Starcraft 2 -- It's coming. Show your support. - Page 5

On September 11 2004 09:25 jacen wrote:

the hardcore player wont even switch to sc2 if its not anywhere near sc1

On September 11 2004 08:45 Abyss_Bahamut wrote:
This is what I think should happen:

We need one representative or a few that are famous [ Progamers, rekrul, leg, someone famous in our community with cred ]

We need a list of what we ALL agree on. As impossible as it sounds, this list has already been started.

The true craft fans who've been playing since day one and visit this forum want:
Keep the same 2D Graphics format.

An expansion will be just as great as another game if not BETTER because it's nearly impossible to re-create what happened with Starcraft and Broodwar. By just creating an expansion we will have a higher chance of remaking that glory.

Continue the story on the plot it's been going, don't put in bs twists and fuck up the godly single player.

No fucking heroes. Because we know they could work but I don't think any of us wanna give Blizzard chances after the heroes in WC3. We want the BEST chances possible to recreate BW.

No fucking items, and so many upgrades for EVERY unit, when I play wc3 it's like playing diablo with every fucking unit including peons, wtf is that.

One new race max assuming you create SC2, 3 new races or some other absurd number would make ZERO sense. The only considerable races are Xel'Naga or the new race implied by Duran. Xel'Naga would be hard as hell to make original though considering they are an advanced Protoss. They'd cost way too much and the ' ladder ' between the other races would be too wide. Think about it, Xel'Nagas first unit would probably only be defeated by 2 zeals or 6 rines or 7-8 lings. Duran's race seems most appropriate.

We DON'T want wc3, do not look at it or even look at the few succesess you had with wc3. Sc is sc, remember, not warcraft in space.

We all want an RTS. We do NOT want a fusion of RTS FPS MMORPG

Point out the sc scene in Korea, educate them, do you really think that by changing the game like you did to wc3 that sc will still continue to exist? People LIVE off sc, you're doing something right, keep it that way.

HARD COUNTERS, I cannot stress this enough, and I'm sure the majority of the community backs me. WE WANT A HARD GAME, DON'T PUSSIFY WITH SOFT COUNTERS.


Generic things like these I think we all agree on and we need to present it RIGHT and with AUTHORITY.

On September 11 2004 08:14 Jim wrote:
I guess its understandable but most of you guys just want sc with better graphics. Doesnt sc have any flaws for you? Imo sc lacks a random map generator ala AOE2. That is so much fun.

On September 11 2004 12:35 suxN wrote:
umm, i cant call wc3 crappy, instead of macroing you creep, and in battles its all about the same but in sc you move couple of units at the time and in wc3 you command single units

On September 11 2004 12:02 0wNaG3- wrote:
I remember when I first baught WC3 the 3rd day it was released. Got bored of it in 3 weeks and havent played it since then. However, a month ago, I was at a friends house who had WC3, but no starcraft, so i played a game for fun. I was orc he was undead, and level 6. With my micro/macro I overpowered him, killing his entire army numerous times. Everytime he countered me he would say "No way are u noob, look how fast u rebuild ur army".( I was MACROING!!! :O ) In the end his giant beatle hero thing killed my entire army, cause it was like level 9. He had gone a "creeped" the entire map, something I hadnt done. I had also expoed a couple of times, but there was nothing I could do against his gay hero. My orcs and shit were even upped to the max. But the conclusion is, I nearly beat a lvl 6 player cause I knew the concept of macro (U cant really micro in wc3). WC3 is just an easier and crappier version of starcraft.

The only micro u can do in wc3, is like zealot vrs zealot micro.