you. Their views are just as valid as yours. No, stupid ideas exist that are not valid like racism and in this case sympathy for terrorists. Sympathy for terrorists isn't all that weird. It's not like all of them grow up in societies similar to ours, with our ethical and moral grounds and they suddenly decide they hate Westerners and want to kill them. There are obviously some of them who are, in every sense of the word, evil. But a lot are just bloody fanatics who don't know better. I think sympathy for terrorists should be pretty damn rare. On the other hand I do pity them. In most cases its just dumb kids being used by people like Bin Laden to carry out their own political agenda Pity, sympathy.. Yeah, what I meant to say was that I can kind of see how they ended up the way they are. As you said, dumb kids being used.
It's so fucked up though, so fucked up.
|
On May 02 2011 18:28 Shigy wrote:don't know if you guys have been talking about this in the past ~40 pages.. but i just read this headline on CNN, they've been updating the story quite a bit tonight. Show nested quote +"OSAMA BIN LADEN DEAD Terrorist leader's body buried at sea; Americans rejoice" really? i'm not one to constantly question the government (eg birthers, the fed, 9/11 conspiracies, any other conspiracies for that matter). but that's kind of curious. we'll have to see how it develops, but it does raise question. why would they get rid of the best evidence they have so quickly? people question the legitimacy of the whole thing with or without this instaburial.
If you get rid of the body quickly you avoid the possibility of any issues becoming of it. Other countries demanding it's return, arousing public anger if you hold onto it and refuse to do anything with it, people making demands for different evidence from it. It also is just a bit distasteful to claim a corpse as a trophy, which is how it will begin to look no matter what you do if you keep it around.
As for dumping it at sea I imagine they were thinking along the lines of Hitler's burial. Do it quickly and secretly so you don't create a burial site that people will flock to and rally around.
|
On May 02 2011 18:29 DorN wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 18:16 napo wrote:On May 02 2011 18:04 Spitmode wrote: so when 9/11 happened and people in the arab world were celebrating in the streets thats bad and when ten thousand americans celebrate in the street when osama is killed thats good? i see You really want to compare the death of almost 3k innocent people to the death of a single man who inflicted terrible damage by killing those 3k? That said, I don't really agree with the open-street celebrations, but I DO see a huge difference between the two celebrations. I dont see the difference. And iam thankful that most European countries see it the same way i do. Therefore we dont have the death penalty. Its just a stupid circle of hate and killing. But i guess you dont see it yet because you are blinded by your wish of revenge. Wish of revenge? LOL
What does a 21 yo Romanian student have to do with 9/11? It's not about the wish of revenge, but about trying to balance the weight of these actions (9/11 and the death of Osama). Also if you would have read my post attentively enough I said that I don't agree with open-street celebrations, but I can somewhat understand what people feel like when they lose their relatives/family/loved ones due to some people who have some severe pshycologival problems.
|
On May 02 2011 18:36 Lemonwalrus wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 18:35 Gingerninja wrote:On May 02 2011 18:34 ImFromPortugal wrote:On May 02 2011 18:24 Zerokaiser wrote: It's completely out of the question that the US government would fake the death. The people who believe that are completely wound up in their won conspiracy genetics.
Put aside your silly theories for a second here in favour of, I don't know, common-fucking-sense.
Let's say the government fakes Osama's death. The United States is super pleased and it's being praised as a victory for counter-terrorism and the world in general.
I don't know...it seems like that might not work if...let's say... Osama Bin Laden releases a new video in response. American government exposed, world moral plummets, etc. etc. etc.
Jesus Christ, you people are talking like Bin Laden would be totally cool with the entire world reuniting in victory against Al Qaeda.
I can't even think of a pretty way to write that, it's just god damn obvious. there have been reports saying that bin laden was dead since 2001 My GF.. ex RAF Techie (British Royal Air force) swears she overheard on the Hanger Radio that he died a long time ago. Well if that isn't proof, I don't know what is. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
I just asked her if she'd saw the news, different timezone atm, and she said odd.. i thought he died in 05/06. :p lol. anyway... I still want to see proof. Surely someone snapped a picture? I mean the second Saddam was caught they had pics of him in his little hidey hole immediatly.
|
On May 02 2011 18:31 Stylus wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 18:28 Shigy wrote:don't know if you guys have been talking about this in the past ~40 pages.. but i just read this headline on CNN, they've been updating the story quite a bit tonight. "OSAMA BIN LADEN DEAD Terrorist leader's body buried at sea; Americans rejoice" really? i'm not one to constantly question the government (eg birthers, the fed, 9/11 conspiracies, any other conspiracies for that matter). but that's kind of curious. we'll have to see how it develops, but it does raise question. why would they get rid of the best evidence they have so quickly? people question the legitimacy of the whole thing with or without this instaburial. According to a U.S. official on May 2, bin Laden's body was handled in accordance with Islamic practice and tradition,[10] and was buried at sea soon after death, in accordance with Islamic tradition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Osama_bin_Laden does this explanation really satisfy you? really? respect for islamic tradition? come on dude.
