World Cyber Games to officially retire StarCraft 1 - Page 35
Forum Index > BW General |
XenOsky
Chile2270 Posts
| ||
marigold
Belgium10 Posts
| ||
HavoK.
United States172 Posts
| ||
SichuanPanda
Canada1542 Posts
| ||
Torpedo.Vegas
United States1890 Posts
![]() | ||
Temporarykid
Canada362 Posts
![]() | ||
Release
United States4397 Posts
On March 14 2011 07:01 SichuanPanda wrote: SC2 is a far faster paced and entertaining game in my opinion, partially for the fact that after so much BW there really remains little to be revealed, even at the top level. I wouldn't be surprised if BW continues in Korea for a long time, but overall, for global e-sports SC2 is the best thing. Its quite simple really, in BW the Koreans had anywhere from a 3 to 6 year head start to practice - full time - all the foreign players did not. SC2 everyone started fresh, and the non-Korean pro scenes started up during Beta and are still going strong. I can understand wanting BW to remain because of nostalgia but for anyone that truly likes e-sports they have to accept that SC2 is the future. Sc2 seems far slow and less entertaining. At WCG, the majority is watching, and watching the same thing over and over isn't really exciting. In BW, there are still things like moving zerglings up ramps, controlling hundreds of lings (like zero), large scale macro, babysitting. This is what makes it so exciting because it's easy to see the difference of someone who plays on mechanics, and someone who plays on practice. | ||
double1185
Vietnam211 Posts
On March 14 2011 07:01 SichuanPanda wrote: SC2 is a far faster paced and entertaining game in my opinion, partially for the fact that after so much BW there really remains little to be revealed, even at the top level. I wouldn't be surprised if BW continues in Korea for a long time, but overall, for global e-sports SC2 is the best thing. Its quite simple really, in BW the Koreans had anywhere from a 3 to 6 year head start to practice - full time - all the foreign players did not. SC2 everyone started fresh, and the non-Korean pro scenes started up during Beta and are still going strong. I can understand wanting BW to remain because of nostalgia but for anyone that truly likes e-sports they have to accept that SC2 is the future. Only agree with u about Korean so far ahead of foreign make the competition WCG less interesting as most of the group games were not worth watching. However, in players' view, BW should be much a faster paced than SC2 as so many more tasks must be done at the same time. For ppl who do not understand the game, SC2 may seem more entertaining but for ppl who do, BW is much more exciting as you know how hard it is to be able to control and manage what you see on the screen. For me, tis news is very disappointing as I still think SC2 is not developed enough to be able to replace BW. | ||
Faraday
United States553 Posts
| ||
Rawr
Sweden624 Posts
| ||
L_Master
United States8017 Posts
On March 14 2011 07:01 SichuanPanda wrote: SC2 is a far faster paced and entertaining game in my opinion, partially for the fact that after so much BW there really remains little to be revealed, even at the top level. I wouldn't be surprised if BW continues in Korea for a long time, but overall, for global e-sports SC2 is the best thing. Its quite simple really, in BW the Koreans had anywhere from a 3 to 6 year head start to practice - full time - all the foreign players did not. SC2 everyone started fresh, and the non-Korean pro scenes started up during Beta and are still going strong. I can understand wanting BW to remain because of nostalgia but for anyone that truly likes e-sports they have to accept that SC2 is the future. Nothing could be further from the truth. I really don't know why this myth gets perpetrated. BW is evolving and changing now perhaps more than any time before (except for the obviously dynamic first couple years). The number of changes and evolutions in 2010 is quite long. Ver made a post that listed probably 10 or 15 changes in TvZ alone, many of them very large scale changes and not mear build order tweaks. PvZ style has changes significantly in the recent months, and ZvZ is one the cusp of a hive tech revolution. I agree with some of what you say, but the idea that BW is stale or figured out is blatantly, completely wrong. | ||
hellbound
United Kingdom2242 Posts
On March 14 2011 16:19 Faraday wrote: This was bound to happen...No surprise here. I'm glad that sc2 is in though, maybe we'll see some new faces and diverse games from now on, bc i'm tired of korean finals. I hope you do realise that korean finals are still veeeery likely. | ||
PSIDefenseUp
United States251 Posts
I'm okay with this. User was warned for this post | ||
Ryusei-R1
United States2106 Posts
On March 15 2011 12:33 PSIDefenseUp wrote: It's great to see that a game I didn't really care for is being dropped in favor of one of my favorite games. I'm okay with this. User was warned for this post How does one lurk for two months, then post this. ![]() But on topic, I will severely miss seeing Jaedong/Flash going to every WCG Grand Final. | ||
Sawamura
Malaysia7602 Posts
On March 15 2011 12:33 PSIDefenseUp wrote: It's great to see that a game I didn't really care for is being dropped in favor of one of my favorite games. I'm okay with this. User was warned for this post Post like this just show how mature the people on the other side who plays same game called starcraft really i applaud this kind of trolls you guys just love to stir up something in the mix and caused hatred for people who still loves bw .Keep trolling .. | ||
virus0228
Cuba16 Posts
| ||
Lard
Australia5 Posts
| ||
ECH0SC
United States39 Posts
| ||
maybenexttime
Poland5556 Posts
On March 31 2011 07:00 Lard wrote: WCG can use SC2 and everyone play on the BW mod ftw. That wouldn't, unfortunately, make it BW. One of the things about BW is its engine, and various tricks and micro techniques it results in. | ||
JiMMyUriNE
United States49 Posts
On March 07 2011 12:46 kagemucha wrote: Counter Strike 1.6->CS:S->CS 1.6. It can happen if SC2 dies out. CS:S did not have an ever growing community and tournaments nor the spectator appeal. It's comparable but not at the same time. | ||
| ||