EPTKOTH match controversy - Page 7
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
mcmascote
Brazil1575 Posts
| ||
|
Hydrolisko
Vanuatu1659 Posts
from what i read from testie its breakdown that refuses to regame.... so someone clarify this for me plz? | ||
|
TM_Machine
United States130 Posts
 gg | ||
|
Final Heaven
Japan310 Posts
On June 06 2005 18:12 Hydrolisko wrote: can someone clarify this for me plz, testie refuses to forfeit or he refuses to regame? because testie forfeiting the game because breakdown disc is utterly ridiculous, not to mention that testie had at least 50% chance of winning that game... from what i read from testie its breakdown that refuses to regame.... so someone clarify this for me plz? it was that jerk testie who refused to regame first . After a while he asked breakdown to regame but breakdown refused . Maybe he was pissed off by testie | ||
|
Resse
307 Posts
| ||
|
Mora
Canada5235 Posts
On June 06 2005 17:42 {88}iNcontroL wrote: er i didnt wanna do basic thinking for you. If one player refuses to regame, with both of them put in the same channel (now) i dont mean in the past (yes i know they both have refused regames) and they both refuse, than dethrone testie eliminate break and have 2 new guys fight for it. If one refuses, and the other doesnt, the one who didnt refuse wins. If they both accept, than revert back to thesis post. That was implied by "regame" obviously u cant force them. And in BW when 1 refuses, he cant win, he can only lose, basic. We're just on different wave lengths then. The post you commented was 'perfect' seemed blatantly obvious to me. You said 'anything after was inferior'. I happened to think that since a regame is so obviously needed that it should be discussed what should happen if 1 or both players refuse, and therefore is much more needed and does not follow under 'inferior'. But since we're entirely in agreement on everything other than the doing of that 'basic thinking' for me, im willing to drop it if u are. | ||
|
NettleS
522 Posts
On June 06 2005 09:25 iNCuBuS_ wrote: I have not yet seen the replay, but I posted an idea about redoing the game on the gosugamers forums. Most of them think its a good idea, although there is an obvious downside... I could remake the map (wouldnt take more than a few days if I do it a couple hours a day... and thats probably still more time than I'd need) so that everything is built where it was in the game, then they can play from there. The downside? They know what each other has and is building, even though Im sure both of them (being on the level they are) knew what to expect from the other. Hrm too much hassle IMO because if you want the game to be 'exactly' the same you would have to click each individual mineral patch and reset the minerals in your map to what they were in the game.Not to mention every injured unit (the zeals were mostly in red etc) Testie should just re ffs. But in my opinion breakdown was winning. | ||
|
1tym
Korea (South)2425 Posts
| ||
|
Art_of_Kill
Zaire1232 Posts
and the next Koth will played by 2 other player | ||
|
Josh124
United Kingdom145 Posts
http://www.gosugamers.net/news.php?id=2454 Basically it's now a bo3, and if either player refuses they are disqualified. | ||
|
cYaN
Norway3322 Posts
| ||
|
cYaN
Norway3322 Posts
| ||
|
[GiTM]-Ace
United States4935 Posts
 | ||
|
iNCuBuS_
United States905 Posts
On June 06 2005 09:30 Liquid`Drone wrote: testie could DEFINITELY rightfully claim a regame. even if his own chances of winning were ~10%, it was the deciding game and breakdown was the one who disconnected. and I believe testie's chances of winning were closer to 50% than 10%, although I'd surely give the current advantage to breakdown. now, claiming a win when you don't have an obvious advantage is gay no matter who disconnected so in this case where testie definitely didn't have a clear advantage and arguably was at a disadvantage, the obvious solution to me would be regame but then testie was gay and immediately wanted a win cause he "couldn't possibly lose", and then breakdown retaliated through being gay on his own and refusing to regame after testie came to his senses and wanted a regame anyway. so unless something has happened since the last time I updated myself on this, they're both being kinda gay. Not taking sides here or anything, but I believe it was like 1-2 am for breakdown... I wouldnt regame at that time either, especially since the match happeend much earlier than that. | ||
|
iNCuBuS_
United States905 Posts
On June 07 2005 02:01 NettleS wrote: Hrm too much hassle IMO because if you want the game to be 'exactly' the same you would have to click each individual mineral patch and reset the minerals in your map to what they were in the game.Not to mention every injured unit (the zeals were mostly in red etc) Testie should just re ffs. But in my opinion breakdown was winning. Its not that much work. It would take a few days at most. I did, after all, make Legacies Open RPG 1 and 2... and those took MONTHS | ||
|
iNsaNe-
Finland5201 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28876 Posts
u lost, why would i regame ?" | ||
Rekrul
Korea (South)17174 Posts
god how can people be so pathetic theres nothing on the line, not even pride the only thing either could do to show pride is play the regame willingly pathetic nerds | ||
|
-PhiL-
362 Posts
On June 07 2005 06:26 Rekrul wrote: wow all this over a show match god how can people be so pathetic theres nothing on the line, not even pride the only thing either could do to show pride is play the regame willingly pathetic nerds would i be banned if i say '' go back to korea , nerd ! '' ? If so, i wont say it.. edit : im really just kidding  | ||
|
Rekrul
Korea (South)17174 Posts
week ban | ||
| ||