|
On May 02 2011 18:36 [F_]aths wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 17:49 kaileah wrote:On May 02 2011 17:42 [F_]aths wrote: I am not unhappy that he is dead, however I don't think it is okay to kill him without trial and to kill surrounding people, too.
you assume that it was possible to capture him alive without losing the lives of US soldiers. you assume that the Pakistan government would have allowed for Bin Laden to leave their custody. you assume that in a firefight that lasted about 40 (?) minutes, that it would have been possible to just take him out of the mansion quietly. the US soldiers did what was necessary. we captured Saddam alive (different circumstances), gave him a public trial, and then executed him. most likely, that would have been ideal for bin laden as well. make an example out of him in front of the world, execute him, and then dump his body at sea. just came down to would we rather have bin laden dead or give him a chance to escape again. If I remember correctly, US troops captured Saddam Hussein (why is anyone calling him with his first name only?) but he was sentence to death by an Iraqi trial. While my heart says that Mr. Hussein deserved to die many thousand times, my head says that death penalty still is wrong even when dealing with monsters of this magnitude. Killing someone with no trial is even more wrong. Bin Ladens death – and the death of the other guys who were killed as he was executed – cannot not bring back the dead. Someone who claims having moral superiority should act properly. In the end I consider Bin Laden's death a relieve in the sense that he presented an active threat to us. A part in me congratulates the US president that he ordered to do the dirty work. But then I am concerned about my own feelings. It was reported that he had a weapon and did use it. Last time I checked they'll still kill people in Germany who resist like that. So this whole trial or not doesn't really matter.
|
On May 02 2011 18:33 vyyye wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 18:30 Shigy wrote:On May 02 2011 18:28 Shigy wrote:don't know if you guys have been talking about this in the past ~40 pages.. but i just read this headline on CNN, they've been updating the story quite a bit tonight. "OSAMA BIN LADEN DEAD Terrorist leader's body buried at sea; Americans rejoice" really? i'm not one to constantly question the government (eg birthers, the fed, 9/11 conspiracies, any other conspiracies for that matter). but that's kind of curious. we'll have to see how it develops, but it does raise question. why would they get rid of the best evidence they have so quickly? people question the legitimacy of the whole thing with or without this instaburial. dug this up out of curiosity http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/05/02/why-was-bin-laden-buried-at-sea-so-quickly/so we're OK with stuff like guantanamo bay, which goes against so many human rights practices, and our own constitution bla bla bla. yet we can't hold onto the most wanted motherfucker in the world for over 24 hours in respect of islamic tradition? please Remember what happened to the Danish guy who made the Mohammed comic? Considering how big this "event" (what word to use?) is I don't think respecting Islamic traditions is a bad call.
Osama is not the prophet Muhammed, pretty sure many high ranking Muslims did not consider Osama a true Mulsim anyway. And I am sure his actual death would have been far more agrivating than not burying him properly to his supporters.
|
On May 02 2011 18:34 Zerokaiser wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 18:29 DorN wrote:On May 02 2011 18:16 napo wrote:On May 02 2011 18:04 Spitmode wrote: so when 9/11 happened and people in the arab world were celebrating in the streets thats bad and when ten thousand americans celebrate in the street when osama is killed thats good? i see You really want to compare the death of almost 3k innocent people to the death of a single man who inflicted terrible damage by killing those 3k? That said, I don't really agree with the open-street celebrations, but I DO see a huge difference between the two celebrations. I dont see the difference. And iam thankful that most European countries see it the same way i do. Therefore we dont have the death penalty. Its just a stupid circle of hate and killing. But i guess you dont see it yet because you are blinded by your wish of revenge. There are some people who do not deserve to walk with the rest of humanity anymore, that's my opinion. Deaths of innocent civilians should not be celebrated, the death of the puppeteer behind thousands of murders is something different. I'm not American, and I don't have any feelings of revenge or even hate for Bin Laden or Al Qaeda, but I believe that even if only a tiny, tiny bit, the world is a better place in his absence.
You (and many others here imho) should realize however that hundreds-of-thousands INNOCENT civilians died in Afghanistan and Iraq after the start of the "war on terror". In the first 3 years only the amount of innocent Afghanistan citizens killed by US air bombing was estimated on 20.000 for example. This is after 9/11, but I don't think anyone can deny that US has never been really innocent in this regard (Vietnam anyone?).
