EPTStarcraft 2 -- It's coming. Show your support. - Page 6
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
| ||
|
MannerLess_
Brazil535 Posts
On September 11 2004 13:30 Orome wrote: I'll bet anything, their will be a new bad race, and the 3 original ones will unite themselves to fight this fourth one... ...you might wanna add that will ruin the game's balance as well. | ||
|
_GniL_
Canada66 Posts
-sets up hovz signal set them straight!- | ||
|
ZZZnachor
Poland200 Posts
On September 11 2004 12:21 Frits wrote: ROFL, an strategy game without a mouse isn't doable, especially if it involves so much speed like Starcraft. There will be auto-clicking. | ||
|
Meta
United States6225 Posts
also on the map aspect: blizzard should make every map "LT level" and nothing bigger than 192x192, if that. | ||
|
XvObiVx
United States21 Posts
| ||
|
Frits
11782 Posts
-Obviously it's gonna be 3d. But i REALLY hope the height differences are gonna be the same like cliffs in lt etc... In wc3 height serves like almost no strategic value at all. And the overal height system sucks ass. -New unique race, ok in wc3 human and orc aren't different enough at all, but this was just the same in wc2. They should add a new race, it'll take A LOT of thinking through etc, but it would be sooo much cooler, i mean if they would only do just new graphics in sc2 and nothing more. Starcraft WILL get boring eventually. Refreshment would be nice, especially for the non-progamers who are obviously a minority. Look at wc3, it's pretty balanced, and blizzard won't stop working until it reaches total balance, it's not IMPOSSIBLE. There isn't like 1 race that is used by everyone much more, and if you've seen the story line of sc, you know a new race is coming. -System specs, look we obviously can't be using a pentium 1 or something forever. The specs should be a little higher then wc3. You don't want sc2 to score a 4 for graphics in every magazine? And i won't mind buying a good comp, you can't let that go for quality of the game. Good graphics but being able to see a lot of units at the same time is essential. 200 limit at least, 300 or 400 would be nice. -For gods sake, keep the pace. And unit physics. 2 lurker shots should kill a marine, but a marine should run very fast when it's stimmed. Vulture's should be fast. Keep everything fast and low on hp. Big army's is what's sc is about. -no heroes, no experience, no autocasting on super-awesome spells, duh. Heal is autocast, the rest not, and i like how if you cast storm with 12 temps selected, they all cast the storm. But in wc3 only 1 would cast that spell. I mean, the 1 second 8 lockdowns wouldn't mean shit anymore then. =[ -platform, there's no need to even start about this, you can't even get on the site or know about starcraft with an pc. The speed and graphics just suck on consoles. (ok the xbox graphics are nice tho) OK i think i covered the things important to make sc2 awesome. | ||
|
Meta
United States6225 Posts
| ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32274 Posts
| ||
|
Ebenol
Sweden1983 Posts
On September 11 2004 13:20 SoleSteeler wrote: Wasn't that added in TFT?you can't level a hero past level 5 from creeping, so he got to level 9 from killing your units =/ | ||
|
STIMEY d okgm fish
Canada6140 Posts
| ||
|
Ack1027
United States7873 Posts
On September 11 2004 09:33 pooper-scooper wrote: You make an online petition, and I'll sign it... not that it worked when that shitty patch came out on April fools day. At least one person agrees with me - _-; Petition is not a bad idea though. | ||
|
Frits
11782 Posts
On September 11 2004 14:45 STIMEY d okgm fish wrote: frits please dont compare war3's struggle to become balanced with sc's or bw's. the situation is not parallel. bw has made 1 severely major patch (by sc standards), which pales in comparison to the regular patches of war3 and tft. they aren't just patching war3/tft; by sc standards, they are completely overhauling it, REGULARLY exceeding the MOST SEVERE PATCH IN BW HISTORY and they still are left with an inferior game time and time again. sc was better out of the box (barring bug abuses) than bw was (bw needed a major patch and major changes in which maps people played), and sc+bw+war2 all are more playable