|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
On June 06 2005 12:31 -PhiL- wrote:
There wasnt a clear winner. Testie behaved bad manner, and after it, Break did. Still kinda strange, that Break says he didnt disc, so i dont know whats the truth now, after all.
I didnt watch the replay until now, but after all these reads i only come to one conclusion ( Trek and Ret, and many other think testie had advantage , eri , naz, twisted, and others think break had advantage), its as simple as this if u ask me :
Why do so good gamers not agree ? Because you cant really now who would have won this game, because it was all about a few questions : 1) Would Testie attack early enough, or after the lurks would have been spawned ? 2) Would he win vs the hyds with his troops ? it would have been all about the two players micro.. 3) Would have any of the two players made a big mistake ..!?
So this again shows us it would have been all about what would have happened in the next minute.. or maybe minutes.. NO ONE can know this..
So theres only one answer.. make a last deciding game OR a bo3 for the decision..
i think everyone should agree with this.. the canadian testie lovers.. and the breakdown lovers..
gogo regame/s
Any post after this is inferior, this is pretty much perfect logic and completely dead on.
|
On June 06 2005 15:00 {88}iNcontroL wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2005 12:31 -PhiL- wrote:
There wasnt a clear winner. Testie behaved bad manner, and after it, Break did. Still kinda strange, that Break says he didnt disc, so i dont know whats the truth now, after all.
I didnt watch the replay until now, but after all these reads i only come to one conclusion ( Trek and Ret, and many other think testie had advantage , eri , naz, twisted, and others think break had advantage), its as simple as this if u ask me :
Why do so good gamers not agree ? Because you cant really now who would have won this game, because it was all about a few questions : 1) Would Testie attack early enough, or after the lurks would have been spawned ? 2) Would he win vs the hyds with his troops ? it would have been all about the two players micro.. 3) Would have any of the two players made a big mistake ..!?
So this again shows us it would have been all about what would have happened in the next minute.. or maybe minutes.. NO ONE can know this..
So theres only one answer.. make a last deciding game OR a bo3 for the decision..
i think everyone should agree with this.. the canadian testie lovers.. and the breakdown lovers..
gogo regame/s Any post after this is inferior, this is pretty much perfect logic and completely dead on.
you can call it completely dead on, but i think i'd call it completely useless. Since most people are in agreement that they should rematch, and both players have made it clear that they would no longer like a rematch...
What happens now? Isn't that where we're at?
|
Its all up to GG.net now. Their final decision will probably be up any day now, so just wait and see what the outcome is before judging and shit-.-v
|
Are both willing to regame even if admins decision is that? Or is someone going to forfeit or something like that.
|
Blatant rematch. Too many factors could have affected that match. For example, Breakdown could've gone and got drunk.
But seriously, Breakdown had that game won but I feel there was still a miniscule chance for error.
Who am I kidding, Breakdown had lurkers coming, map taken = thx. Testie=lose. Notice how testie decided to build zealots vs the wave of lurkers breakdown was no doubt about to hatch, Some how I don't think zlot/temp would break out of that choke when Z has massive advantage already.
|
On June 06 2005 15:59 IAmHaSu wrote:
Blatant rematch. Too many factors could have affected that match. For example, Breakdown could've gone and got drunk.
But seriously, Breakdown had that game won but I feel there was still a miniscule chance for error.
Who am I kidding, Breakdown had lurkers coming, map taken = thx. Testie=lose. Notice how testie decided to build zealots vs the wave of lurkers breakdown was no doubt about to hatch, Some how I don't think zlot/temp would break out of that choke when Z has massive advantage already.
... ;o
|
|
|
This entire thing sounds it could have been avoided if the organizers had just put their foot down and made a decision instead of pussyfooting.
Testie thought he had won and according to the rules it's their decision if a rematch is in order. Either they say "rematch" or they declare someone a winner. If someone refuses to rematch then they lose. It's not that difficult.
