Diablo III - Page 14

On July 01 2008 02:19 LuckyOne wrote:
seeing evil things in a sunny day with bright colors and rainbow is actually more scary to me

On July 01 2008 00:56 EnergyTraction wrote:
The graphics look fine, I don't think that just because it's Diablo everything outside has to be dark and stormy...yea, sure, in the dungeons it should be, which it is in the gameplay video, but just cause Diablo is sending hell-minions out to kill shit doesn't mean the sun stops shining.

However, while I don't have a problem, I do also think that a darker look would be even better looking

On July 01 2008 02:55 NotSorry wrote:

yea the thoughts of demons ruining your gay pride parade must just get your panties all knotted up with fear.

On July 01 2008 02:55 NotSorry wrote:

yea the thoughts of demons ruining your gay pride parade must just get your panties all knotted up with fear.

On July 01 2008 03:45 aseq wrote:
The thing that disappointed me most about the graphics was not the colors or the brightness, but the round candles in the dungeon only having 5 sides. If these are the beginning areas of the game, it's not too bright or happy...compared to something like this:

+ Show Spoiler +

On July 01 2008 04:47 Nitrogen23 wrote:
I think the fact that the fire from the torches had shadows annoyed me the most about the graphics in diablo.

On July 01 2008 05:21 anch wrote:

lol, I mentioned this same thing to my friend.

3d Diablo is innovating, but i dont think anyone would zoom in and do battles.

On July 01 2008 04:59 Gokey wrote:
No way this video is real, right? This guy claims he has a beta of D3 and is giving details of the game...>>>????

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOqnrhaeXIA&feature=user

On June 30 2008 21:56 Constantinius wrote:
Good thing I don't want anything to do with your mind.

I can't believe people can't see that this obviously draws inspiration from the Warcraft III/WoW engine. The blocky, polygonal features that comprise objects in the game detracts significantly from the atmosphere because it forces exaggerations in shape and size of different characters. The mood is QUITE different because of it. Everytime I see the sanded off gryphon and ramparts, and oversized objects when zoomed in close, it pisses me off.

Listen, no one is saying the current graphics are ugly. BUT THEY DON'T F****** FIT. That's the point. Let the WoW people have their franchise, we had a perfectly fine art style of a Gothic art style (I want to draw some allusion to Mary Shelley but it escapes me), and Blizzard has jumped far far away from it. I want, at the very least, a justification.

On July 01 2008 09:13 Nintu wrote:
D3 looks further along in development than SC2 in a lot of ways, which makes me feel uncomfortable.

On July 01 2008 09:59 Railz wrote:


The fact that they only feel comfortable showing off 2 of the 5 classes planned, and only 2 environments, makes believe D3 is still behind SC2. I felt the same way when I saw the D3 video, but what they showed and were able to talk about was actually a minute part of the what one would expect from D3.

SC2, environments look almost done, races are ...well races could arguably never be finished, people will always have issues, even blizzard. They sound like the single player is just being polished, and the UI all but set. So we'll see. My money is still on SC2 being released 2 or so months before D3.

On June 29 2008 17:56 zoLo wrote:


No it's not since at the Diablo 3 panel they said Hydra isn't related to Diablo 3.