EPT[wow] Warlords of Draenor - Page 492
| Forum Index > General Games |
Add yourself to the player list | ||
|
Alabasern
United States4005 Posts
| ||
|
Stancel
Singapore15360 Posts
![[image loading]](http://puu.sh/hCpYw/c254dfbcc9.jpg) fuck you and your 0.9% drop chance, I'm done farming you | ||
|
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
| ||
|
deth2munkies
United States4051 Posts
On May 06 2015 03:03 bo1b wrote: Wraths first two seasons we're stupid but imo out of all the expansions of arena that I've missed out on glad in s7 was by far the most fun and skillful (at least for warlocks) I dunno, I had fun as a warlock S1-3 with both UA and SL/SL. | ||
|
NotSorry
United States6722 Posts
On May 06 2015 05:38 deth2munkies wrote: I dunno, I had fun as a warlock S1-3 with both UA and SL/SL. You had fun, but there was no skill in S2-S3 SL/SL | ||
|
deth2munkies
United States4051 Posts
On May 06 2015 08:11 NotSorry wrote: You had fun, but there was no skill in S2-S3 SL/SL I ran UA/Shadowpriest in S2 and S3 2s and SL/SL + UA + Discpriest in 3s. I played UA both times (SL/SL for a bit in S3 3s) and SL/SL only in S1 with a discpriest for about 2 weeks before we went back to UA/Shadowpriest. We could never beat a resto druid or double rogue, but had favorable matchups against most everything else. Even then, SL/SL still required skill. It was a survival spec and you had to do everything perfectly to actually outlast them. You do no real damage, just are very difficult to kill and can drain mana. It was a slow playstyle that demanded you perform flawlessly for long games, that's pretty skill intensive. That said, I prefered the burst of UA/Spriest with the coordinated DoTs and CC chains. | ||
|
FinestHour
United States18466 Posts
| ||
|
Dismay
United States1180 Posts
| ||
|
Alabasern
United States4005 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20294 Posts
so it looks like there will another raid after hellfire citadel It would be silly to go from the 6.0 raids to hellfire citadel to content gap and next expansion. That's like going from Naxxramas/EOE/OS to ICC without Ulduar or TOTC. - or like cataclysm just ending at firelands. They can't launch the last raid 8 months after expansion release unless they have a seriously amazing content development team hidden away somewhere to announce that WOD will only be 12-16 months long instead of 24.. like every other expansion ever | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21705 Posts
On May 06 2015 17:34 Cyro wrote: It would be silly to go from the 6.0 raids to hellfire citadel to content gap and next expansion. That's like going from Naxxramas/EOE/OS to ICC without Ulduar or TOTC. - or like cataclysm just ending at firelands. They can't launch the last raid 8 months after expansion release unless they have a seriously amazing content development team hidden away somewhere to announce that WOD will only be 12-16 months long instead of 24.. like every other expansion ever They sorta did that last part when they says WoD was delayed because the dev team grow a lot and they said they were planning for WoD to be 1 year long (which they have said every expansion). We shall believe it when we see it :p | ||
|
lestye
United States4163 Posts
On May 06 2015 17:34 Cyro wrote: It would be silly to go from the 6.0 raids to hellfire citadel to content gap and next expansion. That's like going from Naxxramas/EOE/OS to ICC without Ulduar or TOTC. - or like cataclysm just ending at firelands. They can't launch the last raid 8 months after expansion release unless they have a seriously amazing content development team hidden away somewhere to announce that WOD will only be 12-16 months long instead of 24.. like every other expansion ever You say that, but theres interviews of devs saying they might want to do 2 raid teirs this expac, plus Blizzards been talking about 1 expansion a year since 2007. With the setting and theme of Hellfire, along with the datamined details of the last fight, it feels very penultimate. I certainly hope it isn,t but it isnt baseless. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20294 Posts
 I'd love if this expansion was 12-14 months long but i reallllllly doubt it's going to happen | ||
Teoita
Italy12246 Posts
| ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
| ||
|
FinestHour
United States18466 Posts
| ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21705 Posts
On May 07 2015 05:17 FinestHour wrote: you guys think gorehowl being legendary wep is likely now with at least 6.3 happenin Im 99.9% sure there will be no legendary aside from the ring chain. Same way MoP only had the chain. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20294 Posts
~just ran through to 9/10 HC with new guild (they are 10/10 hc, 0/10 mythic) and now i look like a clown from the gear got 9 ilvls and my 2piece and actually posting competitive DPS (though a fair amount down the meters) which is nice | ||
|
Alabasern
United States4005 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20294 Posts
The 2.9 million subscriber dip can be attributed to seasonal changes in the player base. Seasonal changes in the player base would have shown up in the last 40 seasons. ![[image loading]](http://puu.sh/hDYH6.png) "seasonal" is used way too much IMO. I've heard many excuses for people being inactive because it's summer or winter - but now spring? There's always stuff happening in life | ||
| ||