It's their call if this is inconclusive. If either refuse to rematch they forfeit gg shut the fuck up already. I guarantee you they will both suck it up and play if you just put your foot down
|
Sweden1225 Posts
as for the ret,trek vs twisted,naz,eri on who had the upper hand i'll support ret,trek =P testie could've probably forced the hydras back a bit and have time (if he was quick) to get up cannons and secure another expansion while building a real massive army in time for his observers to come~~
geez this is a useless post, but at least i can also add that i'm taking naz' side on saying testie is a faggot!=P
|
King of the Hill is getting so annoying now ? Why not Queen of the Hill ??? Invite Tossgirl and some other female gamers ? It'll be fun
|
On June 06 2005 16:35 Liquid`Daaman wrote:
as for the ret,trek vs twisted,naz,eri on who had the upper hand i'll support ret,trek =P testie could've probably forced the hydras back a bit and have time (if he was quick) to get up cannons and secure another expansion while building a real massive army in time for his observers to come~~
geez this is a useless post, but at least i can also add that i'm taking naz' side on saying testie is a faggot!=P
you are useless. LOL HI
|
I think Ret, Trek and damaan should 3:3 Twisted, Naz, Eri to see who the winner of Testie vs Breakdown would be.
|
no way Testie would won,2 bad Break disconnects he would be the KOTH now
|
On June 06 2005 16:45 pirate cod wrote:
I think Ret, Trek and damaan should 3:3 Twisted, Naz, Eri to see who the winner of Testie vs Breakdown would be.
The Phantom ? 
|
Bill307
Canada9103 Posts
I like the idea of playing a bo3 rematch instead of a bo1 to determine the winner.
|
Like I said in the other thread, I'd support either
Bo3 to determine winner
or
Bo5 with Testie up one game. Breakdown did disconnect, which in most situations is a loss.
|
I think they should make it a draw and declare both players as winners...
King Of The Hill : Testie
Queen Of The Hill : Breakdown
They would fight in a new 2v2 exhibition showmatch called : Royal couple of the hill.
God would that own O_o
|
|
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
On June 06 2005 15:10 Teroru wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2005 15:00 {88}iNcontroL wrote:On June 06 2005 12:31 -PhiL- wrote:
There wasnt a clear winner. Testie behaved bad manner, and after it, Break did. Still kinda strange, that Break says he didnt disc, so i dont know whats the truth now, after all.
I didnt watch the replay until now, but after all these reads i only come to one conclusion ( Trek and Ret, and many other think testie had advantage , eri , naz, twisted, and others think break had advantage), its as simple as this if u ask me :
Why do so good gamers not agree ? Because you cant really now who would have won this game, because it was all about a few questions : 1) Would Testie attack early enough, or after the lurks would have been spawned ? 2) Would he win vs the hyds with his troops ? it would have been all about the two players micro.. 3) Would have any of the two players made a big mistake ..!?
So this again shows us it would have been all about what would have happened in the next minute.. or maybe minutes.. NO ONE can know this..
So theres only one answer.. make a last deciding game OR a bo3 for the decision..
i think everyone should agree with this.. the canadian testie lovers.. and the breakdown lovers..
gogo regame/s Any post after this is inferior, this is pretty much perfect logic and completely dead on. you can call it completely dead on, but i think i'd call it completely useless. Since most people are in agreement that they should rematch, and both players have made it clear that they would no longer like a rematch... What happens now? Isn't that where we're at?
er i didnt wanna do basic thinking for you. If one player refuses to regame, with both of them put in the same channel (now) i dont mean in the past (yes i know they both have refused regames) and they both refuse, than dethrone testie eliminate break and have 2 new guys fight for it. If one refuses, and the other doesnt, the one who didnt refuse wins. If they both accept, than revert back to thesis post.
That was implied by "regame" obviously u cant force them. And in BW when 1 refuses, he cant win, he can only lose, basic.
|
is awesome32278 Posts
On June 06 2005 17:34 hentarion wrote:
blah draw :D
And kill Testie's EGO???????????????!?!?!??!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111one
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
