[Movie] Inception - Page 16
Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
| ||
Cofo
United States1388 Posts
On July 19 2010 14:37 Glaven wrote: Such a huge man crush! Haha. Such good suits. And i noticed that right away, Piaf fit in perfectly. I have a huge crush on both him AND Ellen Page, so this movie was perfect ![]() | ||
Eben
United States769 Posts
| ||
LxRogue
United States1415 Posts
I agree with what a few people have said about the previews making it look way worse than it actually was.. On July 19 2010 13:09 Grobyc wrote: I absolutely loved it, and I actually wanted to see it again + Show Spoiler + just to confirm what I think is real/fake and what happened. I talked about it with someone at work today and I understand most of what happened now, but I still wouldn't mind seeing it again to catch all the smaller details like why you can't do some things in your dreams, why if they Saito died after getting shot he would have to spend like 50 years in some kind of personal dream world or something, etc. Also, I couldn't hear half of what was said at the end where it reinacts the opening scene with Cobb and Saito, but I'm not sure I would have understood it anyway. Cobb wanted to kill Saito so he could return to reality or something? Was it because Saito died and had to spend 50+ years in another dream like I mentioned before? Did Saito know that? I really didn't catch any of what was said at the end. + Show Spoiler + I definitely didn't understand a good chunk of that part, but I think Saito died of his gunshot a few moments before Cobb in the first dream level. I guess that translates to a bunch of years in the "limbo" dreamspace, so when Cobb drowned in the car, he was able to also enter the "limbo", just way later than Saito would had. I think all they did once they found each other after those ~50 years was kill each other, and I guess Saito could have done so all along, but he just didn't know? | ||
Bond(i2)
Canada926 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + The only part that is bothering me is how they came back through the first dream. Wasn't it the feeling of falling that was supposed to wake them up when they were in the van? If so, then why were they able to swim out of the van THEN get woken up. The way i understood it was that if they werent able to jump start their way out of that dream, they'd be stuck there for a week. hmm this is the only part that is bothering me | ||
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [ending] + I can't accept it being a dream because how does he create that entire world, and not only create it, but not realize that he can make stuff in it? Everyone in Limbo has known this, and that would immediately tip him off. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
One thing that kind of bothered me: Dom and Mal spend 50 years in the dream world. Then they get hit by a train and come back to reality (gravity!) But there was a scene where they were shown as old people. Then getting hit by the train they were young? | ||
Chrispy
Canada5878 Posts
Deep. | ||
Endymion
United States3701 Posts
Movie spoilers + Show Spoiler + First off, the motive for the whole movie taking place. The inception of the idea into the corporate heir's mind. The protagonists have no motive for this other than greed, and in Cobb's case, the need for his children. They literally explain the whole preface of the movie in a minute, saying that Saito's company can no longer compete with Fischer's company, so instead of using ethical corporate means they just decide to rub out a multi-billion dollar company. Such a potentially powerful plot piece goes to waste (justifying this rash movement by Saito, or at least a conversation between Saito and Fischer Jr.), as Saito's character isn't developed and this plot string shreads. The arguably main story of the film, Cobb's story about losing his grasp on what was reality and what wasn't. If his mind was so compromised, why would Ariadne let him come? She knew full well how dangerous his subconscious was when Mal stabbed her in her second dream, as well as when she invaded Cobb's dream. You could say that she was ignorant to a point, but give me a break. She was an american student studying architecture in Paris from a British professor who thought highly of her, she wasn't exactly stupid in any regard. Besides Ariadne, why would Cobb enter the multi-level dream if he knew exactly just how dangerous it would be for everyone involved. It wasn't his accomplices were just accomplices, they all knew his story, and were probably his only close friends. Is he really so selfish to endanger everyone around him just to get half of his life back? He could have just assembled the team, and then told Saito that he was a liability, and that he knew the rest of the team could do it. I assume he was just extremely selfish from everything that had happened to him before the film even started, which makes me care so