On June 07 2005 11:03 [pG]BrEaKdOwN wrote: rekrul your wrong. he fuckin cannot break out this small entrance its impossible.and his robo was 1% when he left the game, i could build spire just in time so what ?i contained him, kicked his eco advantage by raping his weak microed army. he would be contained in 30sec-1min and would have no way to break out. but i dont care about this game. i care about his behaviour which is unacceptable to me. i wont regame such a bm person.
as a side note... the ppl has spoken! fans gave testie 74% vote that he is going to win (the vote was probably on the best of 7.. and not the new best of 3).... so one mother fucker is more popular than the other motherfucker
On June 07 2005 11:25 ManaBlue wrote: " # 47 [Canada] Nal_Testie @ 2005-06-07 20:09:59 I am going to crush this mother fucker. I will play. And i'm going to crush this mother fucker. --;"
So breakdown, are you going to forfeit?
Look: breakdown disced. Now it is clear that nobody was really at advantage. Therefore as that other guy said earlier, in those conditions, there should have been a re-game.
But Testie forfeited. He bitched about how he had the game won. He flamed Breakdown and refused to have a re-match.
Hence Breakdown isn't going to forfeit or anything because Testie has already forfeited. Breakdown could have agreed on a rematch when Testie changed his mind. It would have been "fairplay". But fairplay comes along with good manners. That quote of yours says it all.
testie means that he will play breakdown in the new BO3 series that the admins decided was the best solution, so if break doesnt play he forfeits, testie already say he would rape break so...
On June 07 2005 06:46 Rekrul wrote: just watched replay:
testie had a 58.59% - 41.41% advantage.
he is right his economy was much stronger, and breakdown was right contain would be very very very hard to break.... but the reason i say he was winning is because he had so many templars and breakdown had no spire.
by the time he got his observers and made an attempt to breakout of breakdowns contain he would have had around 15 storms....some range goons and good storm micro while dropping zealots above and very sure testie would have busted out with not much effort
BUT if testie fucked up his micro to a medium-level fuck up breakdown could have won...a low level fuck up in micro and im sure testie still would have win
all that being said testie is a queerbag and should have regamed anyways, he has no balls
On June 07 2005 11:25 ManaBlue wrote: " # 47 [Canada] Nal_Testie @ 2005-06-07 20:09:59 I am going to crush this mother fucker. I will play. And i'm going to crush this mother fucker. --;"
So breakdown, are you going to forfeit?
Look: breakdown disced. Now it is clear that nobody was really at advantage. Therefore as that other guy said earlier, in those conditions, there should have been a re-game.
But Testie forfeited. He bitched about how he had the game won. He flamed Breakdown and refused to have a re-match.
Hence Breakdown isn't going to forfeit or anything because Testie has already forfeited. Breakdown could have agreed on a rematch when Testie changed his mind. It would have been "fairplay". But fairplay comes along with good manners. That quote of yours says it all.
Testie didn't forfeit u idiot, according to Teoru (i won't bother checking it out, for obvious reasons) the rules on the site say that if a player discs and one of the players thinks he has a clear advantage he can ask the admins to give him the game. That's what he asked for, how on earth did this become such a big controversy... All the admins have to do is say: "Yes, Testie was winning" or "no, he wasn't, let's regame". Clear and simple, jesus!
On June 07 2005 11:25 ManaBlue wrote: " # 47 [Canada] Nal_Testie @ 2005-06-07 20:09:59 I am going to crush this mother fucker. I will play. And i'm going to crush this mother fucker. --;"
So breakdown, are you going to forfeit?
Look: breakdown disced. Now it is clear that nobody was really at advantage. Therefore as that other guy said earlier, in those conditions, there should have been a re-game.
But Testie forfeited. He bitched about how he had the game won. He flamed Breakdown and refused to have a re-match.
Hence Breakdown isn't going to forfeit or anything because Testie has already forfeited. Breakdown could have agreed on a rematch when Testie changed his mind. It would have been "fairplay". But fairplay comes along with good manners. That quote of yours says it all.
According to the KOTH rules a player can petition for default win when his opponent disconnects. Breakdown disced. Testie petitioned. They have now made a decision and the new series can be played.
Testie did not at any time forfeit. Get your head out of your ass and stop posting your opinions as fact.
I'm not a Testie fan, personally I think he is as big a homo as his hair makes him look. But he doesnt deserve to lose reguardless if Breakdown was winning or not. Breakdown dropped, and both are now throwing around the geeky excuse of "bm" as a reason not to play. Shutup and plays fagits. If you don't agree to play, have 2 other players play, maybe 2 who I would have respect for. If they already agreed to play by the time I posted this then glhf, w/e.
EPT
