EPTKOTH match controversy - Page 4
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
pbjay
173 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
On June 06 2005 11:50 1tym wrote: Showmatch implies that a lot of people are looking forward to that particular games and as you mentioned, it is to be audienced by "hundreds of people who pay attention to these kind of games" right? You don't see why both player wanted a win? Some players value the prize more, some value their pride more.. So you tell me.. Where's the pride in everyone hating your guts? Where's the pride in refusing a regame? | ||
|
Starparty
Sweden1963 Posts
| ||
|
Destroyer
Czech Republic950 Posts
| ||
|
Destroyer
Czech Republic950 Posts
| ||
|
1tym
Korea (South)2425 Posts
On June 06 2005 11:55 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: So you tell me.. Where's the pride in everyone hating your guts? Where's the pride in refusing a regame? I don't see everyone hating their guts, I look at testie, possibly one of the most skillful yet bad mannered foreign bw player, always acting in an immature manner, interestingly has ocean of fan boys everywhere.---(Even though in this particular incident, I can understand why he claimed a win and denied a rematch initially..) | ||
|
Final Heaven
Japan310 Posts
| ||
ManaBlue
Canada10458 Posts
If I were admin I'd simply say, a rematch will be played. If both players come willingly. If one agrees to play and the other refuses, default win to the willing. If both refuse, admin decision. Done and done. | ||
|
1tym
Korea (South)2425 Posts
| ||
|
NeX-HamartiA
United States244 Posts
ret is top 5 non-koreans. listen to ret. | ||
|
Final Heaven
Japan310 Posts
On June 06 2005 12:07 1tym wrote: HOWEVER, If at any point both players refuse a regame, then testie should be awarded a win since it was breakdown d/c lolz it doesnt make sense man . If the rule like that , I dont think Breakdown is stupid not to regame when Testie want to regame . | ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28876 Posts
On June 06 2005 11:50 1tym wrote: Showmatch implies that a lot of people are looking forward to that particular games and as you mentioned, it is to be audienced by "hundreds of people who pay attention to these kind of games" right? You don't see why both player wanted a win? Some players value the prize more, some value their pride more.. the point is, regardless of who gets appointed "king" if they don't play a regame, neither player will be remembered as a winner. this showmatch will remembered as the showmatch that ended 3-3 and then both players chickened out from playing. there's no real pride in winning that, however a prize would still be a real prize. bragging worths are big motivational factors for many players, but what's there to brag about when you play 3-3 and refuse to play the final game? | ||
Twisted
Netherlands13554 Posts
On June 06 2005 12:14 -HamartiA-ThreaT- wrote: ret is right. ret is top 5 non-koreans. listen to ret. ..and you're an idiot. | ||
|
1tym
Korea (South)2425 Posts
On June 06 2005 12:15 Liquid`Drone wrote: the point is, regardless of who gets appointed "king" if they don't play a regame, neither player will be remembered as a winner. this showmatch will remembered as the showmatch that ended 3-3 and then both players chickened out from playing. there's no real pride in winning that, however a prize would still be a real prize. bragging worths are big motivational factors for many players, but what's there to brag about when you play 3-3 and refuse to play the final game? They refused to play the final game not to end the game as 3-3 status but to obtain a win without any risk of losing from playing another game, regardless of the fact that they both believed that they were in the lead. (Since they would've regamed for sure if they knew they'd take the next match 100%) Well one thing is for sure, it's hella better to be remembered as a winner due to forfeit than as a loser.--> Especially when testie is always going on about the winning ratio against other players. | ||
|
Final Heaven
Japan310 Posts
lolz that hurts twisted's ego ya know  | ||
|
Twisted
Netherlands13554 Posts
No, he's not adding anything useful to the topic, and I'm telling him he's an idiot and that he should stfu and get the fuck out of my topic. | ||
|
Addicted`To`Zerg
Bulgaria1353 Posts
| ||
|
-PhiL-
362 Posts
I didnt watch the replay until now, but after all these reads i only come to one conclusion ( Trek and Ret, and many other think testie had advantage , eri , naz, twisted, and others think break had advantage), its as simple as this if u ask me : Why do so good gamers not agree ? Because you cant really now who would have won this game, because it was all about a few questions : 1) Would Testie attack early enough, or after the lurks would have been spawned ? 2) Would he win vs the hyds with his troops ? it would have been all about the two players micro.. 3) Would have any of the two players made a big mistake ..!? So this again shows us it would have been all about what would have happened in the next minute.. or maybe minutes.. NO ONE can know this.. So theres only one answer.. make a last deciding game OR a bo3 for the decision.. i think everyone should agree with this.. the canadian testie lovers.. and the breakdown lovers.. gogo regame/s | ||
|
HaiVan
Bulgaria1698 Posts
| ||
|
1tym
Korea (South)2425 Posts
On June 06 2005 12:15 Final Heaven wrote: lolz it doesnt make sense man . If the rule like that , I dont think Breakdown is stupid not to regame when Testie want to regame . Don't you not agree that it makes more sense than giving breakdown a win if both players refuse to regame? | ||
| ||