much less for the scenes between him and Mal. The Ending. This isn't really a complaint as the ending didn't really make or break the movie, but really? They are going to leave the top teetering? To be honest, I thought his dad would have came and pushed it over while Cobb was running out the children. I was literally thinking "I'll have so much more respect for this film if he knocks it over, because then it could mean A. It was reality and Cobb's father just wanted to reassure Cobb, or B. that it was a dream and Cobb's subconscious just wanted to be done with the whole situation and just be happy." I was really disappointed, but it doesn't really matter. What is this movie trying to be? Was it trying to be a romance, an action movie, or just a thriller? I couldn't pin it on one of the three, and to be honest neither of the three genres prevailed in the end. Oh, it's listed as a drama, but there wasn't really anything dramatic in the movie, everything felt so understated to me in the end. Final Thoughts I know it's just a movie, I just into it with super high hopes i guess. With high recommendations from friends as well as movie critics, and tl.net I thought that inception was unstoppable, and that it could even topple Vanilla Sky as my favorite movie. ![]() Unfortunately, it didn't come close. Inception's lack of an identity completely turned me off, and was the complete opposite of Vanilla Sky's direct shot of sadness and despair straight into my heart. While I have seen Vanilla Sky 40+ times, I'm afraid I will only see Inception once more just to make sure I didn't miss anything. 3.5/5 | ||
Bond(i2)
Canada926 Posts
On July 19 2010 14:56 flamewheel wrote: Hmm. One thing that kind of bothered me: Dom and Mal spend 50 years in the dream world. Then they get hit by a train and come back to reality (gravity!) But there was a scene where they were shown as old people. Then getting hit by the train they were young? I think you see them young in the first scene because it is ariande's interpretation of what happened and the second time, when you see them old, is cobb's actual memory. | ||
![]()
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
On July 19 2010 15:12 Bond(i2) wrote: I think you see them young in the first scene because it is ariande's interpretation of what happened and the second time, when you see them old, is cobb's actual memory. Yeah, I believe this is correct | ||
Loser777
1931 Posts
Saito is shot in the first dream. He remains evidently ill throughout all of the subsequent dreams. The water from the van that splashes onto them results in the turbulent and strange weather of the subsequent dreams, and so forth. But when the "kick" is delivered, and the van is falling, gravity does seem to disappear in the Hotel, but not for any of the others in the snow... even though their actual bodies are in free fall? Also, I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned this before, but I found the film's similarity to "The Mirror", a short that Emily Page did with SNL a little while ago to be interesting. While they're not terribly alike in any way, they share the idea of waking up from a dream within a dream -which doesn't have to be your own. http://www.hulu.com/watch/11203/saturday-night-live-digital-short-the-mirror | ||
Endymion
United States3701 Posts
On July 19 2010 15:36 Loser777 wrote: I don't understand why some of the effects are transitive between dreams while others are not. Saito is shot in the first dream. He remains evidently ill throughout all of the subsequent dreams. The water from the van that splashes onto them results in the turbulent and strange weather of the subsequent dreams, and so forth. But when the "kick" is delivered, and the van is falling, gravity does seem to disappear in the Hotel, but not for any of the others in the snow... even though their actual bodies are in free fall? Also noticed this. It's interesting to note that when they are in the 4th "depth" and Fischer gets shocked in the 3rd depth, that the lightning goes crazy on the 4th. Of course, that could have just been from Mal's anger, I just assumed it was from the defibrillator. Anyone know why there are discrepancies, or was it never explained? | ||
zerodahero
United States358 Posts
On July 19 2010 13:29 Empyrean wrote: You haven't seen many action movies, have you >_> I've almost grown numb to these types of scenes, very rarely does anything actually happen and they're usually just there for looks. On topic - saw this movie on Saturday and absolutely loved it. Want to go see it again to make sure I got everything.+ Show Spoiler + Feels like i missed a few things about how/why certain effects are felt throughout the different dream worlds and some are not, whereas some are only felt 1 dream world away, and so on. Go see it if you havent. | ||
Grobyc
Canada18410 Posts
