| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Ack1027
United States7873 Posts
On September 11 2004 15:49 tfeign wrote: Yes. That just HAS to be implemented in SC2. And Abyss_Bahamut pretty much summed it up well. Yesssss thank you, need to rally more people, otherwise they will take opinions from dumbasses spread around everywhere through the internet. | ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32274 Posts
| ||
|
karelen
Sweden2407 Posts
On September 11 2004 18:02 IntoTheWow wrote: PLease someone kill That w3 supporter OvjdsfjbFrio Sth kill him asap plz -.- i second that, had i great hacking skills his internet connection would be dead for a loooong time.. on a related note nice to see all the tl.net people representing the true view of what we like to see in an eventual sequel. keep on preaching the good word highpriest Fakesteve  | ||
|
SoleSteeler
Canada5421 Posts
sure was indeed | ||
|
MPXMX
Canada4309 Posts
Starcraft is great now because of how its true variety ( not pseudo variety ) and balance allowed it to capture people's attention indefinitely and the game to evolve infinitely. It's impossible to make a game that will compare in greatness to SC off the bat. The game's experience and gamer-influenced changes after creation, the invention of micro, macro and tactics are its jewels. If a game attempts to mimic the best parts of starcraft right now, and introduce improvements at the same time, it will sport a short user attention span | ||
|
tfeign
United States2980 Posts
| ||
|
MPXMX
Canada4309 Posts
I believe harvesters were the same and all races had similar tanks etc... | ||
|
Pob
880 Posts
On September 11 2004 08:17 MiniRoman wrote: Imagine how gay that would be for Z users where 3/4 of their units gets raped right away. Lings would automatically suck and then lurks would be super strong  Basically anything with splash rapes. A temp could get to like lvl 1000 in 2 storms. I think the whole hero idea is alright. I could play a game wiht heros. What I hate the most about War3 soi that the units damage is like 20-25. did you read my post? i said there is only 1 upgrade and that is to veteran status , there is no level 1000 temps or anything , havent you ever played the original command and conquer? sheez! I have thought about this whole starcraft2 thing for a while , while not exactly the best comparison i know but imagine starcraft is warcraft 1 and starcraft 2 is warcraft 2 , that is the sort of improvement i would be happy with , atm i can think of nothing i liked more in warcraft 1 (ok except wolfriders) than in warcraft2 | ||
|
UniversalMoron
Finland426 Posts
| ||
|
NullHK
China340 Posts
id be soo happy if blizzard could just make some patch that gave starcraft some sexy update with icons and level and stuff | ||
|
Chris307
3095 Posts
On September 12 2004 01:49 UniversalMoron wrote: I wouldn't mind to see the Warcraft III graphics engine in SC2. It has actually the only GOOD 3D-RTS camera i've ever seen, since it's basically static (though you can zoom in, but there's no point in doing so). Ban ban ban ban ban ban ban ban ban. | ||
|
lastas
Sweden1219 Posts
| ||
|
UniversalMoron
Finland426 Posts
Well, the WC3 engine (note: ENGINE, not game) is the best 3D RTS engine ever made, and I have no faith in Blizzard managing to top that with anything they can come up with for SC2. My fear is, they'll make one with a true 3D camera and true 3D movement, which alone is enough to horribly screw over the game (*cough*Ground Control II*cough*). | ||
|
SoL.Origin
Argentina2400 Posts
On September 12 2004 01:49 UniversalMoron wrote: I wouldn't mind to see the Warcraft III graphics engine in SC2. It has actually the only GOOD 3D-RTS camera i've ever seen, since it's basically static (though you can zoom in, but there's no point in doing so).  | ||
|
UniversalMoron
Finland426 Posts
| ||
|
Yarertz
Djibouti1891 Posts
| ||
|
Luhh
Sweden2974 Posts
2D runs faster, looks MUCH better, it's much easier to spot differences between units etc. If SC2 is anything like WC3 I for one will NEVER play it. I tried WC3 for one game, and completely hated it because of how it looked and felt. Much too slow, weird camera, units looked to similar (hard to distinguish them in battles)... Nah a SC2 should be in 2D with locked resolution at 1024/768 so that no advantages/disadvantages can come from playing the game in 1600/1200. Oh and no more than 3 Races, hard counters as before, very little static defences and no such from start. Unit experience.. well maybe veteran status but no other than that. Absolutely no heroes or creeps. | ||
|
Pumpkin
United States1141 Posts
 | ||
|
UniversalMoron
Finland426 Posts
On September 12 2004 03:34 Luhh wrote: Nah a SC2 should be in 2D with locked resolution at 1024/768 so that no advantages/disadvantages can come from playing the game in 1600/1200. It should be, but it won't be. Trust me. The fact that they're inquiring about true 3-dimensinal movement proves that the engine is 3D. A company like Blizzard would not make a 2D game anymore, unless it was for GBA exclusively. | ||
|
Pumpkin
United States1141 Posts
 <3 | ||
| ||
|
|
Wardi Open
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV European League
Online Event
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|
|
EPT