So to me Bush et al. are no different than Osama Bin Laden in that regard. Yet one is considered a mass-murder and the other "just" a former president.
Main question to me remains: why is the death of an innocent western civilian seen as more important than the death of other nationalities?
|
On May 02 2011 18:24 kaileah wrote:
Those who are in Abu Ghraib are in no way shape or form innocent. The information extracted in Abu Ghraib, whatever means necessary, have saved thousands of innocent lives around the world. Please don't try to make the connection between terrorists and americans / innocent civilians. It's pretty disgusting.
Do you honestly believe that all American prisioners in the "war against terror" are actually terrorist? Do you honestly think that the torture in _all cases_ was justified, because they were trying to save innocent Americans? How do you think you have any moral high ground over terrorists/dictators/whoever, if you justify torture?
This is exactly the hypocrisy I meant in my post.
I don't mind Americans being happy about the death of Bin Laden, I compleatly understand that. But _celebrating_ it, is just inappropriate in my opinion. It's not like you see pictures of people in London or Madrid celebrating right now, even though they would have the same reason to do so.
|
On May 02 2011 18:24 mathemagician1986 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 18:21 Cloudstrife1337 wrote: What a great day justice has finally been brought to the tyrant. I can finally say with pride our efforts are finally showing some RESULTS------- I AM PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN I think I'll simply never comprehend the thought process of americans like you. Killing terrorists will never do anything against terrorism. The US should try to understand why terrorists want to do them harm in the first place and try to solve these issues diplomatically, before they even arise.
Seeing that I have to be "civil" about this.
The fact that you think that Terrorists can be dealt with in a diplomatic way is absurd.
I think I'll simply never comprehend the thought process of a doltish German like you.
Al Qaeda openly declared war on the United States by having countless attacks against us at home and abroad.
You can not negotiate with terrorists, the best place for them is 6 feet under ground, but because you seem pretty torpid, the best place for them is 1.8288 meters under ground.
|
On May 02 2011 18:39 Aurocaido wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 18:33 vyyye wrote:On May 02 2011 18:30 Shigy wrote:On May 02 2011 18:28 Shigy wrote:don't know if you guys have been talking about this in the past ~40 pages.. but i just read this headline on CNN, they've been updating the story quite a bit tonight. "OSAMA BIN LADEN DEAD Terrorist leader's body buried at sea; Americans rejoice" really? i'm not one to constantly question the government (eg birthers, the fed, 9/11 conspiracies, any other conspiracies for that matter). but that's kind of curious. we'll have to see how it develops, but it does raise question. why would they get rid of the best evidence they have so quickly? people question the legitimacy of the whole thing with or without this instaburial. dug this up out of curiosity http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/05/02/why-was-bin-laden-buried-at-sea-so-quickly/so we're OK with stuff like guantanamo bay, which goes against so many human rights practices, and our own constitution bla bla bla. yet we can't hold onto the most wanted motherfucker in the world for over 24 hours in respect of islamic tradition? please Remember what happened to the Danish guy who made the Mohammed comic? Considering how big this "event" (what word to use?) is I don't think respecting Islamic traditions is a bad call. Osama is not the prophet Muhammed, pretty sure many high ranking Muslims did not consider Osama a true Mulsim anyway. And I am sure his actual death would have been far more agrivating than not burying him properly to his supporters. Sure it would. But if anything can be done to dampen the flames of his supporters, why not do it? Especially if it respects their tradition, which is a good thing whether it's a mass murdering idiot or a saint we're talking about.
|
On May 02 2011 18:37 Sokalo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 18:28 Shigy wrote:don't know if you guys have been talking about this in the past ~40 pages.. but i just read this headline on CNN, they've been updating the story quite a bit tonight. "OSAMA BIN LADEN DEAD Terrorist leader's body buried at sea; Americans rejoice" really? i'm not one to constantly question the government (eg birthers, the fed, 9/11 conspiracies, any other conspiracies for that matter). but that's kind of curious. we'll have to see how it develops, but it does raise question. why would they get rid of the best evidence they have so quickly? people question the legitimacy of the whole thing with or without this instaburial. If you get rid of the body quickly you avoid the possibility of any issues becoming of it. Other countries demanding it's return, arousing public anger if you hold onto it and refuse to do anything with it, people making demands for different evidence from it. It also is just a bit distasteful to claim a corpse as a trophy, which is how it will begin to look no matter what you do if you keep it around. As for dumping it at sea I imagine they were thinking along the lines of Hitler's burial. Do it quickly and secretly so you don't create a burial site that people will flock to and rally around. i sure hope they documented the fuck out of the whole situation in between the time they rushed the compound and the time they got rid of the body. i don't suggest we keep it as a trophy, but let a 3rd party come in and confirm what the government says, you know what i mean? i see what you mean with the international quarreling over the body, but it's weird stuff. i'll have to check out hitler's burial
|
Which Osama Bin Laden did they kill? The first or the fourth one?