out of the box than war3 and tft have EVER been at this point after handfulls of massive overhauls. Yeah, obviously it's much harder to balance. But what else do you want. Blizzard WILL include a new race, and blizzard WILL patch it a lot, nothing really much to do about this. Eventually it will be ok. I don't see any MAJOR imbalances @ wc3. I wouldn't call the patches massive overhauls. Blizzard is doing a great job, they should've released the game a little later for balancing, but now they are letting the community balance it which will go much faster, and this way we can make the game balanced. And just look at blizzard's last patch and upcoming, 3 new heroes and balance changes. If there's 1 company that can do it it's blizzard. I just hope the game is gonna be great. | ||
|
Frits
11782 Posts
On September 11 2004 14:44 Ebenol wrote: Wasn't that added in TFT? It sure was. :-) | ||
|
NotSorry
United States6722 Posts
| ||
|
Chris307
3095 Posts
Try not to be too malicious, though. We all know WC3 players are fucking clueless and retarded when it comes to competitive RTS but it's really difficult to make somebody else understand this fact, and you'll just come off in a very bad way to the Blizzard staff. | ||
|
radiaL
Andorra2690 Posts
alt+G. | ||
|
tfeign
United States2980 Posts
On September 11 2004 15:39 radiaL wrote: there is one thing from warcraft3 that HAS to be implemented in SC:2. alt+G. Yes. That just HAS to be implemented in SC2. And Abyss_Bahamut pretty much summed it up well. | ||
|
aseq
Netherlands3977 Posts
It of course has to come out on PC. one idea i had for awhile is to make it run from bootable CD, so there is no windows, it loads all the drivers for hardware, so you can have an uber-beatiful game. Not sure if everybody would like to reboot tho, i'd like to see how much it matters. I really don't see why it has to be 3d. To be honest, i prefer sc gfx over w3 gfx, since 2d is just so much clearer. They could use some 3d stuff tho, but mainly use top-down sprites (maybe a bit like ikaruga?). | ||
|
Orlandu
China2450 Posts
On September 11 2004 10:53 SoleSteeler wrote: i just wanna ask you war3 haters something, if the game is so dumbed down and newbified, what seperates the good players from the best players? it's not racial imbalance, that's actually pretty good (within about 2-3% differences) it's not luck, anyone says you can win war3 on 'item luck' is stupid and hasn't played the game since they changed the drop tables (over a year ago) =/ for the record, i don't want heroes, upkeep, smaller armies, creeps, shops, mercenaries in SC2 but to call war3 a newbie game at all is quite ignorant, why dont' you just go to korea and become a pro-war3 gamer and make tons of money then? =p It's like anything in life, when you don't know about something, often times ignorance and prejudice is formed. It's very easy to see who has played WarCraft 3 for real, and who hasn't, just by simple statements made. It's frustrating, but shouldn't be taken too seriously as those that DO share their ignorance and prejudice for the game really aren't having any effect on the community so there's no harm done to anyone but themselves. But I'm sure you know that, I'm just discussing it with you. But I too would much rather see SC2 more like SC and without War3 elements. Sure, I defend War3 all the time, but it's not because I feel the game is better than SC. I just defend it because some of the things that are said about it are just down-right ignorant and people to this day still don't understand how complex and different the two games really are. War3 is a great game, well fit for high-level competition, but I still enjoy SC more, and would much rather see a true StarCraft sequel than a game that Blizzard thinks would be cool or fun. Even if most of you are incredibly biased and uneducated on the subject of War3, for this purpose I hope your hatred is taken into consideration, because if it isn't, theres a very good chance Blizzard will try to merge the best of both worlds, and instead of seeing a true sequel, we'll see yet again a totally different game, and while the game may be great in it's own ways, I think it's quite clear that everyone wants a true SC sequel, not a new game. | ||
| ||