On July 19 2010 14:52 LxRogue wrote: Awesome movie. Loved the cast. I agree with what a few people have said about the previews making it look way worse than it actually was.. + Show Spoiler + I definitely didn't understand a good chunk of that part, but I think Saito died of his gunshot a few moments before Cobb in the first dream level. I guess that translates to a bunch of years in the "limbo" dreamspace, so when Cobb drowned in the car, he was able to also enter the "limbo", just way later than Saito would had. I think all they did once they found each other after those ~50 years was kill each other, and I guess Saito could have done so all along, but he just didn't know? + Show Spoiler + Ahh that would make some sense. Still not sure about that last part you mentioned though. Saito should be able to kill himself to return to reality while in that dreamspace, no? | ||
Backpack
United States1776 Posts
On July 19 2010 15:36 Loser777 wrote: I don't understand why some of the effects are transitive between dreams while others are not. Saito is shot in the first dream. He remains evidently ill throughout all of the subsequent dreams. The water from the van that splashes onto them results in the turbulent and strange weather of the subsequent dreams, and so forth. But when the "kick" is delivered, and the van is falling, gravity does seem to disappear in the Hotel, but not for any of the others in the snow... even though their actual bodies are in free fall? Each "kick" only goes one level, same with the strange weather and what not. That is why they have to set up multiple kicks. + Show Spoiler + -Jumping off the building in limbo -blowing up the snow fortress -releasing the cords on the elevator -van hitting the water As for Saito, they state that the farther down they go, the less his injury will be. On July 19 2010 16:13 Grobyc wrote: + Show Spoiler + Ahh that would make some sense. Still not sure about that last part you mentioned though. Saito should be able to kill himself to return to reality while in that dreamspace, no? + Show Spoiler + I don't think Saito knew he was dreaming. When Cobb arrived he sparks the memory that they need to kill each other to return to the real world. | ||
DarthThienAn
United States2734 Posts
| ||
Grobyc
Canada18410 Posts
On July 19 2010 16:17 Backpack wrote: Each "kick" only goes one level, same with the strange weather and what not. That is why they have to set up multiple kicks. + Show Spoiler + -Jumping off the building in limbo -blowing up the snow fortress -releasing the cords on the elevator -van hitting the water As for Saito, they state that the farther down they go, the less his injury will be. + Show Spoiler + I don't think Saito knew he was dreaming. When Cobb arrived he sparks the memory that they need to kill each other to return to the real world. + Show Spoiler + Ahhhhh okay yeah that makes sense. I recall Saito having to jog his memory in regards to what Cobb was telling him. The top also proves to be a significant thing at the scene too because of that. Thanks! | ||
leejas
United States440 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + 2 notes though: 1) Watch it a second time, and keep track of his hands. Specifically the wedding ring. 2) The whole movie itself, the point that an idea is contagious and can't be stopped like a virus sparks the very question if the ending is real or not. THATS the unspoken twist. If he's in reality, then the idea in our heads is to question how we know that. If he's in a dream, then it begs us to question what Cobb's reality is. | ||
LegendaryZ
United States1583 Posts
On July 19 2010 03:58 OneOther wrote: Lol that's a horrible reason to not go see a great, creative film with good reviews. But whatever floats your boat. I pretty much feel the same way in that there's nothing about what I'm hearing or seeing about this movie that actually makes me want to go into a theater to see it, despite all the reviews and hype. I don't really think that's a horrible reason to wait for the DVD release or a decent rip to surface on the internet... For the most part my instincts have served me pretty well and just about every time I've been convinced to see a "great, creative film with good reviews" that I wasn't immediately drawn to, I've been severely disappointed (often to the point of being downright angry for wasting my money). Some movies that immediately come to mind in this category are "No Country for Old Men" and "Juno"... Of course Inception is slightly different in that it has some pretty big names across the board as well as a larger budget attached to it so I'm sure it'll probably be better than those two movies. Not to say that any of these are bad movies, but that they just didn't capture my interest at all. I do hope they release it on DVD soon so I can rent it to kill some time someday. Maybe for once a movie will live up to the hype, although I have to admit, I'm rarely in the mood for an intellectual experience when I sit down to watch a movie and that's the kind of movie this seems to be... | ||
| ||