Great Military leaders of History?
Forum Index > General Forum |
Timberwolf593
United States4 Posts
| ||
SirToonces
United States40 Posts
General MacArthur. A bit crazy but good nonetheless. | ||
Timberwolf593
United States4 Posts
| ||
stfn
United States53 Posts
![]() | ||
Nebo
United States44 Posts
![]() | ||
Kimaker
United States2131 Posts
| ||
Thereisnosaurus
Australia1822 Posts
edit: Also sir John Monash, the allied side's Rommel. | ||
Noxie
United States2227 Posts
| ||
BiG
Germany153 Posts
Additionally i think washington is very misplaced as the first right there, but i guess that pick might be biased by the thread creator cuz hes most likely american i guess :o | ||
O-ops
United States4236 Posts
On February 15 2011 13:43 stfn wrote: ![]() This guy is an arrogant prick. Zhao Yun was much better. | ||
0mar
United States567 Posts
Washington was actually a very poor general. He lost far more battles than he actually won. The Revolutionary War was an American win from the get-go because the tactics of the time, which were large, open battles that were pre-determined. All the colonists had to do was limit their strategic losses and wait it out. What works in that situation is a total war, subjugate the masses strategy, which the British adopted after the RW. | ||
Zlasher
United States9129 Posts
Given that Lee has next to nothing, a spread out force and shitty resources and everything to deal with, he was clearly the best general in American history, even if his side lost. | ||
stfn
United States53 Posts
On February 15 2011 13:46 O-ops wrote: This guy is an arrogant prick. Zhao Yun was much better. Watch your language. | ||
jeddus
United States832 Posts
| ||
`Zapdos
United States935 Posts
![]() | ||
Xenocide_Knight
Korea (South)2625 Posts
![]() | ||
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On February 15 2011 13:46 O-ops wrote: This guy is an arrogant prick. Zhao Yun was much better. Pretty sure this is about being a good tactician, not about being a good warrior one-to-one. | ||
stork4ever
United States1036 Posts
| ||
Lyzon
United Kingdom440 Posts
| ||
Shrinky Dink
United States52 Posts
![]() Seriously though, if you look past the horrors he did, he was actually an excellent speaker, with his war machine being responsible for some of the greatest advances in technology and science, and recovered his country's extreme deficit in its economy at the time (following the Treaty of Versailles). I know it's obviously that he wasn't the greatest of all time, but IMO he is very underrated as a leader for his country since everyone looks at his cons. | ||
| ||