EPTGIVE ME
Diablo III - Page 12
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
SK.Testie
Canada11084 Posts
GIVE ME | ||
|
Nitrogen
United States5345 Posts
On June 30 2008 09:57 Last Romantic wrote: The Smith scared the shit out of me in 3rd grade LOL. I'm looking forward to D3. I think the durance of hate was pretty creepy too. Now that I think about it, most of a3 was pretty creepy back then. | ||
|
paper
13196 Posts
| ||
|
Meta
United States6226 Posts
I don't understand how you people could say the graphics are suffering from "warcraft syndrome". I don't think the graphics are at all childish or cartoony. On the contrary, I think that the graphics pay true homage to diablo 2, by not changing the looks of the creatures (especially the goat-men), and adding true gore effects that the graphics engine of the previous games could not handle. As for only having 5 classes, I'm sure they'll add two or more in an expansion just like LoD. Anyway, those are my two cents. | ||
|
Raithed
China7078 Posts
On June 29 2008 11:45 FreeZEternal wrote: suddenly i have 0 interest for sc2 -,-; thats how i feel! | ||
|
Nitrogen
United States5345 Posts
On June 30 2008 10:10 Meta wrote: I think the graphics are absolutely stunning and shouldn't be changed at all. Also I think the witch doctor looks like an incredible replacement for the necromancer. I'm more excited about this, as is, than starcraft 2 at the moment. I think that Diablo 3 will be an extraordinary advancement in the franchise, by upgrading the two things that made Diablo 2 less than perfect - having to rely on potions and only being able to cast two spells at once without having to change them. I don't understand how you people could say the graphics are suffering from "warcraft syndrome". I don't think the graphics are at all childish or cartoony. On the contrary, I think that the graphics pay true homage to diablo 2, by not changing the looks of the creatures (especially the goat-men), and adding true gore effects that the graphics engine of the previous games could not handle. As for only having 5 classes, I'm sure they'll add two or more in an expansion just like LoD. Anyway, those are my two cents. In one of the screenshots there's a picture of a fucking rainbow in the background. Does that sound like d3 to you? Anyways, I think they could use a little less vibrant colors and a little more gloom, but maybe not as much as some of the pictures w/ some filters on it I've seen. | ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
On June 30 2008 10:01 MYM.Testie wrote: WANT GIVE ME Stick to DotA+Poker man...:/ | ||
|
paper
13196 Posts
| ||
|
Cpt.Cocaine
Canada299 Posts
On June 30 2008 10:10 Meta wrote: I don't understand how you people could say the graphics are suffering from "warcraft syndrome". I don't think the graphics are at all childish or cartoony. On the contrary, I think that the graphics pay true homage to diablo 2, by not changing the looks of the creatures (especially the goat-men), and adding true gore effects that the graphics engine of the previous games could not handle. . What are you smoking? Bright neon colors, bright cartoony textures, models that look straight out of wow, even the damn blue glow on the axe is straight out of warcraft 3. They could've put unicorns in there and they wouldn't look out of place. | ||
Last Romantic
United States20664 Posts
On June 30 2008 10:01 Nitrogen23 wrote: I think the durance of hate was pretty creepy too. Now that I think about it, most of a3 was pretty creepy back then. those fucking little rat fetish creatures were damn scary, yeah i didn't even know what a fetish was back then. | ||
|
Gokey
United States2722 Posts
damn you Blizzard hype machine!!! edit: Scariest monsters for me were the rat fetishes (hit so fast, then stunlock, then explode on death), goatmen (their hits HURT in hell), and the Smith (curse was fking scary when it takes 1/2 your health) | ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On June 30 2008 10:40 Last Romantic wrote: those fucking little rat fetish creatures were damn scary, yeah i didn't even know what a fetish was back then. ![[image loading]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d0/Human_Feet_-_female_-_bruised.jpg/800px-Human_Feet_-_female_-_bruised.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://farm1.static.flickr.com/61/205023033_8a426f6aef.jpg?v=0) ![[image loading]](http://www.hollywoodstandups.com/images/mini_me.jpg) Now you know. | ||
|
HamerD
United Kingdom1922 Posts
Lol i should have phrased that to make it sound less like child abuse. Anyway, rat fetishes were fucking scary, christ! But they were more like 'oh shit im gona die'; and ps seeing as they appeared in andariel's lair first under whatever name, I guess they count more as hers anyway. That whole way to get to andariel was just gruelling too. Once I got to durance I was cruising with bone spear anyway and found it pretty undaunting (though i was a summon nec first ever time through so i was going around in a security blanket of skellies). But man you gota admit tristram was pretty daunting the first time you went? I remember shaking and being like OMG THIS IS WHATS REMAINSS OFS PROUDS TRISTRAMS  ??!!!! | ||
|
G5
United States2921 Posts
| ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
| ||
|
Nitrogen
United States5345 Posts
On June 30 2008 10:40 Last Romantic wrote: those fucking little rat fetish creatures were damn scary, yeah i didn't even know what a fetish was back then. Lol, the spider things were creepy as fuck too in a3. Worldstone probably had the creepiest characters, but not as creepy of an environment. They had the fetish/undead dolls, and those fucking souls turn invisible and pop up and shoot lightning and rape you. | ||
|
EnergyTraction
Canada233 Posts
in terms of scary to play, the fuckin Butcher scared the shit out of me when i was seven and playing diablo i | ||
|
Cpt.Cocaine
Canada299 Posts
| ||
|
Cpt.Cocaine
Canada299 Posts
| ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img211.imageshack.us/img211/4706/1214796509963dd3.jpg) | ||
| ||
