| Forum Index > General Games |
|
slyboogie
United States3423 Posts
On April 20 2011 10:59 cLutZ wrote: Honestly, why is he famous? His films are all pretty bad. What? No way, he did Do the Right Thing, He Got Game and Malcolm X. He has a lot of films that aren't masterpieces but he does pretty good work. His messages do tend to be heavy handed and his artistic vision is a little urban, but yeah, sorry to derail. | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On April 20 2011 11:34 slyboogie wrote: What? No way, he did Do the Right Thing, He Got Game and Malcolm X. He has a lot of films that aren't masterpieces but he does pretty good work. His messages do tend to be heavy handed and his artistic vision is a little urban, but yeah, sorry to derail. Just because you make a film about a social issue does not make it a good film. There needs to be plot and character development. Forgetting about those things is what makes Avatar, Malcolm X, and most musicals terrible. Those movies get rave reviews because they are difficult to make, well anyone who watches Kobe Bryant will tell you that degree of difficulty != quality. | ||
|
Kamille
Monaco1035 Posts
| ||
|
slyboogie
United States3423 Posts
On April 20 2011 11:59 cLutZ wrote: Just because you make a film about a social issue does not make it a good film. There needs to be plot and character development. Forgetting about those things is what makes Avatar, Malcolm X, and most musicals terrible. Those movies get rave reviews because they are difficult to make, well anyone who watches Kobe Bryant will tell you that degree of difficulty != quality. You're putting the cart before the horse with that argument. Malcolm X is about one of the most important black thinkers ever....and it's a good movie. If you don't like it, that's fine, your opinion is legit - it's just in the minority. Shooting difficult shots doesn't uniquely make you good but it doesn't preclude you from being good. Larry Hughes, Gilbert Arenas and Nick Young all take difficult shots. They are different from Kobe Bryant, who also takes difficult shots. | ||
|
Engore
United States1916 Posts
On April 20 2011 11:59 cLutZ wrote: Just because you make a film about a social issue does not make it a good film. There needs to be plot and character development. Forgetting about those things is what makes Avatar, Malcolm X, and most musicals terrible. Those movies get rave reviews because they are difficult to make, well anyone who watches Kobe Bryant will tell you that degree of difficulty != quality. Erp nvm. Thinking of someone else i guess  Anyways on topic. Celtics tonight woooooooot KG beast mode at the end there. 2 great plays to win the game! | ||
pathy
Taiwan619 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
| ||
|
unknown.sam
Philippines2701 Posts
| ||
|
Zorkmid
4410 Posts
On April 20 2011 12:05 Kamille wrote: SUP HAWKS? HAWKS: Oh hey, we took one off you on your homecourt. You gotta beat us at home or you're the fuck out. SUP (not a Hawks fan) | ||
|
igotmyown
United States4291 Posts
They both had 5 fouls, did he just attack them to keep them out of the game? | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
Lakers seem to have a lot of issues despite the win. | ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
On April 21 2011 12:18 igotmyown wrote: Couldn't get a stream my bandwidth could handle very well, but what did Popovich do to neutralize Gasol/Randolph? They both had 5 fouls, did he just attack them to keep them out of the game? I think it was just poor fouls on their part. Randolph seemed very effective but did not receive the ball as much as he could have. Gasol was on the court a lot but does not seem more than an opportunistic scorer to me. It was a great, close game. The Spurs were determined not to lose. The Grizzlies as a team played just about as well as they could have in my opinion. The only exception would be Tony Allen, who Manu flustered early in the game. The thing that concerned me about the Spurs was that they were able to get penetration at will but never drove in for layups. For as many 3 point shots as they made, they should have had the game in hand easily. | ||
|
iLoveKT
Philippines3615 Posts
| ||
The Chief
Australia138 Posts
| ||
|
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
| ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
| ||
|
RowdierBob
Australia13427 Posts
| ||
|
rei
United States3594 Posts
| ||
|
Signet
United States1718 Posts
On April 22 2011 13:09 jmbthirteen wrote: Despite being down 0-3, I am extremely proud of how my Pacers are playing. We are just too young right now. Granger is the only guy that we can rely on night in and night out right now. This experience will only make them hungry this off season to work hard and improve. Its like Larry Bird said about his first time in the playoffs. He realized he needed to do a lot of work in the off season to get better. Definitely the Pacers have played well every game. In all likelihood they're not going to come back to win this, but a strong performance is something to build on for next season. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
RSL Revival
Serral vs Bunny
ByuN vs GgMaChine
CranKy Ducklings
Afreeca Starleague
Snow vs Jaedong
YSC vs hero
SC Evo League
ByuN vs Classic
Cure vs Solar
IPSL
Dragon vs Ret
Patches Events
RSL Revival
Solar vs Rogue
Maru vs NightMare
Sparkling Tuna Cup
IPSL
Bonyth vs Hawk
GSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
