|
NOTE: This thread contains spoilers. Do not read the thread if you are not caught up.
If a new episode has already officially aired, you are allowed to discuss what happened without posting in spoilers. |
On March 03 2013 02:57 Slardar wrote:
Ending was expected, about time that ship took off. Especially when Rachel walked into the file room and locked the door behind her. That was the GG.
Nothing ULTRA exciting or anything, the two new British dudes are great, love em. Whoever was complaining about that the racism is taking it too personally. The guy fires Scottie for betraying him, then rehires in 2 sentences from Harvey? I doubt Harvey himself or Jessica would have done the same.
That was the most exciting line of the finale for me. Scottie working here or in London? Damn she is gorgeous.
Knowing the writers, she won't show up again. Jenny </3
|
Jennys nose bothered me soooo much. Scotty > all
All else aside, I no-lifed the S1+2/3 in 4 days :/ And it was great. Indeed one of the most enjoyable series until the last part where 'name of the door' became the big issue. I was hoping they would continue abit longer with the [H]ouse formula of episode/case. The whole series reminded me of House which attracted me in the first place. Witty comments, funny metaphors and trying to be funny with references. 'You are with your back against the wall' And Harvey responds with: 'I like it here, it gives me backsupport' I lol'd so hard. But that's just at the top of my memory but damn, I enjoyed Suits.
It's a bit disappointing that Louis gets shitted on all the time and nothing changes, not he nor his surroundings. He is probably my favorite character and I'd like it for him to be more in the bright side of things. But than that doesn't fit his character. I feel there's still something amiss with his position in the series, they need to find a better balance. Especially the part where he fucked up his British counterpart behind his back with the efficiency list. YOU JUST GOT LITT'UP!
The funny thing is, one of my subjects is 'Negotiating' atm. I wonder how Suits will end up helping me, if at all :D
|
I really enjoyed the hell out of this series. The latest season was kinda cool showing that Harvey isn't totally invincible and can lose and will not always have things go his way.
Hope the Mike and Rachel thing is done awesomely, like the episode when they go to get the apartment for his grandmother and the banter etc. (Btw what happened to that place, next season it returns?).
And out.
|
hell yeah, love the show. It is not perfect or very well written (story and characters wise) but it is a very very entertaining show for me. The season finale is abit rushed tbh but i enjoyed it nonetheless.
Cant wait for more and it is going to be some waiting for months...
|
season ending was weird as shit. rachel raging = sex in file room? i wanted a cliffhanger
|
On March 20 2013 01:37 evilfatsh1t wrote:
season ending was weird as shit. rachel raging = sex in file room? i wanted a cliffhanger
I think their are several cliffhangers just in that one ending scene. Does Mike tell Rachel the full story? He only told her a half truth, that he didn't go to Harvard. Not that he's not a lawyer at all. If Mike tells Rachel more or just sticks with what he's said so far, does Harvey find out? If Harvey finds out does he tell Mike to end it again? With everything that happened between Mike and Harvey at the end he may just out right fire Mike if he finds out Mike told Rachel even a half truth. I'm really interested to see where they go from there.
|
United States10774 Posts
On February 27 2013 15:53 haegN wrote:meh after watching this series finale I see them losing me as a viewer pretty quickly in season 3 if things do not change. Maybe its just the fact that Jessica annoys me so much, all though I didnt understand the whole "get the name on the door?" thing. How long is the companys name going to be? I also hate the fact that we didnt get to see more tits and ass! Cant wait untill Game of Thrones season 3 
Lawyers in firms pretty much work to be a partner, not to mention being a name partner (unless you plan moving over to in-house or something). Law firms often have 3 to 4 last names as the name haha, check this one out - Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
|
Yeah 3 named partners is pretty common.
|
Did they change writers? Just finished season 2 but Season 1 feels a lot different to me
|
They changed the formula a bit but it still sticked to the 1 case per episode iirc.
|
I despise the one case per episode thing because it feels so inconsequential. The first episode was brilliant - a great and quirky setup and then almost immediately settled into dull monotony. Even the story arch feels meaningless. Its a shame because the characters and backdrop are fantastic.
|
On March 21 2013 20:51 eburnsdaniel wrote:
I despise the one case per episode thing because it feels so inconsequential. The first episode was brilliant - a great and quirky setup and then almost immediately settled into dull monotony. Even the story arch feels meaningless. Its a shame because the characters and backdrop are fantastic.
I generally don't like "one story per episode" either, but in Suits characters notably evolve as the episodes go, and don't forget everything they've done in the past, so it doesn't feel as inconsequential to me.
|
I just watched both Season 1 and 2 in a three day marathon run. Such a good show. Can't wait for Season 3!
|
I love this show too..Have watched every episode of both season...Now, I'm looking forward to next Season 3 which will launch in this June..Anyone know that??
|
On April 18 2013 18:02 harrystefanou wrote:
I love this show too..Have watched every episode of both season...Now, I'm looking forward to next Season 3 which will launch in this June..Anyone know that??
According to tvcountdown website it will be released on Wed 2013-07-17.
|
On March 21 2013 21:02 ZenithM wrote:Show nested quote +On March 21 2013 20:51 eburnsdaniel wrote:
I despise the one case per episode thing because it feels so inconsequential. The first episode was brilliant - a great and quirky setup and then almost immediately settled into dull monotony. Even the story arch feels meaningless. Its a shame because the characters and backdrop are fantastic. I generally don't like "one story per episode" either, but in Suits characters notably evolve as the episodes go, and don't forget everything they've done in the past, so it doesn't feel as inconsequential to me.
The problem is that the characters aren't doing anything interesting. The storylines kind of suck, but the characters are the thing that props it up.
|
The thing I don't like about the one case per episode thing is that EVERY CASE IS THE SAME. Well, there are two types. One, Mike/Harvey bully the shit out of someone into doing what they want. Or two, they miraculously find a piece of evidence last minute. They all just feel so uncreative..
And nothing seems to be utilizing Mike's unique traits? He's turned from being able to remember everything into having an incredible segway when talking to someone about his personal problems.
"wait, thats just it, PEOPLE ARE WHO THEY ARE, TANNER CHEATED!"
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
|
season 3 only a month away!
started re-watching the first 2 seasons
|
Started watching at the behest of a friend, just finished the two seasons. Good thing I don't have to wait long for season 3.
|
On May 06 2013 03:42 Ian Ian Ian wrote:
The thing I don't like about the one case per episode thing is that EVERY CASE IS THE SAME. Well, there are two types. One, Mike/Harvey bully the shit out of someone into doing what they want. Or two, they miraculously find a piece of evidence last minute. They all just feel so uncreative..
And nothing seems to be utilizing Mike's unique traits? He's turned from being able to remember everything into having an incredible segway when talking to someone about his personal problems.
"wait, thats just it, PEOPLE ARE WHO THEY ARE, TANNER CHEATED!"
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
The irony is that Tanner didn't cheat. It was all Hardman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