User was warned for this post
|
On May 02 2011 18:36 vyyye wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 18:35 partisan wrote:On May 02 2011 18:31 vyyye wrote:On May 02 2011 18:28 Fraidnot wrote:On May 02 2011 18:21 Tippereth wrote:On May 02 2011 18:19 Supamang wrote: this is pissing me off.
these assoles who are comparing us Americans celebrating the death of the murderer of thousands of innocent civilians to the bastards celebrating the murder of those thousands of innocent civilians should be warned or temp banned.
i cant believe how anti-american people can be. Silencing opinions you disagree with? How un-American of you. Their views are just as valid as yours. No, stupid ideas exist that are not valid like racism and in this case sympathy for terrorists. Sympathy for terrorists isn't all that weird. It's not like all of them grow up in societies similar to ours, with our ethical and moral grounds and they suddenly decide they hate Westerners and want to kill them. There are obviously some of them who are, in every sense of the word, evil. But a lot are just bloody fanatics who don't know better. I think sympathy for terrorists should be pretty damn rare. On the other hand I do pity them. In most cases its just dumb kids being used by people like Bin Laden to carry out their own political agenda Pity, sympathy.. Yeah, what I meant to say was that I can kind of see how they ended up the way they are. As you said, dumb kids being used. It's so fucked up though, so fucked up.
Agreed.
Also I love the EU perspective on this issue, although I have disagreed with some of the statements. I've actually been scrolling through the comments here in between reading articles because its a great way to see how other people view the situation.
If you piss off an American, don't take it personally. This is a pretty emotional issue for most of us
|
On May 02 2011 18:42 Masamune wrote: Which Osama Bin Laden did they kill? The first or the fourth one? The one we've been looking for. nuff said.
|
On May 02 2011 18:31 nihlon wrote:The real (!?!) conspiracy theories will probably say that they captured him alive to keep in some hidden bunker for all eternity. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" If I were a conspiracy theorist I'd chase this conspiracy to the end. Disclaimer: Tinfoil hat material data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" + Show Spoiler + Let's say Bin Laden was an agent working for US government all this time, 9/11 would be an orchestrated op from government and Bin Laden would be the scapegoat. This raid on Bin Laden compound has to be a hoax, nobody has died and this is merely a declaration by US government to Bin Laden that his contract has ended and he can continue living under a new identity with job well done.
|
It's great they finally got him, now I just hope it won't lead to any repercussions. The "hidden nuke in Europe" story is mildly worrying even though it's probably bullshit. It seems like a good call to follow the Islamic traditions with his body, it helps avoiding to step on more toes.
|
On May 02 2011 18:47 Minastir wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 18:31 nihlon wrote:The real (!?!) conspiracy theories will probably say that they captured him alive to keep in some hidden bunker for all eternity. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" If I were a conspiracy theorist I'd chase this conspiracy to the end. Disclaimer: Tinfoil hat material + Show Spoiler + Let's say Bin Laden was an agent working for US government all this time, 9/11 would be an orchestrated op from government and Bin Laden would be the scapegoat. This raid on Bin Laden compound has to be a hoax, nobody has died and this is merely a declaration by US government to Bin Laden that his contract has ended and he can continue living under a new identity with job well done.
Your conspiracy depends on the US government exhibiting a competency it has never possessed
|
On May 02 2011 18:38 Shigy wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 18:31 Stylus wrote:On May 02 2011 18:28 Shigy wrote:don't know if you guys have been talking about this in the past ~40 pages.. but i just read this headline on CNN, they've been updating the story quite a bit tonight. "OSAMA BIN LADEN DEAD Terrorist leader's body buried at sea; Americans rejoice" really? i'm not one to constantly question the government (eg birthers, the fed, 9/11 conspiracies, any other conspiracies for that matter). but that's kind of curious. we'll have to see how it develops, but it does raise question. why would they get rid of the best evidence they have so quickly? people question the legitimacy of the whole thing with or without this instaburial. According to a U.S. official on May 2, bin Laden's body was handled in accordance with Islamic practice and tradition,[10] and was buried at sea soon after death, in accordance with Islamic tradition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Osama_bin_Laden does this explanation really satisfy you? really? respect for islamic tradition? come on dude.
Oh yeah, it's not as though the Obama administration or the later Bush administration have done their utmost not to repeat the huge screwups that were the Qo'ran flushings, or Abu Ghraib in general. C'mon...
|
|
|
|